This commit simply applies the following renames in the slide.slide model:
- 'datas' is renamed into 'binary_content'
- 'slide_type' is renamed into 'slide_category'
This changes intend to ease the next bug refactoring of the website_slide
module content management.
There should be no functional changes applied in this commit.
Task-2510174
Part-of: odoo/odoo#71477
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
This commit enable users to set a 'Responsible' for the survey by
adding 'user_id' field. Demo data for the same is also updated.
Task ID-2389434
COM PR odoo/odoo#62712
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15217
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2006
The goal of the draft state on survey is to have the survey under edition
mode before before sending it to participants. Under this mode:
- the responsible can test it (can be done with "In Progress" mode)
- the survey can't be answered (same as the state closed)
The risk that the survey can be leaked before being ready is really
limited. If it's a live survey, participants will have to guess the
4 digits access code and wait for the host to go to the next question.
Else, participant will have to guess the token.
Considering these facts, the use of the draft state is very limited so
'draft' state can be dropped. If we do so, we are left with only two
stages that are 'open' and 'closed'. But whether to consider survey
open or closed can be simply achieved with active field we already
have (if active=False, survey is closed, otherwise it's considered
as open).
So with this commit, we remove the state field from survey and thus
simplify the flow. It means that we no longer require 'Start Survey'
button, and so that button is also removed, and for the closed surveys,
instead of the button 'Set to draft', now we have a 'Reopen' button
which will activate the survey. And instead of displaying few buttons
after saving a record, we now display all the buttons from beginning.
Task ID-2389434
COM PR odoo/odoo#62712
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15217
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2006
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
This commit prepares the complete redesign of survey.
Simple choice question type will only use the radio button display mode.
So the dropdown display mode is deleted.
Task ID: 2152223
PR #41453
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :
Type----Old type-----New type
text----free_text----text_box
char----textbox------char_box
Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts
QuestType--------Old type-----New type
text_box---------free_text----text_box
char_box---------text---------char_box
numerical_box----number-------numerical_box
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming
AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field
text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box
Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
``question_ids`` field name is quite difficult to understand as we wonder why
there is such a field on user input model. As its purpose is to store questions
user has to answer (randomly chosen or all chosen) let us rename it to
``predefined_question_ids``.
Moreover starting from now on if it is now given at create it is automatically
computed. Classic flows go through ``survey._create_answer()`` method that
prepares them accordingly. However tests or demo data do not necessarily go
through that method and it makes scoring fail (notably) if people forget
to define them.
Let us automatically generate them at user input create if not given.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced:
``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate
that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is
* ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
on a given row;
* ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
questions;
It adds two benefits
* it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
* it better indicates the use;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZ_SCORE ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, quiz_score field to scoring_percentage
``quiz_score`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZZ_PASSED ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success
``quizz_passed`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME TOKEN ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token
Survey user input model holds two token field. One is used to distinguish
a pool of attempts linked to a given invite: ``invite_token``. The other
one is used to control access to a specific user input. It means that
``invite_token`` indicates a set of user inputs and each of them is accessed
through its own ``token``. To be coherent with other naming in odoo this
latter field is renamed to ``access_token``.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME THANKS_YOU_MESSAGE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done
In this commit we rename thanks_you_message field. Indeed for certifications
or recruitment form, "thank you" is not really the unique content you
would get in a post-survey message. We therefore rename it to description_done
to better indicate its use.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME CERTIFICATE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification
All certification related fields on survey model begin with certification_ .
Only the boolean one telling if a survey is a certification or not is called
certificate. In order to ease grep and ordering it is renamed to certification.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME PASSING_SCORE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
on survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min
``passing_score`` field name is not really the best name we could find.
Renaming the field using a ``scoring_`` prefix allow to know this field
is linked to the scoring mechanism.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to
answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from
``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with
general odoo naming guidelines.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.
After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.
As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model
* ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
used to display suggested values to the user;
* ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
columns which seems easier to understand;
In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model
* ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: QUESTION FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title.
