Let us use existing data for multi-company tests created when calling a specific
method available in mail tools. We may then remove TestMailMultiCompanyCommon
that is used in a single test, with an hardcoded currency_id (hem).
Task-2661036 (Performance tests data cleanup)
Prepares Task-36879 (MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77845
Add the currency symbol for the monetary tracking field to better
represent the change of a monetary field.
The currency will be fetch from the currency defined in the
monetary field or on the record's company in case there is not.
For example, if we have a record with a monetary field displaying
"$ 500". If we modify the currency and the value to have "450 €",
the message containing the tracking values will display:
"500 € -> 450 €".
We only use one field to track the currency of a monetary field.
Indeed, in the case where the currency is changed with the value
of a monetary field, only the new currency is tracked. We focus
on the fact that the more important thing is the new value.
Furthermore, when modifying a currency of a monetary field, the
user can already see the new currency before saving the changes.
This allows him to adapt the value of the field if he needs it.
(N.B. we assume that this case will happen very rarely)
Using only one field takes also into account that there are
millions of record for this model and adding a new field would
take a lot of memory.
odoo/odoo#61999odoo/upgrade#2060
task-2387268
Purpose is to have some low level tests for composer itself allowing to
ensure its behavior. We add tests notably about default values computation
in mass mailing mode as well as template_id change and values synchronization
in composer model.
In a near future composer will probably be improved (use computed fields,
rewrite part of its logic to improve performances). Having tests done before
those tasks ensure we notice every change that might happen.
Task ID-2390314
PR odoo/odoo#62061
X-original-commit: def98d2375a8a906092293f0aa1ce03bf948d2d3
Modules holding tests and helpers
* link_tracker: mainly mock, asserts and tools for link tracker tests
(MockLinkTracker);
* mail: mainly gateway mock and base for mail tests
* MockEmail -> mocks for mail gateway;
* MailCase -> tools and asserts for mail tests;
* MailCommon -> base for mail functional tests);
* sms: mainly SMS gateway mock and base for sms tests
* MockSMS -> mocks for SMS gateway;
* SMS Case -> tools and asserts for mail / SMS tests;
* SMSCommon -> update of MailCommon with SMS capabilities);
* mass_mailing: mainly asserts and tools for mass mailing tests
* MassMailCase -> update of MailCase for mass mailing tools and asserts;
* MassMailCommon -> update of MailCommon with mass mailing);
* mass_mailing_sms: mainly asserts and tools for mass SMS tests
* MockMassSMS -> update of MockSMS for mass SMS tools and asserts;
* MassSMSCommon -> update of MassMailCommon with SMS capabilities);
Modules for tests
* test_mail: module for mail app tests (TestMailCommon);
* test_mass_mailing: module for mass mailing app tests (TestMassMailCommon);
* test_mail_full: tests integrating all discuss features, currently mainly
mail and SMS (TestMailFullCommon);
Enterprise: update test_mail_enterprise and test_marketing_automation
Task ID 2247037
Community PR odoo/odoo#50384
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#10266
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1122
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Currently tools and asserts for mail tests are located inside test_mail
module. It makes difficult to re-use them in apps tests or force them to
write custom quick and dirty tools and asserts.
SPECIFICATIONS
Now that all tests using old ``BaseFunctionalTest`` and ``MockEmails``
classes are updated we can safely remove them.
LINKS
Task ID 2068986
PR #38070
PURPOSE
Currently tools and asserts for mail tests are located inside test_mail
module. It makes difficult to re-use them in application tests or force them
to write custom quick and dirty tools and asserts. Purpose of this merge
is therefore to move tools classes and mocks to mail directly and use them
in various sub modules.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we add ``TestMailCommon`` that will be the class for all test_*
modules linked to mail features. It is build upon tools made available in
mail tests (mocks, tools, asserts) and give the functional basis for mail
tests.
This commit also introduces ``TestMailMultiCompanyCommon`` that is a small
multi company testing class build on ``TestMailCommon``.
``TestRecipients`` class is kept as it creates some testing partners, used
notably for notifications and recipients.
Future commits will gradually make tests use this class instead of the
``BaseFunctionalTest`` that will be set to retirement.
LINKS
Task ID 2068986
PR #38070
The tracked field is now a relation to the corresponding ir.model.field.
This prevents potential privacy issues should the field be deleted or renamed.
closesodoo/odoo#39232
Taskid: 2088634
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
PURPOSE
In order to rewrite some tests, remove low-level tests and add coverage
first step is to reorganize a bit test_mail content. Several tests cases
are spread among several files and finding back some feature coverage
tests is not easy.
SPECIFICATIONS
Quickly clean common class and lessen data creation by default. Offer some
tool methods, notably to create portal users used in some tests but not
all, or to create mail templates.
LINKS
Task 1958697
This commit adds a new mailbox in the Discuss app called 'History'.
Messages that have been marked as read are moved to 'History'.
Notifications are required to link history messages to users. So
notifications are now deleted after they are more tha 6 months old.
This means History mailbox keeps less than 6 months old messages.
Note that this feature only works when user notifications are handled
in Odoo. This can be set in the user preferences, under the
"Notification Management" section.
Task-ID 402597
Purpose of this commit is to better include SMS notifications when posting a
message. SMS is now just another way of notifying people along with Inbox and
email. Following recent mail merge improving notification mechanism [1] we
have to define a _notify_record_by_sms method on mail.thread.
When a message_post is done using message_type being ``sms`` notification type
of customers is set to sms. Customers can be computed on model (generally based
on partner_id field) or directly set usign partner°ids. Notification model is
updated to store this information directly inside the notification itself.
