Re-introduce after discussion with AL the function that allow to specify
a custom placeholder for a specific model.
It has been removed because no more used since we use avatar mixin for
res.users and res.company. But it doesn't means that each model should add
his own mixin and controller and ... Keep it simple!
Use it for product and product template to have a default placeholder more
representative of the model.
Courtesy of xlu-odoo for this design
opw-2513801
closesodoo/odoo#73576
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
=======
1. Unified product demo data
2. Less demo: one per use case
3. Demo data for all models
Specification
=============
1. Refactor all the brol in the demo data
2. Adapt the tests to make them green, as some products are
renamed, removed, created in python instead of as demo data
...
Remaining products :
- product_product_0 becomes service_order_01
- product_product_1b becomes service_cost_01
- product_product_43 becomes product_order_01
- product_product_47 becomes product_delivery_01
- prodcut_product becomes product_delivery_02
- Replace product_product_56 by service_delivery
- Replace product_product_59 by consu_delivery_01
- Replace product_product_58 by consu_delivery_02
- Replace product_product_57 by consu_delivery_03
Removed products :
- product_product_53, product_product_57, product_product_55, product_product_54, product_product_52,
product_product_51, product_product_50, product_product_48, product_product_46, product_product_32,
product_product_33, product_product_28, product_product_38, product_product_39, product_product_40,
product_product_41, product_product_34, product_product_29, product_product_30, product_product_44,
product_product_31, product_product_35, product_product_36, product_product_37, product_product_42,
product_product_45, product_product_49, product_product_26, product_product_14, product_product_15,
product_product_18, product_product_19, product_product_21, product_product_23
Removed corresponding binaries.
Removed all Bill of Materials demo data, that were ridiculous and replace them by 2 bom: A complete
computer, and a kit computer. Rewritten the tests accordingly.
Fixed tests :
- sale_mrp/test/cancellation_propagated.yml : The yaml ref function return a id, not a dictionnary
- sale_stock/tests/test_sale_stock.py : The service product invoiced on the delivered quantity was
in fact not invoiced on delivery on the test. As we are in sale_stock, Without timesheet, we
manually set the delivered qty for the product serv_del. If we don't do this, the invoice will
never be fully invoiced.
- The pricelist rules choice is not based on the sequence anymore (Seems to be a bug, reported to
online). By the way, I changed the product to avoid the overlap.
- sale_mrp/test/sale_mrp.yml: The yaml ref function return a id, not a dictionnary
- mrp : Rewritten the tests to be coherent with the new bom data
- move the service product from product to hr_timesheet
- move default time unit for services from sale to account_analytic_analysis
to ease the configuration
path on the field tag fetching the right file instead of using the base64
encoded file in the field.
<field name="image" type="base64" file="base/static/img/main_partner-image.png" />
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20140109154550-a04qybctzaaqtrlr
stefanorigano (SRI)