Small side effect of commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b19dc634684aab239575b9a9e784c7420d110b7d
When deleting old attendees, we are removing the partner id associated with the email
from the partner_ids set on the event.
As the same partner can be set on more than one event, we need to loop only once
on each attendee email, otherwise we will face the error "Record does not exist
or has been deleted."
Also, when deleting partner_ids on an event, the attendee is already automatically
removed as well in _attendees_values method, there is no need to do it manually, as
it will raise the error a second time.
opw-2694428
opw-2695915
closesodoo/odoo#80828
X-original-commit: 766a1ad50a9dbc85ed2f9083f881781b7d5ec96c
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Joset <arj@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Thuyls (alt) <alt@odoo.com>
On large databases, the `postcommit` hook for Google|Microsoft Calendar
was taking up to 10% of a leave validation even if the user has the sync
disabled.
This commit disables the postcommit hook for new leaves, as the event will
be synced through the cron eventually.
closesodoo/odoo#80160
Taskid: 2693265
X-original-commit: 88884292e105eab2c36b2a334c617ac4978fa79c
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Joset <arj@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Refactor the Environments object into a Transaction object, which is
bound to one cursor, and is no longer shared among several cursors.
The following methods/properties have been changed:
- Environment.envs no longer works (because of the design change);
- Environment.manage() is deprecated (no longer useful);
- Environment.reset() is now an instance method;
- env.clear_upon_failure() is deprecated in favor of cr.savepoint().
closesodoo/odoo#75598
Related: odoo/enterprise#20451
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dollé <xdo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible to create events with defined attendee state. The default value was always set.
This was a limitation when the events were part of a recurrence and all events attendee needed to be created with a known state.
To reproduce, one would create a recurrent event, sync it with Google and in Google, 'decline' this event and the following.
The attendee state was not properly set.
closesodoo/odoo#68700
Taskid: 2484335
Related: odoo/upgrade#2537
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the calendar UX was not good enough. The look and feel was not modern.
This commit improves a lot of small details, remove unneeded or not mature features (like the videocall location url).
Counted recurrence now brings a better experience. When weekly or montly recurrences are created, occurences in the past are dismissed but before this commit their number was not adapted.
User would end up with less occurences than the provided number without explanations.
Taskid: 2484335
Part-of: odoo/odoo#68700
Before this commit, several token related data were stored on the res_users table. During event sync, the table could be locked and this commit aims to move these data to a dedicated table to avoid bottleneck effets.
Taskid: 2484335
Part-of: odoo/odoo#68700
This commit allows using different mail on the user and the partner without experiencing weird behaviors.
Before this commit, sometimes when user would set a different email on his user_id and his main partner, the sync event would not be visible as long as the event was not accepted in Google.
closesodoo/odoo#74903
X-original-commit: bca4532890432d994c0941042f4eff75485c87ce
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, attendee were found based on the email sent by Google.
When multiple partners would match the mail, the first one was selected but we should favour the partner with a user.
The method _mail_find_partner_from_emails has this exact purpose and therefore is used.
X-original-commit: afabce8d20d574e07237d16fa01dea463979f705
Replace text fields to html fields as we have our own 'OdooEditor'.
Indeed, it gives more options to users in the way they format their
content without weighting too much on the UI
(tools appear on demand and not by default).
Adding a new method convert_online_event_desc_to_text
Because online events have fixed format for the description,
this method removes some specific html tags, and converts it into
readable plaintext (to be used in external calendars).
Models -> Fields
1) calendar.event -> description
Task Id: 2499504
X-original-commit: 0d5ca6a6fe8821b4ec19dd603bde116518721792
Before this commit, when the start datetime of base_event_id in recurrences was not set, a traceback would occurs when trying to notify the user.
closesodoo/odoo#71724
X-original-commit: d5b9403c0023d8df49487293b217c59265189a7a
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Joset <arj-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
stdout:
stderr:
17:49:30.703303 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git cherry-pick 3c8bdde81d508fdee301f13bcbc6e4eefc9fb02c
error: Cherry-picking is not possible because you have unmerged files.
hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
fatal: cherry-pick failed
----------
status:
closesodoo/odoo#71390
X-original-commit: 7033f4aa7d1c65ad13dcd19e66378b101b56238b
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Joset <arj-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Turn off calendar.attendees notification during synced_events creation
to improve performances. The calendar notification are only computed
once after all the synced events have been created.
