This commit simply applies the following renames in the slide.slide model:
- 'datas' is renamed into 'binary_content'
- 'slide_type' is renamed into 'slide_category'
This changes intend to ease the next bug refactoring of the website_slide
module content management.
There should be no functional changes applied in this commit.
Task-2510174
Part-of: odoo/odoo#71477
Purpose
=======
This commit is enhancing the website_slides module.
Specifications
==============
It changes placeholders for certain fields, it changes helpers in some
of the views.
It updates some of the main views of the menus and corrects wordings
inside of them.
It activates the Graph and Pivot views for the reporting of
Courses, Reviews and Quizzes.
It cleans up some of the measures inside of the Pivot and Graph views
of each menus where it is available.
It also merges 2 models: slide.slide.link and slide.slide.resource into
slide.slide.resource with a type Selection field.
This is done in order to create a single table for the additional
resources of a Content.
It also improves the front-end of the module with minor changes.
It fixes the problem of long names inside of breadcrumbs.
It also adds a message when there is no leaderboard in /profile/users.
task-2597345
See odoo/enterprise#20480
See odoo/upgrade#2784
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75646
The goal of the draft state on survey is to have the survey under edition
mode before before sending it to participants. Under this mode:
- the responsible can test it (can be done with "In Progress" mode)
- the survey can't be answered (same as the state closed)
The risk that the survey can be leaked before being ready is really
limited. If it's a live survey, participants will have to guess the
4 digits access code and wait for the host to go to the next question.
Else, participant will have to guess the token.
Considering these facts, the use of the draft state is very limited so
'draft' state can be dropped. If we do so, we are left with only two
stages that are 'open' and 'closed'. But whether to consider survey
open or closed can be simply achieved with active field we already
have (if active=False, survey is closed, otherwise it's considered
as open).
So with this commit, we remove the state field from survey and thus
simplify the flow. It means that we no longer require 'Start Survey'
button, and so that button is also removed, and for the closed surveys,
instead of the button 'Set to draft', now we have a 'Reopen' button
which will activate the survey. And instead of displaying few buttons
after saving a record, we now display all the buttons from beginning.
Task ID-2389434
COM PR odoo/odoo#62712
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15217
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2006
Notably
* have tools and helpers in a SurveyCase and let SurveyCommon bet the
one with data;
* remove unnecessary with_user, replaced by standard one;
* move all tools in SurveyCase to help reusing them;
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced:
``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate
that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is
* ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
on a given row;
* ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
questions;
It adds two benefits
* it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
* it better indicates the use;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZ_SCORE ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, quiz_score field to scoring_percentage
``quiz_score`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZZ_PASSED ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success
``quizz_passed`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME TOKEN ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token
Survey user input model holds two token field. One is used to distinguish
a pool of attempts linked to a given invite: ``invite_token``. The other
one is used to control access to a specific user input. It means that
``invite_token`` indicates a set of user inputs and each of them is accessed
through its own ``token``. To be coherent with other naming in odoo this
latter field is renamed to ``access_token``.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME THANKS_YOU_MESSAGE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done
In this commit we rename thanks_you_message field. Indeed for certifications
or recruitment form, "thank you" is not really the unique content you
would get in a post-survey message. We therefore rename it to description_done
to better indicate its use.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME CERTIFICATE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification
All certification related fields on survey model begin with certification_ .
Only the boolean one telling if a survey is a certification or not is called
certificate. In order to ease grep and ordering it is renamed to certification.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME PASSING_SCORE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
on survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min
``passing_score`` field name is not really the best name we could find.
Renaming the field using a ``scoring_`` prefix allow to know this field
is linked to the scoring mechanism.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.
After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.
As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model
* ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
used to display suggested values to the user;
* ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
columns which seems easier to understand;
In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model
* ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
The `website_published` field from the website's mixins is basically a readonly
from `is_published` field.
On read, this field will simply read `is_published` and check if the record's
website_id is accessible (only for the multi mixin).
On write, it will always write on `is_published`.
This commit improves a few things:
- A lot of code was writting on website_published which was just then writting
on is_published. Writting directly on is_published makes more sense.
- Some backend fields would still reference `website_published` instead of
`is_published` which would just go through the related for no reason.
Plus, using `is_published` will make the field tooltip more accurate as we
are not in a website context ('Visible on current website' to 'Is Published')
- Filter and search on tree view were still using the `website_published`
related field, which is just a readonly when we are not in a frontend
context.
- Some create and write function would have security check on
`website_published` value but that was wrong as the user could bypass that by
simply writting on `is_published`. For the write method, check `is_published`
is more accurate as it will cover both case since `website_published` will
then call the write method on `is_published`
Stages modification through the clickable statusbar wasn't very intuitive.
By fixing default behavior through states (and corresponding buttons), default user experience is simplified.
3 static states available : draft, open, closed
Form view: navigation through states with buttons
Kanban view: disabled modification of survey state
Task ID : 1949110
closesodoo/odoo#32325
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Task #1945036
Purpose
=======
If the user fails his last attempt at a course certification, we remove him from
the members of the course (and he has to enroll again).
He receives an email in the process notifying him of his failure and suggesting
he enrolls to the course again.
The purpose is to have a 'certification flow' where the user can re-purchase the
certification when they have failed it.
This could lead to some issues if the course containing the certification also has
other slides with content because the user will not have access to them after failing.
This also prevents configuring courses with multiple certifications since the membership
will be removed at the first failure.
These use cases are considered "non standard" by the business and are thus not handled
in the code. We assume that users will configure their courses "correctly".
Aurélien Warnon