This removes an extra request, targets fetched messages more reliably and
simplifies the code.
task-2847909
closesodoo/odoo#96840
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to add tests on ``failure_reason`` usage of
notification model. Tests already exists for MailMail and other fields
but not that specific one. Followup of odoo/odoo@d895f3514e
New tests are added to check the usage of email_to and email_cc when
sending emails. Notably wrong usage of email_cc (lost formatting, copy
of all sent emails) is asserted to be fixed afterwards.
A performance test about batch sending is also added.
Prepares Task-2684479 (Mail: Better send error storage and display)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#96223
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
``scheduled_date`` field of ``mail.mail`` is a char field since its addition
in 2015 (see odoo/odoo@364b4ba06d). As its first usage was in combination with
mail templates, a char field was used to simplify its implementation.
However this technically allows to store whatever value in that field. Using
it in a filter with a datetime argument is quite strange. A workaround is
to try to parse as much as possible the inputs, remove timezone information,
try to localize it, and have it in regular server format to enable filtering
on it.
We consider value should be set in UTC. If we have a specific timezone set
on the input we localize it to UTC. Otherwise we consider the input was done
in UTC, as all datetime fields. It is the role of the business code generating
mail.mail to either give the timezone, either already convert into UTC.
This might solve the following bug
Step to reproduce:
activate the developer mode
go to settings - technical - emails
create a new email and set the Scheduled Send Date in the future
run the scheduled action Mail: Email Queue Manager
Current behavior:
the email is sent and the action does not consider the filter
Expected behavior:
the email is not sent and will only be sent when the scheduler detects
that scheduled_date exceeds the current time.
Task-2833300
opw-2823106
closesodoo/odoo#94937
X-original-commit: 5c113cb9d54e051132a9a50deb2fcf61f9c9dc2c
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
TestMail holds a tool to create test records in batch, notably with inline
partner creation. Allow its usage in some sub modules and tests depending
directly from the base mail test class. This allows notably usage of this
tool in performance tests (see enterprise PR).
Also explicitly set some test data to ease sub tests writing.
Prepares Task-2150462 (Mass Mailing: Unsubscribe flow improvement)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94660
Use dict.get() instead of a subscriptable call. This way we let through
selection values that are not loaded into the registry, instead
of raising an error.
This is especially useful in the upgrade environment
where such values may be unavailable (because of being
lambda-defined in a custom module for instance).
closesodoo/odoo#94530
X-original-commit: 36a6943740f9b4fbd9a78986bee4cd84bb8469c7
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
In message_notify, when called on a recordset, call model methods instead of
base one defined on MailThread. This allows to use internal methods overrides.
Also perform some linting on calls to ``message_notify`` in order to better
spot calls, parameters, ...
Task-2852908
closesodoo/odoo#92868
Related: odoo/enterprise#28038
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Update to latest runbot state, at least for tests known to be
deterministic.
Notably mail tests are lower than before, probably due to odoo/odoo#73271closesodoo/odoo#93470
X-original-commit: 6118ecba8d807ac5ebc69ae4877e1f202b0daeb1
Related: odoo/enterprise#28308
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Bug
===
Since 9c1cdd330e we ignore all incoming
email sent by mailing lists.
They are real use case when people want to be able to receive email
from mailing list (e.g. if they subscribed to an automated service,
or if someone is in leave and has done a auto-replier for that, etc).
Add a model to whitelist some email address. The alias limit
does not apply for those emails.
Task-2862092
closesodoo/odoo#92015
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
All the recipients of message were not always displayed in discuss and some
users were wondering if the message has been sent to everybody concerned.
This solves the problem by allowing to specify whether to display all
recipients based on the message sub type and defining for which sub type it
must.
Technical note:
- The added query count in some tests is due to the fact that the inbox
notification can now be displayed on the client. Before they were discarded
right away. Now additional check must be done. The added query is due to the
test self.res_partner_id.partner_share which is now also done on inbox
notifications (This has been determined by testing locally for all tests except
one: TestMailHeavyPerformancePost.test_complete_message_post, but it is likely
for the same reason).
