Have a task (A) with two subtasks (B and C)
Archive C
Before this commit, when using timesheets, the task A hours was misconputed and did not take C's timesheet into account
After this commit, hours are accounted for even if their task is archived
OPW 1829658
closes#23920
As of v11, project tasks and project issues have been merged.
Issues used to be ordered by:
priority desc, create_date desc
whereas Tasks had the following historical ordering:
priority desc, sequence, date_start, name, id
(where `date_start` corresponds to the creation date of the task, or the
time where task work began)
After the merge, the Task order was kept, but it became difficult to
understand for users, especially for converted issues.
This commit modifies the default order to a more obvious common order:
priority desc, sequence, id desc
With the following goals in mind:
- the ordering does not change without obvious actions of the user
(starring a record moves it at the top, manually reordering records
reorders them within the same "stars category), and creating new
records adds them at the top, where they are visible
- the ordering is easy to grasp, based on stars and chronological
order, while still allowing manual reordering when really necessary
(by default all records will have the default sequence of 10)
- sorting by "id desc" is similar to the previous "create_date desc"
but it can be sorted more efficiently by the database
One could argue about sorting on chronological or reverse chronological
order. Like blogs and timelines, everyone has their preferences.
The latter option was selected because our UI for quickly adding records
is at the top of the kanban view, so it is more natural to see new
records at the top, instead of having them disappear at the bottom
immediately.
Hopefully this will not disrupt user workflows too much, and will remain
intuitive enough.
This commit adds 3 indexes targeting project_task which are not only
useful in regular RW use cases, but help tremendously when deleting
tasks.
In a production scenario, deleting a single task record went from 685ms
to 5ms.
Equivalent queries for an existing database:
CREATE INDEX account_analytic_line_task_id_index ON account_analytic_line(task_id);
CREATE INDEX project_task_parent_id_index ON project_task(parent_id);
CREATE INDEX sale_order_line_task_id_index ON sale_order_line(task_id);
Customer portal has a widget to display a chatter-like communication
history. However only user comments are displayed. It seems interesting
for documents like tasks that also include tickets and support to
display incoming emails. Indeed most customers will use their email
to discuss with the responsible.
Done after feedback from internal migration.
- Create a project and a task
- Add a channel as follow of the project and task
- Set the channel to follow task stage change only
When changing the stage, the tracking is sometimes received in the
channel, sometimes it is not.
In the case of a stage change, the subtype returned for tracking depends
on the stage sequence. If the sequence is `<= 1`, the subtype for task
creation is returned. Therefore, if the channel is not following task
creation, the tracking message might or might not appear, depending on
the which stage is impacted.
We can remove this specific case, since the creation will be handled
when `user_id` is in the `init_values` or when `mail_create_nolog` is in
the context.
opw-802924
closes#22926
- Connect as a user with only 'User' rights on projects
- Set a project as favorite (click the star)
The project is not set as favorite.
Since only project managers are allowed to write on projects, the field
`is_favorite` is set as read-only. Therefore, it is filtered out by
`_generateChanges`, and nothing happens.
First step is to set the attribute `force_save` in the view, so the RPC
`write` call is forced. Second step is to compute directly the inverse
thus bypassing access rights.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lempereur <nle@odoo.com>
opw-814604
opw-801587
closes#22938
When adding a partner (without any backend or portal access) as a
follower of an invoice, project, task or SO, the mail received contains
a 'View ...' button. When clicked, it redirects to the login page.
In the case of projects and tasks, no `auth_token` exist, so the user
faces an access error in the backend. For the other objects, it
redirects normally to a frontend page.
This feature is not yet complete in v11. So simply hide the button until
this is properly developed in master.
opw-785824
Archive the associated analytic account when a project is archived. Once
a porject is archived, it is assumed that we don't want to use the
analytic account anymore.
Moreover, it might be tempting for a user to delete these "useless"
analytic accounts, and therefore it would delete the archived projects
and tasks without notification.
Closes#21224
opw-784685
When we create an analytic account, a project is automatically
generate, and it should not. This is a bug coming from
the removal of 'use_tasks' field. See eb4ad33513.
We can now remove all the 'project_create' and
'project_creation_in_progress' context key.
Purpose
=======
This isn't useful now that project issues and tasks have been merged.
Specification
=============
Keep the label field, remove the checkbox
This commit adds a 'Create and Edit' button in the footer of the
dialog opened when creating a record from the Kanban of several
models. Clicking on this button creates the record and directly
opens it in a more detailled form view in edit mode.
Purpose
=======
Projects and soon sales teams have a manual "favorite" button that calls a toggle_favorite method
It should actually be a widget on a boolean field
Specifications
==============
Develop a favorite widget for kanban view that allows to toggle a boolean field
Probably update boolean field to allow inverse method on it
Functionally nothing changed.
It doesn't make sense.
- The end date is set on a task when it's moved into a folded stage.
- The start date is the last date on which the task as been assigned to a user.
It's possible that an unassigned task is moved into a folded stage, and it shouldn't raise a ValidationError
This field was needed because a rating could be sent to a customer for a task or an issue.
This was buggy, because if a template was set on a shared stage between tasks and issues, the rendering could crash, generate an email with wrong piece of information, and so on.
By removing this field, we can also remove some ugly code that was needed to make that distinction.
Lucas Perais (lpe)