Add a flag in google_calendar.js to avoid retriggering synchronization
while navigating the calendar view if the past synchronization is still
pending.
opw: 2450259 + fixes/adaptations to 14.3 branch
FW of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/69619closesodoo/odoo#70035
X-original-commit: 28ccb2b88a7793058c81aabffb43071165886f40
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Joset <arj-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Each time the calendar view of event.calendar is loaded,
the synchronization with google calendar was launched
and if a user open many tabs, it can lead to deadlock
Solution: Check for lock before launching the synchro,
if the transaction cannot acquire the lock, it's proably
because another synchro already started
closesodoo/odoo#69540
X-original-commit: 101598fae6fc32a49bb6d422a82b621a81201cb5
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
With this commit we try to improve the way the events are displayed
to the user. Now, an event is displayed for each attendee of the event
that are selected in the filter. These events are displayed correctly
based on the status of the attendee in the event.
The colors displayed for the events now represent the attendees and not the
organizer.
If an attendee edit an event, it is edited for all others attendees.
Also, when an attendee that is not the organizer try to delete the event,
then the event is now declined in place of being deleted. If the organizer
delete the event, it is deleted for all attendees.
In case of an event where all attendees have declined it but the organizer,
the organizer see now a danger icon before the name of the event and it's
outlined and not filled with color, no matter of the actual status of the
organizer in the event.
task-2196775
COM PR: odoo/odoo#55190
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#12196
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#1532
Purpose of this commit is to ease sending mail to attendees using template
by using a template record instead of an xml id. Indeed this allow having
flows using a configurable template instead of an hardcoded one.
Code in calendar_sms is split into main models to ease future improvements
related to SMS.
Taks ID-2191254
COM PR odoo/odoo#68443
Before this commit:
The google synchronization dis not properly synced event in some conditions. Some use cases were not properly tested.
Recurrent events were regularly badly synchronized with Google.
Several issues occured:
- events not follow recurrence were duplicated on both Google or Odoo and sometimes deleted when the recurrence was reapplied.
- the base_event (first event of the recurrence) was duplicated
- miscalculation of the event google_id when they were part of a recurrence but did not followed the rrule.
- improper data handling from google. Odoo objets were created with incorrect values
- attendee state was not properly sync from Odoo to Google
- whole recurrence deletions from google were not properly sync in Odoo
- when time fields of a recurrence were modified on Google, modifications were ignored on Odoo
- Event timezone were not properly saved on the recurrency. (Odoo saves it on the recurrency and Google on the event)
- Odoo considered that all public events are writable bu Odoo users. That would trigger errors as Google implement an access right model on public events
- lack of tests
- a lot of weird behaviors resulting from these problems.
closesodoo/odoo#68412
Taskid: 2456498
Opw: 2299834
X-original-commit: dcfc8b7896f079e8e4474392807d9c53cb7e94f3
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre <lul@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Arnaud Joset <arj@odoo.com>
Issue
-----
- Currently the cron can take too much time and timeout.
In case of timeout process data are rollback.
The sync per user also crash and stop the process for all user and make
the transaction rollback
In both case we cannot ensure that all user will end up synchronized
- The real time sync can end up in deadlock:
If you create a holiday, it trigger a write on the user and the
creation of an event that will be synchronize with google
The synchronization may ask for a new token if this request fail
a new cursor is create to empty on the user the refresh token.
