First step to stream QWeb templates: removing the two post
processing operations applied on rendered templates. This
should slightly speed up the rendering of every page.
1/ Don't remove empty lines after rendering, but fix the root
cause of: view inheritancies and QWeb compilation that don't
add extra empty lines.
2/ handle page break in the two reports that uses it, rather
than processing every view produced.
closesodoo/odoo#82244
Related: odoo/enterprise#23328
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
-Create a quote with 2 lines (same product - different lead time).
-When a partial delivery is made (e.g., 5 of 10), Odoo places the operation related to the remaining undelivered quantity (5), on the last line in the Operations list.
-When the next delivery is made, Odoo deducts the quantity from the first operation in the list instead of from the line whose deadline is closest.
Current Behaviour :
Odoo assign button assign quantity to the first move line in the list.
Behaviour After the PR:
Odoo assign button assign quantity to a move line based on the priority, the closest deadline and the id.
opw-2657048
closesodoo/odoo#82062
X-original-commit: 430f4f2ca1cebaea62415ee72bf4369684abbfaa
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
The stock convention on location name is always to name the destination
`location_dest_id`. It was not the
case on the stock rule model
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
Add a "clear qty" button to revert the change by "set qty" button in
(batch) picking.
On the move, Whenever the qty_done != reserved, we consider it a
manual change from the user. "set/clear qty" buttons won't change the
line with manual change.
Show "set qty" button when there are moves with 0 qty_done and non-zero
reserved. Show "clear qty" button when we don't show "set qty" button
and there are moves with qty done == reserved but the number is not 0.
Task-2659233
closesodoo/odoo#78737
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Clean the code for onchange method with putaway rule applied, merge
them into one onchange method.
Task-2614519
closesodoo/odoo#80519
X-original-commit: 5f562895c4d2f9beac7e0458fcee493b0141f1af
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
Issue, to reproduce:
- Create a product A tracked by serial
- Reciept one product A with a lot without digit
- validate this receipt, Ok
- Create a other receipt for product A,
- You cannot anymore open the detail wizard to enter a
SN/lot : get 'The lot name must contain at least one digit.'
Fix:
Remove the constraint and fallback by adding "0" at the end.
task-2652292
closesodoo/odoo#80104
X-original-commit: 5f75d5b1c8d5d4f37cbdc34daa79514226a17855
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
The packages reservations are not correctly done in case of a backorder
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. In Settings, enable:
- Delivery Packages
- Multi-Step Routes
2. Edit the warehouse:
- Outgoing Shipments: 2 steps
3. In Operations Types > Delivery Order, enable:
- Show Detailed Operations
- Move Entire Packages
4. Create a Pick P:
- 1 x [DESK0004] Desk
- 1 x Large Cabinet
5. Put each product in a separate pack
6. Validate P
7. Create a Delivery Order (Planned Transfer):
- 1 x [DESK0004] Desk
- 1 x Large Cabinet
8. Mark as TODO, Check Availability
9. In Detailed Operations, mark one of the packs as Done
10. Validate the DO, Create a backorder
Error: The not-yet-done pack is still on the delivery order and its
status is "Reserved". This line shouldn't be present anymore. Moreover,
the backorder has a line for this pack, its state is "Draft" (instead of
"Reserved") and the state of the BO is Ready.
When creating the backorder, the packages levels of the not-yet-done
moves are transferred to the new picking (i.e., the backorder) However,
these moves does not have a package level defined (due to
9d758fa2e1). Therefore, when checking the
packs:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e7450bee8f018a5334d9628235824f2fc6f32cec/addons/stock/models/stock_picking.py#L822-L832
`package_level_ids` is empty, so a new `stock.package_level` is created
(instead of using the one of the initial delivery order). And
`move_lines_to_pack` is empty too, so the new `stock.package_level`
won't have any move lines and its state will be "Draft"
We should rather transfer the package levels of the moves' lines.
