Purpose of this commit is to highlight an issue that may happens easily with
`crm` that is made generic here within `test_mail`.
`crm` alters the context when creating a new record adding in this case
`default_type` to it][1]. The returned record contains that altered context.
his results in other records created from it trying to assign that same default
value for `type`. This is a very common name for fields, and happens to exist
in `ir.attachment` too.
If you create an alias for incoming leads in your DB with default values
`{"type": "lead"}` (something very common) and then an email comes to that
alias that contains an inlined base64 image, the attachment creation process
would simply fail.
Obtained error is ``ValueError: Wrong value for ir.attachment.type: 'lead'`` .
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/272602193f5647f7f2270ed6ec68777625a139dd/addons/crm/models/crm_lead.py#L310-L311
X-original-commit: 99434b2e8528c10fcc9cb6860765e0ddcaa364c8
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
When body does not contain any tag or content parsing currently fails
with an ``lxml.etree.ParserError``. To avoid that we can improve condition
about void body: stripping void characters allows to avoid that traceback.
Task-2641572
PR odoo#76159
Closes odoo#75625
X-original-commit: 708fe3e74991c144a05c6bdcafa1931672e36ce9
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Some emails are wrongly formatted mainly due to old servers. If Final-Recipient
header is void or wrongly encoded it currently crashes. This fix ensure there
is no crash, even if bounce detection could be incomplete.
Task-2641572
PR odoo/odoo#76159Closesodoo/odoo#75618
X-original-commit: f437967a1fa4fca56c88e1cf79586805101ab712
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Starting from this commit bounce addresses set in emails will not use any
plus addressing. They will always be ``bounce_alias#@alias_domain`` and
not ``bounce_alias+<mail_id>-<mail_model>-<mail_res_id>@alias_domain``.
Reasons are
* this plus addressing adds information we do not use anymore since a long
time as bounced messages are found using their message ID and not any
information coming from this bounce address;
* this generates unnecessary noise;
* not all email providers really support plus addressing as a mean to
generate "fake" additional email addresses;
This is the followup of odoo/odoo#71244 where a solution to avoid plus
addressing was done in table. We can now safely remove this feature in
master as a cleaning step.
Task ID-2577328
closesodoo/odoo#73363
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Current bounce message is not very user friendly. Purpose of this commit
is to improve it, by improving wording and overall phrasing used in it.
Form view is improved so that bounce message takes all available width in
form view.
Some tests are added, notably to detect pseudo-void content from editor.
Task ID-2532529
PR odoo/odoo#71793
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When a bounce has to be managed on a record already inheriting from blacklist
mixin it shoudl not be counted two times: one for email-based bounce and one
for "all records using that email linked to blacklist mechanism should
bounce".
A mechanism exists to prevent that double increase but it was not correctly
done. Protection was reset in a loop.
Task ID-2547347
PR odoo/odoo#72347closesodoo/odoo#72420
X-original-commit: 6e1bca5df19392d384d7c398b7aea66b62381938
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Since odoo/odoo@f4524f03c3 plus addressing is not used anymore
for handling bounces. Indeed it relies on references / in reply to to find
original message that bounced. It is therefore not necessary to enforce the
use of plus addressing.
As some provider do not support plus addressing as a way to contact left-part
of email with sub-informations people should have a way to deactivate plus
addressing used in bounce aliases.
To preserve backwards compatibility for stable versions old behavior is
retained unless a new `mail.bounce.alias.static` ICP is set with a truthy
value.
Fix https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/71242 by dropping requirement of plus addressing.
@Tecnativa TT29827
Closes#71242
Task ID-2547347
PR odoo/odoo#72347
X-original-commit: df2d955bf41b01556e1b84bb1204aac045c95a63
It is currently escaped as it is not Markup-ed and not considered safe.