2 cursor that are trying to write on the same record => Deadlock
- Bad refresh token management
When the refresh token is not anymore valid it's erased but
the calendar_token and validity are kept. Is odoo consider
the token valid it will try to sync an event with google|microsoft
despite the refresh token is not valid anymore. Of course this lead to
an error and the impossibility to create an event anymore without
manually wiping the calendar_token and calendar_token_validity
- Error 401 are handled in context manager
(google|microsoft)_calendar_token, but get_*_calendar_token never raise
http error only user error.
Solution
---------
- Improve cron resilience
- Commit between each user and rollback in case of issue for a user
- Solve the issue when stop < start
- Solve issue with rrule not being the first element in the list
of recurrence
- Improve perf when searching for organizer
- In order to limit the volume during the first synchronization, we only
synchronized event from x days in the past to x days in the future with
x = 365 by default
- Limit the number of event to synchronize to google each time to 200,
since this operation is time consuming (1 request is sent per event)
- Avoid deadlock
A new cursor is not needed, we only need to ensure that write on the
user is done with a clean cursor and will be commited despite the error
raise. So rollabck before the write and commit explicitly afterwards
- Erase properly all the token and the token validity if the refresh token is not valid anymore
- For google calendar, erase also the token in case of 401
error: Wrong client id, this mean the database parameter have been
change and all the user should reconfigure the synchronization
- Directly handle error 401 with error 400 in refresh_token method
closesodoo/odoo#66250
X-original-commit: 486f69abad6226e5ce016ad89a0eeb103d709a3f
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to make templates easier to preview and edit as
weel as to improve their content.
This is achieved notably by lessening use of custom rendering context and
trying to fix as much error-prone jinja statements.
In this commit we also make ``calendar_template_meeting_reminder`` template
looking more like other templates. There were some rendering differences that
do not seem really wanted.
``calendar_template_meeting_reminder`` was also using an old ``force_event_id``
key not replaced by recurrent_id field on attendee.
This commit improves few strings of the invitation mail being sent while
booking an online appointment. Online appointment is computed based on
``appointment_type_id`` field being defined. Some tweaks in wording made it
necessary to know if recipient is the responsible, customer or an added
attendee on the event, leading to some tooling code added on event model.
The main changes includes
* for customer, remove the CTAs to accept / decline event as attendee are
automatically set as accepted;
* depending on recipient, improve wording of the mail accordingly and mention
appointment type in the mail;
Task ID-2199620
COM PR odoo/odoo#64925
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15914
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2282
Co-Authored-By: Krupal Oza <koz@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
When syncing Odoo with Google Calendar, if one Odoo event has an
attendee with an email address that contains some uppercases, it will
lead to undesirable behavior.
To reproduce the error:
(Need contacts)
1. Create an event
- In attendees, adds a new partner PA
- The email must be valid and the local-part must contain at
least one uppercase (e.g. demoUP@example.com)
2. Sync with Google
3. On Google Calendar, update the event (e.g., add a description)
4. Refresh Odoo Calendar
Error: The event is updated, but the attendee has been removed.
The error comes from both Google and Odoo.
Google Calendar is not case sensitive: if a user creates a meeting on
Google Calendar and adds an email address with uppercases, the latter
will be converted with lowercases. (On step 3, on Google Calendar, we
can notice that PA's email address does not contain any uppercase)
On Odoo side, when syncing the event, the module checks the attendees.
To do so, it uses email addresses from Odoo (with uppercases) and Google
(without uppercases):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12cb76bdfe7a5affb7580485473be71cfa37658a/addons/google_calendar/models/calendar.py#L105-L114
`email` comes from Google and `attendees_by_emails` from Odoo.
Therefore, it will consider the email as a new attendee and will run
`find_or_create` to get the associated partner. However, this method
uses the normalized email address to find the partner:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12cb76bdfe7a5affb7580485473be71cfa37658a/addons/mail/models/res_partner.py#L50-L63
Thus, `find_or_create` returns PA and adds the latter to the attendees
and partners (even if PA already exists in partners and attendees).
