The stock convention on location name is always to name the destination
`location_dest_id`. It was not the
case on the stock rule model
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
Allow the quantity decrease of Sale Order line of a MTO product.
When increasing de quantities, the related pickings, RFQ / PO are
increased as well, but it wasn't the case if decreasing the quantity.
It should allow the cascade of the decrease in the related pickings as
it would work for the increase. Also modifies a related Purchase Order
if it wasn't yet validated (and thus still a RFQ).
merge_moves was modified so it would allow the merge of negative moves
with positive ones, while trying to "deplete" as much quantity as
possible for each mergeable move.
But negative moves don't always have all required properties to be
compared to the positive ones (some keys might be missing, such as
'created_production_id'). That means we will merge strictly the positive
moves at first as it was done before. But then we try to merge them "less
strictly", using less keys to compare.
Let's say we have those moves (and all other relevant keys matches) :
- move_1 : {qty : 5, created_production_id: 1}
- move_2 : {qty : 3, created_production_id: 2}
- move_3 : {qty : -6, created_production_id: False}
move_1 and move_2 cannot be merged as they don't share the same
created_production_id. But to merge move_3, we'll need to merge it into
move_1 and move_2. It will then deplete move_1 and decrease move_2.
Which will leave us with :
- move_1 : {qty : 0, created_production_id: 1}
- move_2 : {qty : 2, created_production_id: 2}
move_3 will be unliked as its purpose is done.
Task-2513592
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78070
Previous specification of making MOs unlocked by default was confusing
for users and made it too easy to accidentally change the qty to consume
rather than the consumed amount. This fix makes it so MOs are now locked
by default and will be unlocked/locked (including existing draft /
confirmed / in progress MOs) automatically when setting is changed.
Previous setting (Lock Quantities To Consume) has been repurposed for
this. When setting is active, no lock/unlock button will be visible to
match the updated setting description (i.e. non-done MOs can
never be locked).
Task: 2518523
ENT PR (only fixes test): odoo/enterprise#19732
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2655
Prior to this commit, MOs would throw a usererror if there were no
components in it. This restriction made it so MOs created by a
replenishment (i.e. `warehouse.orderpoint`) for a BoM with no components
were never confirmed and the `qty_to_order` would accumulate for each
replenishment's new draft MO.
Steps to reproduce:
1. create a bom for a new product (w/ manufacturing route) with no
components
2. create and confirm a sales order for the new product
3. go to Replenishment and automate the product's replenishment
4. create a new sales order for the product
Expected result: 2 confirmed MOs where the quantity of the first MO
matches the first sale order's quantity and the 2nd MO matches the
second sale order's quantity
Actual result: 2 draft MOs where the first MO matches the quantity of
the first sale order and the second MO matches the quantity of the first
sale order + the quantity of the second sale order
This commit makes it so MOs can now be confirmed even when it has no
components. Note this requires changing the logic in a few locations to
ensure expected behavior still occurs including:
- backorders are automatically confirmed.
- `reservation_state` is recalculated when expected (will be blank when
no components).
Task: 2422698
This commit removes stock.inventory(.line) and moves its general
functionality into stock.quant. Some features are lost during this
switch as well.
Feature Additions:
- New single list view for inventory adjustments (no more multiple
inventory adjustment records to keep track of!)
- Improved cyclic counts (annual inventory day setting) + next inventory
dates are immediately viewable in view (vs auto-generated inventories
based only on location)
- Specific quants (i.e. counts) can be assigned to users for more
flexibility (vs only able to restrict by location + product
combinations)
- Counts can be requested (i.e. bulk assigned to user/for a specific
inventory date)
Feature Removals:
- Can no longer look at previous inventory adjustments linked to a
specific record. Each quant has a history button to show inventory
related moves. [relevant account moves are also now harder to see via
stock as well]
Other changes:
- Bulk of changes were for demo/test
- Some changes were done to ensure "Update Quantity"/"Inventory Report"
views still mainly function the same as before with the exception of a
new column added to support updating quant quantities in these views.
Task: 2440026
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#17329
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2326closesodoo/odoo#68409
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
In order to have always a picking_type_id on a stock move (and
consistent with his parent model), make it compute store.
Then clean the call of picking_type_id without change the behavior
(/!\ `move.picking_id.picking_type_id != move.picking_type_id` because
of mrp). Fix some test where the location(_dest) was unset in moves.
