Fixes 2 issues:
Issue 1: wrong view shown when registering strict consumption
To reproduce:
- create tracked product to subcontract
- create subcontract BoM with no tracked components + strict consumption
- create receipt of subcontracted product (remember to select From =
subcontractor)
- click on `action_show_details` burger button in Operations
Expected result:
- Detailed Operations window with no move lines in it (i.e.
stock.view_stock_move_nosuggest_operations view)
Actual Result:
- Detailed Operations window with move lines w/ 0 Done
(i.e. stock.view_stock_move_operations view _ lines also do
not get filled in when using the `action_assign_serial_show_details`,
=> twice as many lines as needed end up in view)i
Similar issue can occur when using a non-strict BoM + tracked product.
Issue appears to be that conditional was incorrectly updated during
refactoring to allow non-strict BoMs also record components.
stock.view_stock_move_operations view should only appear when all
productions are recorded
Issue 2: Consumption warning wizard not showing correctly
To reproduce:
- same as Issue 1, except consume less than BoM amount
Expected result: Consumption Wizard
Actual Result: stock move view shown instead
Issue was due to 'form_view_ref' value in context of picking view,
therefore we force clear this value everytime we expect this wizard
to open.
Task: 2695173
X-original-commit: b9990a5dab8731a8f69fd07aa73a318fc9d4a808
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81649
Since return moves are linked to their original move, it's easy to
manage reservation in those case. We just don't bypass the reservation
when it comes from a reservation outside our stock in order to manage
the computation on linked moves and reserve pieces that were not yet
return.
Also add a return picking type for 2 reasons:
- Allow to select existing lot.
- Display reserved move line for an incoming picking.
Note that this picking type is just a default configuration and could be
modify by the user without any issue.
closesodoo/odoo#64384
Related: odoo/enterprise#20605
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Take in account the bom consumption of subcontracting BoM:
- In flexible and warning we can now record extra component
(even if there isn't tracked component).
- In the warning case, we get a warning issue in during the recording
of component if we consume more than expected
- In case of script consumption, we cannot record component expected
if some are tracked. In this case we can consume more than expected
only if the user is a mrp manager.
Also fix "Set quantities" Button for the subcontracting
task-2486811
closesodoo/odoo#75041
Related: odoo/enterprise#20350
Related: odoo/upgrade#2750
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
The button "Set Quantity" have a different behavior
(it doesn't take in account tracked product) than
the immediate process which is confusing.
Now both flow share the same code and allow to avoid
the "Set Quantity" for the subcontracting with tracked component.
task-2486811
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75041
Before this commit, for a subcontracted product with reserved available
tracked components, if at least one component is recorded but not all,
the "Record components" button isn't available anymore.
How to reproduce:
- Create a product and create a subcontracting BOM for this product;
- Add a tracked component for this product;
- Add some qty. for the tracked component in the subcontracting loc.;
- Create a receipt for the subcontracted product (for demand qty. more
than 1) with the subcontractor as partner and confirm it:
=> The "Record components" button should be visible.
- Record a part of the demand qty. then click on "Continue", then on
"Discard":
=> The "Record components" button is now hidden.
It's because the button is hidden if all the MO are done or to close
(they are) and if all the tracked move lines have a SN/LN (they have as
they are reserved).
task-2604728
closesodoo/odoo#73991
X-original-commit: 392bc27c0ef0bc238a7eac98497b293622f0fe1d
Related: odoo/enterprise#19756
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider a consumable product P with a subcontracted BOM B
- Let's consider that B is subcontracted by a partner S and B has a storable component C
- C has the route Resupply Subcontractor on Order and has a partner SUP as supplier
- Create a purchase order PO with 1 P to S and confirm PO
- A delivery order DO1 is created with C to S
- Change the ordered quantity on PO and set 2 instead of 1
Bug:
DO1 was canceled and a new delivery order DO2 was created with only 1 C instead of 2
It happens due to merge move, when updating the PO line a new rule is
trigger and create the object in this order:
- Move Sub-Stock(finished) -> Subcontract Order -> Move Stock-Sub(comp)
Then the action_confirm is trigger and will run _merge_move
on object from left to right order. But when the move Sub-Stock is
merged, everything is write in the first move and the new move is
unlink. It result by canceling all the following object (so the new
subcontractor and the Move Stock-Sub). It was not an issue for the
subcontracting since the write of stock.move is overridden in order
to update the order quantity when the move quantity is updated.
