When selling a project from a sale order, the SO line
creates the project. When we create a task in that
kind of project, by default, the task will be linked
to the SO line of its project.
However, for the SO line field to be visible on the
task form view, the customer must be set. This commit
set the customer from the SO line when changing
the project (billable project only).
Selling product creating project can now be based
on project template. When setting a project template
on product, this will copy the project (like a duplicate)
and replace its customer, ... with information from the
SO line, on SO confirmation.
There is only one project without template per SO, and
one project per template per SO (so 2 SO lines with the
same project template on their product will only create
one project with this template).
When confirming a SO, only one project will be created, even if
some so lines would create a project. Only the first line will
create the project, the other will not be linked to its.
`project_id` field is added on so line, to keep track of the
generated project, as already done for the task.
The '_timesheet_service_generation' method has been rewritten
to be execute in batch and improve performance and prefetching.
On SO confirmation, no message are now post in chatter to avoid
having one message per so line that should have created a task.
A message is only posted when user manually add SO lines on
confirmed SO.
Now that an analytic account can be linked
to several projects, you might want to change
the analytic on the SO.
Before this commit, the user was allow to create
an analytic account on a confirmed SO but not
modify it. This was usefull when you wanted to
reinvoice an expense on a SO without AA set.
This is now solved (AA is automatically created
when validated expense).
Now, we want to allow set manually the AA before
confirming SO to match the one of potential
projects.
This commit removes the inheritS between account.analytic.account and
project.project. This means :
- When a project is created, an analytic account is not necessarily
genareted
- project has now its own name, company_id and partner_id fields
- an analytic account can be linked to several project
- project module does not depend anymore of analytic, but hr_timesheet
does.
This change implied
- an analytic account is required on project to timesheet on
its tasks. So, when checking 'allow_timsheets', if an AA is not
provided at project creation, an AA will be generated.
- to timesheet on project, an active AA is required. We don't want
timesheeting on project linked to unused AA to avoid bad analytic
entries.
This prepare the fact a sale order can create multiple project, sharing
the same analytic account (the one from the SO).
The project overview is kind of badly design. This
commit does not solve all the issue but tries to make
it simpler and more efficient:
- Does not depends on AAL anymore: the overview search
is now about projects. You can see the overview of multiple
projects. Even when no timesheet are encoded, the plan will
not be empty.
- "Time by people" displays each employee assigned to task,
even if no timesheet are recorded.
- Code now use reporting view to keep consistency and simple
code in overview controller.
The cost of an employee should be in hr_timesheet for a long time, to
allow user to track time on project/task: hours spent and their cost.
This commit simply moves fields and related views. It also moves the
'postprocess' method from sale_timesheet to hr_timesheet since this
method is responsible to set the amount (cost) on AAL.
User can now track their time and cost, without having sale_timesheet
installed.
The project of a SO will not be used anymore, as we planned
to have a sale order creating multiple projects.
The concept of 'only project from SO' does not make sense.
This commit provide a real reporting tool
for project profitability: graph and pivot
views.
You can now have a look at cost and revenues
per project, so line, product, see which
project manager brings the more money, which
project costs many human time, ...
The project overview is based on this report
analysis to be consistent.
However, a change of computation for 'amount
invoiced' is introduced: we now based the amount
on the price_reduce of the SO line, and not from
the invoice lines. Also, once a draft invoice is
generated, the quantity is considered as invoiced
at the price of the SO line (no matter is extra
discount happens when validating invoices).
- Redesign all mimetype icons
- use SVG to reduce file size and improve rendering quality.
- Add a data attribute to attachments to detect the file extension (in somes
cases just mimetype is not accurate)
In some case, (many JS like runbot with all modules), the onload event was
binded after that the image was loaded. So the JS code that make the zoom
conditionnal was not executed.
Now we apply the function on all images already loaded, or that will is loading
Courtesy of @ged-odoo for help and review
An empty div `o_attachment_preview` is added in expense and vendor bills form
views. It will be used as a container to preview the attachment.
The actual behaviour will be implemented in another commit.
Task 40663
Purpose
========
The links on the project kanban cards are not always at the same place : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aONUYkZerqqD7fSVmgozRScgLKR-QHtA/view
============
Specification
============
I get rid of the flex element to allow the placing of links using width
attribute. Create the .o_project_timesheet_box class to assure that the
timesheet/overview link is always placed in the middle.
I also deleted the needaction_count button to avoid breaking the display.
Task: 1817850
self is a rml_parse instance, not a BaseModel
create new environment to call ORM methods
prevent crash when calling formatLang on a RML report
Closes#24068
When not draft, the partner_id field is readonly and cannot be modified
anyway, but it makes the form invalid, so form buttons cannot be used,
e.g. to access the journal items, etc.
When the `partner_id` is not set (it is not required at the model
level), we can still compute the default destination account based on
the company chart of account configuration.
This is necessary to allow creating "customer" or "supplier" payments without
selecting a specific partner.