Also:
- Clean the mess in the create of `stock.picking` about that
and add a onchange to keep location(_dest) consistent with moves.
- The move `description_picking` is set when the `picking_type_id`
change, not only at the create method.
task-2373638
Currently stock moves are auto-assigned (i.e. reserve free stock) both
when the scheduler is run and when a corresponding stock move that can
assign a move is completed. This strictness was causing issues for
prioritization of moves to assign, for example a picking with a
scheduled_date far in the future could automatically reserve all stock
if it was created before another picking that an immediate
scheduled_date. To ease this, an extra setting has been added to
stock.picking.type to let users choose how reservations should occur for
moves assigned to that picking_type (or picking with that picking_type):
1. 'at_confirm' = automatically when:
- stock is available when the move's associated picking/MO is
confirmed,
- when new stock becomes available,
- when the scheduler is triggered (+ stock available).
2. 'manual' = user must always manually click "Check Availability"
button (scheduler will no longer reserve).
3. 'by_date' = automatically when within the move's reservation_date
and:
- stock is available when the move's associated picking/MO is
confirmed,
- new stock becomes available when move is already confirmed, or
- the scheduler is run (+ stock is available).
'by_date' has an extra option of # days before the move's scheduled
date that affects the move.reservation_date.
Task: 2359317
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#1868
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#15050
This commit does 3 things:
1. When 'action_confirm' is triggered in a manufacturing order, any
'move_raw_ids' (components) that are unable to be fully reserved
when `action_assign` is triggered will be checked for an automatic
reordering rule (RR). If a rule exists it will be auto-triggered.
This includes subcontractor manufacturing orders. Relevant test
updated to match this.
2. When a MO is completed, auto check if there are corresponding
confirmed stock moves that can be populated by the completed products
and trigger their 'action_assign' to reserve the completed products.
3. If a new move line is added to an already confirmed MO, then do same
auto-RR check/trigger. (note will occur for pickings without extra
code since `stock_picking.action_confirm` is triggered again in this
case.)
This reuses similar logic as odoo/odoo#52433 from task 2244230.
Originally this was done in the `action_assign`, but has been moved to
`action_confirm` so as to imitate the now archived MTO process with RR.
Overlapping logic has been moved into stock_move for easier reusability.
Note that this now means editing existing moves' `product_uom_qty` (i.e.
Demand) will not have a flow to auto-trigger their RR.
Subcontracting test updated to match + new mrp test added for this new
feature.
closesodoo/odoo#57334
Task: 2322496
X-original-commit: 2688cd1bae489b1dec8862f4de727ac20514844c
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
- The deadline of MO generated via procurements is calculated differently.
Now, it doesn't take anymore in account the manufacturing_lead
of the company (Security Lead Time of MO). The computation of planned date remains unchanged.
- The date_expected fields was duplicated with the date fields
except when the move was done. Merge both fields.
The only information lost is: we can't know what was the
scheduled date before processing move (`state` == done).
Indeed, the date becomes the actual move processing datetime.
- The `date` in `stock.picking` field contained the time of
(purchase) order `date_order` (`purchase.order`).
This field is was wrongly used in the kanban view where we
expected to see date_planned instead. Also, the `_order` used
this date instead of date_planned too.
- The `delay_alert` is activate independently of stock rules.
Then it is now activate in all case.
- Remove the auto-reschedulting process of stock move via
the stock rule (`propagate_date` and `propagate_date_minimum_delta`).
Replace it by a automatic deadline date (`date_deadline`) propagation.
The deadline is the promise done to/by vendor/client (SO/PO)
then it is a readonly fields on picking/move and MO.
- Now the Scheduled date (`date`) of stock move is never propagate
and it is only related to the Scheduled date of
related document (MO or picking).
- Now when a move is created from procurement (sale),
`date_planned` = `date_deadline` - `security_lead`.
- The `delivery_date` of sale is no editable after confirmation
and propagate as the deadline to related stock move linked to order_line
- Adapt filter and decoration of MO and picking.
- Because we are the client in case of purchase (PO), the promise of vendor
can be not respected. Then we add the lead security to the deadline
(inverse the sale order logic) of PO picking (promise reciept date
+ security lead) to match with the replenishment.
task-2246665
In a scenario parent mo <-> child mo, delaying the production start on
the child mo will delay the parent start but not the parent's workorders
This commit will replan the workorders each time a planned production is
delayed.
