Purpose
=======
When creating an opportunity, set the language of the Lead/Opportunity
to the partner's language if it is set instead of leaving it blank.
Also update tests to correctly test lang propagation.
Update event_crm so that lang of lead from registration is directly set
to False when there is no partner. Indeed we have no clue which lang we
should set and we can skip the field computation that otherwise triggers
some additional queries.
Task-2709436
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81028
Tracking is generated using commit hooks, meaning they are really sent when
the commit ends. This is done to ease values aggregation and accumulation
through various record updates. In some tests we therefore have to manually
flush the tracking, otherwise it is not created and posted. Notably tests about
lead lost wizard were not flushing and therefore not generated the tracking
messages. Those tests will be improved in future commits, cleaning them is
therefore a necessary step.
We also specifically add some tracking flush in mail performance tests. This
is to be sure we measure impact of a write and tracking separately from
previous transactions. Seems everything is working as intended as warmup and
query counters already perform flushes. Here we simply flush at the end
of the setup to be sure all base is clean before starting tests.
Task-2671709
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78648
Purpose of this commit is to highlight current behavior of multi company
in lead. Notably a company is set at creation even when no team or user
is set, leading to a lot of issues when dealing with lead merge or convert.
Task-2520276
X-original-commit: dc8d82bbe032cef2f732fdfb1ded3068edc37371
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78860
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault François <tfr@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Add more fields when we merge multiple leads to be sure not lose
valuable information.
Specifications
==============
Those fields are propagated to the destination if the value on the
destination is Falsy
- referred
- color
- recurring_revenue
- recurring_plan
- function
- lang_id
- date_deadline
- reveal_id
- lead_mining_request_id
- reveal_ip
- reveal_iap_credits
- reveal_rule_id
- event_lead_rule_id
- event_id
The "lost_reason" field is propagated to the destination only if it's
lost (otherwise, it makes no sense to have a lost reason on a non-lost
lead).
The field "iap_enrich_done" is set to True if at least one lead has been
enriched.
We also keep the sum of all the lead tags (and remove any potential
duplicates).
The address is taken from the lead with the most non-empty address
fields (sorted by highest rank if multiple lead have the same amount
of non-empty fields).
Task-2447721
PR odoo/odoo#75742
Following the removal of read access on ir.model (odoo/odoo#69120),
the mail.activity.type model was not accessible to non-admin users due
to the res_model_id many2one field.
Before this commit, a project user could not access the Activity Type
menu.
Convert it to a selection field with the selection values being
computed in sudo.
closesodoo/odoo#74981
Related: odoo/enterprise#20214
Related: odoo/upgrade#2734
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Purpose of this merge is to force some probabilities on leads used as data
in various tests. That way when dealing with probabilities changes in tests
are easier to spot and understand.
Also fix some docstrings about stage sequence which were incorrect.
No tests has been changed, purpose was to set probabilities that do not
change any test output.
Task-2198562
PR odoo/odoo#51893
Replace text fields to html fields as we have our own 'OdooEditor'.
Indeed, it gives more options to users in the way they format their
content without weighting too much on the UI
(tools appear on demand and not by default).
Models -> Fields
1) crm.lead -> description
2) event.event -> note
Task Id: 2499504
X-original-commit: 524e2f089a611d897b98d86001bda5d17263db66
Purpose of this commit is to ensure side documents are redirected to the
master opportunity when merging leads. Those side documents include
* communication history (mail.message);
* attachments (ir.attachment);
* visitors (website.visitor);
However some documents are currently not specifically handled :
* meetings (calendar.event);
* activities (mail.activity);
* sale orders (sale.order);
* attendees (event.registration);
In this commit we ensure all are attached to the final master opportunity.
That way we prevent loosing access to those documents and ensure we keep
the complete history of all merged leads.
Also tests are added to ensure the merging of leads and its contents.
A new field is added to have the o2m field between leads and calendar events.
In order to clarify naming, ``meeting_count`` is renamed to
``calendar_event_count`` to match naming.
Task Id-2457941
COM PR odoo/odoo#68884
UPG PR odoo/odoo#2494
Related: odoo/upgrade#2494
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose is to avoid randomly failing tess depending on how leads are allocated
through teams. We achieve that purpose by
* creating more leads, easing their repartition through teams;
* adding a lower and upper bound test for team allocation to ensure weights
are globally ok;
* changing member assign domain to fit more closely test lead data;
We also improve test by using the ``crm.assignment.commit.bundle`` config
parameter that has an impact on lead duplicates removing and therefore
performances.