- A speed optimization could be to add mail_notification.display as stored
computed field in order to avoid that extra read but it would add a little more
needed storage.
Task-2429708
closesodoo/odoo#90203
Related: odoo/upgrade#3487
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Prepare an informative and nice-looking preview from the main content of the
email body, avoiding buttons/images alt etc.
Links, images, tables are removed.
Whitespace is added after the preview to avoid including the full message in
the preview (with markup).
Tags and attributes are also added to increase compliance with HTML5 standard,
including accessibility.
One additional SQL request is required to fetch the preview sub-template.
Task-2413355
closesodoo/odoo#86266
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Improve the performance of mass mailing by removing the <mail.mail>, in
batch, all at once. The unlink operation is very expensive for the ORM,
in terms of SQL queries.
A new field `to_delete` is required to know which <mail.mail> we need
to delete. The reason is that the `failure_type` is stored on the
<mail.notification>, and it's possible to have <mail.mail> without
<mail.notification>.
Task-2587345
Part-of: odoo/odoo#73271
The only mail.channel rule was that a user only had access to channels
they're members of, or can subscribe to (public, or group based).
This rule applied to admins as well, forcing them to switch to
super-admin mode in order to manage mail channels.
This is undesirable on lots of axis:
- superadmin mode is a bit of a last-ditch feature, as a result it's
somewhat hidden
- there is a much higher risk of screwing up as superadmin mode
basically lifts all the access rules, which can have correctness
implications
- auditing completely breaks down when using superadmin mode, as the
real identity of the user is lost
OPW-2857136
closesodoo/odoo#92299
X-original-commit: 1a77ab5726bbcc477d12f40f67433d474ea85316
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
In this commit, we will fix the loops that occur when you send an email
to an alias (to create a ticket e.g.). In that case Odoo can reply
"Your ticket has been created" and then the auto-replier of the user
can reply to this email and the loop occurs.
Specifications
==============
To solve this issues, we add 2 system parameters
- <mail.gateway.loop.minutes>, 120 minutes by default
- <mail.gateway.loop.threshold>, 20 by default
When an email is sent to an alias, we look on the last records created
<mail.gateway.loop.minutes> minutes ago. If we overcome the limit
<mail.gateway.loop.threshold> the email is ignored.
Alias creation detection
========================
To detect the number of records created by a specific email address we
use the `_primary_email` attribute set on the model.
Task-2294034
closesodoo/odoo#78597
Related: odoo/enterprise#21772
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Bug
===
When the admin open an email, he might get an error message if he can
not access one of the attachment of the email.
Now the admin is able to view / edit the attachments he has access to.
Task-2464212
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78734
Purpose
=======
Change all masculine nouns in Odoo's code to neutral nouns (when
possible), making sure that demo data is correctly handled. This is
particularly important since our code is open source, and nowadays lots
of machine learning models are trained on open source repositories.
With this small change we contribute to training more "fair" models, and
teaching models that "employee" or "user" != "he".
This also affects some text visible by the user, hence making it more
inclusive for Odoo users.
Task-2853046
closesodoo/odoo#91292
Related: odoo/enterprise#27302
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose is to ensure tools are called like intended, notably by filtering
input and raising if an unexpected value check is asked. Some code is also
made a bit more generic to have the same kind of parameters when searching
for mail.mail.
In this commit we therefore fix some bad calls to assertSentEmails which
were not checking the right stuff.
closesodoo/odoo#90082
X-original-commit: d9759b2ee86b79b4fb2739a4aebd24a8044cf947
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Issue: when using Amazon's SES SMTP service they rewrite the Message-Id of all
outgoing messages. When someone replies, In-Reply-To contains the SES Message-Id
which we don't know. Threading is therefore broken. Amazon requires to remember
new Message-Id and handle it ourself, which is complicated [1].
Possible solution: copy the Message-Id to References in outgoing message as if
we were pretending that the message is part of a pre-existing thread with
itself. Since Amazon does not alter References it is kept during transport.
Replies will therefore contain both Amazon Message-Id and Odoo Message-Id as
well as original parent Message-Id in case of nested replies.
