This is a followup on b6c688caa2, which
has introduced a new bug.
Consider two groups A and B in a given category, where B implies A and
also A.id > B.id. For the sake of simplicity, assume that A.id=2 and
B.id=1. Following the commit above, the name of the group selection
field will be 'sel_groups_1_2'.
Consider a user in group B. Because B implies A, this means that the
user now belongs to both A and B. A call to read() on that user returns
field 'sel_groups_1_2' with value 2, which on the form view appears as
the user belonging to A only.
The error is in read(), which assumes that the group ids in the field
name correspond to the implication order of the groups, which is no
longer the case since b6c688caa2.
closesodoo/odoo#78662
X-original-commit: e73c406671a51e9c1c4872a9e85eebe5656ea38e
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
* override `onchange` in res.users in order to properly generate and
send the reified group fields alongside the rest: while default_get
sets them up, those fields then get stripped by the onchange
machinery as they don't actually exist on the model
* add a test to check for it
* fix SSF in relation with the new default/onchange system
- because fields may not actually exist on the record,
`record_to_values` needs to `read` the record data rather than
directly access the recordset: the recordset likely will not
know about fake fields
- after the initial onchange has run the form must be filled with
falsy values in case the onchange has not sent defaults for
everything
- on creation, all fields in the form should be considered modified
Task 2341153
closesodoo/odoo#58152
X-original-commit: f8658f229180a595d69cd6daefeded082c7f64ea
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
When a user is created, its partner_id shall not have any company_id.
A test has been added to check that in 'base/test'.
Update test_mail tests by setting a company to partner_id linked to users
as now, by default the partner linked to a new user has no company_id.
closes odoo/odoo#46515
Task: 2198688
Forward-port-of: #45900
X-original-commit: 187b12fc5715721efdd9af283e086dfc3f856fc2
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
When we name_search a res.user, we have a special hack so we will
firstly perform an exact search on the res.users login, if none is found
we will search over res.users name.
This is intended but in the case of negative search since 660cebb4faaeb,
for example operator='not ilike' and name='test' would probably just
return all user that do not have a login that is exactly test.
This is not the intended behavior, in this instance we should just
return user that do not have "test" in their names.
Without fix, added test would fail on:
- .name_search('vlad', operator='not ilike') => finding everyone but
user with exactly login vlad instead of user not containing vlad in
their name
- .name_search('', operator='not ilike') => find all users instead of
finding no user
- .name_search('lad', operator='not ilike') => find all users instead of
just finding "Nothing similar"
opw-2170517
closes#44040closesodoo/odoo#44152
X-original-commit: 2378fb63c132c0bcf027785d478c0608b59a3409
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Raphael Collet