After that, the module checks if some attendees must be removed:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12cb76bdfe7a5affb7580485473be71cfa37658a/addons/google_calendar/models/calendar.py#L115-L120
Again, `odoo_attendee` comes from Odoo and `email` comes from Google.
Therefore, it will remove PA from attendees and partners.
This explains why:
- PA has disappeared
- No partner has been created for the email address without uppercase
This fix suggests to normalize the Odoo email addresses each they are
compared with the Google ones.
OPW-2464863
closesodoo/odoo#67950
X-original-commit: 01648d37b9d5ad858d3b60dacfb724a18045f007
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue:
If we get a 'false' for the real_owner_id from the extendedProperties, we will get an error
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'false'
Fix:
We make sure to set a user for the real_owner_id var if it return a 'false' before
closesodoo/odoo#67840
X-original-commit: 735614a127499843bc7bd701794870234e743a88
Signed-off-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com>
When syncing with a Google account, if user's email is different from
Google account, the server creates a new partner. Moreover, the synced
event are not linked to the current partner.
To reproduce the error:
1. Have two Google accounts GA01 and GA02
2. With GA01, add an event to Google Calendar and add GA02 to guests
3. In Odoo, sync with Google Calendar using GA02
- The partner linked to the current Odoo user must have an email
different from GA02's email
Error: The calendar is synced, but the user needs to check "Everybody's
calendars" to see the synced events. A new partner has been created
using GA02's email. The synced events are linked to this new partner
instead of current user's partner (`self.env.user.partner_id`).
Moreover, Google event's organizer is always added to attendees but, if
it this is indeed the case (so if the organizer is also an attendee),
`google_event.attendees` already contains this organizer.
OPW-2440033
closesodoo/odoo#65630
X-original-commit: 12cb76bdfe7a5affb7580485473be71cfa37658a
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
When synced with Google, if a user adds an event to Odoo Calendar, both
Google and Odoo will send an invitation to attendees.
To reproduce the error:
(Need mailcatcher)
1. Sync Odoo Calendar with Google Calendar
2. Create an event in Odoo Calendar
- Add at least one attendee who has an email address
3. Save
Error: Odoo's server sends an email. When synced, it should not, it
should let Google in charge of emails sending.
(Similar to #62383)
OPW-2440485
closesodoo/odoo#65125
X-original-commit: c0a2729d4b7ba6fefe4dbde9247b2e6e868f5771
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
When using the Calender synced with Google, if the user tries to delete
an event, an error message is displayed: he has to archive it instead.
To reproduce the error:
1. Sync Odoo Calendar with Gogle Calendar
2. Add an event
3. Click on it > Delete
Error: UserError message: "You cannot delete a record synchronized with
Google Calendar, archive it instead"
To make the flow simpler and faster, when clicking on "Delete", the
server will archive the event. When archiving an event, the server
deletes the corresponding event on Google Calendar. As a result, the
next time the user loads his Odoo Calendar, the sync Google->Odoo will
delete the archived event.
OPW-2440339
closesodoo/odoo#64957
X-original-commit: 109ffab4a5d3e77d330d7fa4cc5fd39017bdf561
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently when creating a calendar.event with google sync switched
on and without adding another attendee, the event is immediatly
removed from the calendar view. This is because the user_id is filtered out
of the attendee_ids before sending the values to google calendar. Then, at
the next sync, google response attendees list does not contain the user_id
so Odoo turns that into a [(3, id)] command. Thus, the corresponding event
disappear from the current calendar view even though it is still in the DB.
This fix is essentially the same as the one implemented in the
microsoft_calendar addons available from 14.0 onwards. It adds the
calendar owner if the event organizer is not null. This way, even
though the owner is not sent as an attendee, it is not removed
after google's response.
closesodoo/odoo#63190
X-original-commit: 04aa586a53c2b78cf6646d96d29cbd1e8969de3f
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Add the possibility to stop/restart the synchronization with
Google Calendar.
Change the calendar event popover of the calendar view to
display an 'Archive' button if the event was synced at least
one.
