* = bus, calendar, crm_livechat, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail_bot,
mass_mailing, privacy_lookup, test_discuss_full, test_mail,
test_mail_full, website_crm_livechat, website_livechat, base
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#118354
Related: odoo/upgrade#4553
Related: odoo/enterprise#39661
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
When using message_post, the body format must be explicitly specified.
If html is expected, a Markup object should be used.
If text is given, the content will be escaped.
Before this PR:
message_post was unaware if the content of a message was HTML or
text. This lead to multiple situation where the content was
incorrectly considered as HTML and led to display errors.
In
self.message_post(body="Hello %s!" % self.name)
if the name contained HTML, it would be evaluated.
In
self.message_post(body="Contact Raoul <raoul@caramail.be>")
the email would not be displayed as considered as unknown HTML and
discarded by the sanitizer
Now each call must explict the type of content.
Use the escape() helper to properly combine Markup and translations.
It would also be acceptable to use Markup() to wrap a static
translation but escape is better as one can not guarantee the content
of a translation.
closesodoo/odoo#111850
Related: odoo/documentation#3612
Related: odoo/enterprise#36728
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
No method was readily available to know if a user is `internal` (has
group `base.group_user`), which was inconsistent with other base groups.
_is_internal is now used in the codebase where it is clear that
`.has_group('base.group_user')` is called on a single record.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85703
This PR prepares the ground for the one introducing the new environment in the
mail module. Indeed, the mail_bot messaging_initializer relies on the session
in order to known when to initiaze odoobot. With the new env, we won't be able
to access the session but will instead override init_messaging to automatically
initialize odoobot. Doing this first reduces the noise in the main PR.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90291
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Purpose is to avoid having strong requirements on fields where it is not
really necessary. In this commit we consider now that a void odoobot_state
is the same as ``not_initialized`` key. It allows to remove both the default
and required parameters on the field.
Task ID 2233014
PR #49661
This commit attempts to improve the workflow of the OdooBot onboarding
tutorial, as well as the answer given by the bot while idle.
These changes come from watching how users interact with OdooBot. To
improve the user's experience, the following changes have been made:
1. Move the attachment to the end of the tour, as it is where most
people just close the bot.
2. Remove the quotation marks around commands that OdooBot tells the
user to type, like "/" or ":)", as some users try to actually type
the quotation marks too. Instead, use a light grey background around
the command that the user should type.
3. Some users ask OdooBot questions, but the responses they get are
useless. To solve this, use a message linking to the documentation or the
videos when:
- The user gives wrong answers twice for the same stage of the tour
- The user talks again when the tour is completed
- There's a question mark in the answer
To achieve this a "failed" state field is added on user model, allowing to
distinguish state in the bot workflow from state of answers (failed / not
failed).
Task ID: 2233014
PR #49661
General Purpose
===============
We want an 'Employee profile' gathering every data about an employee.
The main form view is modified to become this employee profile.
A user can also see his own profile through the Preferences menu.
The new profile replaces the current Preferences view if the hr module is installed
and the current user is linked to an employee.
A user should be able to see and edit his own profile.
*Problem*:
Many fields on hr.employee are protected by groups="hr.group_hr_user".
Therefore, a regular user cannot see or edit those fields.
This protection must be bypassed to allow read/write access
to the regular user's own data.
A similar mechanism already exists for res.users (for Preferences)
The better (least worst) solution found is to reuse this mechanism by adding related fields on res.users.
Pros:
- Don't change security access on hr.employee
- Don't implement yet another custom security layer, risking to add new security breaches
- A lot of fields are added by other modules on hr.employee.
It would have required to integrate them with the custom security layer.
- Fields added by other modules on the user's preferences view (normal view, not the profile)
are automatically included in the employee's profile view.
- Allow the hr.employee form view to be different than the user profile accessible
through the Preferences menu.
E.g. add custom buttons only relevant to the logged in user such as "Request a leave".
Cons:
- Each field from hr.employee that you want to appear on its profile
must be added as a related field on res.users
- Those related fields must be added to user's preferences view (duplicate views)
- They also must be added to SELF_[READABLE | WRITABLE]_FIELDS
Note:
When the front-end loads the views it gets the list of available fields
for the user (according to its access rights). Later, when the front-end wants to
populate the view with data, it only asks to read those available fields.
However, in this case, we want the user to be able to read/write its own data,
even if they are protected by groups (groups are kept on the related fields on res.users).
