Purpose of this commit is to have first activities to perform displayed
first in the activities summary view.
This commit is linked to task ID 1882545 and PR #26797.
-Improve no content helper on activity view
-Update chatter after editing an activity un form view
-Avoid context to appear as feedback
When using call_button the context is set as an arg and will be catched by
the kwargs of the called action.
As for action_feedback, we can create a wrapper without kwargs
used when calling this method from a button to avoid this problem.
Another solution would be to change the call_button in order to give
the context as a kwargs. Maybe a possible improvement for master.
-Remove groupby from activity view
group by has no effect on activity
-Change cursor to pointer on record name in activity view
Task: #1878184
PR: #26668
We need to know if a notification is in failure by
displaying the red envelope in even if all partner are inactive.
This commit also fix the filter in order to display notification
of all active partners if there is an exception.
- When a tracked field is modified, a mail.message is created.
When create is called its tries to fill missing values with "default
values".
It first tries to find the default values in the context, which may
occurs.
For example, modifying a tracked field on a subtask will add a key
"default_parent_id" in the context, which is the parent_id of the project.task.
Create will try to use "default_parent_id" for the mail.message
parent_id field, which make the SQL Request invalid.
The search on message_has_error (used when clicking on a failure notification)
was displaying the failure of all users making it difficult to find your
own mail failure. This fix solve the problem by adding a criteria on message
author_id.
The default value for failure_type was the 'NONE', instead of being
simply False/NULL. This represents a significant waste of tablespace
with no added value.
Switching to true NULL value for representing the absence of error
also save some precious time during database upgrades on databases with
large numbers of emails.
While fixing the values for failure_type, also fixed a few typos and
untranslated strings.
See original feature at 133eeb1bbf
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider the today date = D
- Set on your preference a timezone which has another today date = D+1
- Go to CRM > Configuration > Activiy types > Call
- Set 0 as # Days
- Go to CRM > Pipeline > Click on a lead
- Schedule an activity of type = Call
Bug:
The Due Date = D instead of D+1
opw:1877217
The recently introduced `activity` view (see rev. odoo/odoo@1de9496 has not
received all the consideration it deserves as a real view type (no RNG, not in
the valid view `type`, no doc, etc.). It was currently only working based on a
`_get_default_activity_view` method.
Even if the RNG is currently really basic, its grammar could evolve in the future.
This was causing an issue when opening Studio with this view as a default view
with an invalid type was created.
- When trying to fetch notifications for failed mail delivery, the code
doesn't check if the partner is active or not.
If the partner is archived, then it tries to access its information on
a dict that doesn't contains them and crashes.
In unsubscribe page, if the user try to come back
(and be removed from the blacklist)
but his email have been deleted from the blacklist,
it was leading to an error.
Instead, and in order to keep a trace of what the user asked,
if the email is not found in the blacklist, the record will be
created but archived directly.
Also, it aligns the return of both methods _add/_remove
Following 50ab18176 an access token is added in the URL, but there may
not be an existing access token. If so this commit generate one.
opw-1877347
closes#26526
- In some cases (merge of partners, etc ...) there might be mail.channel
that have two mail.channel.partner with the same res.partner.
When you try to open a discuss window with a partner for which you
have no existing mail.channel.
The channel opened is the one where your partner is duplicated.
This is due to the fact that the SQL request to find the mail.channel
doesn't take in account that a mail.channel may have twice the same
partner.
To fix this issue, we try to exactly match the partners we search.
This commit fixes two issues:
- If a partner has multiple users and if any of these users is a
share user, then the access button on mail notifications is not displayed.
- If a project.task is either assigned or has its stage folded
the access button may not be displayed for certain users.
The users affected by this bug are the one who have their user's
partner is linked to multiple users with at least one flagged as a share user.
activity.js was a little dirty with a lot of copy paste.
Most of the common logic is now in a BasicModel.
This commit also add some tests on activity view
Co-authored-by: RomainLibert <rli@odoo.com>
The indentation of the computation of date_deadline was incorect
leading to a deadline only getting compute when the base date was
depending on a previous activity.
The activity was incorrectly scheduled with a deadline as the now in UTC while
the state was computed using "today" in the user's timezone.
This made the nightly test fail (run at 23:30 UTC with the user in UTC+2).
