This commit enables eLearning users to share the channel linked to
certification they cleared directly from the result page.
Notes:
1 - We already have the option to share a certificate from the user info page
or from the slide page, and the same mechanism has been utilised here.
2 - With a recent commit[1], top padding was added to the modal opened on
website front-end to prevent modal overlapping the navbar. But it caused
a side effect on survey result page, where navbar is hidden. So we remove
this top padding on modal for the survey result page.
[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/6ef622772f7d0172553aca6dbce9eb71855460d7
taskId - 2337696
closesodoo/odoo#58104
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This commit adapts the business code in which
class/module/function/method redefinition took place so that it no
longer happens and the pylint test passes.
Bug
===
In the user profile view, we can see the certifications of the current user.
If we click on the share button, we are redirected to the course instead
of opening the share modal.
Technical
=========
Since 1f52435966 we use an on-lick event to
redirect the user when he click on the card. We use the JS event instead
of an standard anchor because nested anchors are forbidden in HTML.
That cause an issue if we click on a child anchor and if we stay on the
same page (which is the case when we open a bootstrap modal) because the
on-click event will be triggered.
We can not just stop the click propagation otherwise the modal won't be
opened.
Also, as the bootstrap modal element (`website_slides.slide_share_modal`)
is inside the element with the on-click event, so, if we click anywhere
on the modal, we will be redirected...
So, the solution is to open manually the modal, to stop the click
propagation and to move the modal element.
Task-2337693
closesodoo/odoo#59545
X-original-commit: 2a63f98bd359907169d14539feaa99a1d83263f0
Signed-off-by: awa-odoo <awa-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Including demo data this time
closesodoo/odoo#58862
X-original-commit: 575abde110acb3d12b25f177a863374becef0894
Related: odoo/enterprise#13705
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Use _for_xml_id to replace all the self.env.ref().read()[0]
This has the advantage of having a single point of control and to add
the fields filtering and model verification.
Add sudo for other operations on ir.actions.*
PURPOSE
Improve elearning backend usability and onboarding
SPECIFICATIONS
Improve layout of email send when invite. Do like a SO, add the join button
in the notification email and not in the composer itself. It required to
create a new notification layout specific to that invite wizard.
Improve channel form view: remove statistics as they are already displayed
in various places, add a stat button for content/visits, better display of
karma (split gain from karma-based access rules).
Automatically publish channel's product to avoid de-synchronization of publish
flags.
Remove unused channel_url field on wizard.
LINKS
Task ID-2241513
PR #55698
PURPOSE
Improve usability of course creation and management in frontend
SPECIFICATIONS
This commit improves various elements of the eLearning module:
* the create 'new course' dialog has been improved with examples and
improved placeholders;
* allow to create tags directly from course creation modal. Using the
add tag button after having created the course is not the only way of
managing tags anymore;
* the create 'new content' dialog has some explanations on the right side;
* add a flag indicating which content has already been viewed in
documentation;
* changes the text/color of some buttons;
LINKS
Task ID-2241513
PR #55698
Before this commit, the Start now button uses the first slide (a content
slide or a category slide). If the first slide was a category slide then
an error was raised.
Now, only content slides are used to start the survey.
opw-2265250
closesodoo/odoo#52309
X-original-commit: bbc84c5d03eae51b6edfe270da51087970db2227
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Before this commit, in the front end, you had to create a certification before
adding it to a course. This commit allows creation of certification in
front-end with pre-filled settings.
Functional Spec
===============
1. On a course, add content, type certification, you can choose an existing one
(normal flow) or create a new one in the dropdown by typing a new survey
name (new flow).
3. When submitting (Publish or save as draft), a certification survey, with
pre-filled settings is created and linked to the slide.
Pre-filled settings:
* One page per question
* Attempts limit : 1
* Time limit : no limit
* Scoring without answers
* Passing score : 70%
* Is Certification : True
* Email Template : Certification: Send by email
* Give Badge : False
4. After submit, the user stays on the Course Content.
5. A toaster is displayed in the top right saying:
Toaster's Title: Certification created
Content: Follow this link to add questions to your certification.
