The alert block content and style for the transaction status after
payment were computed in two different places: In the dedicated
`payment.transaction_status` QWeb template, and in the
/payment/confirmation` route's controller which, for some reason, was
re-inventing the wheel instead of relying on the dedicated template.
This commit combines the slightly different behaviors in the template
and gets rid of the duplicated logic in the controller to:
- Handle the states 'draft' and 'error'.
- Always show the transaction's state message, and not only when the
transaction was in a state for which there exists no pre-defined
message (`draft` and `error`).
task-2924873
closesodoo/odoo#96348
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Issue:
When trying to print a Suisse QR bill, if multiple images are presents
in document and they have a url as src, some pictures will not be
displayed.
(Same issue may occur with simple QR code)
Cause:
It's a known issue with wkhtmltopdf: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/2949138a7d84cd6c925ea1745d62f25ef077bb8b
Also, adding css class to body by js break wkhtmltopdf.
Solution:
Replace link by base64 image value (use a function to retrieve base64
image instead of image_url).
Remove class 'l10n_ch_qr' added by js (no need since CSS file didacted
to this report).
Move `_get_qr_code_base64` and `_get_qr_code_url` logic/flow
(since generic) to account module.
Move specific logic like `_get_qr_vals` and
`_get_qr_code_generation_params` to specific module (ex: l10n_ch).
extra: Alter some css for better rendering + update unitest.
opw-2620082
closesodoo/odoo#77643
X-original-commit: 699b6eeac993e3a8d97ae7949170f7e18ca05831
Signed-off-by: Olivier Colson <oco@odoo.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
The *_msg fields are HTML fields so there's no reason to do anything.
A few of the values are a bit more debatable though:
* Thanks_msg seems pretty much never used?
* The `message` value comes from `state_message`, looking at how
that's set it doesn't seem like there's any reason for it to ever
contain markup?
The system completely changed. I also had to adapt classes to new
screen breakpoints.
hidden/hide -> d-none
show -> d-block
hidden-xs -> d-none d-md-(block/inline/...)
hidden-sm -> d-md-none d-lg-(block/inline/...)
hidden-md -> d-lg-none d-xl-(block/inline/...)
hidden-lg -> d-xl-none
visible-xs-* -> d-* d-md-none
visible-sm-* -> d-none d-md-* d-lg-none
visible-md-* -> d-none d-lg-* d-xl-none
visible-lg-* -> d-none d-xl-*
hidden-print -> d-print-none
visible-print-* -> d-none d-print-*
...
and all possible combination of those had to be handled too.
- Added the support of form payment.
- Fixed payment form's errors not being displayed.
- Fixed a crash when paying on e-commerce with a saved token.
(dev commit, need to clean the code)
- Added the most used payment option (credit cards) in the world and assigned which payment acquirers can use them.
- Added the form templates for each payment acquirer.
PURPOSE
=======
The field auto_confirm is complicated to understand for common users. Furthermore, on of its options is only useful for authorize module.
SPECIFICATION
=============
Remove the auto_confirm field. The destinies of its options are the following:
- none: Simply disappear.
- authorize: Become capture_manually. It has nothing to do with the auto_confirm field has it's related to the autorize module (And could be extended to other payment acquirers too).
- confirm_so: Remove it. Will be automatic, and we will always validate the sales order and generate the accounting entries on acquirer validation.
- generate_and_pay_invoice: Is linked to the journal_id. The field journal_id is always set and we will use it to validate the sales order and generate the accounting entries on acquirer validation.
Bonus: website_sale: Allow to create/validate invoice automatically on `Mark as Paid`
Indeed as transfer transactions are always pending and independant of
any callback, it is not necessary to see credentials, auto confirmation
settings and error / cancel / done messages.
* make CSRF protection the default on all non-SAFE methods
note: there currently is no way to call a CSRF-protected endpoint
without a form-encoded entity-body as that's the only place we get the
CSRF token from.
* simple CSRF token generation: just use the HMAC'd session id, no
generating a new random token per session then HMAC it
* use constant-time equal function to avoid timing attacks
* assert that a database secret is configured before hashing/validating
the CSRF token
* opt-out database manager from CSRF: The super-admin password serves
the purpose of a CSRF token in the database manager screens.
There is no request database to obtain the
secret and generate a CSRF token.
merge *ALL* the dicts
The form rendering used to receive a dict for partner information and a dict for tx information and to transmit another dict to the qweb template; now everything is done in a single dict
payment. Added post_msg, message displayed after payment.
[IMP] payment_transfer: added a default value (generated at create) for
post_msg, that contains bank accounts details. bank accounts linked to the
current company and used in report footer are shown.
[FIX] payment_*: make the buttons noupdate.
[IMP] payment: portal_published -> website_published + propagation
[IMP] payment: added process selection field that will be used for some
control in the website, telling w hether we want to refresh a payment
validation page or not.
bzr revid: tde@openerp.com-20140124134652-cc0nz08znnlmftw4
Antoine Vandevenne (anv)