In some screen it is very hard to edit the factor.
closesodoo/odoo#72309
X-original-commit: 2e2e588ec5bc1563312415eda75947d10902f060
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, to activate/deactivate records with the 'active' checkbox
user has to switch to edit mode of the form.
So the purpose of the task is to allow the user to activate/deactivate
records from the readonly mode of the form view.
In this commit, we set widget='boolean_toggle' on the 'active' field in form
view.
closesodoo/odoo#46567
Taskid: 2206794
Related: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/8918
Related: odoo/enterprise#8918
Closes: #46567
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This removes the measure_type field which has become unused and
causes issues when users try to add new uom categories.
Task-2043927
closesodoo/odoo#41056
Related: odoo/enterprise#6945
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Some formviews are useless since there are so few relevant fields https://nimb.ws/1EdMV7
For instance, to create a new lost reason the user is forced to:
1. Hit create
2. Type in the name of the record
3. Hit save
4. Go back to the treeview
While he could simply type them away in an editable treeview.
The goal of this task is to allow for creation/edition of records in such models
directly from the treeview.
Specification
=============
Modify tree views from a given list of models for which the
treeview has to be made editable bottom.
If not specified otherwise, the content treeview should stay the same.
If a field is readonly/required/etc. in the formview, it should be in the
editable treeview as well.
Relabeling has to be done of the field itself, not in the view.
TaskID: 2026126
closesodoo/odoo#34577
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
The ratio field in the UoM form view has 2 different labels depending
on the type (bigger or smaller). This commit put the same label 'ratio'
for two cases.
Task :1859328
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field
In order to restrict some uom field to some uom category, it is required to
add a measurement type on uom.category. Also, this will lessen the use of
master data.
Some technical justifications:
- measure_type is not required, to allow people creating their own
uom.category. Those ones will not interfere with addons business.
- measure_type is unique: we restrict to only one category containing
time, weight, ... in order to avoid mismatch category during conversion.
(2 different weight categories can not be converted).
- measure_type on uom.uom is stored: to allow search and domain on
field, we need to store it. Usually, UoM are not updated every day,
and the number of uom in a database is not that important.
To illustrate this mecanism, a domain is added on
'project_time_mode_id', in project module. This field
is use as timesheet default uom, and we obviously want to
restrict it to time category (timesheeting in liter does
not make sense ...)
Task #1820076
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
Florent de Labarre