It means raw content is currently displayed in sent emails, which is not
really what we expect.
closesodoo/odoo#71911
X-original-commit: 62e6bc216aefe93c4cd1cca8e39f124a8a298386
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
ALIAS_WRITEABLE_FIELDS is used to write alias fields with sudo
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a user
1.1. Give rights Services -> Project-> Administartor
1.2. Not given rights Administration-> administartor
2. Project app -> open any project -> Action -> duplicate -> it give validation error.
---
opw-2506566
closesodoo/odoo#70414
X-original-commit: 7ae1b4622c6743e28deca12476d6e70375c9417e
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
Create a company whoose name ends with a dot like "Bidule Inc.", change
the company of the user to that new company, head to the Accouning
module and create a new journal of type purchase. Traceback because the
generated mail alias for that journal uses the company name and that the
local-part of an email cannot ends with a dot.
From the RFC standpoint, the local-part of an email address (the part
before the @, `john` in `"John Doe" <john@example.com>`, cannot begins
with, ends with or contain following dots.
The email sanitizing function have been updated so it takes care of the
above requirement.
See also #61811
opw-2448692
closesodoo/odoo#69864
X-original-commit: f0e840ae6db387e1dfc99cc21e09d84eb126e7b9
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
Rename fields on mail_thread and wizard: ``no_auto_thread`` should be replaced
to ``reply_to_force_new`` to ease understanding and be prefixed by reply_to.
SPECIFICATIONS
For better understanding, this commit renames ``no_auto_thread`` field of
``mail.message`` model to ``reply_to_force_new``, to indicate that if the
field is checked (☑) replies should check gateway alias rules instead of
updating mailed threads.
It is also more coherent with reply_to namespacing used in various mail models
(notably new composer fields and ``reply_to_mode`` of mass mailing and mail
composer models)
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
Before this commit
When someone tries to send a mail to a restricted alias (which can be
anywhere in 'To', 'CC' or 'BCC') and if the sender is not allowed to do
so, the mail bounces. However bounced mail shows info as if it bounced due
to address provided in 'To', even though it is not always the case.
Example you send a message to
* 'To': 'valid@gmail.com' (okay)
* 'Cc': 'myalias@odoo.com' (not allowed for you)
Mail bounces because you are not allowed to send a mail to alias provided
in 'Cc', but it shows the message that: `The following email sent to
valid@gmail.com cannot be accepted because [...]`.
After this commit
Boucing alias is shown in message body. Above example becomes `The following
email sent to myalias@odoo.com cannot be accepted [...].`
Note: Because the alias can be present in `Bcc` too (which will not available
in the message values we get in `message_route_verify` method), we simply use
display name of the alias instead of finding mail address matching with alias
from the message values.
Task ID-2390310
closesodoo/odoo#69788
X-original-commit: 15325b19c15a649041db75bacbe8409ae4c58df7
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When Odoo routes incoming emails it is looking for existing messages in
database using Message Ids which are coming from e-mail header
References.
In Odoo the message id looks pretty long like
743570479975566.1584086032.522504091262817-openerp-message-notify@ip-172-31-45-160
As it declared in [RFC2822] long header bodies can be "folded" using
CRLF+WSP. And some mail clients do that very thing. They split
References header body which contains Message Ids by "\n ". The example
of mail client where it can be reproduced is apps.rackspace.com We
created Sales Order in Odoo, sent this quotation to the client email. He
replied with e-mail, and this email can't be matched with any existing
message id and as result it's not attached to the Sales Order.
RFC2882: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-2.2.3closesodoo/odoo#68077
X-original-commit: 559f6cf62711ad45557eddec3af7c66616724eb5
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models..
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove the auto-follow mechanism on mail.channel. It is
used as a trick to have self-notifying channels. When posting on a channel
it listens itself. When a channel listens to a record its members are notified
depending on channel type. It means that a channel following itself notifies
its members in a magic way.
We decided to remove this magic and instead do a cleaner implementation of
this mechanism. ``_notify_compute_recipients`` method from ``mail.thread`` is
now overridden on channel model. It computes recipients to notify using a
custom SQL instead of the generic one given by ``mail.thread``. Some other
code adaptation is done to ensure notification on channel model is done as
intended on that specific model.