Add some tests for the new stop/restart features.
When the database is migrated from 13.3 to 14.0, the write_date is not set on the 'calendar.event' records.
During the syncing with google api, the write-date is compared to take the more recent values, leading to an inevitable crash for recently migrated databases.
closesodoo/odoo#63007
Taskid: 2389374
X-original-commit: e1493af550bd425ca682e4db707e5a490d3d4af8
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
With this commit, all instances of errors being raised inside
`BaseModel.unlink` overrides are moved into methods decorated with
`api.ondelete` which is safer.
What are the steps to reproduce your issue ?
1. Install "google_calendar"
2. Log in with "admin"
3. Create an eventX with "admin" and "demo" has attendees
4. Run "Google Calendar Synchronization" from "Scheduled Actions"
What is currently happening ?
eventX is successfully added to Google but without admin
if you sync Odoo to Google one more time, Google will overwrite eventX
and it will remove admin from attendees
What are you expecting to happen ?
Sync Odoo to Google and Google to Odoo without lost attendees
Why is this happening ?
Because there is a filter that prevent addition of current user to the attendees
How to fix the bug ?
Remove the filter
This reverts commit 287ee0f83ae6fd457e5356860c8a8ab5a4e66754.
opw-2382443
closesodoo/odoo#62416
X-original-commit: f6a610d0b1379aa97ad97fb7494a5d269da87775
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
When creating an event through the quickcreate, the user creating the
event was not set as attendee.
closesodoo/odoo#58631
Taskid: 2334943
X-original-commit: 07d799a5f676ed68fd2ffd9cd9bac3269f947ad1
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
When more than one parameter is present in a message, it helps the
translation to use named placeholder. This way, the order can be
changed. It also helps the comprehension of the message.
Using a few regex like
\((_\(.*%s.*)(\) % )([\w\[\]][\w .\[\]\(\)'"]*)\)
($1, $3))
Old syntax is still compatible but starts the migration to the new
syntax that catches error.
Historically, it was possible to import addons via a naked import. It is
no more possible since 9e1f13bac, since that commit, the only possible
way to import odoo addons is via the `import odoo.addons' prefix.
closesodoo/odoo#46995
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Create an event with at least one attendee.
Synchronize the event between Odoo and Google.
Add/Remove an attendee in Google.
Observed behavior
-----------------
After synchronisation, the partner is not added/removed in Odoo
Expected behavior
-----------------
The partner should be added/removed
Task 2241572
This commit refactors calendar synchronization between Odoo and Google after the
main calendar application refactoring.
This refactoring takes advantage of two new features from the Google API:
- New way of synchronizing resources efficiently[1]
Incremental sync is performed repeatedly and updates Odoo with all the changes that
happened ever since the previous sync. Each time, Odoo provides the previous sync
token it obtained from Google and stores the new sync token from the response.
- Event metadata[2]
Ability to set hidden key-value pairs with an event, called extended properties.
These extended properties are used to store the related odoo event id and the Odoo
owner id (see known limitations)
Known limitations
=================
- Let A and B be two new users (no tokens available). A creates an event in Odoo and
invites B. A is the owner of the event (user_id). Now B authenticates to his Google Calendar
account and synchronizes his calendar. We cannot send the event to A's calendar since we
don't have any access to his Google Calendar. Hence the event his sent to B's calendar.
This leads to data de-synchronisation: The owner is A in Odoo but B in Google.
The "real" owner (user A) is stored in the Google event's metadata to be able to
reconcile the owner for following synchronizations.
- Let A and B be two users of Odoo and Google Calendar. And let the Google Calendar of B
be private (e.g. if A creates an event in Google Calendar and invites B, B won't see the
event in his calendar). If A creates an event in Odoo and invites B. The event is synced
to Google Calendar of A. Now B can see the event in Odoo but he can't see it in his
Google Calendar.