However in this case the rule are not triggered in order to create
the moves that ressuply the subcontractor.
In order to avoid this mess, this PR prevent the merge in case of a
subcontracting move.
opw-2419222
closesodoo/odoo#69553
X-original-commit: c6447e724b9df3c25c5a5306fc902dfc5dcd6bb8
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: simongoffin <sig@odoo.com>
Some usage of `_bom_find` are performance bottleneck (one request by
product). By example, when the mrp is installed, search products
with fields compute by `_compute_quantities` (e.g. 'Negative forecasted
quantity'). it is due to the override of `_compute_quantities`
in mrp which will make (in the worst case) a `_bom_find` for each
product in the DB.
To avoid this situation the `_bom_find` method become batched
which can handle several products in once. The signature of the method
has changed and uniformize in all module.
Example performance Gain:
------------------------
In a DB with 7000 products (type 'product'), 500 locations, 1800 BoM,
9000 Stock moves, etc. Search in the tree view with filter "Negative
forecasted quantity":
Before: 10879 (nb SQL request) 12.67 +- 0.11 sec (Total RPC Time)
After: 159 (nb SQL request) 1.82 +- 0.03 sec (Total RPC Time)
task-2439019
Step to reproduce:
- Create a subcontracting BoM by partner A,
for a tracked product B (by serial or lots)
- Create a incoming transfer coming from A and mark as todo.
- Fill the move with move lines with lot + quantity.
- It is impossible to validate the transfer, "You need to supply lot..."
Also at the creation of the picking a warning popover indicate that
the previous operation (the hidden MO) is set after the transfer.
These issues comes from the refactor of mrp for v14 and the part of
subcontracting wasn't complete obviously.
Fixes done:
- Rewrite the code of the `_action_done` for subcontracting. It is for
the case of tracked finished product without any tracked component,
there wasn't any code to manage that. Now manage it by backorder MO
feature. Fix the main bug
- Set finished_date_planned before the transfer to avoid the alert
popover.
- Avoid to write activity in channel about the hidden MO in case of
cancelling.
- Fix `action_record_components` to manage multiple subcontracting
products with tracked component.
- Remove the `priority` field from the wizard MO (in case of tracked
product. Also the wizard is not really a wizard, just a weird hybrid
MO form)
PR: odoo/odoo#61606
task-2357115
closesodoo/odoo#62109
X-original-commit: 1a34e46eaca14aec981dd0f162e8014c7cb0abea
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a product P with route 'Resupply subcontractor on an order'
- Let's consider a BOM for P with type 'Subcontracting'
- Create a PO with subcontractor set on that product and process with Qty > 1,
- Validate a receipt with partial Qty and no backorder
Bug:
An error was raised because no production_id was set when trying to create a mrp.product.produce
When function _action_done is called with cancel_backorder = True, the function _action_cancel is called on the new_move
with no backorder and it called the function _action_cancel defined on model stock.move in module mrp_subcontracting
This function called _action_cancel on the mrp.production record MP
And finally this function called action_cancel on model stock.move on all finish_moves and raw_moves of MP
This line unlink MP of finish_moves and raw_moves
move.move_dest_ids.write({'move_orig_ids': [(3, move.id, 0)]})
That's why production_id was not set
PS: In this way, we don't cancel a MO when it is still used by other moves.
opw:2322278
closesodoo/odoo#57346
X-original-commit: e4d22d390c8aa8edf757e36704a9e04b2b89f115
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
After the odoo/odoo#52949 , the registering of tracked component,
in case of subcontracting, was broken. Fix and try to mimic
the same flow than before. The produce wizard has been replaced
by a clean MO form to register component and use backorder mechanisme
of MO to manage tracked finished product + tracked component.
task-2278147
closesodoo/odoo#54994
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a subcontracted product tracked without tracked components
- Create a receipt for this product
- Click on show detail
-> Lot_id are display even if the picking type uses create lot.