Use context_today instead of today for all activity_schedule calls
To make it easier, use on the context_today default value instead of setting
context_today everywhere (which is more error prone in the future)
Never use datetime, only date objects
add a warning to detect potential errors when passing a datetime
Closes#26411
Purpose
=======
Sometimes we could want to send a notification to the author too.
Like in the onboarding bars, where we send a sample invoice to the administrator.
He's the author of the message, but the goal is to send him an email to check the
full process when sending a sales order/invoice by email to a customer.
Specification
=============
For that purpose, if a key 'mail_notify_author' is set on the context when
sending the email, then notify the mail author.
With this commit, most threads show an indicator when a member is typing
something. e.g.
"Mitchell Stephens is typing..."
Supported threads:
- DM
- (public & private) channels
- Livechat (Website & Backend)
Unsupported threads:
- mailboxes (e.g. 'Inbox')
- document thread (= 'Chatter')
- support channel (with `im_support` module)
Some technical details:
- This is a mix between 'start'/'stop' and 'regular notify' strategies.
- On typing text in composer: notify 'start typing' to all members of
thread.
- On clearing text in composer: notify 'stop typing' to all members of
thread.
- A member can only notify once every 2.5 seconds to the server when he
starts or stops typing something (throttled, buffered notify call).
- On receiving a message from someone that is typing: determine that he is
no longer typing.
- On non-empty and unchanged composer text for 5.0 seconds: automatically
notifies all members of thread that he is no longer typing anything.
(This is like a 'soft / cooperative sender' timeout).
- On non-receiving a typing notification of someone after 60 seconds:
determine that he is not longer typing something (This is like a
'hard / receiver assumption' timeout).
- When some types for more than 50 seconds straight: notify that he is
still typing something (again and again every 50 seconds).
- When two or more people are typing something (Multi-User channels), it
displays at most 2 typing users (ordering rule: longer typers first):
"Mitchell Stephens, Marc Brown and more are typing..."
- Timing summary:
- Usually 2.5 seconds uncertainty.
- Up to 5.0 seconds uncertainty on typer inactivity.
- Up to 60 seconds uncertainty on typer page reload / browser tab
closed / etc.
Future Improvements:
- Detect page reload or browser tab close with loose of longpolling
connection
Task-ID 28188
This commit is the counter-part of an enteprise commit introducing
the Documents app.
Here is a summary of what has been done:
- tweak unlink of ir_attachment to prevent unlink recursivity
(when attachments are attached to ir_attachments)
- improve ir_attachment kanban view
- add several arguments to binary_content controller:
- 'force_ext': to force the extension in the filename, base on
mimetype
- 'share_token' and 'share_id': to autorize download from a
share link
- add 'thumbnail' field on ir_attachment to optimize Kanban view
- add 'upper_limit' argument to image to allow to bypass the
500*500 size limit
- DocumentViewer now handles text files
More information available on task 1853490
Co-authored-by: Pierre Paridans <app@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: sri-odoo <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: ThanhDodeurOdoo <tso@odoo.com>
In order to avoid sending mail indefinitely to a wrong email address,
Take the mail statistics for the recipient of the last 3 month :
if more than 5 mails bounced (with interval of more than 1 week)
the email is blacklisted.
Purpose
=======
- Apply the blacklist implementation to Improve mailing subscription to be more
compliant with the European GDPR law. Keep a list of people who does not want
to receive promotional emails (or mass mailing in general) anymore.
- Allows the recipient to update himself his mailing preferences
Specifications
===========
This commit is regrouping some main changes on mass mailing.
Apply Blacklist for following models through blacklist.mixin :
- crm.lead
- res.partner
- mail.mass_mailing.contact
- mail.channel.partner
- Opt_out per mailing list instead of per mailing contact.
- Replace opt_out by blacklist in crm.lead + res.partner models
- Added 'ignored' state for mass_mailing. Ignored = blacklisted, opted-out
Ignored email are not included into final statistics to avoid confusion.
- Unsubscribe(d) pages migrated from website_mass_mailing to mass_mailing module
as thoses pages should work without having the website module installed
Detailed implementation
===================
Mass-mailing :
- A blacklisted email is notified by the ban icon next to the email field.
