Purpose of query counter tests is to try to match real life use cases. In
mail those generally involve a correctly configured mail gateway. This is
why we set those parameters in performance tests, leading to a small increase
in some counters.
Task-2661036 (Performance tests data cleanup)
Prepares Task-36879 (MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77845
PURPOSE
Improve modeling and performances of mass mailing by manually updating trace
status instead of using complex computed fields and lessening fields usage.
Remove some fields and keep only relevant metrics to simplify and clean trace
model.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we clean the way trace state is managed. Currently it is a
computed field based on several datetime fields. However this generates a
lot of noise in the table as well as unnecessary computation
* there are several columns (one for each state) storing datetime at
which status was reached. Generally only 2 or 3 contain relevant
information;
* state could be set in code directly to avoid a computed field based on
many triggers;
* recomputing it each time a date changes is not necessarily necessary;
* state value can always be updated manually as this is main done through
some automated server update (mailgateway, link clicks, ...);
As trace states and its triggers should not be updated manually it is better
to synchronize it in code flow. When there is an exception or update done
through sending or gateway status is updated as well accordingly. Various
datetime fields are also updated at the same time. In order to align with
notification model mail and sms trace status are updated to a classic field.
Only last status update is now kept as there is no need to store the entire
history of status change.
We keep only a datetime for relevant metrics: open, reply and click. Other
datetime bring no real value. Knowing when a trace was in error or bounced
is not necessary. Indeed exception generally indicates a server issue (at
sending), cancel indicates a data issue (at sending) and bounce depends on
customer email server.
Status update is removed as using write_date is sufficient. Once created
traces are updated only when an external event occurs (opened, replied, ...).
It allows to simplify trace model.
We also rename ignored field into canceled to match naming use through mail
and sms.
QUERY COUNTERS
This change has some positive update on query counters when sending mailings
as traces have less unnecessary status update compared to priori this change.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1907
Update query counters according to last runbot state. This helps spotting
query counters change linked to this PR.
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
PURPOSE
=======
We want to increase the score of the emails sent by Odoo and we want to
avoid them to be marked as spam by the mail clients (gmail, outook...).
SPECIFICATIONS
===============
From filter
-----------
Add a new field on the "ir.mail_server" which is "from_filter". This
field defines the email address for which the outgoing email server can
be used.
The "from_filter" can either define an email address or a domain name.
Use the system parameter "mail.default.from" which allow us to define
a default email address which is used to encapsulate the emails
(default: notifications@<catch.all.domain>).
Mail server priorities
----------------------
When sending an email, we read the FROM header and,
- We first look for a mail server which match the entire mail FROM
in that case, we do not change the email header (not needed)
- If not found, we search a mail server which matches the domain name of
the mail from (do not need to change the headers in that case)
- If not found, find the mail server linked to the "notifications"
email (defined in the system parameter). Then change the FROM header
to the notification email, and put the old one in the name part of
this header.
E.g.
Initial mail from: "Admin" < admin@example.com >
Final mail from: "Admin (admin@odoo.com)" < notifications@odoo.com >
- If no notification email is configured or if no mail server are
found for the notification email, fallback to the old system and
spoof the FROM header. In that case we do not have the choice if we
want to send the email, he will probably be marked as spam.
Sending method priority
-----------------------
In the mail server models, we defined some priorities,
1. Forced SMTP session
2. Forced mail server
3. Try to find the best mail server (see "Mail server priorities")
4. If not found, read the odoo-bin arguments
Bounce
------
As there's no standard for bounce address, we put it in the envelope
(smtp_from). But in some case, it might be considered as spoofing. So,
we use the bounce address ONLY if the mail server is configured for the
entire domain name.
One behavior which might be broken is the following; we send an email as
"std@gmail.com" and the bounce address is on the domain "odoo.com".
Before we received the bounce notifications but we were spoofing the
local part and the domain.
Now
- if a mail server is configured for GMAIL, we do not use the bounce
address (and we might not receive the bounce notification)
- if no mail server is configured for GMAIL, but one is configured for
"odoo.com"
- the FROM header will be "notifications@odoo.com"
- the FROM envelope will be the bounce address
=> In this situation we are spoofing only the local part of the email
but it's allowed as the mail server is configured for the entire
domain name
LINKS
=====
Task-2367946
odoo/odoo#61853odoo/upgrade#1903
Purpose
=======
The purpose of this new module is to manage the mailing lists. Now they
are no more <mail.channel> (will email_send set to True) but they have
their own model.
