* account, hr_expense, mrp, sale, sale_product_configurator, stock_account,
website_sale, website_sale_comparison
Before this commit, the `product.attribute.value` were stored on the variants.
This required filtering of attribute lines to find the appropriate matching
`product.template.attribute.value` that were used in most of the business code,
such as when computing the `price_extra`.
This also prevented to have multiple attribute lines for the same attribute,
which is needed to handle use cases such as grape varieties for wine products.
This will be done in the following commit.
After this commit, the combination of `product.template.attribute.value` will be
directly stored on the product variant.
Other changes
=============
Add `combination_indices` on product, which allows to quickly find a variant
matching a combination (1 simple indexed equality query as opposed to 1 query
with as many joins as there are attribute lines), and to add an easy
SQL constraint to ensure active combination uniqueness.
Add active field on `product.template.attribute.line` and
`product.template.attribute.value`, with the same behavior as variants:
They become archived if they can't be unlinked. This allows to keep the database
consistent, such as archived variants correctly keeping all their values, sales
order lines keeping their custom and no_variant. This is done with the help of
`ondelete=restrict` on the corresponding m2m fields, and the `unlink` methods
falling back to archiving when `unlink` is restricted.
Part of task-1912579
PR: #32946
* = account, mrp, purchase_stock, sale, sale_product_configurator,
stock_account, website_sale
It is always better to create the product template attribute lines before
creating the variants. In a following commit, this will become mandatory.
The variants that are created should always match the combination of attributes
set on the template.
Finally explicitly call `create_variant_ids` when possible instead of reassigning
the attribute lines to implicitly call `create_variant_ids`.
closesodoo/odoo#34122
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
This commit has several parts:
- fix ordering of attributes and values
- fix/create python logic (notably for checking the possibility of a combination
and for price computing)
- fix currency
- display correct info on the views without the need of JS (prevent flickering)
- fix various issues with website and SO
- add a lot of tests (both unit and tour)
================================================================================
*** Make consistent the filtering and ordering of product variants ***
Filter & Check possibility
==========================
The first variant shown on the website should always be possible.
When activating the customize "list view of variants", we don't want to show
impossible combination on the list.
We also don't want the user to be able to add to cart an impossible variant.
Show appropriate messages when no combination is possible.
Order
=====
We want the variant order to be consistent with what the user selected with the
sequence fields. The display order on the website should be the same than the
display on the various backend views.
This implies also fixing the order of:
- product.attribute
- product.attribute.value
- product.template.attribute.line
- product.template.attribute.value
The general order is now: (parent,) sequence, id.
Before, it was already a mix of those, but not always in the same order, and not
every key for every model. The name has been removed from the order: either we
sequence them correctly, or we want them in the creation order.
On the website, the first combination shown by the python should be the same as
the one that will be computed by the JS to prevent flickering.
Ideally there should be no RPC at page loading if the python has computed
everything correctly, but it is currently not possible to achieve because the
view logic for website_sale_stock is only in JS.
================================================================================
*** Fix product template and variant price computation ***
Move and improve the get_combination_info method:
- take into account tax included/excluded settings (B2B/B2C)
- take into account pricelist discount policy (striked price)
- fix inconsistencies when price after pricelist would be 0
- use proper rounding and discount compute with the currency helper methods
- fix an issue where context "partner" would have a mix of id and recordset
================================================================================
*** Fix currency conversions ***
The list_price and lst_price of a product are always encoded using the currency
of the product.
The results of "combination info" are always returned using the currency of the
pricelist if given, or the currency of the product.
The prices on an order (line) are encoded with the currency of its pricelist.
================================================================================
*** Fix dynamic variants access rights ***
Public users on the e-commerce should be able to create product variants if the
configuration of the attributes of the product template is set as "dynamic".
This uses "sudo" to bypass create security rules for public users.
Multiple checks are done to ensure that it creates a valid product variant.
================================================================================
*** Miscellaneous bugs, tracebacks and necessary improvements ***
In general:
- correctly show warning when no variant is possible
- don't let user add to cart an impossible variant (from optional product
modal or from any RPC), both in interface and controller logic
- fix as much flickering as possible by correctly pre-computing in python/views
- move business logic from controllers to models
- correctly add no_variant and is_custom values on the SO line description
Sale order:
- fix traceback when emptying the product_id field from configurator
website_sale:
- correctly compute first image / carousel, and correctly swap images when
changing variants, without duplicate image or zoom problems
- don't use list view of variants when it doesn't make sense
- added missing product info when adding a no_variant attribute to cart
- fix cart accessory product computation
website_sale_wishlist:
- fix it with dynamic variants, no_variant and is_custom
website_sale_comparison:
- fix it with dynamic variants (comparison and alternative products)
website_sale_stock:
- fix it in general (some flickering still present)
================================================================================
Authored by @seb-odoo with contribution from @awa-odoo
task-1910821
closesodoo/odoo#28079
The new product configurator introduces the possibility to create
variants dynamically. One of the main goal is to be able to create
product templates with **many** attributes and values, but not generate
all variants automatically. Only the necessary variants are created
on-the-fly.
However, it turns out that **many** dynamic attributes and values still
fails. For example, create a product with 10 attributes, 10 values for
each. This allows 10^10 theoretical combinations; although the variants
are not created, the creation of the product template fails.
The reason is that the `variant_matrix` contains the list of all
combinations, which causes a `MemoryError`.
An easy modification to improve the process is to keep an iterator
instead of generating the list. This avoids the `MemoryError`, but it
remains necessary to go through all combinations three times, which
would take too much time.
Therefore, some refactoring is necessary in order to keep the same
logic, but avoid going through any huge list. Here are the improvements:
1. Skip the creation part if nothing will be created.
If any attribute is dynamic, no variant is created. Therefore, we can
perform the check upfront and skip the variant creation part if
possible.
2. Stop the creation loop as soon as possible.
There is an hardcoded limit of maximum 1000 variants to create. We
can perform this check along with the list creation instead of
checking at the end.
3. Determine if a product has valid attributes in a different way.
The existing logic is safe but expensive: we check that all attribute
values of a product are part of the possible combinations. This can
be simplified by checking if (1) all attribute values of a variant
are part of the accepted attribute values of the template and (2) a
variant uses all attributes of the template. The second check is
mandatory to delete existing variants when an attribute is added to
the template.
Thanks to these modifications, we at worst go through 1000 possible
attribute values combinations. It might still be possible to optimize
step 3 with a fancy SQL query which would retrieve all (in)valid
products at once. Hopefully this won't be necessary and the optimized
logic will be enough.
opw-1902392
closesodoo/odoo#28530
Commit dc1681b1 did change the name of the inventory creation from
direct qty update, but test still tries to compare the product.name
closesodoo/odoo#25948
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
Including
- unit tests for test/inventory.yml
- unit tests for test/move.yml
- unit tests for test/shipment.yml
- integration of test_reuspply.py
- integration of test_owner_available into test_product.py
New tests are temporarily deactivated. Indeed they rely on onchange methods
that will change during migration. Tests will be reactivated after migration
and updated.
Raphael Collet