If a user tries to reconcile already reconciled lines, the calling
method might have already filtered out these lines, and the method is
called with an empty self.
opw-748223
In case you have multiple warehouses and/or multiple manufacturing
locations (procurement routes), the same sequence is taken for the
created manufacturing order no matter where it is finally produced.
Closes#17681
opw-748344
Closes#16973
Steps to reproduce:
1) Go to Settings -> Technical -> User Interface -> Views
2) Create a new view and give only name, leave fields View Type and arch_base empty.
3) Exception occures
Current behaviour:
- The user gets an exception with a full stacktrace.
Expected behaviour:
- The user should get a warning
Re-enable the constraint when reconciling entries belonging to different
partners.
The constrain was not triggerd because of the triggers on line_id.
In old API it was triggered only when explicitely writing on that field.
Convert to new API instead.
Fixes#17292Closes#17600
When duplicating a quotation without template, the expiration date
was duplicated even if the expiration date was already expired.
The date order is not duplicated but set to now.
opw:744671
When creating a new record, the numeric field default value should be 0 in order
to avoid manually setting mandatory fields to 0.
This behaviour has been removed with the new views but one wants to restore it.
The `mockRead` function has also been adapted in this commit because the server
returns 0 for unset numeric fields.
After rev d938ba87ae, taxes that are
included in the price are subtracted in case the tax is not applied in
an order (e.g. when the fiscal position remove the tax).
Some of the test orders did not apply any tax, and because the products
used in the test had some tax included, the above revision made the
tests fail (by subtracting the tax amount from the price).
Fixed by making the test orders more consistent wrt to taxes, applying
the taxes as would happen in the UI, then correcting the payment amounts
to include the extra tax amounts.
- Set your timezone in Brasil
- Install the Maintenance module
- Create a Maintenance Request, set the Requested Date to 2017-06-15
- Save
In the chatter, the track fields message shows a Requested Date of
2017-06-14.
This can actually happen with any date tracked. The issue comes from the
web client: it converts the date in UTC, which should of course not be
done. This only applies for a datetime, not for a date.
opw-746216
Before this fix, a traceback occured when we clicked on the translate icon
in a form dialog.
The `translate` event wasn't stopped and was thus handled by the dialog's form
controller and by the main controller.
Purpose
=======
Currently we are updating the coupon rewards on the fly when creating/modifying/deleting a sales order line.
To avoid multiple searches on res_partners and product to know whether the customer/product is valid on the sale coupon program, we store the applicable customers and products on the program according to the domain defined on it.
This brings 2 issues:
- The customers/products stored on the program are not updated (Was the original spec)
- The checks are numerous and maybe overkill for the given results
Specification
=============
- Don't recompute the reward lines on SO modifications. Add a button to compute the line by hand and make an automatic compute on the SO validation or on the page shop/payment.
- When recomputing the reward lines, make a search on the res_partners and products instead. Now that the action is not triggered so often we can afford to make a search.
- Don't use the fields rule_partners_domain and rule_products_domain. This should be removed in master.
- The field is_public_included is useless now. And we decided to make the coupon available for all the partners if they fit the domain on the program.
Purpose
=======
Currently we are updating the coupon rewards on the fly when creating/modifying/deleting a sales order line.
To avoid multiple searches on res_partners and product to know whether the customer/product is valid on the sale coupon program, we store the applicable customers and products on the program according to the domain defined on it.
This brings 2 issues:
- The customers/products stored on the program are not updated (Was the original spec)
- The checks are numerous and maybe overkill for the given results
Specification
=============
- Don't recompute the reward lines on SO modifications. Add a button to compute the line by hand and make an automatic compute on the SO validation or on the page shop/payment.
- When recomputing the reward lines, make a search on the res_partners and products instead. Now that the action is not triggered so often we can afford to make a search.
- Don't use the fields rule_partners_domain and rule_products_domain. This should be removed in master.
- The field is_public_included is useless now. And we decided to make the coupon available for all the partners if they fit the domain on the program.
Purpose
=======
Currently we are updating the coupon rewards on the fly when creating/modifying/deleting a sales order line.