OPW-2659176
closes#77509closesodoo/odoo#80072
X-original-commit: 4fd5cd6f940575090021dedd2159d050b594dd69
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Florent de Labarre <florent.mirieu@gmail.com>
When a backorder is created, the quantities are not reserved. This is an
issue: the module should try to directly assign these quantities if the
reservation method of the associated operation type is "At Confirmation"
(Forward port of 723d4b35f9fa9c49249c1b4e9b8dc93e51c5d359)
OPW-2658469
closesodoo/odoo#79980
X-original-commit: ae19ae04192d21ad956af05e5739bde8c6bca746
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Currently, the order of transfer lines makes no sense for a picker
(it's in the order of the creation of the line). We want to have the
lines of the detailed operation in the same order as the picker will be
picking the products, so we order by source location, destination
location, sequence, and then by id (i.e. creation time) respectively
instead.
Also the printing report of the batch transfer is on too many pages,
it's one page by location, but we always group on 'from location'.
So it would be better not to split by location and keep the report
on the least number of pages possible.
task-2496324
odoo/enterprise#21921closesodoo/odoo#79446
X-original-commit: 9b120caa2a5cd5e2487d663a180b486b5bdb201b
Related: odoo/enterprise#22144
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Sets the `inventory_quantity_set` as an editable field (not readonly)
and creates its own compute to avoid to override it each time the
`inventory_quantity` is modify and we set the `inventory_quantity_set`
aside (before this commit, this field new value was always overrided by
the `inventory_diff_quantity` compute).
This is useful when we want to write on the quants from the Barcode App
as we can write on `inventory_quantity` and `inventory_quantity_set` at
the same time.
task-2632818
closesodoo/odoo#78719
X-original-commit: 489e76ade600f7983a9a1976c04529ac542fdd44
Related: odoo/enterprise#21810
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
The allocation order is not based on the pickings order
To reproduce the issue:
(Need sale_management,mrp)
1. Create a storable product P
2. Create a BoM for another product dummy_P and add 1xP as component
3. Create and confirm a SO with 1x product P
4. Create and confirm a MO for 1x dummy_P
5. Process a receipt transfer with one P
Error: On the SO, the reserved quantity is still 0. The product has been
reserved for the MO, even if the picking of the SO has been created
first
The default order of several SM is based on the sequence and the
identifier:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/abc9fdaae2927214d98082f391a1dc0fc75e4c77/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L26
The default value of the field `sequence` is 10:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/abc9fdaae2927214d98082f391a1dc0fc75e4c77/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L26
When creating a SO, the field isn't defined so its default value is used
(10). However, when creating the MO, the field is defined thanks to the
sequence of the related BOM line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/864d90a064f093bd6ba24d8464ee491a443a320e/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L940
Which, in our case, is equal to 1
As a result, when allocating the quantities in `_action_assign`, the
recordset will contain first the SM of the MO and then the SM of the SO.
This commit ensures the order will be based on the priority, the date
and the identifier (the latter allows the search result to be
deterministic)
Side note: this commit also adds the identifier to the search in
`_run_scheduler_tasks` to keep consistency between the different
flows
OPW-2524205
closesodoo/odoo#78497
X-original-commit: da2b336d467d95cda8ed21707535fb7119f5d777
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
How to reproduce:
- Create a product tracked by lot;
- Create two receipts for this product;
- Use the same lot name in the two receipts;
- Try to validate the two receipts in the same time
=> `ValidationError` will trigger in the `_check_unique_lot`
constrain of the production lot.
task-2646107
X-original-commit: cf018e9f215336ef19e0a517d4e116f0da26850e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78189
In a lot of test class, we use `setUp` instead of
`setUpClass`. `setUp` is execute for each test method and `setUpClass`
will be execute only once by Class (and use savepoint + rollback).
Then change setUp into setUpClass reduce the time to make all tests
and avoid to repeat this error for the future.
closesodoo/odoo#78082
Related: odoo/enterprise#21563
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
When creating a wizard `stock.return.picking` and call
`_onchange_picking_id`, the creation of return picking line will perform
a write on move linked with it, due to `uom_id` being set as related with
`readonly=False`. Set `readonly` to `True` to avoid it
closesodoo/odoo#77242
X-original-commit: 6bdc99f8b67da069c8d26c73b5499d0b0c019c1e
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
- Clean the `report_stock_forecasted` for the next commit.
