- RML Reports
- Webkit Reports (most part already removed by 13b9982c62)
- LocalService in netsvc.py
- rename attributes like rml_% to report_%
- rename ir.actions.report.xml to ir.actions.report
- allow rendering directly on an ir.actions.report by calling render method
- remove 'controller' report_type
- remove unused res.font stuff
- remove print_report method in models.py (not used)
- restore removed call to pdftotext process in test_reports
Before this commit, fields were selected on activation (focus) but only
after a setTimeout. This setTimeout is in fact not necessary. Removing
it allows to test the selection in unit tests.
`DebouncedField` and `InputField` classes were not properly factorized,
some of the DebouncedField code had to be part of the `InputField`
class (which is a specialization of `DebouncedField`). Indeed the
`FieldText` class, specialization of `DebouncedField` class, was missing
properties which were part of `InputField` and was duplicating code
which was already defined in `InputField`.
For example, it was not possible to navigate out of text fields in
editable list views with the right/left keys as this was part of the
`InputField` class.
Note: the FieldTextHtmlSimple class was implementing the `commitChanges`
function differently than `DebouncedField` but this was in fact not
necessary. This is why documentation update has also been done for this
by this commit.
This rev. fixes 2 issues about many2many fields displayed with
an editable list view, occuring when the user edited some values
in the list.
First, the many2many field was re-rendered each time one of its
sub-widgets triggered a 'field_changed' event, and thus the row
the user was editing was no more in edition and the focused field
was no more focused. This was quite annoying.
Second, when the user saved changes made in the editable list view,
only a command 6 (REPLACE_ALL) was sent, so updates of subrecords
were never saved.
Before this rev., if you opened a form view with, e.g. a float
field, that is unset, and then click on edit, then save, it
actually saved the new value for the float field (being 0),
whereas it shouldn't do any RPC as nothing changed.
This is because the former code couldn't detect if the value "0"
in the input is there because the field is still unset or if the
user simply set it to 0.
The process of evaluating a domain is not really difficult, but the hard
part is getting the evaluation context right. The evaluation context is
supposed to contain informations coming from various sources (active id/ids,
session context, ...). Before this commit, we just ignored the context coming
from the action.
This could cause many problems. For example, in the Inventory
application: create a picking, add 10 ice cream in initial demand, force
assign, click on scrap. A form view should be opened (with the context
coming back from the button_scrap method). In that formview, there is a
many2one Product. Clicking on it should perform a name_search with a
domain looking like ['id', 'in', [64]]. This domain is the result of
the evaluation of "[('id', 'in', context.get('product_ids', []))]".
Before this commit, product_ids was ignored, so the domain was always
['id', 'in', []].
In this commit, we simply add the element context in the list of sources
when computing the evaluation context (the element context is the
context given to the view, which is the way an action give a context to
a view)
In short, handling context is hard...
If the option 'event_open_popup' is set to true, then the calendar view will open events (or records) in a FormViewDialog. Otherwise, it will open events in a new form view (with a do_action)
Before this change the t-call can use only receive a literal as parameters:
<t t-call="template.name17" />
This call render the template 'template.name17' with the current context.
Now, we can defined an expression with braces (same syntax that t-attf):
<t t-call="template.name{{ 10 + 7 }}" />
This call render the template 'template.name17' with the current context.
This change allows for greater flexibility for applications using qweb.
(The performance due to this change is unchanged during rendering time.)
Before this rev., the function that parses monetary fields (i.e.
the one that converts the string value of the input into a
numerical value) totally ignored the sign of the value.
Actually, parsing a monetary field is exactly the same as parsing
a float field, so we simply use the same function.
Unit tests are executed after module installation, which is sometimes
challenging when some part of the UI is modified by another module.
In this case, a test in module web/ was implicitely relying on a behaviour
introduced by the module document.
So, the test failed when document was not installed.
Since the installation of ´document´ module changes the toolbar display,
we check in the test if the module is installed to do the correct assertion.
Before this commit, the parameter ´searchview_hidden´ was not used anymore
when it was defined for some views.
After this commit, the search view is hidden when it needs to be, e.g.
the helpdesk dashboard.
The editable list view may be really new, but it still suffers from a
performance issue. The problem is that we need to evaluate modifiers
for a (sometimes) large number of fields: a list view with 80 rows and 7
columns has 560 field values. This is not so large, but each of these
evaluation is still costly.
