With the new views, we mainly focused on making them work. But we also
need to be able to handle unusual cases, such as some RPC failing. An
example of such a problem was the following:
- a form view with a one2many with an onchange
- edit mode, change a field in the one2many, click elsewhere
- the onchange triggers, calls the server
- it may happen that the server fails with a ValidationError
- the onchange deferred fails, the line in the one2many is restored to
the value known by the list renderer, which is the previous value (but
the new value was applied to the model)
- we now have a 'corrupted' state: clicking on save will send the
invalid value, even though the UI displays the previous one.
We solve this problem in this commit by making sure that the onchange
deferred returned by the _performOnchange always succeed (or stays
pending). If the rpc fails, the deferred will succeed with an empty
dictionary. This means that the list renderer will be updated with the
value from the model.
Note that it may not be intuitive that a failure in the onchange is not
seen as an error from the perspective of the _performOnChange, but I
think that it still makes sense:
- the validation/network errors are not really a concern of the UI. The
UI just display the values entered by the user.
- if an onchange fails (for example, because of a coding error), we do
not really want to prevent the user from working.
Also, when the onchange is performed, the initial change was already
applied to the local data. Rollbacking them would be a more difficult
task.
Note that we also improve the mock server in this commit, to allow
mocking failures.
We had an interesting bug with the field many2many_checkbox: in some
cases, it could cause a crash, because it could not find an element in the
localdata.
To reproduce this, start with a non empty field many2many checkbox, then
uncheck them twice.
The reason is that the datapoint of type 'list' that represents the
current value is actually modified, and the replace_with operation
assumed that it could find the localID by looking into its data. I have
the feeling that a more complete fix is to make sure that the datapoint
is not modified (in its 'data' key), but is modified in its '_changes'
key. However, this would probably be a bigger change.
This use case was not correctly managed as the function evaluating if the
value has changed compares datetime and date.
This triggered an issue if the widget `date` was set on the field `date_order`
on a purchase order for example ; it was not possible to create a record as
the datapoint was set `dirty`.
This rev. ensures that a `field_changed` is not triggered if the day is the same
on a date widget.
This rev. also adds support of `datetime` fields on date widget, which appears
to be a valid use case.
Fixes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/20311
Before this commit, the image was directly built without using the corresponding
template, which set some properties on the image (class, width, etc.).
When we generate commands for many2many, it could happen that the id was
in the list of changed fields (when we are in a new records, with a non
empty initial onchange). When this happens, the server is not happy.
To reproduce this, open the uninstall wizard of a module in the 'App'
application. This creates a new record with a non-empty many2many
field. Then click on 'Show technical modules', this will trigger an
onchange which should not send the id field.
When creating a new record with a non empty default value for a one2many
field, we did send the command 0 (for each one2many line) instead of the
command 1 (update). This was a pretty big problem, because then the
server would try to create a line with possibly incomplete data.
For example, it was not possible to create expense sheets: go to expense
menu, select one expense in the list view, click on the action menu
'submit to manager', this opens a form view with a one2many with the
selected expense, then save. Before this commit, this would lead to a
server error.
Opening a record in a calendar view always showed the default form view when it is not a popup.
Example in CRM: opening an opportunity will always show a lead view.
The fix aims to use the "get_formview_id" method to find the right id of the view that must be shown instead
of using a default id.
opw-774272
Opening a record in a calendar view always showed the default form view when it is not a popup.
Example in CRM: opening an opportunity will always show a lead view.
The fix aims to use the "get_formview_id" method to find the right id of the view that must be shown instead
of using a default id.
opw-774272
This commit ensures that tab navigation works properly when editing a
form view that contains input fields with phone widgets. Previously,
pressing TAB would skip those fields.
This commits fixes a traceback that appears when ticking a checkbox in
an x2many which triggers an onchange. The root cause of the issue is
twofold:
- confirmUpdate requires currentFieldIndex to be defined, but might be
needed when setting currentFieldIndex;
- confirmUpdate attempts to restore the selection range even if we are
not dealing with a char field (e.g. checkbox).
We solve the issue by ensuring that _selectCell gives a temporary value
to currentFieldIndex. This value is chosen so that confirmUpdate calls
_selectCell with the right parameters. Moreover, we only restore the
selection range when the range is defined.
This commit ensures that tab navigation works properly when editing a
form view that contains input fields with phone widgets. Previously,
pressing TAB would skip those fields.
Before this commit, the widget many2many_tags only loaded the first 40
records. This was difficult to see, because there were not so many views
with a lot of tags.
