From a form view (say Bill of materials)
Edit the form
Click on a bom line
Click on the external button that makes the product form pop up
change the order of suppliers on that product
Before this commit, a JS traceback was raised
This was because the changing object was not present in the localData that the Model object holds
or more accurately, it was not the **right** model object that was targetted
and this was due to the propagation of the resequence event
After this commit, no error is thrown, and the resequencing works as expected
OPW 807196
A `default_get` for a x2many field can return a new list of commands for one of
its x2many field, like
[[0, 0, {
'groups_id': [[6, 0, [1, 2, 3]]],
}]]
where [1, 2, 3] is a list of existing ids.
This use case was not correctly handled by the BasicModel because
`_makeDefaultRecord` was not recursive.
Closes#22401
When creating a record with many default values, it could happen that
the number of ids returned by the default get (or onchange) exceeds the
limit for the form view.
For example, we can see the issue in the expenses list view. We can
increase the limit in the pager, to a value higher than 40. Then,
clicking on select all, then on 'Submit to manager' in the action menu
will result in a traceback.
The Submit to manager action will trigger a new action with a context key
'active_ids' with a large number of ids. After that, the web client
will execute the server actions, which will return a new action with a
context key 'default_expense_line_ids' with a bunch of ids. Then, it
will attempt to create a form view. This will call the
makeDefaultRecord method in the basic model. This method will generate
the commands for the one2many, for all ids, but will only load the 40
first sub records. After, it will attempt to apply the onchanges, with
some code that assumes that all operations of type 'ADD' correspond to a
local datapoint.
In this commit, we fix the code to properly work with operations of type
ADD with a res_id, but with no id. In that case, we simply generate a
command 'LINK_TO', since the value has not been changed.
opw 804370
When fetching x2manys in a x2many, the basic model did not properly sort
the internal data structure before fetching the data. This is usually
not an issue, except when we have an order which is different from the
order of the res_ids. In that case, it can cause crash in some
conditions, because the results from the fetchx2manybatched were applied
to the wrong datapoint.
To reproduce this issue, some specific conditions needs to be met. I
think that it is easier to refer to the test, instead of trying to
explain that.
In this commit, we properly sort the data at the correct place. Note
that this probably solves a bunch of other related issues, caused by the
fact that the internal structure was corrupted.
Cleaning dead code from these commits that have been reverted:
41fe7f9d1113d026b226b136b4477aaaf9f1f638#diff-54fd886cc58f994ad518ee72df4d3edeR50
2a5488619da22cfd901963dd141e722b195e82ab#diff-f96b339a9374f74489f1f98755e9787bL9253
41fe7f9d1113d026b226b136b4477aaaf9f1f638#diff-86d6d41b5bb7499bf055258d05549d59R3111
With these final changes, we hope to stop the many issues that have occured with
binary fields, from these commits:
255e8ca3d97813a8e71441fe7f9d112a5488619d
What remains is the format of binary fields in list views without widgets,
which shows the bin_size instead of the base64 string representation...
... Rest assured, the computation is in JS, so there are no 'bin_size'
shenaningans!
Revision on 41fe7f9d11
This commit intended to reduce the network load when reading records with
binary fields. This was made possible by enforcing the contextual key
`bin_size` to be set for records with binary fields.
However, it is causing some issues (see #22222, #22231) which are:
- write with bin_size:true generates a traceback
- read/search_read with bin_size:true breaks some images
on some views (e.g. base.view_partner_form)
Since the problems outweight the gain of these changes, we revert them.
Field widgets now have a key 'context' that let them
extend the context of the dataPoint (e.g. list).
In particular, widgets on binary fields enforce the contextual
item {bin_size: True}, so that the server gives the size of the
binary field as its value, instead of its content.
This change on binary fields reduces network load when accessing
a view with binary fields.
When we have a form view with a one2many with an onchange, and with
lines which contains a x2many, and more lines that the limit (so more
than one page), and the read is not in the same order as what is
displayed because we have a widget=handle, then we might have a problem
when we delete one of the lines, if the onchanges tries to change the
x2many.