<a>Edit certification</a>
A website editor can select a certification (if available) for the creation of
a slide.
Task id: 1981399
PR #43577
Co-Authored-By: Florent Lejoly <fle@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: David Beguin <dbe@odoo.com>
Commit 90bf317c01 added read rights on survey for eLearning officers.
Reason is that they should be able to link surveys to slides, notably to create
certifications in eLearning.
However in backend eLearning officers cannot access any survey form view as
rights on sub models are not granted. We fix that by correctly giving a read
access on survey sub models to eLearning officers.
They are therefore able to read survey results and statistics. It makes sense
as they are linked to marketing teams. They have no modification rights as
those are limited to survey users / officers.
Notably
* have tools and helpers in a SurveyCase and let SurveyCommon bet the
one with data;
* remove unnecessary with_user, replaced by standard one;
* move all tools in SurveyCase to help reusing them;
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
If you archive a certification while being member of the source you still
have access to the "Begin Certification" button. Indeed you can see the
certification as you have rights to do so (publisher, manager) but trying
the certification will crash as it is not allowed for archived slides.
Instead in archived mode the "Test Certification" button is displayed that
allow to make a test entry even for archived surveys.
closesodoo/odoo#47956
X-original-commit: 10abdf711ac7d0aee7d6eab4e30b08acd38eaa23
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
To have a better UX, the transition between questions in a survey should not
be done by loading another page, but by loading next questions in AJAX.
This will allow to fade out / fade in the next question and improve the user
experience, as well as prepare the work for the complete survey redesign.
SPECIFICATIONS
General
=======
This commit refactors the way the questions are loaded.
To go to next question(s), instead of redirecting to a new page containing
the next question(s), the submit process is loading the next question(s)
using ajax. The template of the question is prepared at server side and is
given in html string to the client that display the next question in a smooth
transition (fade in / fade out).
This commit includes also the start and the end screen of the survey inside
the survey form in order to perform smooth transition between start screen
and first question(s) and between last question(s) and end screen.
Only one master template (survey form) is now used to display every part of
the survey : start + questions + end screens.
The answer_done error is now handled by the _prepare_survey_data itself.
If the user wants to display an already_done survey, the returned template
is the end screen.
This commit handles page transition for the survey results. When submitting
survey, the survey result widget is initialized and attached to the survey
result section.
A new route has been added : /survey/begin/.
If the user arrives on start screen, the state is 'New'. Once the user clicks
on Start button, an rpc call is made to survey/begin that will call the
survey_prepare_data to render the first question page and set the state to
in_progress and the start_datetime of the answer.
Validation
==========
Add the validation of all types of questions directly in the frontend.
This allows to reduce the latency before the survey is validated and was
necessary to go along with our new fade out / fade in mechanism.
The client does not need to wait the validation answer from the server to
display validation error messages.
The current questions are only faded out if the frontend validation has passed.
The server still makes this validation before submitting answers and loading
next question(s) to avoid direct rpc calls that would mess up the answers.
Error messages are now displayed with a slide down transition, for a wonderful
wow effect !
Timer
=====
As the survey form works with ajax to display start screen, question(s) and
end page, the timer has to be started only after the start screen.
This commit display and start the timer only after start survey button is
clicked.
Breadcrumb
==========
As the survey form now works in ajax to display in same page start screen,
question(s) and end page screen, the breadcrumb has to be controlled not only
on page loading but also manually between transition from a screen to another.
To ease the breadcrumb management, breadcrumb is now a widget that will reload
a js template, mainly depending of the current page id.
The js form initialize or update this widget giving this new page id.
On breadcrumb item click, the widget triggers a onclick caught by the form
that calls the submit with the given target.
This commit handles page transition for the breadcrumb. When going forward or
backward (next or previous page), the breadcrumb activates, deactivates and
links elements are reinitialized depending of the target page.
LINKS
Task ID: 2152223
PR #41453
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
This commit prepares the complete redesign of survey.
