Most operations on X2Many widget possibly propagates a field context
(name_create, name_search, ...) but the original read or read on an
onchange does not.
With this changeset, the field context is also used in these instances.
The assertions added in the added test failed with:
expected: ["world"], result: [undefined]
expected: ["world","world"], result: [undefined,undefined]
fixes#29203
opw-1914466
closes#29866
Fine-tuning of commit e7fab23420
In a one2many with more than one page with a limit of k records, add a line l.
It increments the list limit to k+1. Remove a line above (of index <= k).
It will try to load a line l' to replace it, that it will find on page 2.
However when deciding if it should read missing fields on that record, it will
scan at most u records, skipping virtual ids.
Here u is the min between the current number of lines and the list limit
without the temporary increase due to the added record.
Since there are at least two pages, u = k.
However since l is in the list at index k, then l' won't be read, and since it
was on page 2 its data hasn't been loaded.
Therefore the js would traceback when trying to evaluate it.
opw 1913361
closesodoo/odoo#29338
Use case: a x2m (ex: attribute values) displayed in a x2m (ex: attributes on
product) using different fields in different views (ex: tags in product form view
and list in product attribute form view). When opening the x2m record (in a
wizard) then going back on the form view, the tags are empty because the
`display_name` value has been lost when fetching x2m for the second time.
In this case, the list `fieldsInfo` needs to be updated with the existing
(default for tags) one so all the fields will be correctly loaded.
Task 1916891
closesodoo/odoo#29598
Have a one2many display records in a kanban subview,
which opens a form view when edited.
Edit a field displayed only on the form view.
A call to _applyX2ManyChange is done without giving it the viewtype argument,
therefore the fieldinfo is taken from the wrong view, traceback ensues.
opw 1914163
closesodoo/odoo#29607
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closesodoo/odoo#29094
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes#28644
Have a form record with a progress bar
Modify the max_value of the progress, as well as the current_value bar through an onchange
Before this commit, the new max_value was not taken into account
After this commit, it is.
closesodoo/odoo#29056
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closesodoo/odoo#28840
When a view is loaded, it checks which fields it has to load.
In the case of a many2one, it could be the case that a context key is present in
one view and not in the other; if it happens, we should reload the data, as a
name_get result could vary.
opw 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28298
Before this commit, when loading the data and calling the prostprocess,
the viewType was not correctly passed which could lead to broken
behaviour. For example, if one was to load a record from a list view
embedded in a form view, the viewtype passed was the list which
prevented to load the data from the form view.
OPW 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28279
In Firefox, the input behavior and visual representation (navigation, caret
placement, value selection, etc.) was broken when using a datepicker (easily
reproductible on date and datetime widgets).
This was due to the `focus` event being stopped on the input, which doesn't
seem to be correctly supported by Firefox.
The deleted code was supposed to toggle the picker when the field was clicked
(see odoo/odoo@89093a1) (toggle on click and disable focus) but the lib
correctly supports on focus without extra code.
This also fixes the fact that the datepicker was not open on focus (only on
clicked). In some tests where the field was the first in the form view, it is
now correctly autofocused.
Forward-port: not useful from 12.0 because the code has changed with BS4 and
this has already been applied in odoo/odoo@6692919 and odoo/odoo@c63630d.
Closes#23438closesodoo/odoo#27657
Image field widget need the __last_update field alongside them
for caching purposes, though that field should never be present explicitly
in the views
Before this commit, the dependencies of field widgets were not merged into
the model's fields definition, creating a traceback when adding an image field widget
into a x2many list
After this commit, there is no traceback and the image field works properly
closes#27545
stopPropagation of navigation_move event for where direction=cancel,
currently if navigation_move event throws error when user press escape
in dialog where dialog is opened from editable list record
Scenario: Install website_sale -> Open Product form(variant enable) ->
open variant tab -> open Attribute m2o form popup and press Escape on dialog
Result: Error
Expected: It should close dialog and keep editable list view record open,
btw m2o field should also be focused when dialog is closed but that's
another issue, will be fixed in another ongoing task
Related to Issue: #1873919
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when focusing on a date[time] field, the value was not selected
In v11.0, it was
This is due mostly because of the migration to BootStrap 4
After this commit, the value inside the input is selected
OPW 1911333
closesodoo/odoo#28989
In a form view (account.invoice), have a date field as:
<field name="date" options="{\'datepicker\': {\'warn_future\': true}}"/>
Open a record with the field set to a value
Click Edit, click save
Click create
Before this commit, the value of the field of the new record
took the one of the previous record
On account invoices, it resulted on having the popup "The record has been modified etc...."
And it was not possible to create an invoice from another one
this was because we passed the same reference object for the datepicker
After this commit, there is no popup as the field do not take a value from the framework
OPW 1906085
closesodoo/odoo#28759
Some tests were skipped these last months. This is a slippery slope.
The best time to reactivate them is the moment they were skipped, the
next best time to reactivate them is now. So, this is what this commit
does.
Three kinds of tests were skipped:
- 3 password tests
- 2 kanban progress bar tests
- one keyboard navigation test
Password tests
--------------
When the auth_password_policy addon was introduced, two tests in web/
were skipped, because they would fail when the auth_password_policy
addon is installed.
Since then, a commit was done to change the way the password field works
(commit 5bbbd25edf). With this commit,
the password field is no longer an 'include', but a new field widget.
This means that the skipped tests no longer fails.
Kanban progress bar tests:
--------------------------
In saas 11.2, the 'archive all' feature was removed, but it was readded
in saas 11.4. The tests had to be slightly adapted to make sure they
use the proper css selectors.
Keyboard navigation test:
-------------------------
It is now a functional decision not to allow moving from one cell to the
next by using left/right arrow, so this test is no longer valid.
closesodoo/odoo#28685
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closesodoo/odoo#28441
Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
On the user's preference, change the timezone to one that is different
from the browser.
Save the form.
Go back to the user's preferences.
Before this commit, every timezone was displayed inside the span that contain
the warning icon, and leaked everywhere on the form view.
This was because of the joint action effects of commits:
86897ca1674dfabb8f7a
Which provoked the field to be re-rendered in edit mode,
but with an $el on which a span was added. `<option/>` elements
were then added to both `<select>` and `<span>`
This did not happen before v12.0
After this commit, there is no display glitch
OPW 1895088
closesodoo/odoo#28108
Let's assume a one2many editable list containing a many2one field
(e.g. in a sales order, the product_id m2o in order_line o2m), and
the scenario where the user clicks on 'Create and Edit' in the o2m,
and then presses ESCAPE in the opened dialog.
Before this rev., it crashed because the 'navigation_move' (cancel)
event wasn't stop propagated by the form renderer (the one of the
dialog), and thus bubbled up to the list editable renderer, which
asked its basic model to discard a record it didn't know.
Note: same fix as in 8445baa (done in saas-11.3), but with a
simpler test.
Task 1878254
Before this commit, the compute sequence was relying on the fact the ID was used
as a secondary order key to get the right result.
This is necessary when adding items between pages because we don't resequence
the following elements.
However this was not necessary when adding new elements on the last page since
there are no following elements to resesquence in that case.
PR: #27639
Christophe Simonis