As channel model is somewhat different from classic mail.thread enabled
models let us implement its features in a more traditional way. More overrides
and less magic !
QUERY COUNTERS
Due to changes in ``channel_partner_ids`` fields being a computed inverse
searchable field there may be an additional query when performing a message
post as indicated by ``test_complete_message_post`` test. This is due notably
to message_format fetching channel_ids information. A call to ir rules on
channel is performed that uses ``channel_partner_ids`` as part its rule domain.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
WHY:
Some mail servers may provide `Message-Id` header in a section typed
`text/rfc822-headers` instead of a `message/rfc822`
According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6522#section-4 that section's body
actually contains the headers from the bounced email.
STEPS: a way to reproduce it should be using postfix v2.5+ with setting
bounce_size_limit=1. See
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/42340#issuecomment-617605521
BEFORE: `bounced_message_id` is empty and thus the little email envelope icon
doesn't turn red, nor do the email resend features trigger in the UI. You could
be sending an invoice and never knowing it was bounced.
AFTER: bounces from mail servers that return the `text/rfc822-headers` part will
be handled properly.
---
@Tecnativa TT21170
opw-2162067
opw-2344252
closes#42340closes#62551closesodoo/odoo#62732
X-original-commit: 375ba5b37053a599922dd61c9e787553d6171291
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose of this commit is simply to add tests about alias defaults.
Code protects it against being badly formatted. However having
tests ensuring it is always a good idea to avoid regression.
Task ID-2361179
closesodoo/odoo#60026
X-original-commit: 0075cc02f9a11dcddaf9ca7d70cc1adf7596f6d3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Document creation or update is still done without auto subscribe. Indeed user
running mailgateway or owning alias is not necessarily linked to the email
author. That way we avoid auto subscription of irrelevant people.
Posting message based on incoming email is now allowing auto subscription if
there is an author found during email parsing. We also ensure this author is
not root, to be sure he is not added in followers of documents.
LINKS
Task ID-2326281
PR odoo/odoo#56560Closesodoo/odoo#38383
X-original-commit: fe27f9fe0cf9581c15a2a9e45125abe82dd303ad
PURPOSE
Have a cleaner test_mail addons
SPECIFICATIONS
Keep only mail-related tests, move odoobot in test mail full, send "update
notification" tests in mail (specific to mail). Merge some test files to
lessen number of files, perform light file renaming.
Split test mail models file to prepare some cleaning in those models and tests.
LINKS
Prepares Task ID 2238597 (clean notification models)
Prepares Task ID 2083854 (improve mass mailing technical flows)
PR #49891
Purpose of this commit is to allow multi-create in alias mixin by correctly
creating / updating aliases in batch.
Task ID 1919277
Community PR odoo/odoo#41160
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6983
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#872
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Clean the usage of mail aliases and more specifically its associated mixin
`mail.alias.mixin` .
Stop using context for model of aliases, and correctly give model_id and
parent_model_id to the call chain through a cleaned code easier to override.
We also merge methods get_alias_model_name and get_alias_values in single one
called before record creation (alias first values) and right after (to have
values depending on actual record).
LINKS
Task ID 1919277
Community PR odoo/odoo#41160
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6983
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#872
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Make aliases usage more unique, prevent re-using bounce or catchall aliases
and remove auto-uniqueness of aliases.
SPECIFICATIONS
Before this commit, user could create an email alias having same name as
catchall/bounce email alias, which should not happen. Also, while creating
or duplicating alias, if the same name was already available, a new unique
name was generated by adding a sequence number to existing name.
This behavior is not considered as a good one as it magically creates aliases
different from what user expects. User could even not own the newly-created
alias, leading to a broken mail gateway.
In this commit we improve that behavior by ensuring that no duplicate alias
name should be entered while creation / updation for both catcall/bounce and
mail alias. Also, while duplicating an alias, name will now be blank by default
to force user to enter the name. Finally when creating an alias an error is
raised if the name is already taken.