An new ``_message_sms`` helper method is introduced in SMS module allowing
to send messages using sms type and notification with a reduced parameters
number. It is just a shortcut to message_post, easier to use. Either it
computes default recipients on the record set, either it is based on given
partners and numbers to notify.
The following use cases are notably supported
* default computation: find customer, notify by sms;
* force recipients to notify by sms (partner_ids);
* give a set of numbers to notify by sms (sms_nubmers), not necessarily
linked to existing partners;
* force number / customer relationship independently of mobile number defined
on customer (for example when sending an SMS directly from a mobile field
on a lead linked to a customer);
Tests are updated accordingly. Performance tests are added in order to have
some insights on queries generated when sending SMS, like already done for
mail.thread alone.
Related to task 1922163
Linked to PR #33510
[1] see be27955136: performance and notification code improvements
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Pierre Rousseau <pro@odoo.com>
This commit prepares SMS refactoring by updating some mail models. Purpose
is to be able to store SMS notification information inside existing mail
flow and models.
Main changes
* mail.notification: define a notification_type field to store the medium
used to notify people. In mail two ways exist: inbox and email. It will
ease introduction of SMS notification mechanism. This field replaces the
is_email boolean field;
* mail.notification: make res_partner_id field not required. This means
notifications could be linked to something else than a partner. An SMS
for example. For Inbox and email notifications partner is still required
and a constraint is added accordingly;
* mail.thread: let notification methods handle the creation and update of
their notification instead of creating them in _notify_thread and tweaking
them in sub notification methods;
* mail.thread: clearly move inbox-style notification in its own method like
notify by email;
Some lighter code changes
* propagate message_type to notification recipient computation. It will
allow for example to be more precise when computing a notification type
depending on the message_type. For example, send a notification by SMS
when the message_type is SMS;
* ease inheritance of ``_notify_thread`` by returning computed recipients
data. It will allow to work on it without having to re-compute it;
* propagate kwargs from message_post and message_notify to notify methods.
This allow to avoid depending on context and set explicit parameters.
Drawback is that message_post and notify must separate kwargs used to
create a message and those that are propagated to notification methods;
* update various notification check to ensure they work on email
notifications, notably the resend and cancel wizards;
One side effect of this commit is that notifications are created by the
relevant notification method. Previously all notifications were created
by writing on needaction_partner_ids fields then updated according to the
notification process. Notably there could be too much notification created
when sending emails due to _notify_customize_recipients not being correctly
synchronized with notification. This issue is now solved as only really
sent emails create notifications.
Migration tips
* notification_type: notification.is_email and 'email' else 'inbox';
* remove is_email;
Related to task 1922163
Linked to PR #33510
Purpose of this commit is to improve and add tools, methods and data to test
mail and SMS features. We also add tests for current implementation of SMS
feature, allowing to better understand future changes.
[ADD] test_mail_full
* have a module depending on mail sub-applications like sms or snailmail.
Its purpose is to check that standard mail features work effectively with
all overrides and extra behaviors activated;
* add a new model specific for SMS gateway, with default recipient
computation;
* add SMS tests for SMS module adding SMS capabilities linked to mail
feature. This commit tests SMS feature before the upcoming refactoring
and improvement of SMS module in community: posting with SMS and sms
composer usage;
In test_mail
* add necessary mobile information on test partners;
* improve assertBusNotification that was not correctly asserting all items
in message of bus notifications;
In sms
* add mock for SMS sending. Purpose is to mock the connection to IAP
services by mocking the call to IAP server. It allows to perform SMS
tests without having to contact (and pay) for this service;
* allow some customization when calling the SMS gateway mock to simulate
errors and test corner cases;
Related to task 1922163
Linked to PR #34516
This commit add some tests related to the mail gateway: more bounce management
tests and some additional thread formation tests. Some test asserts about
bounce / blacklist management are commented as they are not completely working
currently. This will be improved in master soon.
Some cleaning in also done in all mail gateway tests. Notably some call to
tool methods are cleaned / simplified, duplicate tests are removed. Some
low-level checks are removed.
A new test model is added for mail gateway: mail.test.gateway. It is a
chatter model with blacklist enabled on it. It allows to tests the
various blacklist-related overrides and features as well as all basic
mail gateway features.
Sub-part of task 1853147 (pre-cleaning before implementing mail gateway
improvements)
Linked to PR #32974
Purpose of this commit is to use the newly introduced helper to create
test users in a quick way and reduce code duplication. A mail specific
helper tool function is defined based on the standard one defined in test
allowing to pass a custom context. It bypasses mailing features in order
to speedup the creation.
This commit is linked to task ID 1889703 and PR #27526.
Purpose of this commit is to allow moderation on incoming messages in
discussion channels. On some channels on which moderation is required
messages should be in a pending moderation stage. Moderators can accept
or refuse messages as well as always allow or ban messages coming from
a given set of emails.
Channels now have an option to be moderated. Moderators can be added on
channels. They have access to a specific UI in Discuss to see and take
action on messages waiting for moderation.
Concerning mail.thread message that are pending moderation are not notified.
It means nobody receives a notification about them. Moderation process calls
the notification once the message is validated.
Various features included in this commit :
* a model is added to store the decision about emails, allow or ban;
* access rights are updated so that only moderators can modify moderation
fields on message;
* specific bus notifications are send to moderated people as well as to
moderators on incoming emails as well as when a decision is taken;
* options are added on channels to send explanations to moderated emails;
* options are added on channels to write and send guidelines explaining
why and how moderation is performed;
* a reminder is send daily to moderators with remaining messages to moderate;
* discuss UI is adapted and a new channel is added below Inbox and Starred
giving access to moderation tools;
* chanenl UI is adapted allowing to moderate directly inside channels;
This commit is linked to task ID 29521. Closes#21921.
Thibault Delavallée