- Add some test about the `_compute_forecast_information` to ensure
the correctness of the forecasted widget.
task-2579011
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77092
The reserved and the done column doesn't have any sense for
draft picking and the forectasted button was always green.
-> Fix it
Also we add forectasted information for draft move in mrp
(281e1a57b3).
-> Use it also for outgoing picking
task-2579011
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77092
We fix 2 related UoM issues:
1. Fix quant inconsistency from changing the UoM of Done
stock.move.lines
Steps to reproduce:
- Enable "Storage Locations" setting
- Create a new "Storable Product" and create a receipt for 1 unit of it
- Validate the 1 unit receieved
- Open "Detailed Operations" of the move and change the stock.move.line
UoM to dozen.
Expected result: 13 on hand
Actual result: 1 on hand
To fix this:
- prevent users from editing the UoM after the picking is
done (i.e. unless adding a new stock.move.line and not saving).
- update the write on done logic so stock.move.line UoM changes are
considering and will update the quant correctly (in case of RPC or
direct write).
2. Prevent changing UoM of Done stock.move to prevent inconsistent field
values within stock.move and confusion for users
Steps to reproduce:
- Complete a picking (incoming is easiest to see) with a new product
(i.e. 0 qty) having 1 unit done.
- Unlock picking and add a new stock.move with 1 unit done and save.
- Edit the just added stock.move's UoM from Units to Dozen.
- Check the quantity on hand / Done qty of stock.move after leaving and
returning to form.
Expected result: 13 On Hand
Actual Result: 2 On Hand and the "Done" qty in the picking is 0.0083
(i.e. 1/12 of a dozen)
To fix this:
- prevent users from editing the UoM after the picking is done (unless
adding a new stock.move and not saving)
- if a Done stock.move UoM is uodated, a UserError occurs because there
is no straightforward way to ensure the quant is updated correctly
since is handled within the move.line (i.e. has no visibility to its
move's uom change => changing only UoM and not qty done will result in
no quant update)
closesodoo/odoo#76916
X-original-commit: 72a1e7d75f0b13f23def912c8bcc758c58438b04
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
- create a second warehouse, resupply from the first
- create a product, replenish W2 from W1
- Goto Inventory Forecast
--> Issue value are wrong.
An OUT is when WH source is Set and WH dest is not set.
An IN is when WH dest is Set and WH source is not set.
closesodoo/odoo#76129
X-original-commit: ad7deb4cfced42f08733da5ed9c1233109900d87
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Since return moves are linked to their original move, it's easy to
manage reservation in those case. We just don't bypass the reservation
when it comes from a reservation outside our stock in order to manage
the computation on linked moves and reserve pieces that were not yet
return.
Also add a return picking type for 2 reasons:
- Allow to select existing lot.
- Display reserved move line for an incoming picking.
Note that this picking type is just a default configuration and could be
modify by the user without any issue.
closesodoo/odoo#64384
Related: odoo/enterprise#20605
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
As the inventory adjustments have been removed in favour of the editable
quants, this commit introduced the possibility to import pre counted
quants like non validated inventories back then.
task : 2555118
Part-of: odoo/odoo#74715
Assuming that the only thing cared about when removing items from stock
is the accessibility of the product. Then it would be better to take
products stored on the floor instead of on higher levels of my racks.
In this case current solutions in Odoo are not the most efficient.
Closest location picks items in the 'smallest' location (in alphabetical
order), so it assumes the locations are ordrered alphabetically
according to how close they are to the ground.
Assume we have the following stock :
- WH/Stock/Shelf 2
- WH/Stock
- WH/Stock/Shelf 1
Quants would be looked at in the following order :
1. WH/Stock (due to shortest name for the same stock)
2. WH/Stock/Shelf 1 (due to alphabetical order)
3. WH/Stock/Shelf 2
Task-2568735
closesodoo/odoo#75303
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
`result` might be a Markup object (eg during tests) or a bytes-like object.