LINKS
Task ID-2528906
COM PR odoo/odoo#70756
Followup of Task ID-2489951 (assign process improvements)
Followup of odoo/odoo#70172 (smoother assign process)
X-original-commit: 8fdf97b6498adc0a2fb15e360ebbbaa1672534e5
This commit contains two main preparatory changes in tests
* 1) lead_month_count will be changed to count lost lead as well. So
archiving leads before running the test doesn't reset the counter.
Lead needs to be unlinked in order to make tests reproducible;
* 2) assertMemberAssign checked the validity of the team domain. Normally
all lead assigned to the member should match the domain of its team.
This assert is not always verified since we force the team after a
merge of duplicated leads. Final merged lead may not match team domain
anymore as final properties depend on all merged leads.
Some tests are also added :
* add tests for master lead team_id and user_id values when merging leads
in assign process;
* add tests using email_normalized check in duplicate finding to ensure that
normalized emails are used for duplicates and not only exact match;
* add tests for won / lost inclusion in ``_get_lead_duplicates``, as well
as different between probability=100 and stage.is_won = True . This is
going to change in upcoming commits, hence some test to highlight it;
* add tests counting existing leads for assignment purpose;
* add tests for assignment_max maximum leads allocation as well as max=0
meaning salesperson is opt-outed from assign;
* add tests for default user / team / stage computation for leads;
* add tests about leads taken into account in assign process (currently
failing with won unassigned leads);
We also add some flush to ensure some fields notably related to probabilities
are flushed before counting queries.
LINKS
Task ID-2444908 (assign fixes)
Task ID-2489951 (assign process improvements)
COM PR odoo/odoo#70172
X-original-commit: bd3444085974f4e12287c2f5da4fb33308cd6180
Co-authored-by: Thibault François <tfr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Currently phone_sanitized computation on lead model works only if crm_sms
is installed. Indeed an override of ``_phone_get_number_fields`` is missing.
However ``_sms_get_number_fields`` coming with ``crm_sms`` and its ``sms``
dependency hides the issue as those modules are auto-install. However if
``crm_sms`` is uninstalled phone_sanitized is not correctly computed anymore.
Task ID-2528169
Oversight of odoo/odoo#45315
X-Original-Commit: odoo/odoo@45ae2922e5
Purpose of this commit is to improve phone, email and mobile synchronization
tests for lead / partner. Notably
* mobile is not synchronized: only a void mobile is set to partner's mobile
when changing partner. It is not synchronized back onto partner;
* email / phone are correctly synchronized;
* phone_sanitized is computed on both lead and partner based first on mobile
then on phone. It means records having the same phone numbers could have
different phone_sanitized values if mobile numbers differ;
Task ID-2461308
PR odoo/odoo#66890
X-Original-Commit odoo/odoo@0adecd9a6e
When setting a partner on a lead if we select the individual customer that
is not a company with company_name being set, propagate it to partner_name
on lead.
Task ID-2446969
PR #65846
Add tests related to lead / partner contact fields synchronization. Add tests
with user input and/or partner synchronization to ensure editable stored fields
work as expected on lead model.
Warning: those tests are failing. Next commit will split computed fields into
several methods in order to fix computation.
LINKS
COM PR odoo/odoo#65381
Task ID-2451339
X-original-commit odoo/odoo@18cd93ded8
X-original-commit: 94d618ff3ff8ee13d23f893836d00a5a71981938
When merging leads final priority is currently the one of the lead considered
as the master lead. This is based on ``_sort_by_confidence_level`` who sorts
on confidence but not on priority.
We think final priority should be the highest one from merged leads. Indeed
if a top priority lead is merged into a low priority one we should not loose
the priority information. It is better to keep the final lead with an high
priority and let salesmen move it downwards.
LINKS
Task ID-2446759 (lead merge priority field management)
Task ID-2446883 (query counters fix)
PR odoo/odoo#65016
Purpose of this commit is to make clearer how final opportunity value are
computed or chosen when merging leads. Functionally nothing should change
with this commit.
LINKS
Task ID-2446759 (lead merge priority field management)
Task ID-2446883 (query counters fix)
PR odoo/odoo#65016
Purpose is to test internals of lead merge method, notably about values
of final opportunity. That way we ensure future changes will be reflected
in tests and regressions will be avoided.