The front-end need to be made aware of those fields by sending all field definitions.
hr_attendance
=============
This commit integrate attendance in the new employee profile.
It also adds a stat button to this employee profile showing
the number of hours worked last month.
Remove the boolean computed field 'manual_attendance'.
This field is just a shortcut to add/remove the employee's user
in the "Manual Attendance" group.
The checkbox is confusing on the employee's form and this should
be done through the normal group management screens.
hr_presence
===========
Display the presence status on the employee kanban template.
The status is a colored chip which can be green (present),
orange (to define) or red (absent).
Currently, the presence status is only computed when accessing
the report view. As this commits displays it on the employee kanban,
it should be updated more frequently.
The state should not be updated every time the kanban view is loaded
since the computation is a bit heavy. Instead: add a cron to update
status every 15 minutes.
-> The status is accurate on the report view (status is still updated
when loading the view)
-> The status in accurate at 15 minutes on the kanban view
[ADD] hr_attendance_presence
============================
Bridge module between hr_attendance and hr_presence.
This commit integrates hr_presence module in the employee
profile and adds the presence status on the employee kanban view.
But hr_attendance adds at the same place a similar status icon for
checkin/checkout.
This bridge module makes the status from hr_presence invisible as
hr_attendance should be the main presence control mechanism.
Also, this commit adds the ability (through a new setting option)
for hr_presence to take into account checkin/checkout to determine
the presence status.
l10n_be_hr_payroll
==================
integration with employee profile
The current implementation of odoobot is stateless, making him a little dummy.
Adding a state on the user allow to be sure that the user don't skip a step,
or loop back to a previous step.
States also allows odoobot to repeat the question when the user don't give the
right answer.
A quick modification asked by FP before freeze, in order to change the field
type in time.
Purpose of this commit is to improve onboarding with a wow effect and a bot
to test the Discuss app. Otherwise new users have nobody to talk to. Retention
will be improved by both increasing interactions and onboarding of Discuss
features.
This commit adds a simple bot in discuss. It answers some questions, helps
users getting their hand on discuss and eases the onboarding.
In this version, the flow is quite simple, and only im_livechat adds some
logic in order to show canned response. The logic is contained in new
modules: mail_bot and im_livechat_mail_bot in order to keep everything
well separated. It also allows users to remove the mailbot if they do not
want to keep this functionality.
Odoobot will only answer if he is in the onboarding conversation (alone
with a user in a channel of type chat) or if a user pings odoobot.
Odoobot logic applies to both standard chatter / channel messages and
also transient messages (like help commands).
Specifications
* 2 minutes after first sign in, users will receive a direct chat from
Odoobot;
* make Odoobot an archived partner;
* scenario
* Odoobot: "Hello, I'm here to help you discover chat features. Try
answering me with an emoji :)";
* User: Send emoji
* Odoobot: "Great! :) Did you notice that you can also send attachments,
like a picture of your cute dog? Try it!"
* Odoobot: "Not a cute dog, but you get it :) To access special features,
start your sentence with "/" (I.E. /help)""
* User: /help
* Auto message then Odoobot: "Wow you're a natural! As a channel usually
contain a lot of users, you can grab the attention with a ping. Try to
ping me with @Odoobot!"
* User: @Odoobot lorem ipsum
* if Livechat installed
* add 2 demo canned response so it does not look weird (like "Hello, how
may I help you?" and "Have a nice day!")
* Odoobot: "Perfect! <br> Try to type ":" to use canned responses."
* User tries canned
* Odoobot: "Good, you can customize your canned responses in the live chat
application. <br><br> + réponse suivante"
* Odoobot: "There's 3 different ways in Odoo to interact with your
colleagues: via this chat window, [img of chat window] via the Discuss
application [img of Discuss app + icon on it] or via the chatter [img of
the chatter]. Aaaaand that's it! Enjoy discovering Odoo! :)"
* random answers to ping/bad answer
* "Mmmmh I'm not sure what you mean.. Can you try again?"
* "I'm afraid I don't understand. Sorry!"
* when someone pings @OdooBot with no reason: Odoobot: Yaaaay that's me!
[party emoji]
* fun stuff to add for some answer
* User: i love you / love
* Odoobot: Aaaaaw that's really cute but, you know, bots don't work
that way. You're too human for me! Let's keep it professional <3
* User: Fuck
* Odoobot: That's not a really nice thing to say, you know? I'm a bot but I
have feelings, ok?! </3
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588 and PR #25075.
Sébastien Theys