* ``In-Reply-To``: Amazon Msg-Id
* ``References``: Odoo Parent Msg-Id Odoo Msg-Id
Task-2643114 (Mail: Message-Id in references to ease thread formation)
[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/header-fields.htmlclosesodoo/odoo#89328
X-original-commit: bc568747bdf92c6bbca400ce3ba11f6487679f3a
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Followup of odoo/odoo@de7c119e66 where the parent finding was incorrectly refactored.
Indeed due to a typo new_parent was not updated. Instead of getting higher in
the parent chain until the first message, only the first parent's parent was
considered.
Moreover ``_mail_flat_thread`` is incorrectly taken into account. Due to the
hereabove issue it was not really impacting discussion channels, as anyway
parent finding was not working.
New parent management, depending on ``_mail_flat_thread`` is now
* ``_mail_flat_thread`` True: no free message. If no parent, find the first
posted message and attach new message to it. If parent, get back to the
first ancestor and attach it. We don't keep hierarchy (one level of
threading);
* ``_mail_flat_thread`` False: free message = new thread (think of mailing
lists). If parent get up one level to try to flatten threads without
completely removing hierarchy;
Tests show that parent is correctly flattened on business documents and left
untouched for channel-like documents.
Task-2822652 (Mail: fix parent message fetch / flattening)
X-original-commit: 86f21c1f384e37a4555b4b1ce4831904c8d40b6f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#89328
Purpose is to test behavior when having multiple references in mail headers.
We have to check that parent_id is correctly taken (as it impacts internal
flag), and that flattening is performance when posting the message (always
attaching to the thread first message being the default behavior).
Note that tests highlighted that flattening is currently a bit broken as it
does not go up until the first ancestor, which is the expected behavior for
business documents having ``_mail_flat_thread``. Next commit will fix that.
Task-2822652 (Mail: fix parent message fetch / flattening)
Task-2643114 (Mail: Message-Id in references to ease thread formation)
X-original-commit: f7d4f1d29213c71e76564c485db2bbecf0bbf37c
Part-of: odoo/odoo#89328
Python library currently holds a limitation when we use a formatted email
that is longer than 78 characters (e.g. "Long Company Name With Long Record
Name <email@domain.com>"). Python folds address if is longer than 78 chars
and a bad management of quotes breaks the reply-to. Even if anything should
technically be ok with the RFC python seems to incorrectly handle it (please
refer to [1] for more details and discussions).
Until this is finally sorted out we decided to avoid issues by shortening
reply-to. To avoid that issue when formataddr would return more than 78 chars
we return a simplified name/email to try to stay under 78 chars. If not
possible we return only the email and skip the formataddr which causes the
issue in python. We do not use hacks like crop the name part as encoding and
quoting would be error prone.
Task-2602862
OPW-2733513
[1] See https://bugs.python.org/issue44637closesodoo/odoo#89081
X-original-commit: d2d705708a11de68d8dd9d9edf62e0a33ddb066b
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Steps to repoduce:
- Accounting > Customers > Invoices:
select several invoices to send
- Action > Send & Print > (deselect Print) > Send & Print
Issue:
- It sends only one invoice per company
Cause:
- the mail_compose_message sets the status of an email as `cancel` when a mail has already been sent to a specific adress mail in the batch
Solution:
- If the use of mass mailing is document-based (e.g.: sending multiple invoices) it will allow to send multiple emails to the same adress
opw-2775121
closesodoo/odoo#88992
X-original-commit: f08685020f6a00d4e10e30ccbcf70c9eb1a764d5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Current behavior :
When you delete a record (for example project.task), all the messages related
to this record aren't deleted.
This, in case a user has his notifications managed in Odoo, may prevent him
from accessing the History tab in the Discuss app because these messages are
linked to a record that doesn't exist anymore and it will raise a Missing Record
error
Steps :
*with demo data*
- Install Project
- Make Marc Demo notifications managed in Odoo
- Delete a task project to which Marc Demo is assigned
(*with Marc Demo*)
- Go to Discuss and try to access History tab
OPW-2764855
closesodoo/odoo#87732
X-original-commit: ee8feeb73c920827090b1a5ecf78e8b1d21bbae4
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Claude Thibault (thcl) <thcl@odoo.com>
Skip the confirmation step when wanting to get rid of a notification
for emails, sms or letters that were not sent.