Task ID 2160070
PURPOSE
When incoming emails bounce due to alias security bounce email is quite
generic. Purpose of this task is to ease its customization and update.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to improve the flexibility of alias, add a customizable html field
on the alias model. This html content will be send as bounce email core content
in case of bounced/unauthorized mail received for this alias,
Obviously it has no effect on 'everyone' security setting as no email will
bounce due to that issue.
If it is not set a default generic mail will be send depending on security
setting. It allows to keep void html fields when no specific bounce content
is required
In HR, an old template allowing some light customization for employee based
security option is removed as it is completely replaced by the new feature.
Also add references message-id of the mail received to the answer so that
threads are correctly set.
LINKS
Task ID 2126509
When mailgateway receives an incoming email being a reply to a thread but
containing a recipient being an alias linked to another model, it is
considered as a forward to that new alias. It therefore skips the reply
step in routing and applies rules related to new thread, aka checking
all recipients.
Consider this use case: receives a email on a task from "project@domain"
project being the alias of the project which creates new tasks when not
routing replies. Reply / forward it to "project@domain, sales@domain" in
order to transfer it to the sales team (sales alias creates new leads).
As this is a forward, both aliases are evaluated, leading to a new task and a
lead which is not what we expect.
We solve this issue by removing alias linked to the ignored reply model
when considering recipients.
PR #46764
Task ID 2121551
closesodoo/odoo#46784
X-original-commit: 7cff7787cb42cc9d3d0cb4c5af41a9f09d59d1ff
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
/!\ This commit is a manual forward-port of two PR targetting originally
11.0: #40442 and its fix / partial revert #41042. /!\
Purpose of this commit is to check all recipients of incoming emails when
trying to determine the route to apply. Notably
* an incoming email should be considered as a write to catchall only if all
recipients are catchall. Catchall + a valid alias should take the alias
into account;
* an incoming email sent to the bounce alias should be considered as a bounce
even if another valid alias is in recipients and whatever the order. Indeed
it indicates an issue and bounce is considered as more important;
* forward to an alias linked to another model should check all recipients
and not only the first one. Otherwise reply_alias, forward_alias is
considered as a reply whereas it should be considered as a forward when
considering all recipients;
Tests are added according to those specifications.
Please see original PRs for more details about the content, the comments
done on it and the various discussions.
PR #46764
Task ID 2121551
X-original-commit: df00bd2d3bddf9a2b56e8554380669025e146d21
This reverts commit 976e560a87.
Even if it didn't looked like a bad idea, this need some more thinking.
This new version of query count creates random failure of runbot builds.
closesodoo/odoo#43820
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
- take advantage of runbot multi-build capabilities
- get similar result when running them locally during dev
- better detect when other modules add extra queries
Query counts are split in the base value (testing with just test_mail installed)
+ the extra modules overhead.
Part of task-2178641
closes odoo/odoo#43666
Pr: #43666
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Clean posting process and improve mail.message definition and comprehension.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to be more explicit subtype parameter is renamed to subtype_xmlid.
It therefore clearly indicates it should be a valid subtype Xml ID. Support
of ill formatted Xml IDs is removed because there is no reason to try to
add some random prefix. Give something that exists or go to hell, punk !
LINKS
Task ID 2071556
PR #38692
PURPOSE
Currently tools and asserts for mail tests are located inside test_mail
module. It makes difficult to re-use them in apps tests or force them to
write custom quick and dirty tools and asserts.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update tests to new tools / asserts / helpers / classes defined in mail
and test_mail. Notably
* ``BaseFunctionalTest`` class is replaced by the new ``TestMailCommon``
pimped one;
* ``assertNotifications`` is replaced by ``assertSinglePostNotifications``
(shortcut for a simple message_post) or ``assertPostNotifications``
(complete asserts involving several messages and notifications);
* correctly invoke ``mock_mail_gateway`` when mocking email sending;
* replace manual check of sent emails or ``assertEmails`` by
``assertSentEmails``;
* remove custom mocks / checks and replace them by now standard mocks
and assertions (if any);
In this commit we update: test mail gateway
LINKS
Task ID 2068986
PR #38070
Somehow followup of dbb6cfdbf8 . Purpose is
to use formataddr from tools instead of manually handcrafting the full
email address format. Indeed the tools one correctly encapsulates and
format name and email.