Step to reproduce: click on "Send by Mail" on a SO -> Traceback
Step to reproduce (2):
- Install website_sale
- Add something to the cart
- Go through checkout and click on Pay Now
- Crash, 500 error page, as this step is trying to generate the SO PDF to send
by mail to the customer, which tries to encode a bytes-like object.
```
AttributeError: 'bytes' object has no attribute 'encode'
```
But if you do that flow during a test, eg
```
./odoo-bin -d mydb --test-tags=.test_02_admin_checkout
```
You have a Markup object, thus you had to encode it.
Now, even during test, we return a bytes-like object.
Related to #68299
Community: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/75377
Enterprise: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/20449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75377
A stock move with 0 qty in initial demand is considered as 'ready'. But
those stock moves should be excluded of the picking state computation to
not false the readiness of the picking, especially if the delivery
policy is set to 'direct'.
opw-2611018
closesodoo/odoo#75589
X-original-commit: bc7198961583562243b393bd8cd009c5e7220ad0
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Achraf <abz-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
New reception report added for non-outgoing transfers. This is intended
to support easier stock allocations by allowing dynamic MTO
assignment/unassignment, e.g. if we have an incoming transfer with
products we want to assign to an existing outgoing transfer, then we can
use the report to create a MTO link to the specific outgoing moves. To
support this assignment flow, the report also allows printing of labels
to place on the product so stock workers know which transfer/MO the
product has been assigned to.
Expected use case is when a product is purchased to fulfil a sale.
Demo data has been added so reception report can be immediately
seen/used for this flow.
Implementation Notes:
- Report has been made flexible to work with batch transfers.
- Only done moves can be assigned to moves that already have quants
reserved (prevents undesired behavior + this makes sense logically)
- Confirmed (+ Done and everything inbetween) moves can be assigned to
any confirmed moves that are not already assigned.
- Report does not affect quant reservation/unreservation at all. It
works only with linking moves (i.e. move_orig_id/move_dest_id) so
move/transfer linkage traceability is stored within db (i.e. this
isn't possible with quants)
Limitations: To keep code simple for now, this assignment flow will
break in certain cases:
1. Done amount of an assigned move is less than the Demand amount
(linked move will not autoreserve correctly when assigned move is
validated, same issue already occurs in multi-step transfer).
2. If a linked move is unreserved after its assigned move is
validated, then another move can reserve its quants and its
assignment link will not be accurate.
3. Already reserved SNs + assign move, may lead to mismatching SNs
between report and what's actually reserved.
4. Changing a linked move's Demand amount after a move is assigned to
it.
5. Potential moves to assign to are only checked for being in same
warehouse, not in a matching source location to destination location.
User is expected to make this match on their own.
Task: 2500844
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#18268
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2731closesodoo/odoo#70669
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
reserved_availability is expressed in move uom
forecast_availability must be in product base uom
closesodoo/odoo#75077
X-original-commit: fa9abcc1b105c07e1eaf6bdd3010abe19a056088
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
In order to limit encoding decoding, the _render method returns a
unicode string in the markup safe object instead of a MarkupSafeBytes
closesodoo/odoo#68299
Related: odoo/upgrade#2454
Related: odoo/enterprise#17270
Signed-off-by: Antony Lesuisse (al) <al@openerp.com>
Usecase:
- Product A 10 units in stock
- Do a planned transfer of 7 units to customer
- Reserve
- Do an rpc or execute code to call copy on the stock.move.line
It will result with 2 sml that have 14 units reserve and 7 units
reserved on stock.quant
It's the same result if you create twice the stock.move.line without
updating the stock.quant at the same time. However in stable we
try to only use _update_reserved_quantity on stock.move or some
override in create/write method for 'done' stock.move.line in unlock
cases.