To avoid multiple searches on res_partners and product to know whether the customer/product is valid on the sale coupon program, we store the applicable customers and products on the program according to the domain defined on it.
This brings 2 issues:
- The customers/products stored on the program are not updated (Was the original spec)
- The checks are numerous and maybe overkill for the given results
Specification
=============
- Don't recompute the reward lines on SO modifications. Add a button to compute the line by hand and make an automatic compute on the SO validation or on the page shop/payment.
- When recomputing the reward lines, make a search on the res_partners and products instead. Now that the action is not triggered so often we can afford to make a search.
- Don't use the fields rule_partners_domain and rule_products_domain. This should be removed in master.
- The field is_public_included is useless now. And we decided to make the coupon available for all the partners if they fit the domain on the program.
Purpose
=======
People doesn't understand that the reward line product is the product that will be used in the discount line, not the product the be rewarded
If they set another product before the program is created, the product they set will be renamed, which is wrong.
Specification
=============
- Don't display the field before it's set
- Make the field readonly on the program form view
Purpose
=======
On a sale coupon program, the allowed partners are the customers by default.
That way, users like the Administrator aren't allowed to use coupon on a fresh database
Specification
=============
Allow all the partners by default and the user restrict the partners as he wishes.
Before this commit:
Coupon Program: Only customers have access to rewards
Promotional Program: Only customers have access to reward and this can be retricted with a domain
After this commit:
Coupon Program: All partners have access to rewards
Promotional Program: All partners have access to reward and this can be retricted with a domain
Before this fix, multiple records were created if you clicked
on the quick create of a many2one in a modal.
The 'mutexify' event wasn't stopped and was thus handled by
the dialog's form controller and by the main form controller.
* web_editor, web_tour, website_event_track
Before this commit, one JS file was responsible for all the library
extensions and fixes. There were two main problems with this system:
- The file was only available in the backend (as some extensions are
made on backend-only libraries).
- Some other modules were doing library customizations.
This commit creates one file per library to regroup their associated
customization and adds them in the right asset. These are placed in
the web module and every other module should avoid doing customizations.
This allows to have libraries consistency accross all modules and
between the backend and the frontend.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Change the default lang on the website to be different than en_US
-Edit the name of a product in the website
Bug:
The name of the product is changed in en_US and not in the language
set on the website. The lang is in fact removed from the context in
function saveElement(in addons/web_editor/static/rte.js).
opw:747084
The module `crm.voip` alters the focusable behaviour of the phone
widget by overriding the `canCall` method.
We thus disable this test if the module is installed.
Creating and editing mass mailing in multiple language is managed with
the change 05daa15.
But currently the language the mass mailing is sent in, is the language
of the "Process Mass Mailing Queue" (root user if not changed) so all
the recipients will receive the mail in the root user language has at
the time the given batch of mails is sended.
So this is different from what someone could expect by it being
translatable. In any case the recipients list could be based on a lead,
a partner a mass mailing contact or other and a language could not be
determinable in stable (a mass mailing contact does not have a language
for example).
If the system worked, there is also a usability downside in the meaning
that someone could duplicate a mail and not check all translation and
not be aware that the mail he see is maybe not the mail that will be
received (if translations have not all been completed).
In stable to have the same behavior in any case and lessen the usability
burden of users thinking erroneously the mass mailing may be sent in
several languages depending on a not-existing heuristic, this changeset
remove the translatability of mass mailing content.
This has the following effect:
no translation editing appear,
the mass mailing is edited and sent in one and the same language,
If someone want to send a mass mailing in several language, currently in
Odoo it would then require to:
duplicate the mass mailing,
change the domains of recipients base on choosen heuristic,
edit the duplicated mass mailing in the choosen language
opw-746445
opw-746776
closes#17718
If the user change the access right to filter some stock location or multi
company, the user can have an access error to read stock pack operation.
opw-747526
Before this the -webkit-text-security CSS property was used. This, as
the name implies, only works in webkit based browsers. Instead we can
just render the PIN code as •'s since the value of the inputBuffer is
used (not the rendered text) when checking the PIN.
Fixes#16458
Fabien Pinckaers