Before this commit, there was a bug when creating a new record which
contains a one2many with an onchange. The commands sent to the onchange
did not contain the full information.
Here is how you could reproduce the issue: install expense, go to the
expense list view, select the 2 lines, then, in the 'action' menu in the
control panel, choose 'Expense: submit to manager'. In the new expense
sheet, you could see that there were two lines in the one2many
expense_line_ids. However, these lines are empty. The reason is that
the commands sent in the onchange were 2 commands 0, with {} as data.
So, in short, the BasicModel did generate the proper commands, but with
empty data, in the specific case when we have a non empty one2many in a
default_get, then an onchange.
To solve this issue, I had to fix 2 things: the internal data struture
was wrongly updated, and the commands should be generated with all the
data, and not only the changes.
The parsing of the integers does not escape the thousands separator.
issue: Integers are currently not properly parsed. For example, create
a database in Spanish language, install product_expiry and in settings
activate Lots & Serial Numbers. Go to Products and create a new product.
Choose to track by lots and specify the use_time, life_time, etc.
When saving, all integers are set to 0
Since the new views, the field parsing for m2o returns an object with
id and display_name. If the given value to parse is a string, it is
supposed that this is an ID. This was breaking the domain selector
widget which should allow strings as name-strings of m2o values.
We clear the input field when clicking 'Create and Edit' to ensure that
the field is empty if the user chooses to cancel the record creation. If
a record is indeed created, then the field value will still be updated.
Before this commit, two variables were used to store the current
position in a list view: currentCol and currentRow. This made it
difficult to handle incremental moves (eg: tab, shift+tab) inside a
row, since we have to ignore all buttons. Previously, this was done by
converting 'currentCol' to 'currentFieldIndex', but the conversion
between the two variables was incorrect and does not appear to be
that easy to fix. As an example, it was not possible to TAB-navigate to
the last column of the components list when creating a BoM.
This commit removes all mentions of 'currentCol' and uses
'currentFieldIndex' instead, removing the need for conversions. The TAB
navigation code is simpler as a result, and should now be correct.
The sum is already used in views for
<field name="foo" sum="Total" />
Where "Total" is translatable and extracted in source terms export.
The progress bar kanban widget expect a field name (untranslatable).
Avoid to translate a field name by changing the attribute
When a record was added in a kanban thanks to the quick create, column
tooltip and column progressbar were not updating the values they showed.
Now, adding/deleting records updates the whole column as the update
operations.
Thanks to @kig-odoo for the test.
Note: to backport (partially)
When using quick create to create a kanban record, if this record was
then updated thanks to a field widget, the view crashed. This was
because it tried to update the whole column but the newly created
record was not properly attached to it in the model.
Thanks to @sja-odoo for the test.
Note: to backport (partially)
When an onchange is set on an x2many field displayed as an editable
list in a form view, and the user updates one of the subrecords,
the updated subrecord is kept in the DOM and updated, and all other
subrecords in the relation are re-rendered and re-inserted at their
correct place in the list (because the onchange might have changed
them).
Before this rev., the order of the subrecords after the edited one
was reversed.
Kanban records with 'global click' feature activated should open
the record in a form view when the corresponding card is clicked.
Before this rev., it wasn't working if the user clicked on a tag
of the kanban record, because of an unused click handler defined
on the Many2ManyTags widget (preventing the global click feature
from actually performing the global click).
This rev. removes that handler in the KanbanFieldMany2ManyTags.
This reverts commit b6ef149b as it seems that we don't want this
feature ultimately (was confusing for users trying to open the
record, but it filtered instead).
Note that opening the record by clicking on a tag still doesn't
work, but this is fixed by the next commit.
Problem occured in the MRP Production wizard (with a consumed
product tracked by serial number). The opened record is a new
record, and its one2many has 2 default rows that are prefilled.
If the user edited one of the quantities in those rows, and set
an invalid value instead (e.g. a letter), the row was removed
without notice when it was focused out. This was because the
model wasn't aware that a change has been done on the record,
and as the record was flagged as new, it was simply abandonned.
The one2many default get code used to meddle with basic_model's res_ids
manually, which ended up desynchronizing the data and res_ids fields
of the list representation of the one2many values.
This commit solves the issue by using the proper mechanisms of the
basic_model, that is creating a proper datapoint for those ids.