LINKS
Task ID-2446759 (lead merge priority field management)
Task ID-2446883 (query counters fix)
PR odoo/odoo#65016
Purpose is to split assign tests related to results (leads being assigned,
with deduplication, compared to team and member domains) from tests related
to performance (query counters).
Assign process is a random process: randomizing teams leads to searching,
assigning and de-duplicating leads in various order. As a lot of search
are implied during assign process query counters may vary from run to run.
"Heavy" performance test included here ranged from 6K to 6.3K queries. Either
we set high counters maximum which makes those tests less useful. Either we
avoid random if possible which is what we decided to do by setting the seed
of random in tests.
SPECIFICATIONS
For results oriented tests remove query counters. Those tests should simply
ensure results of assign process, notably that even with random choice between
team and users we always have leads assigned with right domain and counts.
For performance oriented tests using query counters set random seed to have
a reproducible scenario and have less random in query counters.
LINKS
Task ID-2446759 (lead merge priority field management)
Task ID-2446883 (query counters fix)
PR odoo/odoo#65016
GLOBAL PURPOSE
Ability to have salesmen belonging to several sales team is a core requirement
of CRM. It is therefore moved from website_crm_score to crm along with cleaning
and behavior improvement. Automatic lead assignment is also moved and cleaned.
SPECIFICATIONS
Move sales team automatic lead assignment from website_crm_score (enterprise)
directly into sales_team. Some cleaning and renaming is performed while moving
the code as it is old fashioned.
Scoring feature is removed completely from lead assignment. Indeed we consider
PLS is a better feature and provides more accurate results.
Minimal scoring specific field on team is removed. Indeed it can also be
integrated directly into domains linked to a sales team as this is a field
directly available on lead using ``probability``. It allows to reduce fields
of team model and move all logic in the team's domain itself.
Overall behavior as been kept as close as possible from the original one.
Purpose is to avoid too much undesired changes between versions.
In this commit we also add tests for automatic lead assignment.
ASSIGNMENT PROCESS DESCRIPTION
1- LEAD TO TEAM ALLOCATION
Allocate leads to teams given by self. This method sets ``team_id`` field
on lead records that are unassigned (no team and no responsible). No
salesperson is assigned in this process. Its purpose is simply to allocate
leads within teams.
Heuristic of this method is the following:
* first we randomize all teams;
* then for each team
* find unassigned leads, aka leads being
* without team, without user -> not assigned;
* not in a won stage, and not having False/0 (lost) or 100 (won)
probability) -> live leads;
* if set, a delay after creation can be applied (see BUNDLE_HOURS_DELAY)
parameter explanations here below;
* keep only leads matching the team's assignment domain (empty means
everything);
* assign maximum BUNDLE_SIZE leads to the team, then move to the next team.
This is done to ensure every team will have leads enough to fill its
capacity based on its domain;
* when setting a team on leads, leads belonging to the current batch
are also merged. Purpose is to clean database and avoid assigning
duplicates to same or different teams;
* for all teams that still have capacity (aka: a search on unassigned
available leads with team domain still give results), do another
assignment round. Each round teams are randomized so that team order
is not always the same;
Note that leads are assigned in batch meaning a team could receive leads that
could better fit another team. However this heuristics is based on hypothesis
that team domains do not overlap. Indeed if a company has several teams they
will probably target separate market segments: country-based, customer type or
size, ... Having several teams using same assignment domain could lead to less
fairness in assignment process but this should not be the target use case of this
heuristic.
Leads are allocated by batch. This can be configured using a config parameter.
Batch size depends on cron frequency, lead pipeline size and members assignment
maximum. Finding an optimal heuristic for this parameter is not easy as it
depends on internal processes and organization. Higher batch size leads to
better performances when running automatic assignment. It can also give unfair
results if teams domain overlap or if pipeline is not big enough to fill all
teams capacity.
2- LEAD TO MEMBER ASSIGN
Main processing method to assign leads to sales team members. It also converts
them into opportunities. Its main purpose is therefore to distribute team
workload on its members based on their capacity.