Task ID 2068986
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules: `email.(charset|header|mime|utils)`.
The new `email.message.EmailMessage` API exposes a much easier interface
to create multiparted emails [1], is capable of doing all the necessary
headers value conversion (RFCs [2045], [2047], [2049]) [2] and get/set
different flavor of payload (text/bytes) in a straightforward way [3].
All headers are structured in a way to support python native types, i.e.
the `Date` header supports `datetime.datetime` objects and automatically
performs the required formatting. The same goes for multi-valued headers
like the `To` header, one can directly set a python list of values, it
will be automatically be formatted according to the RFCs.
The dedicated encoding and decoding functions are no more needed thus
has been removed has part of the refactor. FTR, [RFC2231] is an update
of [RFC2047] and based on tests we've just conducted, both GMail and
Thunderbird now support RFC2231 encoding just fine in all headers:
attachments names, From, etc.
[1]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.message.html
[2]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.headerregistry.html
[3]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.contentmanager.html
[2045]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045
[2047]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2047
[2049]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2049
[2231]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2231closesodoo/odoo#35929
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
[PEP 594][1] is going to depreciate legacy `email.message.Message` API in
PY3.8 in favor `email.message.EmailMessage`.
All `email.message_from_x` constructor functions take an optional
`policy` argument. The policy can either be `policy.compat32` to
generate an `email.message.Message` instance, either be `policy.SMTP`
to generate an `email.message.EmailMessage` instance.
The [current][2] default policy is `policy.compat32` but will change in
a future version of python. It is recommended to always specify the
policy.
[1]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/#email-legacy-api
[2] https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/email.parser.html#email.parser.BytesParser
PURPOSE
In order to rewrite some tests, remove low-level tests and add coverage
first step is to reorganize a bit test_mail content. Several tests cases
are spread among several files and finding back some feature coverage
tests is not easy.
SPECIFICATIONS
Split cc tests to either discuss or mail gateway tests. It allows to remove an
unnecessary file.
LINKS
Task 1958697
PURPOSE
In order to rewrite some tests, remove low-level tests and add coverage
first step is to reorganize a bit test_mail content. Several tests cases
are spread among several files and finding back some feature coverage
tests is not easy.
SPECIFICATIONS
Reorganize tests, notably
* put message_post related test in test_message_post;
* have only composer related test in test_message_compose(r);
* put alias tests in test_mail_gateway;
* move some discuss tests to post tests as they are linked to notification
details, not really Discuss features.
LINKS
Task 1958697
In resend wizard tests
In some cases tuple comparison of states seems to fail. Indeed order seems
to change in some cases depending on installation order. With this commit
we correctly check partner / notification status one by one, avoiding
to rely on order / set length that is not guaranteed.
In mail gateway tests
Add a specific order on name to be clearer about what we mean when fetching
users as a fallback, until better heuristic. Using name is sufficient as
we have no need to rely on complex partner display_name.
Task 2060220 (testing SMS integration)
PURPOSE
Currently mailgateway runner user is used to create most documents through
incoming emails. Purpose of this commit is to try to link document creation
and update to users, using the email to make the matching.
SPECIFICATIONS
New sudo implementation allow to bypass access rights while keeping effective
user as creator. Use this mechanism to create documents still using the
mailgateway runner user while linking creator to matching user.
Heuristic to use to match email_from and users
* if route is linked to an alias: check its owner record and check in its
followers;
* find users having this emails;
* if route is linked to an alias: use alias_user_id field;
* fallback on mailgateway user;
Other side effect is that creator and author of incoming email linked to the
new record will now better match the document creator when linked to an
existing user.