In particular, it needs to compute the evaluation context. However, the
evaluation context is the same between all fields of the same record, so
in that case, the web framework does way too much work (with 7 columns,
it is 7 times too much).
This commit does not totally fix the issue, but it helps quite a lot.
What we do is just memoize the evalcontext computation. This means that
it will be evaluated only the first time it is needed, then will be kept
in memory.
Note that this is a fix, not an imp. The list view should be fast...
When a record is added in an x2many field with an onchange, the
onchange is only triggered once the new record is valid (i.e. when
all its required fields have a correct value).
However, there was an issue in the code checking the validity of
a record, as it checked, for each required field, that its value
wasn't falsy (!value). This is incorrect for several type of
fields:
- numerical: a value of 0 is correct
- boolean: should be always considered as correct
- x2m: their value is a dataPoint, so it is never falsy, what
should be check is the number of records inside the dataPoint.
This was an issue for example in the sale.order form view, as the
onchange wasn't triggered when an order line was added (with a set
product), so the total amount wasn't updated correctly.
Since the new views merge, a lot of design elements were broken. This
was particularly impacting the fields in the editable list view; indeed
the editable list view is not using an inline form view anymore so the
fields in the list were not properly styled as the LESS was still
defined assuming the form view environment (for example the invalid
fields were red for o2m fields in form view but not in editable list
view even though they got the right CSS class).
This commit refactor the LESS following these rules:
- No more division of non-layout and layout rules. Dividing LESS rules
in x_layout.less and x.less was a mistake. Many rules can be
considered to be layout and not layout at the same time, developers
always have to switch from one file part to the other, many CSS
selectors (and rules!) are duplicated for nothing, ...
- Field style is extracted from x_view.less and put in the new
fields.less file. As before, the fields_extra.less will contain the
rules specific to community so that the enterprise repo can override
those by replacing the whole file.
- Many classes have been renamed so that o_form_x_y becomes o_x_y as
many classes can now be applied outside of form view. These classes
should not be used in templates anyway.
The commit also changes the DOM of fields so that it is more minimalist
(no useless parent div, etc).
Input elements are not automatically styled anymore, they have to get
the o_input class explicitely. This allows to fix lots of small style
bugs of previous versions (required monetary field had not the proper
style, readonly m2m tags appeared as editable, ...). This also improves
the LESS code.
The editable list view should also completely stop flickering on chrome
and firefox.
The commit also removes the orange outline on list view dirty cells.
The commit also removes deprecated static xml, LESS and other code.
Notice there are still styles to restore/fix and LESS to improve.
One could set the attribute `default_order` in the view arch
(like 'name,id desc'). The records should then be sorted accordingly.
This feature was not implemented in the new views.
This attribute should work on both basic views and embedded views (x2many).
The former uses the `sort` argument in `search_read` while the latter is
sorted client-side.
There is however a potential issue with the latter: as the order is done
client-side with records received by the server, if there are more records
than the limit, the server will send records without any order. The client
side order will thus be done on a fraction of the records.
This attribute is used to determine one can create a new column in
the kanban view.
Before this commit, it was always true and not specified in the
controller `activeActions` (which was causing a bug where the
no content helper was displayed instead of the column quick create).
The controller was also always initiated with false so the column was
only available after an update.
The commit e07f27d has wrongly changed the fallback for one2many raw_value from
an empty array to `false`. This modification brokes a lot of templates where we
assume that the value is always an array.
This commit restores the previous behavior with the fallback on [].
With this commit, we try to improve the way navigation is done in the
list view. In particular, we want to make sure that pressing TAB on the
last editable cell move the cursor to the next line (and create a new
line if necessary).
Also, we add a few tests for keyboard navigation (it was almost not
tested before this commit, and while working on this commit, it was
broken at some point).
When we unselect a line in a one2many list, we ask for all fields to
commit their changes (because many fields are debounced, so we may not
know their current last value). This is good, except that it could
trigger an extra field change event, which may in turn trigger a second
onchange.
We solve this issue by improving the _setValue method and delegating the
comparison to a new _isSameValue method.
It is particularly relevant for field types such as integer, which are not
stored as a string.
When multiple clicking fast (and with the server not too fast), we could
end up with an error (eg. "Cannot read property 'controller' of null").