Preparation
* prepare lead domain for each member. It is done using a logical AND with
team's domain and member's domain. Member domains further restricts team
domain;
* prepare a set of available leads for each member by searching for leads
matching domain with a sufficient limit to ensure all members will receive
leads;
* prepare a weighted population sample. Population are members that should
receive leads. Initial weight is the number of leads to assign to that
specific member. This is minimum value between
* remaining this month: assignment_max - number of lead already assigned
this month;
* days-based assignment: assignment_max with a ratio based on ``work_days``
* e.g. Michel Poilvache (max: 30 - currently assigned: 15) limit
for 2 work days: min(30-15, 30/15) -> 2 leads assigned
* e.g. Michel Tartopoil (max: 30 - currently assigned: 26) limit
for 10 work days: min(30-26, 30/3) -> 4 leads assigned
Assign process then follows the following heuristic
* take a weighted random choice in population;
* find first available (not yet assigned) lead in its lead set;
* if found:
* convert it into an opportunity and assign member as salesperson;
* lessen member's weight so that other members have an higher
probability of being picked up next;
* if not found: consider this member is out of assignment process,
remove it from population so that it is not picked up anymore;
Assignment is performed one lead at a time for fairness purpose. Indeed members
may have overlapping domains within a given team. To ensure some fairness in
process once a member receives a lead, a new choice is performed with updated
weights. This is not optimal from performance point of view but increases
probability leads are correctly distributed within the team.
LINKS
Task ID-2086889 (main task)
Task ID-2357969 (scoring migration task)
Community PR odoo/odoo#48422
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#499
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#996
GLOBAL PURPOSE
Ability to have salesmen belonging to several sales team is a core requirement
of CRM. It is therefore moved from website_crm_score to crm along with cleaning
and behavior improvement. Automatic lead assignment is also moved and cleaned.
SPECIFICATIONS: MODEL CLEANING
In this commit we improve team member model to make it more usable and
aligned with current Odoo views and usability.
This commit contains notably
* add some related fields on the user: phone, mobile, company, email;
* rename "team_user_domain" to "assignment_domain";
* rename "maximum_user_leads" to "assignment_max";
* improve member views globally;
We also introduce dynamic domain computation for users and teams when seeing
team members. This allows to limit selection of users or teams depending
on already existing configuration. Purpose is to avoid having people trying
to create wrong configuration (duplicates, ...) and receiving error messages.
Also
* clean some data and demo about teams and members;
* fix some views glitches;
* improve views: add some fields in search views, improve wording of
fields or actions, ... globally improve usability and US as well as
feedback given to users;
* group sales team members by team by default as it help getting an
overview of team members distribution;
* update tests to create team members instead of writing directly on m2m
towards users;
SPECIFICATIONS: SALE_TEAM_ID FIELD ON RES.USERS
In this commit we also rewrite sale_team_id field of res.users. Previously in
crm it was simply a many2one field linking to a crm.team. It was used to compute
team membership as a standard many2one / one2many relationship. In enterprise
module ``website_crm_score`` this field was set as a related on first user
teams. Indeed scoring changed relationship between users and teams to a
many2many.
This field is now directly a computed many2one field that links to the
"main" team of the user even in multi memberships mode. As memberships can
now be de-activated we changed this field to a computed stored field. It is
based on oldest active membership of user. That way default team of documents
will be the user's oldest team considered as its "main team".
SPECIFICATIONS: LEAD_ALL_ASSIGNED_MONTH_COUNT
Improve crm_team ``lead_all_assigned_month_count`` field computation. It is
now simply the sum of assigned leads of team members. Differences may
happen if a lead in teamA is assigned to an user working in teamB. This should
not happen if team / user is correctly set at lead level which is generally
the case. However if that happens, old field counted it. New field will not
count it as it is not directly linked to a team's member.
SPECIFICATIONS: DEMO DATA
Make crm.lead demo data coherent with user_id / team_id . As demo data should
be using a mono-membership behavior for users and teams, we have to ensure
user_id and team_id effectively matches. It allows to have coherent reporting
and assignment demo flows.
Also avoid having Odoobot responsible of leads. Instead of undefined user_id
and team_id leading to Odoobot being responsible of some leads, force it
to be False. Those demo data allow to test automatic assignment of lead
LINKS
Task ID-2086889 (main task)
Task ID-2357969 (scoring migration task)
Community PR odoo/odoo#48422
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#499
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#996
Purpose of this commit is to
* move tests about mass management of leads (mass assignment + mass convert
wizards) in its own file to ease writing of tests;
* add some performance tests :
* performance for assignment;
* performance for convert wizard in mass mode;
Task ID-2351604
PR #59084
X-original-commit: 950dd491bc4b680e0bcfab83815313e909a3c282
RATIONALE
Activities are a way to organize our daily pipe. Notably in a sales pipeline
salesmen may have multiple leads with activities to perform in the next few
days. We would like to be able to have a list view displaying a list of leads
with "my" deadline, and to order leads based on this field.