Question model holds two fields for its title: ``title`` and ``question``.
Question is simply a related on title, making the two fields completely
redundant. It is mainly due to historical reasons, when updating models for
certifications and eLearning. In this commit we keep only title field and
remove the question related field as it adds unnecessary complexity to the
model.
SPECIFICATIONS: INPUT_TYPE FIELD ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect.
``input_type`` field exists on user input model to tell whether answer has
been created through invite or through manual click on a survey page. It
has been added a long time ago when surveys were either open to everyone,
either closed and on invite only.
Since eLearning and certification surveys access mode on surveys has evolved.
Notably being able to distinguish invite from manual survey user input is not
necessary anymore. Indeed what is important is the way people can reach the
survey, not how they created their user input.
Invitation creates token and this can be used if people effectively want to
find invitation-related user inputs.
Since 09ea5c7d49 manual entries still in draft are garbage collected.
Reason is still unclear as it is not obvious that tons of unnecessary entries
will be created. As this seems like unnecessary optimization this commit
removes that feature along with the input_type field.
SPECIFICATIONS: REPLACE URLS FIELDS BY METHODS ON SURVEY.{SURVEY, USER_INPUT}
On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods
In this commit we remove some remaining of URL fields that are better found
using methods. Both survey and user input holds a "start" url field that is
replaced by a method call ``get_start_url`` on both survey (generic) and
user input (token specific) models. We also introduced a ``get_print_url``
method doing the same for the printable version of survey / user input.
SPECIFICATIONS: REMOVE CATEGORY FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove unused category field.
Survey model holds a ``category`` field whose purpose is to be able to somehow
categorize surveys according to their use. However using this field is not
easy as it is hidden and is a simple selection field. Module should add their
own key. Its sole use is in ``hr_recruitment_survey`` which is a niche module.
Let us clean models and lessen model complexity.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
Purpose of this commit is to help users knowing there is new content in a
course by adding a visual insight. It is done through a new content arrow
displayed in courses homepage.
Regarding the file "website_slides_templates_homepage.xml", the choice to
incorporate the t-call attribute into a 't' balise was necessary to display
the customize option (part front) associated with the model course_card.
Side dish usability improvements raised during development
* display completed courses as last instead of first in "my courses";
* do not show promote strategy field for training courses as it has no
use, only for documentation courses;
TASK ID 2025186
Closes PR #36703
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Test frontend and UI tools of eLearning.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add some demo data to allow demonstrating various flows: training, lessons,
public, private, quizzes, ...
Also prepare future test tours by improving courses that will be used for
tours, notably the public one.
LINKS
Task ID 1937768
PURPOSE
Like already done for sale order, invoice of survey, purpose of this commit
is to remove category model and replace by a flagged line (slide). It allows
to easily reorder slides in an embedded list view.
SPECIFICATIONS
Instead of having a fully fledged slide.category model, slide.slide will serve
that purpose with a is_category flag. This will allow to drag and drop slides
and sections in the channel form view.
This change had an impact on the way slides were added/sorted on the front-end.
In fact, whenever a slide is added from the front-end, a resequencing of all
the slides in the course has to be triggered.
Category of a slide is now a computed field based on the sequence. Order
of slides is based on sequence, with categories splitting the slide list based
on is_category flag.
In this commit tests are added. Some cleaning in tests is also performed to
speedup a bit tests (savepointcase) and some cleaning / renaming to ease
their understanding.
Future commit will add JS necessary to manage slides in the section list view.
LINKS
TaskID: 1978731
PR: #33255
The `website_published` field from the website's mixins is basically a readonly
from `is_published` field.
On read, this field will simply read `is_published` and check if the record's
website_id is accessible (only for the multi mixin).
On write, it will always write on `is_published`.
This commit improves a few things:
- A lot of code was writting on website_published which was just then writting
on is_published. Writting directly on is_published makes more sense.