Something has been done previously to improve this when switching
between views in: fc8a4b5e. This commit do something similar to limit
multiple click on kanban records (doing it as in 26f91c429).
note: master equivalent of 8f1cc2fa (which is for 10.0 up to saas-15)
opw-705329
closes#16775
Suppose that there is a many2many (list) field in a form view,
and there is a many2many (e.g. many2many_tags) field inside the
list.
In edit mode, if the user adds a record in the relation, this
record and its relational data should be fetched.
Before this rev., the relational data wasn't fetched, so the
many2many_tags couldn't be displayed correctly.
Before this commit, it was possible to edit something in an editable
list view, then press the DOWN key, then enter some other values. With
the DOWN key, the focus is supposed to move to the line below, so we
save the current line, in the current state. This means that the edit
coming after are simply lost (well, just not saved nor displayed).
What this commit does is simply disable all control elements in that
situation. This prevents uncomfortable situations from occurring.
Before this commit, when a kanban view was grouped by a selection field, the
column were named with the raw value of the selection instead of the display
string.
Furthermore, fix the fact that when the column title was 0 or False,
'undefined' was displayed instead.
- Fix the toolbar behaviour since there is no more dataset in the widget.
- Improve the communication beetwen the controller and the toolbar.
- Move the code linked to the document upload in the right file.
- Adapt the tests to mock the search_read done by ´document´ addon
- Adapt the mock server to be able to give a custom toolbar action
Before this commit, if the user created a line (thanks to the create
button) then deleted it, the rows were in a broken state which made the
list edit the wrong line on line click (it opened the next one). This
was due to row indexes which are kept as data on rows: they were not
updated on row deletion. This commit simplifies the code by getting rid
of this indexes data and instead compute those when necessary.
In PostgreSQL, a field of type `integer` must be in the range
-2147483648 to +2147483647. If the user enters a lower or a larger
value, a traceback is thrown.
opw-740286
When a record is added in an x2many field with an onchange, the
onchange is only triggered once the new record is valid (i.e. when
all its required fields have a correct value).
However, there was an issue in the code checking the validity of
a record, as it iterated on all known fields of the model (instead
of those in the view), so if there were required fields that
weren't, the record was always invalid (as those fields obviously
never had a value), and thus the onchange was never done.
This wasn't a problem with embedded views as in this case, the
known fields are those in the view. But when the view isn't
embedded, all fields of the related model are known, even if only
some of them are in the view.
This was the case for example in the stock.picking form view, when
adding a line in the stock.move o2m: the onchange wasn't done and
thus, the schedule date wasn't correctly set.
Relational fields with attribute 'invisible' set to true are in
views because they are used in domains or contexts. In this case
their relational data is useless, only their ids matter. Before
this rev., their relational data was fetched anyway. More
precisely, it was the case for many2ones after a default_get, and
for x2manys with inline views, or without view (e.g. with widget
'many2many_tags').
The previous code used to create its own args array
for the search_read method, replacing the one that
was originally given to it.
This lead to silent errors since positional arguments
to this function were completely ignored in the case
of search_read.
I took this commit as an opportunity to improve a
bit on the current state of these rpc helpers.
Namely, the basic args/kwargs priority is the following (top-to-bottom):
- kwargs defined in the rpc call
- kwargs defined in the kwargs key of the params kwarg of the rpc call
- positional arguments are passed as is
For read_group and search_read methods, the priority is the following:
- kwargs defined in the rpc call
- kwargs defined in the params kwarg to the rpc call
- kwargs defined in the kwargs key of the params kwarg of the rpc call
- positional arguments are passed as is
For the /web/dataset/search_read controller, only the params kwarg is
supported, resulting in the following priority:
- kwargs defined in the rpc call
- kwargs defined in the params kwarg to the rpc call
- positional arguments are passed as is
If both a kwargs and a positional arg is given for the same parameter,
it will be sent as is to the server which will crash with a typical
"got multiple values for keyword argument" TypeError. However, in the
MockServer however, we give priority to kwargs over args in this case.
Please note that I also chose to remove unnecessary default values so
that the ones actually used are the ones from the server, not the ones
that were duplicating those in the rpc js file.
Widgets which manipulates their dom in _renderEdit were left out
from the previous implementation since this processing was done
only once when the widget is rendered the first time. If the
widget regenerates a new input upon reset for example, then it
would lack the idForLabel.