This is due to the fact that the order of the basicmodel datapoint is
not preserved by the various operations going around. I think that we
may still have a few other issues of this type, but it is actually quite
difficult to establish.
In any case, this situation is now properly handled.
opw 804530
Issue: create 60 lines in ordered x2many with the same value (0) for the order
field and make a change ; the displayed records will be switched.
The problem appears because the sorting function is not stable and the
records with the same values can change place (hence change page), which is
quite disturbing for the user.
Two attempts of dealing with sorting (and resequencing) in tabbed (multi-pages)
x2many editable lists (see odoo/odoo@c2563db and odoo/odoo@983c7ae) have been
previously done, using a static attribute (`keepChangesUnsorted`) on the
datapoint.
This solution sadly only covers both cases separately, not if they are combined.
Morever, onchanges were not correctly managed in neither of these two cases.
A new approach is used here, by "freezing" and "unfreezing" the datapoint when
needed, which is more flexible.
Some modifications have been introduced:
- when ordering a x2many, all records are now considered (and not only the
records on the current page) ; an additional read is thus done on the sorted
field for all records in the x2many relation
- `setSort` is now asynchronous as a `read` might be needed
In many cases, we allow class and style attributes in the arch of a
view. However, it did not work in a list view, and there is not really
a good reason for that (only cost is a few runtime checks).
So, with this commit, we allow those attributes in list views (and
x2manys obviously).
However, note that there is a subtle (maybe slightly confusing)
behavior: when a list renderer is in 'readonly' mode, it does not
actually instantiate any field widgets. In that case, it optimizes the
rendering by putting only the formatted value inside a cell:
<td>some value</td>
So, in that case, the only valid target for the attributes is the td:
<td class="hello">some value</td>
But when we are in edit mode, we actually have a field widget inside a
td:
<td><input>some value</input></td>
And in that case, the natural home for the attributes is the field
widget. This is quite important, because this is the way attributes are
done in the form view, and we do not want different behaviour.
<td><input class="hello">some value</input></td>
In many2many lists, the remove record from the widget is a trash bin.
It is confusing, as people feel they are deleting it when they are
only unlinking it.
So in many2many, we propose to change the trash icon by a 'X'.
This icon appears in many2many relations and in many2many widgets:
even though hr.expense.sheet defines the expense lines as a one2many,
it uses a many2many widget, so we use a 'X' instead of the trash bin.
To avoid ambiguity, we decided to rename 'delete' to 'remove'.
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
If a row is being edited, this row will be refocused when performing changes
(i.e. resequencing records). It can cause an issue if an onchange modifies the
record being focused.
To avoid this issue, the row is unselected before resequencing records. The row
isn't selected anymore but this behaviour wasn't expected anyway.
Resequencing records with the same sequence wasn't correctly working in the
editable list because we only care about the range between the swapped ids. In
some cases, this isn't good enough.
For example, if we have the records 1,2,3 with sequence field = 10,10,10, then,
swapping records 1 and 2 should lead to resequencing 3 with the sequence values
11,10,12 (to guarantee that the third item is after the previous 2).
Resequence now checks if the list increases or decreases without interruption
to create the subset that must be changed ; otherwise the whole list is changed.
Before this commit, the way mode was handled was not optimal. The end
result was correct (the widget were properly created/displayed in
edit/readonly as required), but useless work was done. In particular,
if we have list/x2manys with widgets and modifiers, it could happen that
widgets were created in edit mode, then destroyed and recreated in
readonly mode.
This could happen in some important views, for example, any view with a
field many2many_tags with a readonly modifiers (pretty much all views
handling taxes)
In this commit, we add a 'editable' attribute to list renderer. This is
necessary, because the list renderer is not actually editable when it is
in a x2many in a form view which is in readonly mode. Also, we need to
manage the distinction between the fact that a list view is editable,
and the fact that some widgets are created in edit and other in readonly
mode, depending on modifiers, and on which line is being edited.