So we never use the copy in stable and define the basic behavior as
'we don't copy the reservation' could prevent some usecase where
the update on the stock.quant is forgotten after.
closesodoo/odoo#74489
X-original-commit: e5041ee1d9b5036cab55f4332977aeb818a3b1e1
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Some changes in the delivery slip layout:
- For delivered products, replaces the Quantity column by two other
columns: Ordered and Delivered;
- Shows the non-delivered products even when the delivery is done and
haven't any backorder.
task-2373833
closesodoo/odoo#61366
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
1. Add product category in inventory report.
2. Default quantity when creating a transfer switched to 1 instead of 0.
3. Remove the reorganize lines step in purchase tour (there is only 1
line).
closesodoo/odoo#69483
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
General improvements of the new Inventory Adjustment mechanism, among which:
From the Inventory Adjustment page
- A new inventory_quantity_set Boolean field is used to hide the Counted Quantity when not set instead of showing 0.
- Possibile to set 0 as a Counted Quantity directly (not using the set button).
- Allows to provide a name for the Inventory Adjustment when using the Apply button at the top of the tree view. This name is applied on the corresponding stock moves.
- Add warnings when trying to Apply/Set on multiple records when some records are not set/already set.
- Highlight lines when there is a mismatch between Quantity / Counted Quantity / Difference. If the user still tries to Apply, shows the option to either keep the current Difference or the current Counted Quantity for all records.
- Set the user when directly inserting a Counted Quantity (before only when using the Set button)
- Add the possibility to import records.
- Add "To Apply" filter.
- Add a 'Reset' button at the top of the tree view for multiple records.
From the Update Quantity page of a product
- Remove the "Updated on Hand Quantity" and can directly change "On Hand" quantity
- Pre-fill a default location (Last used location for tracked products or default destination location in single WH environment)
From the Inventory Report
- Remove the "Updated on Hand Quantity" and can directly change "On Hand" quantity
closesodoo/odoo#71199
Task-id: 2495664
Pr-community: 71199
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
On a delivery, when changing the initial demand of a stock move, if its
value was 0 and becomes > 0, its state will be 'Partially Available' but
the reserved quantity will still be 0.
To reproduce the error:
1. Create 2 products P01, P02
- Product Type: Storable
- Qty On Hand: 1
2. Create + Confirm a SO with 1xP01 and 1xP02
3. Open SO's delivery
4. Unlock, set P01's initial demand to 0, Save, Lock
5. Unreserve, Check Availability
6. Unlock, set P01's initial demand to 1, Save
7. Click on PO1 line
Error: The stock move state is "Partially Available", but the initial
demand is 1 and the reserved quantity is 0. It should be "Waiting
Availability"
On step 5, since the wanted quantity of P01 is 0, the state of the stock
move becomes "Available". Then, when increasing the requested quantity,
the state automatically becomes "Partially Available" because the module
does not consider the case where the state is "Available" with a
reserved quantity equal to 0.
OPW-2488580
closesodoo/odoo#71445
X-original-commit: 05b6dfa0b1e4daf46d569c2e0a330b35e6437f8d
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- create a product with 0 stock
- Sale order 500 units
- a RFQ is created for 500 units
- in replenishments, you have 0 units to order, OK
- RFQ --> confirm PO
- in replenishments, now the quantity to order is 500
--> should still be 0, it leads to confusions
It happens because the replenish action check the missing
quantity for today. It result by -500 units since the delivery
is planned for the next day (default supplier lead days = 1).
But since the orderpoint exist, the quantity forecasted is
already computed correctly with the right lead time.
But the action will remove the 500 missing today from the
quantity forecasted (The idea is to add the missing quantity on
the main location. e.g. I have
-10 units in WH/Stock/Shelf1
-20 units in WH/Stock
The orderpoint will only look for its own location -> 20 to reorder
The replenishment report look by warehouse and not by location -> 30
missing. So 30 missing + 20 incomming -> 10 to add (by default on
WH/Stock)
The fix is to add a step when a product is missing then compute its
virtual available with lead days (to avoid missing confirmed moves
during the lead time).
opw-2456978
closesodoo/odoo#69527
X-original-commit: f939c7b2c4143d685c25d155a164d63070d36ed2
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix the access for stock user to stock.quant.