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
[1] https://developers.google.com/calendar/v3/sync
[2] https://developers.google.com/calendar/extended-properties
The fields `start_datetime` and `stop_datetime` are the exact miror
of fields `start` and `stop` respectively.
The field `display_start` is never used.
Hence those fields are removed.
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
TL;DR A bit of magic and ... Pouf ... all virtual events are now real records.
Purpose
=======
The current implementation of recurring events uses "virtual events" to represents all
events in the recurrence. Only one event is stored in the database. All other events are
dynamically built and sent to the web client which sees them as real records.
This implementation is old, difficult to read (6 years of changes and bug fixes) and
has become more and more difficult to maintain.
A fresh start would be welcome.
Specification
=============
When creating a recurring event, a `calendar.recurrence.rule` record should be created.
This model holds the rrule configuration and is responsible to manage events that result
from the rrule.
When a new recurrence is created, all resulting events are also created (stored in the
database). No more virtual events.
To avoid an explosion of events, a maximum of 720 events is created. With 720 events,
a daily recurrence lasts for 2 years and a weekly recurrence lasts for 15 years.
This strategy is used by Google Calendar and seems acceptable in most cases.
A cron job could eventually be introduced to generated more events as the end comes.
This allows to introduce an new rrule end type: 'Forever'. This is actually a shortcut
to create a recurrence running for 720 events.
Inspired by Google Calendar, new possibilities are introduced when modifying a recurring
event (e.g. change the name, add an attendee):
- Modify only this particular event (the event is still part of the recurrence)
- Modify this and following events (events are still in the same recurrence)
- Modify all events
In a similar way, when updating the rrule of an event (e.g. from every Monday to every
Tuesday), the user can choose to:
- Modify this and following events: the recurrence is split. The first part remains
unchanged but now ends when the second recurrence begins. The second parts is the
updated rrule.
- Modify only this particular event.
- Modify all events: Forbidden (same as Google Calendar)
Note: when events are "moved" because the rrule changed, the events are not actually
moved. They are unlinked and new events are created (See "Some design choices explained"
section).
Some design choices explained
=============================
Where to store the rrule?
-------------------------
Two options were considered.
1) Store the rrule on an event, each event of the recurrence having a Many2one
to the parent_id, aka the Master Event of the recurrence.
2) Store the rrule on another model: `calendar.recurrence.rule`. Each event in the
recurrence having a Many2one to the recurrence record.
Both options have pros & cons. But there is no clear winner.
However the actual business logic of handling the recurrence creation/update
would be the same.
Where the rrule configuration is stored is the only main difference between both options.
And this is probably the easiest part of implementing recurring events.
With that in mind, option 2) is chosen. It allows to clearly separate recurrence
logic from the events themselves. It is also the "correct" way of modeling data to avoid
many empty columns for most records.
Reusing events on rrule update
------------------------------
When an rrule is modified, events should also be updated.
In most cases, current events are unlinked and new events are created from scratch.
Only events exactly at the same time before and after the rrule update are kept.
Trying to reuse other events would require an obscure and arbitrary heuristic.
(Imagine an rrule every Monday that is changed to every Tuesday and every Friday.
What would you do?).
This implies that any change to a specific event (name change, attendee added, chatter
messages) is lost. This tradeoff seems acceptable as updating an rrule should not be
that frequent. Moreover, Google Calendar also works that way so why not Odoo?
Reusing events on events shifts
-------------------------------
On the calendar view, drag and drop an event to shift the entire recurrence.
One way to handle the recurrence shift is to apply the same timedelta to all events.
Now events are correctly positioned... except for events that were specifically
moved. Those outliers needs special handling.
This also introduces some behavior inconsistencies:
when an rrule is directly modified, events are not reused, but when the rrule is
modified by drag & dropping an event, events are reused. This option needs more code to
handle the shift and the behaviors are not consistent.
The chosen option is to find the rrule configuration from the dragged event (this is
easy) and update the recurrence with those new rrule values. This brings us back to
an rrule update (see above): code reusability yeah; one behavior to rule them all yeah.