Task : 2278147
Improve onboarding by removing the replenish on order route.
Companies that do MTO process could unarchive the route in
order to have a basic configuration.
closesodoo/odoo#55147
Task: 2245882
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Bunch of last minute fixes including:
- serial handling in tablet view
- expected durations and backorders
- button unplan unlinks the leave but the computed aren't recomputed
then we need to manually set the date_planned_start/finished
then we need to not propagate them on the related document
(move/production) because they are required
- operation company_id wrongly set
task-2241471
Removed abstract workorder
Removed the integration of expiry wizard in tablet view since it should
be moved in enterprise in the tablet view implementation (not possible
to set consumed lot on workorders on community anymore)
Refactor _set_quantity_done to use ORM command in order to not return a
dict with vals to_create/to_write
task-2241471
Set the operations directly on the Bill of Material.
Duplicate the demo data where a routing was shared.
Adapt the tests.
Remove the following feature:
- set the same routing on parent and kit child bom
- when planning, if the component of the kit have the same operation
than a component of the parent bom, merge these operations
task-2241471
- create product comp1
- create product finished1
- created bom: 1 comp1 for 1 finished1
- activate PBM
- 100 units of comp1 in stock
- create an MO for 5
- on the pbm, deliver 3 and no backorder
- on the mo, check availability, produce 3
- on the pbm, unlock, change delivered qty from 3 to 5
On the mo, the raw move is reserved to 5 units but the 3 units
used in the first produce are removed.
It happens because editing the quantity or initial on a move
will try to reserve the next moves. In order to reserved,
_do_unreserve will destroy the stock.move.line and _action_assign
(call just after) will recreate them in order to regenerate the
reservation. In the process the qty_done on the stock.move.line will
be loss. We want to avoid this behavior in mrp so we call
_decrease_reserved_quantity from mrp that will keep stock.move.line
with quantity done.
opw-2206472
closesodoo/odoo#47617
X-original-commit: c6cf5841015c87163f8ea16dd75232e5cb855df6
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a product MTO manufacture with a BoM
- Set produce delay as 1 day.
- Create a SO for the product and validate
The production order is created but with a duration of 1h.
It's due to commit 8944674d6d
It will use the moves finished date in order to determine the MO
finished date. However before this commit during _run_manufacture
the MO was created with a fix finished date and the move finished
date_expected was created with this date as date_expected.
Now the MO is created with the finished date, the inverse does
nothing since the finished moves do not exist yet.
In order to fix it, generate move_finished_ids use the product/company
manufacture delay. A first patch tried to rewrite date_planned_finished
after action_confirm. However it triggers the propagate date on
following moves.
closesodoo/odoo#44532
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously when the BoM on a product do not have components but only
services. Then during scheduler a log was posted on the product explaining
that components are required.
However since this process is possible in another usecase it should be
possible with procurement. The only difference is that procurements
confirm records in order to propagate. In this case since there is
no components and services are not propagate with procurements, it's
not needed to confirm the MO.
closesodoo/odoo#43133
Task: 2170845
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When a manufacturing order was created through a stock rule, the `delay_alert`
feature was broken. Indeed, we should store on the order the `delay_alert` value
similar to what we do with the `propagate_date`, `propagate_date_minimum_delta`
and `propagate_cancel` fields.
We thus add the missing field and add the values in the multiple prepare methods.
We also the missing values for `propagate_date_minimum_delta` and `propagate_date`
in `_get_move_raw_values`.
task-2154781
closesodoo/odoo#42032
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Before this patch, writing on the `date_expected` field on the raw moves did not
update the `date_planned_start` (but writing on `date_planned_start` did write on
the raw AND finished moves `date_expected`).
This proved to be wrong: having the same `date_expected` on both raw and finished
moves did not make sense (the manufacturing order is not instantaneous). It also
makes difficult to make the rescheduling work: the rescheduling is done on the stock
moves and thus updates `date_expected` on the raw moves. If this information is not
transmitted to the manufacturing order, we won't be able to continue the rescheduling
on the finished moves (the idea is to update the raw moves which will update the
date_planned_start which will update the date_planned_finished which will update the
finished moves)
To have a more sane system, the `date_planned_start` and `date_planned_finished` are
computed (with an inverse) on the raw and finished moves `date_expected` (similar to
what's done on the picking model). There's a tweak though: as `run_manufacture`
creates first the order with a `date_planned_finished` and then confirm it (which will only
create the finished move at this moment), there's no place to write `date_planned_finished`.