Technical:
- All 3 wizards to confirm the discarding of the notification have been removed
(the ones for mail, sms and letter) have been removed
- The method to discard notification has been centralized in MailThread
(notify_cancel_by_type in addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py)
- This centralization has been done as well on the client code as the same
server code is called whether it is a mail, a sms or a letter
(in addons/mail/static/src/models/notification_group/notification_group.js)
- Existing front and back test have been adapted
- A test of notify_cancel_by_type for mail has been added
(addons/test_mail/tests/test_mail_management.py)
- add missing author_id in mail_notification demo data
Task-2752190
closesodoo/odoo#84452
Related: odoo/upgrade#3246
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
There were inconsistencies in the calls to `_render`.
* the view context could contain information that misled developers.
Indeed, the context and value of the view are not supposed to be found
in the rendering. Thus by calling `ir.qweb` with the name of the
template, we ensure that there is no unwanted information and in
addition the cache key is that of the name of the template which saves
a query.
* the context used for rendering was modified by a method on
`ir.ui.view`, except this is not information used by this model. There
is now a `_prepare_environment` method residing on `ir.qweb`. This
method allows to modify the value dictionary as well as the context in
which the rendering will be done. This preparation of the data as well
as my security check is done only once per rendering. This also saves
some queries
* Freeze options for rendering were inconsistent. It could be that
options on which rendering depends were not part of the cache key. Thus,
depending on the user who generated the generation of the rendering
function, there was or was not information in the template. For example
for automatic branding. This is no longer possible, because it is the
context that is used. The options serving as a cache key are only
recorded for information (for the profiling system for example). A
simplification of the `ir.qweb.field` models could be made.
The report rendering and call `ir.qweb` instead of `ir.ui.view`.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85110
PURPOSE
Cleanup and improve post-related tests. As composer and posting methods will
soon be improved better ensure we don't break flows.
SPECIFICATIONS
Cleanup tests added for message_post and the related API (notify, log, with
view or template, ...) as well as sub-methods (notify, recipients computation
and classification, ...).
Use existing tools, reorder and add some details check on content. Add some
tests with attachments, notably with main_attachment management.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
PURPOSE
Cleanup and improve composer-related tests. As composer will soon be improved
better ensure we don't break flows.
SPECIFCIATIONS
Cleanup existing tests: rename, make it use tools, reoder them.
Add some tests about composer in order to better spot changes and differences
as well as to help debugging mail composer code update. Notably add tests
with Form tool, add tests for reply-to computation, auto-delete, mail server.
Performance tests about composer are added, notably using the Form tool. This
helps determining differences between creating / manipulating a composer in
code and in UI. Indeed notably onchange and some side effects may lead to
different query counters, which is the case as highlighted here. Tests
involving attachments are also added to see their impact on posting process.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
PURPOSE
Purpose of this commit is to add a company field on test mail models used to
replicate ticket / project behavior (``mail.test.ticket`` and ``mail.test.
container``).
SPECIFICATIONS
To avoid messing with existing tests and ease comparison through all Odoo
versions (notably performance) this is done by adding new models inheriting
from current mail models. A company_id field is added as well as MC rules.
Those models will be used to add tests for mail thread behavior in a multi
company environment (aliases management, performance, emails and notification
layouts, ...).
In this commit we also update ACLs for ticket-like models to add rules for
portal users, based on followers. This mimics classic rules from Odoo used
notably in a light project-like environment. This allows to test a bit more
in details recipients, access tokens, links in emails, ...
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
PURPOSE
Add tests related to mail failure management and its effect on mail.mail
and related mail.notification records.
SPECIFICATIONS
Test wrong configurations when sending emails (email_from, email_to) and/or
use mocks to enable sending issues (SMTP issues, Memory errors, assertion
errors, ...) that may happen when sending emails.