- Some backend fields would still reference `website_published` instead of
`is_published` which would just go through the related for no reason.
Plus, using `is_published` will make the field tooltip more accurate as we
are not in a website context ('Visible on current website' to 'Is Published')
- Filter and search on tree view were still using the `website_published`
related field, which is just a readonly when we are not in a frontend
context.
- Some create and write function would have security check on
`website_published` value but that was wrong as the user could bypass that by
simply writting on `is_published`. For the write method, check `is_published`
is more accurate as it will cover both case since `website_published` will
then call the write method on `is_published`
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Stages modification through the clickable statusbar wasn't very intuitive.
By fixing default behavior through states (and corresponding buttons), default user experience is simplified.
3 static states available : draft, open, closed
Form view: navigation through states with buttons
Kanban view: disabled modification of survey state
Task ID : 1949110
closesodoo/odoo#32325
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose: use more email_formatted when possible, clean and simplify
email_from, email_to and partner_to computation.
Next step is to try to extract some common patterns in tools or methods in
order to simplify template creation and customization.
Related to task 1972615
Linked to PR #32872
Task #1945036
Purpose
=======
If the user fails his last attempt at a course certification, we remove him from
the members of the course (and he has to enroll again).
He receives an email in the process notifying him of his failure and suggesting
he enrolls to the course again.
The purpose is to have a 'certification flow' where the user can re-purchase the
certification when they have failed it.
This could lead to some issues if the course containing the certification also has
other slides with content because the user will not have access to them after failing.
This also prevents configuring courses with multiple certifications since the membership
will be removed at the first failure.
These use cases are considered "non standard" by the business and are thus not handled
in the code. We assume that users will configure their courses "correctly".
Display
* improve color of trophy displayed on top of course main page (success if
course done, warning while working on it);
* correctly fetch and display karma/xp points on course lesson list. It is
either gain of next try, either awarded points depending on slide
completion;
* fix control buttons in course main page (prev, next, set done,
set completed, fullscren), notably correctly set them disabled;
Linting / Code
* put demo in no update;
* rename some parameter in website_slides_survey to avoid conflict between
quiz (on a slide) and certification (a survey);
Commit linked to task ID 1941250 and PR #31697.
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit is to improve eLearning demo data. Notably links
(links to external resources on a given slide) and quizzes (allowing to
gain karma) are added. Some slides are added. Demo user interaction with
eLearning is also added, such as membership and votes. Finally a channel
is specifically kept specific to 1 single slide of type certification as
its flow has to bypass some screens when selling pure certifications.
Commit linked to task ID 1941250 and PR #31453
This commit puts the certification slide from the demo data into a category
so that it's correctly displayed on the channel frontend view.
Commit linked to task ID 1941250 and PR #31279.
Task #1940360
Subtask of #1902304
Purpose
=======
Adds certification capabilities to the website_slides module.
Channel/courses can now include certifications as a new type of slide.
This new type of slide is available as a "Certification" button on the slide creation
frontend view (next to "Video", "Presentation", ...).
Users have to link the slide to an actual survey that has the 'certificate' field
set to true (that will populate the slide's survey_id field).
Slides of type certification are handled in frontend in a very simple way for now:
- A button "Begin certification" that redirects the user to the related survey frontend.
- A button "Download certification" when the user has succeeded the certification.
- When the survey is done, if it's linked to a slide, a button "Go back to course" allows
the user to go back to the slide frontend.
(There is a special use case for when the website_publisher designing the survey lands on a
certification slide: he is allowed to test the survey with a survey_input created as test_entry)
Survey creation as well as limited time, limited number of attempts, ... are still completely
handled in the survey module. That means that the user will have to first create a suitable survey
that is a certification and only then create a slide of type "certification" and link
the created survey to it.
Ideally, the taking of the survey should be transparently included in the slide frontend but
it requires a full refactoring of the way surveys are submitted. This will most likely come in
a later commit.
This commit is an advanced merge of full eLearning module (see task #1902304).
Aurélien Warnon