Specifications
==============
The mailing list are basically a public discussion that users can have
by email. They can respond to email, send new messages, etc... All the
members of the mailing list will receive the message by email.
Users can moderate the emails of the mailing list in the same way as
they did with the "email" mail channel.
- *accept*, will accept the emails and send it to the members of the
mailing list
- *discard*, will drop the email without warning the author
- *reject*, will drop the email and send a notification email to the
author
- *allow*, will accept the email and all other pending emails of the
same author and create a whitelist for him
- *ban* will drop the email and all other pending emails of the same
author and create a blacklist for him
Now a portal view is available (in /groups) and replace the old module
"Website Mail Channel" that was removed in the previous commit. In this
view, users can subscribe / unsubscribe to the mailing lists and some
links to this portal view are added in the footer of the emails of the
mailing list.
As before with mail channels, you can send guidelines to the members,
notify the moderators whose an action is required (in a CRON), send back
an email to the author of an email to say "Your message is waiting
moderation"...
Links
=====
Task-2510267
See odoo/odoo/pull/71599
See odoo/enterprise/pull/19296
See odoo/upgrade/pull/2600
Purpose
=======
Add a unicity constraint (on the url, UTM campaign, medium and source).
As we must care about null values, we can not implement it in SQL
(possible in pure SQL, but we will need to create an index on the
columns, which is not possible in Odoo if we want to customize the
error message).
Clean the code, before the "search or create" behavior was implemented
in the create, causing strange behavior (creating a link tracker with
the same values as an existing one didn't raise an error, but open
the form view of the existing link tracker).
Task-2090344
closesodoo/odoo#48845
Related: odoo/enterprise#9608
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Propagate reply_to radio keys (update and new) to mass mailing in order to have
a coherent naming (was thread and email). This naming is also coherent with
gateway naming (message_update and message_new).
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
The goal of this change is to simplify the code managing `create_date`
and `write_date` in methods `create()` and `write()`, and also to remove
weird behaviors caused by the way those fields were updated.
Assume we update a simple field on a record. This adds pending updates
for the field and `write_date`. However, the value of `write_date` is
not known yet: it will be updated as `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` in SQL.
So `write_date` is actually given a dummy value in pending updates, and
it is invalidated from cache, until its value is flushed to the database
and fetched again.
Now assume we access another field on the record, and that field is not
in cache. The prefetching mechanism will read all column fields,
including `write_date`, and flush them first.
# this adds pending updates foo: 42, write_uid: 1, write_date: False
record.foo = 42
# assume 'bar' is not in cache; this prefetches all column fields,
# which flushes the pending updates above before reading them back
result = record.bar
We can avoid flushing pending updates if the values read from database
do not overwrite existing values in cache. If you assume that the value
of a pending update is in cache (in the example, `foo: 42`), you don't
need to flush the corresponding field. Indeed, the value of `foo` will
remain 42 in cache, whatever its value in the database. This assumption
(pending updates are in cache) is true for all fields *except* for
`write_date`: it is invalidated from cache, and given a dummy value in
pending updates. This branch actually makes this assumption true for
all fields. The avoidance of flushing pending updates will be done in
another commit.
In order to directly assign `write_date` its value, we use a cache for
the value `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` from the database. This costs at
most one query per transaction, and potentially saves a few queries.
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Adapt some query counts to their optimal value, in order to measure the
effect of the following commits on queries.
In module test_performance, some query counts were actually not correct:
the initial flush() done by the context manager assertQueryCount() may
prefetch some data to the cache, and that prefetching is not accounted
for in the query count. This is very true when assertQueryCount() is
preceded by a cache invalidation. We have to move the invalidation
inside the context manager, so that the prefetching is now counted.
Make the method `_search` return a `Query` object, and make that object
generate a subquery when used on the right-hand side of a condition.
closesodoo/odoo#52403
Related: odoo/enterprise#10945
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Improve the Email Marketing tour and onboarding to create a "wow effect" when
users test the app.
SPECIFICATIONS
Create a tour for mass_mailing to let user visit Odoo Email Marketing through
a simple mailing creation flow.
This require the following functional changes
* by default, if user chooses to contact mailing lists and there is a single
mailing list available, add it as default value for chosen list;
* create a master mailing list data containing the admin user so that he can
easily follow the tour and test the mailing application;
LINKS
Task ID 2194876
Community PR odoo/odoo#48259
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#983
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
URPOSE
Prepare code cleaning and optimization in mail, mass_mailing and SMS by
cleaning models for readability and code complexity and footprint reduction.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tool methods and asserts for link tracker tests.
