Current bounce message is not very user friendly. Purpose of this commit
is to improve it, by improving wording and overall phrasing used in it.
Form view is improved so that bounce message takes all available width in
form view.
Some tests are added, notably to detect pseudo-void content from editor.
Task ID-2532529
PR odoo/odoo#71793
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
It is currently escaped as it is not Markup-ed and not considered safe.
It means raw content is currently displayed in sent emails, which is not
really what we expect.
closesodoo/odoo#71911
X-original-commit: 62e6bc216aefe93c4cd1cca8e39f124a8a298386
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Since v13 some commits added code in mail thread file. This file is already
quite long and keeping it organized allow to understand its content.
SPECIFICATIONS
Some methods defined on mail.thread may actually be called on models
not inheriting from mail.thread . Instead of having model methods on mail
thread receiving a records parameter it seems better to have those available
directly on BaseModel.
Move static_message_track on BaseModel in models.py. This method is now called
_mail_track, to be coherent with othe rmail-related naming. It is used in
accounting to track values in line model that does not inherit from mail.
thread. Update accounting accordingly (followup of d862965).
Move _message_get_default_recipients_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_message_get_default_recipients() allow to be compatible with current behavior
and current override available in some addons (like CRM, event, ...).
Move _notify_get_reply_to_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_notify_get_reply_to() allows to be shorter and coherent.
Move _alias_check_contact_on_record in models.py. Renaming it
_alias_check_contact_() allows to be shorter and coherent. Its override in
hr is also moved on BaseModel.
LINKS
Task ID-2327096 (code cleaning)
PR #56631
X-original-commit: f5df1ed912455e5ed52a65df3149f30a9d424de0
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
When incoming emails bounce due to alias security bounce email is quite
generic. Purpose of this task is to ease its customization and update.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to improve the flexibility of alias, add a customizable html field
on the alias model. This html content will be send as bounce email core content
in case of bounced/unauthorized mail received for this alias,
Obviously it has no effect on 'everyone' security setting as no email will
bounce due to that issue.
If it is not set a default generic mail will be send depending on security
setting. It allows to keep void html fields when no specific bounce content
is required
In HR, an old template allowing some light customization for employee based
security option is removed as it is completely replaced by the new feature.
Also add references message-id of the mail received to the answer so that
threads are correctly set.
LINKS
Task ID 2126509
Commit 78ac6de52d refactored methods checking alias security on the
routing found for a given destination address. Indeed if a routing is found
linked to an alias a security check is performed according to the restriction
defined on the alias itself.
HR module adds the 'employees only' restriction. A bug has been introduced
in the mentioned commit concerning employees-based aliases. Indeed a condition
on having a recordset has been added (self.ids, changed to record.ids at
20d8025036). This condition is actually not necessary as checking the
email author is linked to an existing employee has nothing to do with the
alias being linked to a record or creating new record.
This may causes issues notably using employees-restricted aliases in
expense application. Indeed you could use aliases to create new expenses
for employees and you could have issues with this condition.
This commit is linked to task ID 1829860 and ID 35093. Closes#22960 .
You could try to check followers on a model not inheriting from mail alias
mixin. In that case current code would check followers on a void mail
alias mixin record, meaning no followers found. Instead we now
differentiate the class method from the method checking record properties.
Currently check of alias security is directly embedded in mail.thread
routing method. In this commit we move this check in the mail.alias.mixin
class itself. Doing this allows models to extend or improve the behavior
depending on how inheriting models use aliases.
New feature in mail module
==========================
Currently, an email can be sent to an alias from:
- Everyone
- Authenticated Partners
- Followers
This commit is intended to add another category: Employees
The main purpose of this new feature is to allow employees to send an email
to an 'expense' alias in order to create automatically their expenses with
their mobile phones.
Use this new mechanism in hr_expense
====================================
Currenlty, we're overriding message_new to make a security check and create
an expense if the sender is an employee or bounce otherwise, which is not the
correct way to achieve this. A better way is to use the alias mechanism now
that it has been extended to employees too.
Don't hardcode email_from
=========================
The email_from of the bounce email is hardcoded to "help@odoo.com". I am sure
they will be happy to receive all answers from any odoo instance
Review the bounce email content
===============================
content: Your expense has not been created because your email address is not set
on an employee or on a employee's user. Configure your employee's information correctly and try again.
-> this is a message for the admin, not an employee or anyone else
Now the content is generical for aliase defined for employees.
Thibault Delavallée