Since the inventory adjustement feature has been moved on
the stock.quant. The user should be able to write on them to
make their count. However we kept that a stock user can't validate
an inventory nor modify quantities on product
closesodoo/odoo#69006
X-original-commit: 6b8d40ec494dfbcaaef0da438692c76d0088f671
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit removes stock.inventory(.line) and moves its general
functionality into stock.quant. Some features are lost during this
switch as well.
Feature Additions:
- New single list view for inventory adjustments (no more multiple
inventory adjustment records to keep track of!)
- Improved cyclic counts (annual inventory day setting) + next inventory
dates are immediately viewable in view (vs auto-generated inventories
based only on location)
- Specific quants (i.e. counts) can be assigned to users for more
flexibility (vs only able to restrict by location + product
combinations)
- Counts can be requested (i.e. bulk assigned to user/for a specific
inventory date)
Feature Removals:
- Can no longer look at previous inventory adjustments linked to a
specific record. Each quant has a history button to show inventory
related moves. [relevant account moves are also now harder to see via
stock as well]
Other changes:
- Bulk of changes were for demo/test
- Some changes were done to ensure "Update Quantity"/"Inventory Report"
views still mainly function the same as before with the exception of a
new column added to support updating quant quantities in these views.
Task: 2440026
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#17329
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2326closesodoo/odoo#68409
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
We introduced new Smart Putaway Rules.
Locations now can have a storage category, on each storage category,
we can specify the amount of products/packages(with certian package
type) that can be stored in the location.
On putaway rules, we can also set a storage category. Now when apply a
putaway rule, we will find a suitable child location of the out
location according to quantity/weight setting on the storage category.
Task 2341820
PR #63516
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15363
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2040
Let's say we have location A, B, and C. A is the parent of B, B is the
parent of C. And we have a putaway rule to move product from A to B. Now
receive product at C, because currently when we can't find a putaway
rule at one location, we will loop to check its parent locations. So the
puteaway rule A -> B will be found, and product received at C will in
the end be stored at B.
After this commit, we don't check the parent locations when we can't
find a putaway rule.
Task 2341820
PR #63516
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15363
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2040
This method is useless and it bypass the computation of some fields
(qty_available, virtual_available, incoming_qty, outgoing_qty). Then
this method is not cache-friendly, and we should use `read` instead.
task-2439019
closesodoo/odoo#66621
Related: odoo/enterprise#16584
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently the non-reserved moves in the availability report are sorted
by priority, date, id (same as reserved moves). This commit makes it so
non-reserved moves are now sorted by reservation_date first + the
previous ones (i.e. different sorting logic from the reserved moves).
The idea is to make it easier to reserve moves according to the set
reservation_method logic. Unfortunately there isn't an easy way to split
the sorting logic and we need to search for some overlapping moves
ordered in a different way.
closesodoo/odoo#65730
Task: 2418907
Related: odoo/upgrade#2143
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds 2 small feature additions to reservation logic:
1. Add another # days parameter for reserve "before scheduled date"
option for priority moves (i.e. so they can be marked for reservation
earlier)
2. Add Reserve button in the forecast report
It also cleans up some auto-reserving logic:
- 'at confirm' now has a reservation_date = day of confirmation:
- removes need to check `reservation_method` when doing automated
_action_assign (i.e. in scheduler + completed incoming move).
- allows ordering by reservation_date during automated _action_assign
for more consistent and logical reservations.
Task: 2418907
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2143
In simple search by qty_available we use optimized method. Before this commit
that method didn't work when product doesn't have stock moves and domain
includes zero qty, e.g. ``[('qty_available', '>=', 0)]``, ``[('qty_available',
'=', 0)]``, etc
The problem comes from https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/66652closesodoo/odoo#68042
X-original-commit: 629ce193e4725919c1aeede000517564f0e8adf1
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
The run_push() method may change the location_dest_id of the stock move
but not the associated stock move line. That can produce a
de-synchronisation between stock move and stock quants as those are
updated by the stock move lines.
This commit ensures the location_dest_id of the stock move is also set
on the move lines in run_push()
opw : 2427301
closesodoo/odoo#67460
X-original-commit: 7dafde71c0591be74f9d433976243342b1b3e635
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Fabien Pinckaers