Simple choice question type will only use the radio button display mode.
So the dropdown display mode is deleted.
Task ID: 2152223
PR #41453
Previously there was no way to view when a survey (specifically a
certification survey) was being used by a course from the survey
app. We handle 2 cases for when a survey is currently assigned to
a course:
1. A survey is assigned to 1 course => survey form stat button visible to bring user
directly to corresponding course form.
2. A survey is assigned to more than 1 course (unlikely, but currently possible) =>
survey form stat button visible to show user a list of corresponding courses where
each list entry can be clicked on to view corresponding course form.
Note: we do not cover viewing courses a survey was previously assigned to as this would
be currently be unreasonable to track.
closesodoo/odoo#42336
Task: 2153743
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Have user groups specific to eLearning to separate them from generic website
editors. Indeed this is a specific work area and require more than pure design
skills.
SPECIFICATIONS
Two user groups are added in this commit
* group_website_slides_officer
+ can read any course/slide
+ can create a course (will be responsible)
+ can write on its courses
+ can upload slides to the courses he is responsible
+ can publish slides to the courses he is responsible
- cannot unlink courses/slides (you should archive them)
* implies group_website_publisher in order to see the top navbar in
frontend with the publish toggle button and the new content button;
* group_website_slides_manager: has full rights
+ can read any course/slide;
+ can create a course;
+ can add slide to any courses;
+ can publish any courses/slides;
+ can unlink any courses/slides;
+ has access to reporting menu entries;
Rights for other groups are untouched for courses / slides. As a reminder
we still support responsibles being outside of eLearning groups, for example
if an employee is a teacher that handles a course:
* people in upload_group_ids of a channel can upload slides, even if they
don't belong to any eLearning group;
* people responsible of a course can upload and publish slides even if they
don't belong to any eLearning group (done through controller as they
don't have real rights on underlying models);
We choose to keep the survey rights separated from eLearning ones. Indeed
it is easy in odoo to update the imply_ids field of groups if necessary
to link survey / eLearning groups; default user template can also be updated
easily. Standard Odoo should therefore correctly separate those groups. The
only specific rights is that eLearning officers can read all surveys, allowing
to choose them for certification-based courses.
LINKS
Task ID 2062462
PR #39485
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :
Type----Old type-----New type
text----free_text----text_box
char----textbox------char_box
Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts
QuestType--------Old type-----New type
text_box---------free_text----text_box
char_box---------text---------char_box
numerical_box----number-------numerical_box
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming
AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field
text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box
Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
``question_ids`` field name is quite difficult to understand as we wonder why
there is such a field on user input model. As its purpose is to store questions
user has to answer (randomly chosen or all chosen) let us rename it to
``predefined_question_ids``.
Moreover starting from now on if it is now given at create it is automatically
computed. Classic flows go through ``survey._create_answer()`` method that
prepares them accordingly. However tests or demo data do not necessarily go
through that method and it makes scoring fail (notably) if people forget
to define them.
Let us automatically generate them at user input create if not given.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced:
``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate
that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is
* ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
on a given row;
* ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
questions;
It adds two benefits
* it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
* it better indicates the use;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZ_SCORE ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, quiz_score field to scoring_percentage
``quiz_score`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZZ_PASSED ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success
``quizz_passed`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME TOKEN ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token
Survey user input model holds two token field. One is used to distinguish
a pool of attempts linked to a given invite: ``invite_token``. The other
one is used to control access to a specific user input. It means that
``invite_token`` indicates a set of user inputs and each of them is accessed
through its own ``token``. To be coherent with other naming in odoo this
latter field is renamed to ``access_token``.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME THANKS_YOU_MESSAGE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done
In this commit we rename thanks_you_message field. Indeed for certifications
or recruitment form, "thank you" is not really the unique content you
would get in a post-survey message. We therefore rename it to description_done
to better indicate its use.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME CERTIFICATE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification
All certification related fields on survey model begin with certification_ .