(at the left of the email field for display purpose)
- Renaming the '_get_blacklist' method that was actually
searching opt_out list into 'get_opt_out_list'
- Opt out per mailing list : Add opt_out + related fields (for display and
ergonomy reasons) on the relational model
- Display relational model tree view instead of mass_mailing.contact tree
view when clicking on mass_mailing_list in kanban view
-> In order to be align between contact_nbr displayed in kanban tile and
the content of the tree view
-> mass_mailing contact is accesible via the user icon in this tree view
- Remove custom filters 'filter_contact_subscription' and
'filter_contact_unsubscription' as opt_out is not on mass_mailing.contact
model anymore
- Add 'is_public' to mailing list
The name of this mailing list can be seen (or not) by recipient in
the unsubscription page
If the mailing lists used in the mass mailing are not public,
the user in only informed that he has been unsubscribed.
If the mailing lists are public, the user is informed that he has been
unsubscribed from the mailing lists
and he has the choice to modify his subscription to all the public
mailing list he is or was subscribed to.
- Unsubscription Page :
- mass_mailing_contact :
Opt_out per mailing list, done by email and not by id, as multiple
contact can have the same email
The recipient can add/remove himself to/from the blacklist
The recipient can send a feedback about why he unsubscribed
- crm.lead + res.partner :
Once the recipient unsubscribe, he is automatically blacklisted
The recipient can 'Come back' and remove himself from the blacklist
if he changes his mind
- Show blacklist button parameter added in config :
The idea is to enable/disable the fact that the recipient can add
himself to the blacklist by showing or not the 'blacklist me' button
Only applies for mass_mailing.contact. The recipient, once
blacklisted, can always, no matter the value of this parameter,
'come back' and unblacklist himself
crm.lead + res.partner :
- Replace opt_out by blacklist in crm.lead + res.partner models.
As when a res.partner or crm.lead unsubcribe, we assume that the recipient
does not want to receive mass mailing anymore, at all, even if we adds him
to a mailing list afterwards. He is then blacklisted to avoid this.
With this behaviour, if a new lead is created with the same email address,
he won't be able to receive mail in mass_mode.
But he will still be able to receive '1 to 1' direct email.
Task ID 33224
Closes#25966
Purpose
=======
Improve mailing subscription to be more compliant with the European GDPR law.
Keep a list of people who does not want to receive promotional emails
(or mass mailing in general) anymore.
Specifications
===========
This commit is regrouping some main changes on mass mailing.
- Added blacklist : Avoid sending mass mailing to blacklisted recipient
(blacklisted = email address that doens't want to receive mass mailing anymore)
Detailed implementation
===================
Mail :
- Add Blacklist mechanism in mail module (NOT in mass-mailing) :
as we can send mass-mail without the mass-mailing module
- Unicity in email -> To avoid error in import, override the create and return
the existing record if any, else, create the record normally.
- Blacklisting is done by email address and is cross model.
Will apply to model that inherit the blacklist.mixin.
- field 'is_blacklisted' -> computed : check if email is in blacklist
+ search method to be able to filter on is_blacklisted
- When a email address is blacklisted, it will never get mass mailings anymore.
Even if the email address is added to another mailing lists
- Avoid sending notification to blacklisted recipients when sending email
in mass mail mode. If the recipient is blacklisted, we should not even send a
notification in the recipient's chatter for an email that he won't even
receive.
- When a email address is blacklisted, it can still get 'normal' mailings.
- The blacklist shoud be accessible in
Mass Mailing / Configuration / Blacklist
and Settings / Technical / Email / Blacklist
-> Renaming Settings / Technical / White / Black List config menu item
into Channel Moderation to avoid confusion with Mass Mail Blacklist
- Add indexes to the blacklist table (on email) to make it fast for access for
the different use cases
- _primary_email : attribute that must be overriden to specify which field must
be used as email in the blacklist mechanism.
- Filtering the blacklisted recipient in mail composer :
done in mail._get mail value()
In case of real mass mailing, we need the statistics to be computed in order
to know how many recipients were ignored in the mail.
So we cannot avoid sending mail but instead flag the mail as canceled.
Task ID 33224
Purpose of this commit is to add possibility of rescheduling the assigned
user on automated activities. Currently rescheduling is limited to updating
the deadline. In some cases we want to be able to update the assigned
user of an automated activity.
Tests are added to avoid regression.
This commit is linked to task ID 1838956 and PR #25899.