LINKS
Task 1919267
PR #30597
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose
* move bounce information detection in message parsing. It allows to have
this information available in various steps of routing instead of having
to manually re-compute them;
* handle bounce in specific methods allowing easy override;
* improve bounce management, notably when detecting a bounce not linked
to the bounce alias configuration;
* better integration with blacklist mechanism;
Specifications
* compute bounce information in ``_message_parse_extract_bounce``.It parses
bounce information and returns a dictionary allowing to update parsed email
values;
* remove override in mass_mailign that basically does what mail already
does;
* manage bounce in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* when detecting a bounce, correctly call the bounce management method on
all models inheriting from blacklist;
* correctly update bounce counter;
* bounced mailing traces and automatic blacklist in mass mailing should
be done in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* add some tests;
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Parsing email values: make message_parse effectively prepare all required
values for later processing
* update message_parse to add some more data directly in parsed dictionary
and avoid having to parse value again in later processing and computation.
* notably recipients computation is now done directly in parsing. It
includes email check and reconstruction using tools methods. That way
routing just has to handle those values and not compute part of them;
* from and cc are correctly managed with parsed and cleaned (sanitized)
versions in dictionary;
* remove all code decoding message header and replace them by fetching
the parsed value instead;
* filter parsed values before calling message_post to ensure right values
are given to it instead of having to manage them in message_post. Indeed
caller has to give the right input;
* make parsing sub-methods (extract payload, post process payload) have
a dictionary as input and output to always manage a dictionary of values
through the parsing methods and update their namespace;
Routing: remove deprecated code parts
* remove use of email_references regex. Indeed emails are routed using their
messageId and not the regex anymore since several versions [1];
* clean some unnecessary variables;
* simplify variable type input, like message_parse accepts only valid
email.message instances and to avoid several decode / encode. Tests are
updated accordingly;
Update docstrings of those methods.
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
[1] See df037e2959 and 0028c42136
Message post should always be called on a record (ensure_one). That way we
ensure posting a message is always done in a record's context with right
values computed (reply_to, followers, ...)
Message_notify can be called on record or on mail_thread and must have
partner_ids. It is based on the recently modified user_notification mechanism
and allow to notify a partner on a record or just to push him a message
(aka, not linked to a record).
Small performance improvement
* browse recipients instead of search in _notify_email_recipients;
* todo in future optimizations: mayybe be improve by searching on ids
and is_blacklist immediately;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
Purpose: make some methods from mail.thread mixin private and update their
naming if necessary. Some methods prepare data for business flows and deal
with internal information. Public methods should either use of give some
access to those methods. Computation itself should be keps internal.
In this commit we put message_partner_info_from_emails as private. As it is
used in discuss JS we define a controller that controls access to this method.
It explicitly checks for related document access rule and rights before
calling the private method.
Some addons are updated accordingly to the method change.
Related to task ID 1911679
Linked to PR #29483
This commit add some tests related to the mail gateway: more bounce management
tests and some additional thread formation tests. Some test asserts about
bounce / blacklist management are commented as they are not completely working
currently. This will be improved in master soon.
Some cleaning in also done in all mail gateway tests. Notably some call to
tool methods are cleaned / simplified, duplicate tests are removed. Some
low-level checks are removed.
A new test model is added for mail gateway: mail.test.gateway. It is a
chatter model with blacklist enabled on it. It allows to tests the
various blacklist-related overrides and features as well as all basic
mail gateway features.
Sub-part of task 1853147 (pre-cleaning before implementing mail gateway
improvements)
Linked to PR #32974
We don't want to notify inactive followers,
especially in the case of oddobot that was considered
as a inactive partner in _notify_compute_recipients.
The computed recipient data for odoobot are
(pid:2 active:False pshare:True notif:None)
It was considered as a partner and notified by email.
This fix simply removes inactive partner from partner to notify.
closesodoo/odoo#31734
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to use the newly introduced helper to create
test users in a quick way and reduce code duplication. A mail specific
helper tool function is defined based on the standard one defined in test
allowing to pass a custom context. It bypasses mailing features in order
to speedup the creation.
This commit is linked to task ID 1889703 and PR #27526.