Before this rev:
* Take 2 domains that contain at least two leaves, and at least one of
them must use the implicit `&` operator
e.g.:
d1 = [('so_line', 'in', [91]), ('amount', '<=', 0.0)]
d2 = ['&', ('so_line', 'in', []), ('project_id', '!=', False)]
* Perform osv.expression.OR() between both domains
Expected result:
d3 = ['|', d1, d2]
Actual result (after normalization):
d3 = ['&', '|', d1, d2]
This is because, since the `&` is implicit for the first domain, when we
OR it, we give it an explicit `|` operator, so when we pass this domain
through the normalize_domain function, d1 no longer contains an implicit
`&` operator but instead the implicit operator is the one between d1 and
d2, therefore giving us a completely wrong domain.
The `combine` function states that it only accepts normalized domains,
however neither the OR nor AND functions do, this leads to a lot of
developers putting non-normalized domains into these functions, and
there's no error checking or anything that obviously indicates that the
domain is incorrect, so we might as well normalize all domains being
passed since it's already pretty optimized.
Commit d39856db prevents crawler to crawl and index blog tag URL which could
lead to possibly millions of URLs combinaison.
Still, it would crawl (but not index) second level of tags combinaison.
This commit ensure that crawling is prevented when already one tag on the URL.
Before this commit, when some records were created from an `onchange`,
we have the following weird behaviour:
Suppose that this record has some required fields that are empty.
When we click on this record, then somewhere else, the record
disappears from the list.
This is because the records contains invalid fields, and it is wrongfully
assuming that the record to be discarded comes from "Add an item".
A previous commit [1] fixed a bit this issue with `default_get`, but since
it relied on a fragile heuristic, we decide to apply the correct fix with
this commit.
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b09f0c99be2b13d33986414485556d87da186d65
Before this commit:
If a blog had multiple tags on the page, the crawler would click on every one
of them one after another until every tags combination got crawled.
With a lot of tags, this could result in million of URLs.
Now, we prevent URLs with more than one tag to be crawled.
Eg: With tags 'A', 'B', C':
/A
/A/B
/A/C
/A/B/C
/A/C/B
/B
/B/A
/B/C
/B/A/C
/B/C/A
/C
/C/A
/C/B
/C/A/B
/C/B/A
Chat window having higher z-index value then attachment preview model and in the
mobile chat windows are covers whole screen so attachment preview is hidden behind
chat window. so increasing preview model's z-index by 1 will fix the issue.
(PR #24065)
The read_group method was recently modified to allow more flexibility.
With this commit, we add the possibility of aggregating many2one fields.
These fields can be aggregating by counting the number of distinct IDs,
directly in postgres.
Also, note that we had to modify the mock server to implement the
corresponding functionality.
For x2many relational fields(of type kanban), we shoud be able to set custom label for
'Create / Add' button by adding 'create_text' node option on particual field from xml.
Right now, 'create_text' is only handled for many2many fields, preventing users to set
custom label for one2many fields.
This commit allows users to set Create Button label for both m2m and o2m fields.
This commit fixes two issues with discuss tests (JS):
1. Improved mocked `message_fetch` rpc
Some tests were incorrectly mocking the `message_fetch` rpc.
With this commit, the mock server correctly mock this route,
so that tests should simply pass the records as data, and the
mock server correctly handles this rpc.
2. Patch `_.debounce` and `_.throttle`
The test "older messages are loaded on scroll" failed with
Google Chrome right after destroying the widget discuss.
This is due to a debounced function that called its inner
function at this moment.
With this commit, any discuss test patch `_.debounce` and
`_.throttle` so that the inner functions are executed
immediately and synchronously.
Before this patch the registry and cache signaling was only activated
for PreforkServer. In case Odoo was deployed in a multi process/multi
threaded architecture the signaling was not ensured, causing registry
de-synchronisation amongst threaded servers.
This fix will be backported in v10.0 and v11.0 as soon as it has been
battle tested.
Create a hr.attendant in a stage where a mail template is present.
Fill the email field as: Name Surname <name@surname.com>
Before this commit:
- the created partner's email has been rendered as name@surname.com>
- the email failed to be sended because of this
This was because Jinja rendered that snippet escaping the special characters
Putting a 'pipe' safe in the snippet does the trick
After this commit:
both the partner and the email are created successfuly
OPW 1830739
closes#24059
Also when there is both a docstring and directive-level content put
the docstring first. That seems to match what Sphinx's autodoc does
and looks less odd.
Possible future improvement: a parameter to suppress the docstring?
Possibly a way to reorder the non-docstring content (e.g. members
documentation)?
Also when there is both a docstring and directive-level content put
the docstring first. That seems to match what Sphinx's autodoc does
and looks less odd.
Possible future improvement: a parameter to suppress the docstring?
Possibly a way to reorder the non-docstring content (e.g. members
documentation)?
jem-odoo