Add tool methods and assets for mass mailing tests, notably about mailing
traces and their link with emails.
Merge existing and duplicated tests and rewrite them a bit.
Rename and improve test_mass_mailing models.
LINKS
Prepares task ID 2238597 (notification and trace models cleaning)
Task ID 1906925 (mass mailing tests cleaning)
PR #50169
Related: odoo/enterprise#10180
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Several counter fields are performed inefficiently. They use compute methods
using length of 2many fields instead of making use of more efficient ORM
methods like read_group.
SPECIFICATIONS
No functional change, only technical performance improvements.
Purpose is to improve lead_count performance. Some people claim to gain a lot
of queries: from 90 to 30 SQL queries to read 39 partners. Hard to reproduce.
LINKS
Task ID 2196182
PR odoo/odoo#44662
Co-Authored-By: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Perform some code cleaning in mail module
SPECIFICATIONS
mail.address.mixin is used only for mail.thread.blacklist mixin. Let us
merge those two and simplify class organization.
LINKS
Task ID 2222033
closesodoo/odoo#48115
Related: odoo/upgrade#967
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When the `select` returns nothing more than ids that are already known, there is
no need to make it at all.
This removes one query from `_read` every time it has to fetch only fields that
are stored in a different table (o2m, ...), which happens all the time when
reading a stored field first (triggering prefetch) and then reading a o2m.
The query that is now removed was used to check access rules, but the trick is
to use `check_access_rule` to verify the rules in python instead.
Part of task-2061122
closesodoo/odoo#36263
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Query counts weren't adapted to recent performance changes.
This commit updates the different query counts to make sure
any commit changing the query counts knows it and does it on purpose.
Some query counts may vary between community and enterprise
and therefore have a higher value than needed in community version.
closesodoo/odoo#43202
Related: odoo/enterprise#7682
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Currently tools and asserts for mail tests are located inside test_mail
module. It makes difficult to re-use them in apps tests or force them to
write custom quick and dirty tools and asserts.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update this module to new tools / asserts / helpers / classes defined in mail
and test_mail.
In this commit we remove the ``MassMailingCase`` and replace it by a fresh
``TestMailCommon`` that is simply updated to hold a marketing user by default.
That way all mocks and asserts are available in all sub test classes.
Coming from common update, we have notably
* ``BaseFunctionalTest`` class is replaced by the new ``TestMailCommon``
pimped one;
* ``assertNotifications`` is replaced by ``assertSinglePostNotifications``
(shortcut for a simple message_post) or ``assertPostNotifications``
(complete asserts involving several messages and notifications);
* correctly invoke ``mock_mail_gateway`` when mocking email sending;
* replace manual check of sent emails or ``assertEmails`` by
``assertSentEmails``;
* remove custom mocks / checks and replace them by now standard mocks
and assertions (if any);
LINKS
Task ID 2068986
PR #38070
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. We will also add relevant
statistics on utm campaign model in order to use it in various applications.
SPECIFICATIONS
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. This change implies that
mass_mailing.tag and mass_mailing.stage have to move to the utm model along
their associated views/data.
These changes were made so that campaigns could be used in the future
by social, mass_mailing and mass_sms and available in the same view
This commit also removes the source_id and the medium_id
fields on the campaign.
This commit also moves the unique_ab_testing field from the mass_mailing_campaign
to the mass_mailing model
Task ID: 2002029
PR: #34015
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename mail.mass_mailing model to mailing.mailing. Rationale :
* mailing is now a prefix for mass mailing models;
* mailing.mailing is easier to read / find / understand;
Note that mail.mass_mailing.campaign is not updated as it is likely to be
removed soon and replaced by simple utm.campaign model.
MIGRATION
mail.mass_mailing model -> mailing.mailing
mail_mass_mailing table -> mailing_mailing
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Move some code bits / fields declarations to reorder them. Purpose is to
make code easier to understand and find. Funny we found two override of create
that have been merged. An override of name create is not necessary considering
code was present in one of the two merged create.
Make internal methods private.
Rename send_mail to action_send_mail to avoid confusion with composer and
template send_mail methods.
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
Purpose is to have some basis performance counters when sending a mailing
on 100 records, with and without blacklist involved. It will serves as
reference when working on mass mailing performance improvements in future
tasks.
This commit is linked to task ID 1889703 and PR #27526.
Thibault Delavallée