The assign serial feature is not working either.
The lot_id instead of lot_name is required in case of tracked
components since it will open the produce wizard and the user
will create lot there. However in the case of non-tracked components,
the wizard will not be used nor lot created. In this case the
classic behavior should be used with lot_name
closesodoo/odoo#43997
Task: 2180191
X-original-commit: 00fe4186935435f46a0db197c68e6df956fe80db
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When subcontracting a product via a purchase order and not a simple
receipt. Then the cancelation of the receipt will not only cancel
the receipt of the finished product but not the delivery for the
components.
It happens because button_cancel on purchase order will call
_action_cancel the stock.move linked to purchase order line. It will
not call action_cancel on the stock.picking. However the part
responsible for the cancelation of components delivery is in the
stock.picking action_cancel method.
Move the stock.picking action_cancel logic in the stock.move
_action_cancel method since it's always call for both usecase.
Fixes#42551closesodoo/odoo#42653
X-original-commit: 841305f271411c3a67af271ac09da9ce0922f100
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When the action is called by a javascript function the view
is not correctly rendered because the tree type does not exist
in the registry but the correct type is list.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt with a quantity of 2
- Receive 1 and create a back order
- Receive 2 in the BO
It will only require the components for 2 units and not 3.
closesodoo/odoo#37305
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
- nothing tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products not tracked and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
- finished products and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Validate a purchase_order with a user without group inventory user or manufacturing user.
AccessError on operation read for BoM. A purchase user should be able
to validate an order independently of the documents that will be
generate.
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
Currently, the subcontract picking present multiple difficulties:
- The user has to introduce multiple time the lot produced.
In register components button and then create a new move line with
the show details operation button.
- Same problem with the correction system. The user has to modify the
lot in details operation and then go on the subcontract production and
unlock and edit it.
In order to facilitate those behavior. A move line will be automaticaly
created during the register components process. Also the subcontract
moves for components will be available in the detail operations tab.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt of 1 units of a subcontracted product
- Receive 2
- Validate the receipt
-> An extra move for subcontractor of 1 has been validated but a
new move of 2 still in waiting availability and can not be
validated.
It happens due to action_done that will validate existing subcontract
order (with the initial quantity). Then the move is validated and an
extra move is created and merged in the first one. This new merged
move of 2 is then confirmed and validated. That will recreate a
subcontract order of 2 that will not be validated since it was validated
in the picking action_done at the start.
This commit will modify:
- action_done on move in order to validate the subcontract order after
the move validation and the new subcontract order creation too.
- action_confirm in order to create the subcontract order with the
additional quantity and then merge it to the existing moves.
In a few words, it allows to send components to a subcontractor partner
and receive a finished product. The production is managed through classical
manufacturing orders where the raw and finished location is the
subcontracting location. When creating a receipt picking for a
subcontractor partner, the location_id of the moves will be set to the
subcontracting locations by using the property_stock_customer and
property_stock_supplier of the partner. An override of _action_confirm
will create the manufacturing order.
When a subcontracted bom contains tracking, the produce wizard is
available from the picking to record which lots were produced/consumed.
New type on the BoM: subcontract
New type on res.partner: subcontactor
New location per company (we still own the components stored at the
subcontractor so they're still valued)
New routes created to resupply the subcontracting location on order or
not (through a reordering rule).
Override of res.partner to set the property_stock_customer/supplier on
subcontactor partners.
Proper tests were added too.
Joint work with: Arnaud Baes <arb@odoo.com>
task 1831382
Tiffany Chang (tic)