PURPOSE
As activities are linked to records through a one2many and as my activities
are only a subset of those activities, it is impossible to store a field
on lead model. Indeed it would depend on the current user which makes storing
it impossible.
However ordering on a column in list view asks for a stored field. As it is
not possible, this commit proposes to hijack the web client and search of lead
model in order to allow it.
SPECIFICATIONS
Introduce a activity_date_deadline_my field, computed and searchable that
behaves like activity_date_deadline. It is filtered on current user activities
instead of being global to the record activities. "My" deadline is the earliest
deadline of my activities, even in the past.
Ordering through web client calls search_read with an order parameter set.
Search_read then calls search. In this commit we therefore override search
to intercept a search without count with an order on activity_date_deadline_my.
In that case we do the search in two steps.
First step: fill with deadline-based results
* Perform a read_group on my activities to get a mapping lead_id / deadline
Remember date_deadline is required, we always have a value for it. Only
the earliest deadline per lead is kept.
* Search leads linked to those activities that also match the asked domain
and order from the original search request.
* Results of that search will be at the top of returned results. Use limit
None because we have to search all leads linked to activities as ordering
on deadline is done in post processing.
* Reorder them according to deadline asc or desc depending on original
search ordering. Finally take only a subset of those leads to fill with
results matching asked offset / limit.
Second step: fill with other results. If first step does not gives results
enough to match offset and limit parameters we fill with a search on other
leads. We keep the asked domain and ordering while filtering out already
scanned leads to keep a coherent results.
All other search and search_read are left untouched by this commit to avoid
side effects. Search_count is not affected by this commit.
As web client order availability is simply based on field being stored we
have to allow hijacking its value. A new option 'allow_order' is added that
display the order icon in list view column headers. It allows calling
search_read with an order based on the column but nothing more. Using it
on a not-stored field will give a warning log and ORM ignores it by default.
LIMITATIONS
At least following limitations apply
* search on "my activities" gives a list of ids that is used for searching
and ordering. It means that having too much activities on a given user can
result in poor performances.
-> we consider that activities assigned to a given user should be kept
under control. Leads with activities for a given user should be a small
subset of leads without activities.
* ordering on activity_date_deadline_my always put those records on the top
(deadline asc or desc) whatever the actual ordering of order items given
to search. This is done to avoid complex implementation where deadline
would be used to order records within groups ordered by another field.
-> for example: order = 'priority DESC, activity_date_deadline_my ASC'
actually behaves like 'activity_date_deadline_my ASC, priority DESC'.
WARNING
This implementation is a hack. It has been done by professionals. Do not try
to do it at home.
More seriously this is hackish and should be avoided. IN our case we consider
that the use of activities in sales pipeline is mainly driven by "my activities
deadline", which is not necessarily the case with longer processes like tasks.
Moreover user tests tend to show that this feature could be interesting. It
will improve quality of Odoo CRM and its adoption by improving its daily
use. A framework solution has to be found. Until this is done we keep this
hack and hope it is not duplicated in other applications.
LINKS
Task ID 2276011
Prepares Task ID 2243124 (My activities in CRM)
PR #52232
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Get rid of email / phone behavior on lead that is hard to understand: if
and contact is set fields are readonly, if not they are editable.
SPECIFICATIONS
We want to be able to edit them if a partner is set. If we write on the
email/phone of the lead, it should write on the partner (and vice-versa).
Even a Falsy value is propagated to the customer. Reason is that if you update
a contact information, it should be available for all other records. Setting
a void value probably means you want to stop contacting this contact. This is
now also propagated.
SIDE NOTE: MOBILE FIELD
Mobile field is a bit different. Main phone contact field is phone, and is
placed in the main contact section of the lead view. Mobile is under a more
technical / detailled tab and is not completely synchronized with the partner.
Like zip, city or country, changing partner updates lead information but
changing lead values does not propagate those to the customer. Those fields
can be used for deal-specific information if needed.
Statistics: 5k crm.lead use mobile for 80k active records which means it is
a "lesser field".