Add unit tests for as much use cases as possible to assert current behavior
even if some tests show that it is not always accurate. Notably
* invalid / missing email failure types that are not correctly distinguished
even if it should;
* email_from invalid value goes a bit incognito;
* sometimes mail is marked as sent even if it was not sent;
Future commits will (probably) fix or improve behavior while impacting as
less as possible the global behavior of the outgoing gateway that is quite
tricky to modify.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
PURPOSE
Improve tooling of mail tests. Lessen custom code, try to use same tools
in all tests.
SPECIFICATIONS
Use MailCommon as a base class for performance test. It now uses the same
boilerplate as other tests, leading to easier to reproduce and understand
testing setup.
This notably now adds outgoing mail servers which means adding one query
to some tests involving emails.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
mail_* = mail, test_mail, test_mail_full, test_mass_mailing
PURPOSE
Improve tooling of mail tests. Use SMTP mockup class available in base tests
in mail tests to have a better and simplified mock tool when dealing with
mail tests. Remove old fashioned code.
SPECIFICATIONS
Include ``MockSmtplibCase`` directly into ``MockEmail`` so that we re-use
existing components for mocking outgoing emails. Also make parameters for
gateway coherent between those two classes (use same test values).
Remove 'sim_error' weird parameter of Mail ``mock_mail_gateway`` and use
standard mock 'side_effect' instead in some specific tests, notably on
SMTP.connect() mock.
Add some assert / tools method and improve existing tools, used for creating
or improving test data. This will be used in future commits when adding new
tests.
Add outgoing mail servers data in mail tests, allowing to make tests closer
to real life use cases.
Remove unnecessary calls to ``_init_mail_gateway`` as it is automatically
done in ``MailCommon.setUpClass()``.
Try to consolidate starting test data, notably with countries, phone numbers
or email in mind to be sure test mail are deterministic.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
Without ce342f42f21cad3 the new test fails because copying an
attachment requires write access to mail.template
closesodoo/odoo#85271
X-original-commit: d5ceaa13a36e86e97f14e870ade477f62234b304
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Steps :
- Make sure the Admin is notified by mail;
- Set an Alias Domain for the company.
- Create a Project with an Alias e-mail address.
- Send an e-mail to this alias.
Issues :
In the admin mailbox, see the signature is: `<p>-- <br/>False</p>`, which means two issues.
- It is not unescaped from Html.
- The content of the signature is 'False'.
Cause :
When no user is related to the sender of the mail, we manually set a signature.
- It was written between html tags, so it should be sanitized.
- Its content was author.name, yet author is a partner, so if there is
no partner, name is False.
Fix :
- Sanitize the html code of the signature.
- If there is no partner for this sender, use email_from, or else ''.
opw-2728483
closesodoo/odoo#84329
X-original-commit: a1ac9c8171742c5622e5f310cec2fe4ab53c2717
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Onockx Audric (auon) <auon@odoo.com>
- Open any record with a chatter (i.e. a SO)
- Log a note with a mention to any res.partner
- Edit note and save
The mention is not a link anymore, but just plain text.
During edition the list of mentioned partners is not retrieved correctly,
preventing function that generates links from mentions to work properly.
On client-side, a variable named MentionedPartners is used to generate
mention links when posting a message.
It should contain the id and name (to match the mention text) of each
mentioned partners.
During edition, MentionedPartners is empty, leading to this issue.
As the list of mentioned partners is stored in message model in partner_ids
field, "id" and "name" of partner_ids will be retrieved and added to messages
data when requested by client side.
This will allowed to populate MentionedPartners with all required data.
Note that retrieving "name" from partner_ids will add an extra query,
as seen in the modified test.
opw-2739665
closesodoo/odoo#84152
X-original-commit: 510764730057b20a1706ae20d50549e280f7f9a7
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Activities and mailing trace are linked to documents through a model and
a many2one reference field. The latter one is required but is implemented like
an integer field, meaning writing 0 is actually a valid value for 'required'.