One downside is that outliers are lost (but Google Calendar also works that way).
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
In a database with many users / events to synchronize, the cron
`ir_cron_sync_all_cals` may time out. Consequently, even if a `commit`
is performed for each user, some users are never synchronized.
In this commit, we first sort the users by last synchronization date,
meaning that all users will ultimately be synchronized, even if the cron
times out. On top of that, we introduce the context key
`last_sync_hours` to prevent the synchronization in case the cron is
restarted after timeout.
opw-2158372
closesodoo/odoo#45032
X-original-commit: 2f21def63c61324e2286dbee6abead091171a041
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Martinelli <nim@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on OE a recurrent event (no allday)
synchronize the calendar, then delete an event of the recursion on OE,
sync again on OE.
An error will popup in the console. There is a typo in the variable
sent to the google API.
https://developers.google.com/calendar/v3/reference/eventsclosesodoo/odoo#40625
X-original-commit: 299bb8a995fb8058bbc0b9e4d71b67d3e765c6af
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on OE a recurrent event,
synchronize the calendar, then delete an event of the recursion on GC,
sync again on OE.
The event will be deleted from GC but not from OE after sync.
This appens because of this "rewrite" rule
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12.0/addons/calendar/models/calendar.py#L918
that occur on event creation from OE, altering the event parameters when
is marked "allday".
When an "allday" event is deleted from GC the unlink is triggered in OE with the
default time "00:00:00". During the creation of the exclusion '
_inverse_dates' will be called altering start and stop datetime but not
recurrent_id_date, so the new record will not match the event generating
the recursion and the exclusion will not occur. The problem require
particular carefulness because when a recurrent event is fetched from
google the '_inverse_dates' is not called, so in that case the default
time is fine.
opw-2060526
closesodoo/odoo#39662
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on GC a recurrent event,
synchronize OE, then delete an event of the recursion on GC, sync again
on OE.
The event will be deleted from GC but not from OE after sync.
The exclusion on OE is not correctly working in that particular case,
fixing require also to "suppress" the attendee to avoid that just
created exclusions would be detected as changes to send in a following
synchronization.
closesodoo/odoo#37884closesodoo/odoo#39510
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Create a lot of event (i.e. 300 via recursive events) with attedees. Sync.
Cancel all the events. Sync again. This and all subsequent
synchronization will take a lot of time to complete. The first time is
normal because odoo will cross-check every deleted event for the "syncing" user
with google to ensure that there is match between OE and GC.
This matching will sistematically fail because the json module cannot
serialize a datetime object, so it will be retriggered again and again
stalling the synchronization for minutes. Formatting the datetime before calling the
dump fixes. Moreover the api usage was wrong as 'originalStartTime' is
not a date but a complex object holding the date.
Note: this could have been avoided via logging but error detection was
suppressed.
opw-2052450
closesodoo/odoo#37335
X-original-commit: 951808b2434717d38ab9d562404eb74d8bd40634
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
During a Google Calendar sync,
exclusive instance of a recurrent event to which you are not the owner and
without an update datetime shouldn't be considered.
See developers.google.com/calendar/v3/reference/events/update
where cancelled status event might have empty fields.
> A cancelled status represents two different states
> depending on the event type:
> Cancelled exceptions of an uncancelled recurring event indicate
> that this instance should no longer be presented to the user.
> Clients should store these events for the lifetime of the parent recurring event.
> Cancelled exceptions are only guaranteed to have values for the id,
> recurringEventId and originalStartTime fields populated. The other fields might be empty.
As you are not the owner, the event shouldn't be deleted from Odoo
as the actual event owner might still attend the meeting.
It should just remove the user who is syncing his calendar from the attendees,
but as the sync currently doesn't support syncing event without an update datetime
from Google, we just choose to ignore the sync of this event.
The attendee will be removed/marked as not attending when the owner of the event
will sync his calendar.
opw-1966309
closesodoo/odoo#34075
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
alt-odoo