LINKS
Task ID 2207636
PR odoo/odoo#48395
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1025
PURPOSE
Prepare enhancements of sales team membership.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to prepare modifications in sales team management
notably by cleaning sales team tests. We also move some data preparation in
sales team. It allows to rely on some common data while doing sales team
then crm tests.
LINKS
Task ID 2086889 (sales team enhancements)
Task ID 2234698 (preparation lint)
Community PR odoo/odoo#49520
PURPOSE
Try to move from onchange / default_get to stored editable computed fields.
Behavior should be the same (computed or set by user), with support of
create / write / onchange field update without additional code.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update classic fields updated in some cases by onchange and/or default methods
by fields with store=True, readonly=False. It means their value comes either
from manual user input, either from trigger based computation.
Remove onchange and default_get when possible, leading to an unique computation
method and clearing fields definition.
Also clean some fields definition inconsistencies, notably required fields
that should instead be correctly computed or default that have no real meaning.
SPECIFIATIONS: CONSTRAINT USER_ID / TEAM_ID
In this commit we also remove all the better implementations of "not really a
constraint" constraint about user_id and team_id. Indeed as this is a computed
field normally we should not have to call the onchange manually, even through
a hackish call to a falsy constraint (see fdc8749, 222cca2, 4e8ebc7 ). You are
all inferior to SM team.
SPECIFIATIONS: DATE_OPEN
Assignment field, namely ``date_open``, has a random definition as it seems
linked to assignation, with several behaviors intended
* ce39ca8a97 : reset only when going from
no salesman to a salesman (aka, keep assignation when changing)
* 8e540558ee: reset when changing salesman
We choose to keep first implementation as it seems a bugfix broken again
by second commit. It will also replace the ``assign_date`` defined in
``website_crm_score`` module.
SIDE EFFECTS
Several side effects occur with this commit. Indeed behavior is not always
exactly the same, notably as code rewriting allowed to fix some issues,
incoherent behavior or was simply not able to achieve exactly the same
result. Notably
* at lead creation: default probability is the one coming from PLS and not
0.0 anymore, since field is already computed. Synchronization with PLS
still works the same way (change probability, you are out of syn);
* various user_id / team_id combinations notably in convert / merge wizards
may change, notably we do not reset team_id if user_id is reset. We
consider we could keep a team_id set without user_id;
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#781
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Florent Lejoly <fle@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
As CRM is going to be updated (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving code is a necessary first
step.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tests. Amazing. Notably about matching partner / duplicate based on email
as there is some weird behavior.
closesodoo/odoo#45477
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
As crm will soon evolve (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving tests is necessary to avoid
regressions.
SPECIFICATIONS
After ff6b35f759 that added some first tests, this commit will add more tests
notably about convert wizards.
Notably
* add tests for crm.lead2opportunity.partner wizard, notably options about
action (do nothing, exist or create partner), as well as some corner cases
like stage update, lost leads, ...
* rewrite and improve tests about crm.lead2opportunity.partner.mass, aka the
mass converted wizard that implements some random behavior on top of the
crm.lead2opportunity.partner wizard;
Some strange behaviors spotted
* partner action works on lost leads, but not the convert;
* user_id / team_id / stage_id coherency is not enforced during convert
as it relies mainly on onchanges that are not called;
LINKS
Task ID 2180521 (add tests for crm wizards)
Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR odoo/odoo#43473
Purpose of this commit is to clean a bit crm tests, notably lessening data
created in tests and removing / improving some low level tests. As we are
about to remove onchange / default and replace them by editable computed
fields it is easier to clean some tests and data beforehand.
This commit is a preliminary cleaning coming from task 2088565 about CRM
onchange to compute methods update.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565
Community PR #42344
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7403
Related: odoo/enterprise#7403
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose is to be able to move mail tests in a separate module without
breaking other tests. It seems dependency is not real, only some data
to add. It is better to have self contained tests anyway.
Currently partners have a boolean field to choose whether to receive
notifications only in their Odoo inbox or to receive them in their inbox
and by email. This leads to several issues :
* if a customer is configured to not receive emails he will not receive
any notification on sales orders, leads, ... This is not clearly
indicated to the salesman and it is not easy to know how to change
that behavior
* if an user chooses to receive emails and does not use its inbox a lot
of notifications stay in Odoo. The user has to manually set them as
done to make them disappear which is redundant.