In this commit we add a constraint to ensure we never update activities with
a void res_id value. Same for mailing traces. This allows to remove the
required attribute on fields to avoid having redundant sql constraints.
Source: internal feedback about activities with 0 as res_id
Task-2694133
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81292
Expected Behaviour
When a user get a mail from the data cleaning about records to examine, the View button should be linked to the same url as the 'here' hyperlink or not be in the e-mail.
Observed behaviour
Clicking the link in the View button lead to an error page
Reproducibility
This bug can be reproduced following these steps:
1. Duplicate a contact
2. Wait for the scheduled task to launch
3. Click on the View button of the mail you'll get about te duplicate
Problem Root Cause
This issue is coming from the way we create the 'View' and 'View Task' button, and can't be changed easily. The easier way to fix this issue is then to hide these button
Related Issues/PR
opw-2674138
closesodoo/odoo#83284
X-original-commit: 3a61747b366a315488837e2e560b305e89217dbd
Signed-off-by: Hendrickx Anthony (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Note: fix not necessary since odoo/odoo@https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a62927e7e2d7df4047f8606b41e70ef61ac29b73 landed in master. This
forward port contains only the test.
Step to reproduce:
- Go to a project with visibility set on 'Invited portal users and all internal users'
- Go a task
- Send an follow invitation to Marc Demo (an internal user)
Intended behavior:
The mail has a 'View task button'
Current behavior:
No view task button
This behaviour is due to the function _get_recipient_data which is supposed to return groups when given pids but doesn't.
See _get_recipient_data docstring.
opw-2727410
closesodoo/odoo#83594
X-original-commit: d113cb6398806a1a744085d041b73b827f9f4ada
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit is to add potential groups but de-activate them by
default. Indeed each group require about 20 queries for rendering and
sending. If no specific behavior (access button, content) is made for this
recipient group it can be included in lower-version of the group.
Specifications
* de-activate portal group in mail as it has no additional rights compared
to customers;
* add follower group but de-activate it for the same reason;
* activate portal group in portal_mixin and include links to the record in
notification emails, using standard mail/view link. ACLs are managed in
each specific model, generally based on followers;
Update a test in test_mail as it was playing with public and portal users
that are now not really differentiated when sending notification emails.
Better have more real-life scenarios with portal and internal users.
Task-2739294 (Mail: Batch recipients fetch and improve its usage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Purpose of this commit is to improve notification recipients computation.
Code cleaning
* make it batch enabled. Currently it works only for a single record. It
should evolve towards real multi computation, allowing to prepare post
and notification in batch;
* better manage multi users. Now when several users are linked to the same
partner, we try to find an internal user or fallback on share user. This
is cleaned compared to a distinct done previously;
* support recipients without subtype (pids + records) as a new case to
include follower computation;
Improvements
* include follower status if linked to records (is_follower can be used
notably in link computation to redirect to the portal);
* fetch partner lang directly in the SQL query. While fetching partner data
let us add its lang. That way it will be easier to improve lang support
in layouts;
Task-2739294 (Mail: Batch recipients fetch and improve its usage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Add a constraint directly at db level ensuring no duplicated notification
exist on partner / message pair, if partner is set. Partner can be void notably
with SMS notification process which may target numbers directly.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean Mail.Thread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
In order to make fields a bit more explicit, let us rename "add_sign" to
"email_add_signature". It indicates it is linked to the email notification
process, adding the signature depending on the notification layout itself.
This is done on both mail.message and mail.compose.message models. It is
also updated as rendering value parameter used in notification emails.
Task-2712450 (Mail/Sale: Improve 'Pay Now' notification template)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Purpose of this commit is to add tests for recipients fetch. Purpose is to
assess current behavior before going into some cleaning or refactoring.
Notably when dealing with
* forced recipients (pids, aka 'additional recipients' in composers);
* subtype-based computation (internal, subtype follower);
* multi-users per partner (notably as a result of partner merge);
Future improvements will modify this method. Adding some low level tests
for it will ease development and checking differences.
Some tests are also regrouped in the same test class to lessen noise.
Task-2739294 (Mail: Batch recipients fetch and improve its usage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Sébastien Theys