We also add a benchmark (courtesy of CHM) to be able to measure the
performance impact of edit/readonly/onchange in a larger form view.
Before this commit, running this form benchmark on my machine gave a
number of 0.4 op/sec, and after, it increases to 1.26 op/sec, so a
pretty large improvement.
This rev. introduces two helper functions for the tests: patch
and unpatch. Those function allow patching an Odoo Widget (e.g.
AbstractField), and unpatch it at the end of the test with the
guarantee that the Widget's prototype is exactly the same as it
was before the test.
This was necessary because the way it was done before was a little
bit too naive, and could lead to unexpected behavior. Indeed, doing
var someFunction = AbstractField.prototype.someFunction;
// test content
AbstractField.prototype.someFunction = someFunction;
is correct if someFunction is actually define (or overriden) in
AbstractField, as in that case, it really exists on its prototype.
Otherwise, it isn't correct if it is not directly defined on the
prototype before the test, as it will be after..
This rev. introduces two helper functions for the tests: patch
and unpatch. Those function allow patching an Odoo Widget (e.g.
AbstractField), and unpatch it at the end of the test with the
guarantee that the Widget's prototype is exactly the same as it
was before the test.
This was necessary because the way it was done before was a little
bit too naive, and could lead to unexpected behavior. Indeed, doing
var someFunction = AbstractField.prototype.someFunction;
// test content
AbstractField.prototype.someFunction = someFunction;
is correct if someFunction is actually define (or overriden) in
AbstractField, as in that case, it really exists on its prototype.
Otherwise, it isn't correct if it is not directly defined on the
prototype before the test, as it will be after..
The 'main_flow_tour' noticed an error that we
had already corrected for the input fields.
See here: @a71f2237
In fact the same error can occur in the many2one fields
for the exact same reason.
It's why the 'main_flow_tour' crashed at the following step:
".ui-menu-item > a:contains('the_flow.customer')"
Before this commit M2Mtags widget did not translate.
This was because no context was given to the rpc that fetched the fields
Hence, the lang was not passed.
After this commit, M2Mtags translate well
OPW 784396
When fetching batched namegets (typically after a default_get), we need
to evaluate the context that we send to the server. This may be
important for models with a custom name_get method. (note: overriding
namegets should be avoided if possible)
With the new views refactoring, this was not done properly and the
'view' context was sent instead. This is not really critical, the proof
is that it took a few months before getting some complaints, but this is
definitely a bug.
To reproduce, simply add a context attribute to a m2o field in a form
view, with a non empty value in a default get, and look at the context
sent to the server.
Consider the following situation: a form view with a one2many which
contains sub x2many fields (for example a m2m_tags). Suppose that the
one2many has more than 40 records. Before this commit, trying to delete
one of these records caused a crash.
The reason is that when we delete a record, we need to reload the
missing records in the one2many field. We actually do that with a
_readUngroupedList. However, the _readUngroupedList method did not
process x2many fields, so the information stored in the datapoints was
'raw', and the rest of the web client expected it to be a datapoint.
To reproduce the issue in the testing environment, i had to use
onchanges and a readonly attrs, to reach a situation where a crash could
occur. This shows that, while the issue is critical, it was not totally
trivial to be impacted by it.
Before this commit, the 'limit' attribtue worked properly for list views
(but was not documented), and was ignored for inline tree views. There
was no good reason for that limitation, so we fix this issue.
New feature:
- New Transparent tag visual (grey border & text, white bg),
- By default, newly created kanban tags are transparent,
- Tag's colorpicker has now a 'Hide in Kanban' checkbox,
to select the transparent color.
Toggling off 'Hide in Kanban' sets the color of the tag as follow:
- Previous color, if 'Hide in Kanban' was toggled on on the
same formview session.
- Color 1 (dark orange), otherwise.
Christophe Simonis