A simple new view to easily display all activity on a model grouped
by res_id and activity_type_id. Some action are possible like sending
a mail template for all record having an activity with this activity type
and present in the view (depends on the filter).
The view use the Kanban activity view on cells. It could be a good idea
to rename this widget to something like "DropdownActivityView" (maybe
after the freeze)
Task: #1870662
PR: #26272
It was possible to define a delay in days on activity type
to reschedule next activity. It is now possible to specify a unit
(days, weeks, months) and a starting point for the delay
(as before, from the moment when the new activity is scheduled,
but also after the deadline of the previous activity).
We realy need to have all javascript action triggering a done
and schedule next to call the python corresponding method on
activities. A part of the work have been there but some
cleaning could still be done in activity.js.
Task: #1870662
PR: #26272
Purpose of this merge is to improve onboarding of Discuss. This is done via
a wow effect and a bot to test the Discuss app; otherwise you have nobody to
talk to. Purpose is also to improve retention as "the best way to increase
retention is this: when the user invites someone, when this guy activates its
account, the user gets a push notification from the invited user that just
logged in; that way he will come back to Odoo and start discussing with its
colleagues.
Concerning your new best friend: it is not a dog but Odoobot.
See sub commits for more details. This merge is linked to task ID 1838588 and
closes PR #25075.
Purpose of this commit is to improve onboarding with a wow effect and a bot
to test the Discuss app. Otherwise new users have nobody to talk to. Retention
will be improved by both increasing interactions and onboarding of Discuss
features.
This commit adds a simple bot in discuss. It answers some questions, helps
users getting their hand on discuss and eases the onboarding.
In this version, the flow is quite simple, and only im_livechat adds some
logic in order to show canned response. The logic is contained in new
modules: mail_bot and im_livechat_mail_bot in order to keep everything
well separated. It also allows users to remove the mailbot if they do not
want to keep this functionality.
Odoobot will only answer if he is in the onboarding conversation (alone
with a user in a channel of type chat) or if a user pings odoobot.
Odoobot logic applies to both standard chatter / channel messages and
also transient messages (like help commands).
Specifications
* 2 minutes after first sign in, users will receive a direct chat from
Odoobot;
* make Odoobot an archived partner;
* scenario
* Odoobot: "Hello, I'm here to help you discover chat features. Try
answering me with an emoji :)";
* User: Send emoji
* Odoobot: "Great! :) Did you notice that you can also send attachments,
like a picture of your cute dog? Try it!"
* Odoobot: "Not a cute dog, but you get it :) To access special features,
start your sentence with "/" (I.E. /help)""
* User: /help
* Auto message then Odoobot: "Wow you're a natural! As a channel usually
contain a lot of users, you can grab the attention with a ping. Try to
ping me with @Odoobot!"
* User: @Odoobot lorem ipsum
* if Livechat installed
* add 2 demo canned response so it does not look weird (like "Hello, how
may I help you?" and "Have a nice day!")
* Odoobot: "Perfect! <br> Try to type ":" to use canned responses."
* User tries canned
* Odoobot: "Good, you can customize your canned responses in the live chat
application. <br><br> + réponse suivante"
* Odoobot: "There's 3 different ways in Odoo to interact with your
colleagues: via this chat window, [img of chat window] via the Discuss
application [img of Discuss app + icon on it] or via the chatter [img of
the chatter]. Aaaaand that's it! Enjoy discovering Odoo! :)"
* random answers to ping/bad answer
* "Mmmmh I'm not sure what you mean.. Can you try again?"
* "I'm afraid I don't understand. Sorry!"
* when someone pings @OdooBot with no reason: Odoobot: Yaaaay that's me!
[party emoji]
* fun stuff to add for some answer
* User: i love you / love
* Odoobot: Aaaaaw that's really cute but, you know, bots don't work
that way. You're too human for me! Let's keep it professional <3
* User: Fuck
* Odoobot: That's not a really nice thing to say, you know? I'm a bot but I
have feelings, ok?! </3
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588 and PR #25075.
We do not want inactive partners to be added as followers. Indeed this may
lead to unwanted notifications send as inactive partners are not easily
found in the various widgets. It also creates unnecessary data and
computation.
This commit has a small impact on performances as we choose to do it in
message_ subscribe method. Private _message_method is left untouched as
parameters given to this method are left to caller control.
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588.
Christophe Simonis