Steps to reproduce the original issue:
- Install sale_mamangement, mrp and purchase
- Create a product
- In the Inventory tab, in Routes, uncheck Buy
- Check and then uncheck back any other route than Buy
- Get a traceback because we are looking for a record with a given
res_id in the list data but since they are desynchronized, data
is empty at that point even though res_ids is not.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/36b4d78a2678806b25aaa5650b64496f9da9d205
fixes most post-onchange focus issues for x2many fields, but does not
account for "button columns" properly. More precisely, the current
widget is computed via a position index taking buttons into account in
an array that ignores them. This caused the index to be out of bounds,
resulting in a traceback. This commit fixes this issue.
Problem occured in the MRP Production wizard (with a consumed
product tracked by serial number). The opened record is a new
record, and its one2many has 2 default rows that are prefilled.
If the user edited one of the quantities in those rows, and set
an invalid value instead (e.g. a letter), the row was removed
without notice when it was focused out. This was because the
model wasn't aware that a change has been done on the record,
and as the record was flagged as new, it was simply abandonned.
Before this commit, pressing tab then enter was generating a traceback because
the event creation and modal deletion was done twice.
This commit adds a protection to be sure that we are doing only one event
creation.
The one2many default get code used to meddle with basic_model's res_ids
manually, which ended up desynchronizing the data and res_ids fields
of the list representation of the one2many values.
This commit solves the issue by using the proper mechanisms of the
basic_model, that is creating a proper datapoint for those ids.
Steps to reproduce the original issue:
- Install sale_mamangement, mrp and purchase
- Create a product
- In the Inventory tab, in Routes, uncheck Buy
- Check and then uncheck back any other route than Buy
- Get a traceback because we are looking for a record with a given
res_id in the list data but since they are desynchronized, data
is empty at that point even though res_ids is not.
This commit introduces a new way to hide a column in a x2m list view.
The attribute 'tree_invisible' can be add in the field attrs in the x2m
view definition. This attribute can use the 'parent' key to make a reference
to the parent record (e.g. 'parent.id').
Rev. 2728fe1 introduced an attempt of restoring the focus on the
currently focused field in an x2many list after an onchange
returned, and the list has been updated. However, it was often
wrong (e.g. leaving a field by pressing tab/shift+tab, clicking on
another field...) and reset the focus on an unexpected field.
In addition to fixing this issue, this rev. also unifies the helper
functions to get and set the cursor positions in an input or
textarea, as they were duplicated between mail and web.
This reverts commit b94939377a.
The commit was breaking most of the backend checkboxes trying to fix a
frontend one.
On top of the revert, this commit adds frontend-only style to fix the
frontend checkboxes.
Before this fix, trying to create a column in a kanban view where there
were progressbars was opening a traceback. This was because the newly
create column is made from data which are guessed in the client (no RPC
is done), so this guess had to be adapted to progressbars.
- Kanban colors and tag colors are now the same
- Tag color 0 (default) is now back to be the invisible kanban one
- Same colorpicker for kanban and tags
- Define correct number of colors (12 not 13)
- Color 0 should be a neutral one (gray)
- ...
Before this rev., onchange specs where only computed up to level
2 (i.e. for fields inside x2many fields). So basically, if there
were a one2many list inside a one2many (e.g. which opens in a
form view), the fields of that inner one2many list weren't added
to the specs, and it could lead to unexpected responses from the
server (like erasing the changes made on the inner one2many
records).
Closes#19600
The o_row class mechanism is supposed to be used to put another
element next to a field, like a button for example. However,
in the case of phone and email field, the o_text_overflow hack
gets in the way.
The problem that o_text_overflow is trying to solve is when you
have a long email, the table used to display the form view fields
tends to use very long cells (td) so it can display the whole email
address. This behavior completely breaks the form view, even though
the email address is clearly set to wrap in css. The o_text_overflow
class is a hack that forces the table to think that the email is
small, then defaulting to the width 50% css rules. If the email is
too long, it is correctly wrapped inside the cell, without breaking
the form view layout.
However, when we need to add a button next to those fields, this
hack gets in the way of the o_row class css rules, completely
wrecking it. We looked for a fix with qsm-odoo for hours but were
unable to find one that did not require a complete rewrite of the
form view css rules. In the end, we decided to remove the hack from
the phone field and keep it on the email field, as we think it is
less common to have a very long phone number than to have a very
long email.
Before this commit, a field handled with a widget url was given its value (href) as its text, fully displaying the url.
Moreover, the display was odd and did not match that of buttons
After this commit, if the field contains a text attribute, we use is as the text of the link.
The link also correctly displays and looks like a button (in a form view)
Of course, a test for this new field widget feature is implemented
closes#19587
Géry Debongnie