This commit changes that behavior. From now on customers will always
receive all notifications by email. Indeed Odoo is not a customer oriented
mailbox. Moreover sales orders or discussions on leads send to customers
should always be sent by email as it is the standard communication
mechanism. Users will be able to choose to receive notifications in Odoo
or by email. The choice is no longer inbox or inbox + email, but inbox
or email. Choosing one option or the other one depends on the way the
user wants to work.
Technically the field is moved on the users model and selection keys
are renamed. Notification process is modified
* notified_partner_ids contains as before specified recipients as well
as followers matching the subtype
* customers and users working with emails are notified. During that
process customers notifications are marked as done to be able to
track the email state without having needaction. Users notifications
are currently deleted as we do not track their email state.
The removal of partner field implies changes in various addons that
define partner data with this field set in the values.
Currently almost all mail tests run on mail.channel model. Indeed it is
the only model inheriting from mail.thread and mail.alias when having only
mail installed. However channel model have several specific features and
is not totally a standard mail.thread model. For example notification
recipients are computed a bit differently.
Since 4f9105a4ef mail module has a test
model allowing to perform tests on a very simple mail.thread-like model.
This commit make mail tests use this test model instead of mail.channel
everywhere it is possible. Channel model should be used only when tests
are channel-dependent.
Functional
==========
Sales teams become sales channels. Their dashboard cards now include a graph
displaying customizable data for managers (comparable to those in accounting).
By default, you now have the following sales channels (non-demo):
Direct Sales (with installation of crm or sale)
Sales Channel type: Sales
Works same as before, what's changed is:
- their cards display one big button directing to the start of their
workflow
- the links on the right-hand side have been reworked, and are only
displayed when there is at least one item requiring attention.
- 'More' tab remains unchanged.
Website (with installation of website_sale)
Sales Channel type: Website
Differences lies in the links displayed in the dashboard card:
- it displays abandoned carts, awaiting payments and payments to capture
Default Channel linked to all sales made from the eCommerce.
Point of Sale (with installation of sale and point_of_sale
-> auto-installs pos_sale)
Sales Channel type: Point of Sale
Linked to pos.configs and their pos.sessions and pos.orders.
- only links to their linked pos.config dashboard and open sessions
- can't use opportunities, lead or invoicing and can only display
pos.order data in the graph.
Default Channel linked to the default pos.config.
Technical
=========
- Add a channel type: sales, pos, website that have different actions/settings
- Add a graphs to the kanban cards in the sales/crm dashboard, configurable in
the form view in the new dashboard page.
- Rename sales teams to sales channels, rename and add default and demo sales
channels
- Change dashboard links depending on the channel type and add a related
computed fields on crm.team
- Rename strings and improve channel form view.
- Leads are now checked by default once activated for 'sales' type channels
- Disable checking "leads" without using "opportunities".
- Hide invoicing and invoicing target depending on channel type.
- Move currency_id to sales_team
This commit remove required alias on res.users model. It also removes the
inheritance of mail.alias.mixin. The field alias_id is kept and allow people
to use aliases on users if they want. However there is no default void alias
created for each user anymore.
Default from of mail.message does not use user alias anymore. Indeed this
creates issues with aliases not being correctly configured and can be
confusing compared to private channels. Using user aliases is therefore
now done manually instead of being a default behavior.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
[FIX] account: move some ir.model.access to sale module
[FIX] payment: Move some ir.rule to website_sale
[FIX] stock: move some ir.model.access rule to sale_stock
[FIX] project: Move some ir.model.access rules to crm_project_issue
[FIX] mrp: Move some ir.model.access rules to sale_mrp
[FIX] calendar: move some ir.model.access rules to crm
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
[ADD] sales_team: See own documents => See only his sales team
Moved the "User: Own Leads Only", "User: All Leads" and "Manager" groups from sale and crm
into sales_team module. Add the record rules so that user can see only his Own Sales Team
if "See Own Leads" is sales right and can see all sales teams if he is having sales rights
of "See All Leads" or manager.
This branch need more testing instead of doing 10 fixes. A lot of issues are occuring
when installing modules in different orders.
This reverts commit fa6e415cdb.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
- fixed computation of needaction flag (typo)
- fixed order of auto subscription and message tracking: first subscribe then
track. This way messages are send to newly added followers.
- added tests in CRM to ensure this behavior works by updating the already
existing test and using the mail test class
Fabio Barbero