We cannot have byproduct in case of subcontracting,
raise a Error if we try (like operation). Also remove the
it from the subcontracted form (also clean empty space of it).
task-2486811
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75041
When setting a Bill or Material to subcontracting, the "Operations" tab
is hidden. But it still effect eg. BoM Structure & Cost report.
With this changeset, we get an error when we save a subcontracting BoM
that has operations.
opw-2513637
closesodoo/odoo#74441
X-original-commit: 41c7bd1461a5346a030ab194b5f7fafa87a4c45a
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Some usage of `_bom_find` are performance bottleneck (one request by
product). By example, when the mrp is installed, search products
with fields compute by `_compute_quantities` (e.g. 'Negative forecasted
quantity'). it is due to the override of `_compute_quantities`
in mrp which will make (in the worst case) a `_bom_find` for each
product in the DB.
To avoid this situation the `_bom_find` method become batched
which can handle several products in once. The signature of the method
has changed and uniformize in all module.
Example performance Gain:
------------------------
In a DB with 7000 products (type 'product'), 500 locations, 1800 BoM,
9000 Stock moves, etc. Search in the tree view with filter "Negative
forecasted quantity":
Before: 10879 (nb SQL request) 12.67 +- 0.11 sec (Total RPC Time)
After: 159 (nb SQL request) 1.82 +- 0.03 sec (Total RPC Time)
task-2439019
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
**Steps to reproduce:**
* Create a subcontractor.
* Create a BoM of type Subcontracting and assign the subcontractor.
* Create a children contact for the subcontractor.
* Creat a purchase order (or a receipt picking) with the children contact of the subcontractor.
* Confirm the document.
**Current behavior:**
Subcontractor documents are not created.
**Expected result:**
They should be created.
**Cause:**
The BoM search is not including possible parents of the partners.
**Solution:**
With the use of `parent_of` operator in the search, we cover both cases of the children
and the parent as initiators of the subcontracting.
closesodoo/odoo#46670
X-original-commit: 86726aba26f4ba8d7dadb29ed2415baf49fe54c0
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
_bom_subcontract_find return a BoM of typer subcontractor for
any partners if the subcontractor is not set. The real behavior is
to not create a subcontracting order if the partner is not set.
Force to set subcontractors on subcontracting BoM since
it's always used in order to determine if a subcontracting
should be apply on a receipt or not. Also there is not magical
behavior has 'if there is no subcontractor on the BoM then it
means all partners...'
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
In a few words, it allows to send components to a subcontractor partner
and receive a finished product. The production is managed through classical
manufacturing orders where the raw and finished location is the
subcontracting location. When creating a receipt picking for a
subcontractor partner, the location_id of the moves will be set to the
subcontracting locations by using the property_stock_customer and
property_stock_supplier of the partner. An override of _action_confirm
will create the manufacturing order.
When a subcontracted bom contains tracking, the produce wizard is
available from the picking to record which lots were produced/consumed.
New type on the BoM: subcontract
New type on res.partner: subcontactor
New location per company (we still own the components stored at the
subcontractor so they're still valued)
New routes created to resupply the subcontracting location on order or
not (through a reordering rule).
Override of res.partner to set the property_stock_customer/supplier on
subcontactor partners.
Proper tests were added too.
Joint work with: Arnaud Baes <arb@odoo.com>
task 1831382
Rémy Voet (ryv)