The compute thus defaults on `date_deadline` which is stored and the finished moves
will be created later on with this value.
We implement the same logic `_onchange_date_planned_start` in `write` so that it doesn't
only rely on the onchange mechanism and the rescheduling can work when changing the
`date_expected` on a child mo for example.
task-1970595
Before this -
If we have follwing configuration -
Manufacturing -> Propagate Cancel -> True
Buy -> Propagate Cancel -> True
* BOM of a Car -
1) Component 1 -> Iron (MTO & Buy)
Now create a SO of product Car and confirm it.
It will create a MO (Car) and then PO (Iron).
Now if PO is cancelled, it will cancel its
move_dest_ids and on change of it MO will be
cancelled but delivery move will remain ongoing.
When action cancel is called on a move raw, it will
check if the production order is also cancelled.
If the MO is cancel, in this case cancel also its
move finished.
Task-2117832
closesodoo/odoo#42209
X-original-commit: 9522e51a3b290c91f23658a4fb781003ff1fd8d2
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
If it isn't set manually, it defaults to now and the result is not
consistent with planned date end. We make it an hour before totally
subjectively.
closesodoo/odoo#37173
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Made some changes in stock.quant model to allow user to modify product
quantity easier.
To allow the edition of quant without opening more permissions on the
model, we switch to sudo in create mode and write if the conditions are
met (special key in context + access rights on the current user + write
on a specific field).
Also, we have two list views for the quant:
- The old list view who still readonly.
- A new list view where user can create new quant or edit quantity
of existing ones
We display the second one if user is a stock manager.
For existing quants, user can modify counted quantity (which will modify
product quantity). User can also create new quant, in this case:
- The quant is really a new one (ex.: new product/location
association) so will simply create a new quant.
- A corresponding quant already exist, so will modify the existing
quant instead of create a new one.
When an user creates a new quant, the model will check each time a
non-quantity field (product, location, SN/LN, package or owner) is
modified to see if corresponding quant exists. In this case, it'll get
the quant ID and will update reserved and on hand quantities.
If user didn't change the inventory quantity, it'll be updated too.
On product form view, the 'Update quantity' button was removed as user
can now simply modify quant with 'On Hand' stat button.
Task #1935921
Co-authored-by: sle-odoo <sle@odoo.com>
To record a production via a manufacturing order, the user can either
use the produce wizard or the workorders views. Those two objects was
technically different but act more or less the same. This commit aims to
merge the similar behaviors in common code
We introduce two new abstract models :
1. Abstract workorder to share workorders and the produce wizard
2. Abstract workorder lines to share active_move_line on workorder and
product_produce_line on the wizard. Those abstract line keep the information
about the quantities and lot number to put on component move lines and
finished product move lines
Task : 1891864
The purpose is to be able to plan manufacturing order
without propagate the components's documents directly.
Except when the manufacturing comes from a pull rule, it will
be confirmed directly.
In order to do it, it will just create the moves without confirm them.
They will be only confirmed after a 'Mark as Todo' click.
Refactor production order state:
- Directly have an idea of linked workorders's state
- Computed in order to manage it in a single method
- Add tooltips for each state
Remove the None in availability selection field instead use a False
Also refactor the ready_to_produce field in order to only set as
assigned a production order that have the component for its first
workorder.
New test :
- Create a MO with a finish product tracked by SN with a dozen as
quantity
- Click on produce button in order to open the produce produce wizard
The quantity to do is 1 dozen although the tracking is by serial number
Task #55494.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
According to the routes set on the products of the raw materials, a
procurement may have to be created for the consumed lines of the MO.
A route may also be set on a product category. Before this patch, we
only look for procurement rules for the routes defined on the products
and on its category, ignoring the inherited route of the parent category.
Fortunetaly, we have a computed field on the product model returning
all the routes from the current category, so we use this one in the
search for procurement rules.
A test has been added to show the failure.
William Henrotin