In the overrides of _name_search we should avoid creating domains with
huge lists of ids as it is inefficient.
We can also make sure that we optimize the empty search as in this case
the custom domain doesn't make sense, we can simply search on an empty
domain and, thanks to the limit argument, still keep a fast query.
Linked to task 1918906
Thanks to @odony and @nseinlet
closesodoo/odoo#30155
Purpose is to clean the use of tracking parameters on fields. Parameters are
merged and is now tracking=<int> or tracking=True.
This commit is linked to task ID 1903814 and PR #28430.
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Purpose of this commit is to give description more "business oriented"
because those descriptions appears in Odoo Studio which is supposed to be used by end users, not only by developers.
Related Task ID : 37311
Purpose
=======
The method _name_search and _search add support to search as another user.
All the overrides of name_search and search redefine the behavior of the search.
This bring inconsistencies as the result of a call to _name_search and name_search
could differ on certain modules, which is not acceptable.
Specification
=============
Example:
~~~~~~~~
If the name_search method is overridden to search also on the driver name,
then calling name_search with a label 'JF' will return all the cars with a name containing
'JF' or all the cars with a driver name containing 'JF'. Let's say that we have a ir.rule
preventing a user to read the cars of another company. Then the call to name search only returns
the cars satisfying the previous condition AND belonging to his company.
Now, we want to overpass this constraint. We call _name_search with the attribute name_get_uid=1.
Then the call to _name_search returns all the cars from all the companies with a name like 'JF',
but nothing is done about the driver_name.
Example of wrong search redefinition on a model
-----------------------------------------------
@api.model
def name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', 'ilike', name)]])
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search([('name', operator, name)])
if partners and name:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partners.ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self.search(domain, limit=limit)
return rec.name_get()
Example of correct search redefinition on a model
-------------------------------------------------
@api.model
def _name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100, name_get_uid=None):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', operator, name)]])
partner_ids = self.env['res.partner']._search([('name', operator, name)], access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
if partner_ids:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partner_ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self._search(domain, limit=limit, access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
return self.browse(rec).name_get()
The same logic should be applied on the overrides of the search method.
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field
When creating a timesheet, several fields need to be recomputed:
- `currency_id`
- `group_id`
- `department_id`
- `is_timesheet`
- `validated`
When `validated` is computed before the other fields, the recomputation
will lead to an `AccessError` because of the rule
`hr_timesheet.timesheet_line_rule_user`.
Since the test `test_timesheet_validation_user` expects an
`AccessError`, the test succeeds. However, from time to time,
`validated` is computed last => the `AccessError` is not raised.
Actually, a `ValidationError` should be raised in this case (from the
`create` override in `timesheet_grid`).
This commit is a cherry-pick of 802339c12d
and dcca2e8b9d
When creating a timesheet, several fields need to be recomputed:
- `currency_id`
- `group_id`
- `department_id`
- `is_timesheet`
- `validated`
When `validated` is computed before the other fields, the recomputation
will lead to an `AccessError` because of the rule
`hr_timesheet.timesheet_line_rule_user`.
Since the test `test_timesheet_validation_user` expects an
`AccessError`, the test succeeds. However, from time to time,
`validated` is computed last => the `AccessError` is not raised.
Actually, a `ValidationError` should be raised in this case (from the
`create` override in `timesheet_grid`).
This replaces the former modified preorder tree traversal (MPTT) with the
fields `parent_left`/`parent_right`. Each record is associated to a string
`parent_path`, that represents the path from its root node to itself. The path
is made of the node ids suffixed with a slash:
a node | id | parent_path
/ \ a | 42 | 42/
... b b | 63 | 42/63/
/ \ c | 84 | 42/63/84/
c d d | 85 | 42/63/85/
This field provides an efficient implementation for parent_of/child_of queries:
the nodes in the subtree of record are the ones where `parent_path` starts with
the `parent_path` of record. It is also more efficient to maintain than the
MPTT fields, and less sensitive to concurrent updates, because the value of
`parent_path` does not depend on sibling nodes.
Purpose
=======
User not able to see his total balance per customer if user has several projects with same customer..
see here : https://www.odoo.com/web/content/3287924
Specification
=============
User should be able to see the sum of the debit, credit and balance when group by partner
The difficulty here is that debit,credit and balance are non-stored computed fields depending on the company and the date passed with the context. As these parameters depend on the user and the current date, we can't store the field. The simplest way to achieve this is to override the read_group method and compute the sum by hand when the values are aggregated (means when a group_by is applied).
* analytic accounts can be shared among companies
* amount on analytic lines always refer to amount in company currency of which it belongs to
* add analytic groups (hierarchical way to classify analytic accounts)
* analytic tags:
- only present on analytic lines, not anymore on analytic accounts
- can be used to distribue/split an analytic lines among several analytic accounts
- enabled by a dedicated res.group
- added on several objects (vouchers, expenses, analytic defaults...) as well as in bank statement reconciliation widget (manual counterpart and account.reconcile.model)
* bunch of fixes made related to analytic
Was PR #22124. Was task 32386. Original work by tbe.
New feature:
- New Transparent tag visual (grey border & text, white bg),
- By default, newly created kanban tags are transparent,
- Tag's colorpicker has now a 'Hide in Kanban' checkbox,
to select the transparent color.
Toggling off 'Hide in Kanban' sets the color of the tag as follow:
- Previous color, if 'Hide in Kanban' was toggled on on the
same formview session.
- Color 1 (dark orange), otherwise.
1/ An empty notebook was created in analytic and filled in account_budget
That way, we had a horizontal line while the module wasn't installed yet
2/ The fields use_task and use_issue displayed on the account.analytic.account
are just redundant information. The probable use case is to go on the project
select the issues management on it, and it will be activated on the related
analytic account. I don't think that anybody will come on the analytic account
to activate the issues. So we hide them in group_no_one
3/ On the analytic account form view, display the title label only in edit mode
Currently there is a selection field 'account_type' on the
account.analytic.account model with 2 values : Active or Archived
Let's use an active field instead and add a Archive stat button on the
form. That way, we can remove all the domain ('account_type','=','normal')
which are implicit with the generic active field behavior
The algorithm for matching analytic accounts based
on search term is only meant to be used for
simple, positive operators.
In other cases the results will not be what the user
expects. Falling back to the default name_search
behavior will be more useful.
It is using an already existing field that wasn't used anymore ('account_type') but as a lot of domains on analytic accounts were
- wrong (still using old fields state and type that have been removed as well in the same commit),
- or defined directly in the views
so, an update of some modules may be needed in order to avoid further problems.
On databases with a large number of res.partner entries,
the extended name_search of analytic accounts was prohibitively
slow, due to the expensive name_search on res.partner.
Restricting the search to the partner name is extremely
similar business-wise, but makes a huge difference in
terms of speed. E.g. sub-second results vs 10+ minutes
for a database with 30k analytic accounts and 600k partners.
If a method used as a default returns an id instead of a RecordSet,
it could fail in 'convert_to_write' (Many2One field) because it will try
to return "value.id". If "value" is an integer, it fails.
Also changed the method to a lambda expression and removed the
'_default_user' method because it's not used anywhere.
- add contract_type field on account.analytic.account and real_quantity on account.analytic.invoice.line
- refactor contract form and list views for better clarity (hide unnecessary fields depending on the type of contract)
- divide account_analityc_account class according to contract type for future work
- divide contract template menu in 3 menus depending on contract_type
- add on_change_uom behaviour on account recurring lines
- rewrite tests in python
- add new report (pivot & graph)
- end date of contract is now computed from the template recurring rules
- small fixes & usability improvements
RomainLibert