When enterprise is installed, the rendering of these widgets on
extra small screens is different, thus breaking these tests. We
need to force the test to run on normal screens.
Before this commit, when we moved from one line to the next, we did not
wait for the unselectRow to end. This means that if the read (from the
unselect row) completes after the default_get, the list renderer was not
in a coherent state (currentRow was set to null), which could (and did)
cause a crash.
This was found by pressing the TAB key a few times, and editing some
values.
Also, we slightly improved the logging in the mock server. Before this,
the responses from the mock server did not show from which route it came
from. But in this test, we specifically make sure that the rpcs
complete in a different order, so it was not really optimal.
Since the new views, the editable list view lost some behaviors. These
behaviors were indeed implemented in the form controller/renderer but
as the new editable list view does not use an inline form view, these
behaviors had to be implemented in the basic controller/renderer.
For this to work, the list editable renderer had to be changed as it
was doing work that should be done by the controller.
The problem is even more complex because the x2m fields are using a
list renderer but not a list controller. So moving code from the
renderer to the controller obviously broke the x2m fields. Right now,
the problem is solved by catching renderer events and forwarding new
ones to the form controller (which handles the x2m specifically).
The initial goal of this commit was to share the validation of records
on save. Indeed, the fields were marked as invalid in the form view but
not in the list view. Also, before the new views, the editable list
view had different behaviors if they were used for a x2m field or not.
As these behaviors are making sense, this commit tries to restore them.
Basically, what we want is:
- When a record is saved (form view save or list view line leaving),
the invalid fields are marked (in red), the names of the related fields
are notified to the user and the record is not left.
- When a record is discarded (form view discard or list view discard),
the user is asked to confirm if the record is dirty before making the
record readonly.
- When a record is discarded, if the record is a new one, then the
record should be abandoned (removed as if never existed). In the form
view this induces to go back in the history and in the list view, to
remove a row.
- For x2m fields, the notification of invalid fields is not triggered
but the user is instead asked if he wants to discard the changes made
to the row (indeed, this replaces the list "Discard" button, as non
existent for x2m lists).
- ...
Saving, discarding, marking the fields as invalid and other behaviors
are thus now shared behavior of basic views.
The management of the dirty flag has also been moved to the model
as it was handle by the controller for the form view but by the
renderer for the list view. Now this flag is directly managed in the
basic model (the model can have changes thanks to the `_changes`
property but not be dirty (this is the case for creations)).
This change however created a problem. The view manager is currently
keeping asking if there are changes to discard at each action which
might lead to leave a dirty record (appswitcher / url change / ...).
It however did not discard anything as leaving if the user is ok with
it will lead to an implicit discard. However, as the view manager might
ask for this discard multiple times by second, the controller was
marking the record as not dirty the first time but without discarding
the changes. This is more complex to do now, as the dirty state is
part of the model and that the renderer should match the model data.
To solve this problem, the view manager now actually discard changes
explicitely when asked to. Even though this had been optimized to not
cause any rerender in some cases where it is not needed, this could
cause some performance decreasing. However, this makes some cases more
logical (opening the app switcher on a dirty form view then going back
to the form view by hitting the "go back" button left the form view
untouched although the user asked to discard it). This solution will
be improved with the view manager refactoring.
This commit is also making use of the `commitChanges` system which had
been implemented for HTML fields. Indeed, these fields cannot know
about all of their changes, so when hitting the save button, we asked
those fields to commit their value. Using this system is a great way
to make the `isValid` method of x2m fields synchronous. Indeed, before
this commit, the method was sometimes asking the user if he wants to
discard an invalid line before save. That case can be handled by the
x2m `commitChanges` method: we consider that saving the lines of x2m is
an operation that has to be done before considering the save, so we ask
all the x2m fields to do so at that time. Also, the system was broken
since a recent commit: we indeed protected the changes - save order
with a mutex but unfortunately, the `commitChanges` method was part of
the save and the changes it triggered were not able to be considered
because of this mutex. This had not been detected by tests as there is
not current way to test html fields.
The FieldTimezoneMismatch was redone, but an error was done after the
last code review. With this commit, we fix the mistake (a function is
properly called) and improve the test to make sure we catch such a
regression later.
Trash icon does not take account of the option on the tree tag
Before this fix: The delete option on the tree tag is not taken
into account in the widget
Laurent Smet