Only the boolean one telling if a survey is a certification or not is called
certificate. In order to ease grep and ordering it is renamed to certification.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME PASSING_SCORE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
on survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min
``passing_score`` field name is not really the best name we could find.
Renaming the field using a ``scoring_`` prefix allow to know this field
is linked to the scoring mechanism.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to
answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from
``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with
general odoo naming guidelines.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.
After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.
As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model
* ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
used to display suggested values to the user;
* ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
columns which seems easier to understand;
In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model
* ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: QUESTION FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title.
Question model holds two fields for its title: ``title`` and ``question``.
Question is simply a related on title, making the two fields completely
redundant. It is mainly due to historical reasons, when updating models for
certifications and eLearning. In this commit we keep only title field and
remove the question related field as it adds unnecessary complexity to the
model.
SPECIFICATIONS: INPUT_TYPE FIELD ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect.
``input_type`` field exists on user input model to tell whether answer has
been created through invite or through manual click on a survey page. It
has been added a long time ago when surveys were either open to everyone,
either closed and on invite only.
Since eLearning and certification surveys access mode on surveys has evolved.
Notably being able to distinguish invite from manual survey user input is not
necessary anymore. Indeed what is important is the way people can reach the
survey, not how they created their user input.
Invitation creates token and this can be used if people effectively want to
find invitation-related user inputs.
Since 09ea5c7d49 manual entries still in draft are garbage collected.
Reason is still unclear as it is not obvious that tons of unnecessary entries
will be created. As this seems like unnecessary optimization this commit
removes that feature along with the input_type field.
SPECIFICATIONS: REPLACE URLS FIELDS BY METHODS ON SURVEY.{SURVEY, USER_INPUT}
On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods
In this commit we remove some remaining of URL fields that are better found
using methods. Both survey and user input holds a "start" url field that is
replaced by a method call ``get_start_url`` on both survey (generic) and
user input (token specific) models. We also introduced a ``get_print_url``
method doing the same for the printable version of survey / user input.
SPECIFICATIONS: REMOVE CATEGORY FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove unused category field.
Survey model holds a ``category`` field whose purpose is to be able to somehow
categorize surveys according to their use. However using this field is not
easy as it is hidden and is a simple selection field. Module should add their
own key. Its sole use is in ``hr_recruitment_survey`` which is a niche module.
Let us clean models and lessen model complexity.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
Purpose is to ease designing your courses by allowing to create and update
slide quiz directly in frontend, within the slide display.
With this commit you are able to
* add a quiz to a slide or add a question to an existing quiz;
* edit an existing question from a quiz:
* change the title of the Question;
* add, remove or update answers;
* change the right answer;
* delete an existing question;
* reorder the questions from a quiz;
* reset the quiz for the current user if he is a website designer, allowing
to test the quiz and its answers;
New frontend widgets are introduced allowing to manipulate quiz. Slide page
now supports a readonly / taking quiz mode and an edit mode for quizzes
used notably for website designers / course maintainers.
Task ID : 1999636
PR : #35326
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Purpose is to perform some cleaning in survey models: naming, ordering,
dead code [0]. As new features are about to land in survey, notably live
interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning
is necessary [3].
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove dead code :
* split templates into 3 main files
* survey_templates: holding main templates when taking a survey;
* survey_templates_statistics: graph and statistics (results) of a survey;
* survey_templates_management: templates linked to corner cases and
error management (403, closed survey, ...) as well as tools and utility
templates;
* rename template ids to ease code understanding;
No functional changes should occur with this commit. It contains only
code move, not any change at all.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2144393 (surveys split / cleaning)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
[3] Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
PR #40623
This commit adds a section to distinguish the certification badges from the
other badges users may obtain in eLearning. Certification badges are available
on the ranks page, linked to a running survey. Clicking on them directly
redirects into the linked course.
Task ID : 1961053
PR #32594
Purpose of this commit is to ensure challenge linked to surveys linked to
slides have ``slides`` category, while challenge linked to surveys not
linked to slides (if changing survey_id for example) have ``certification``
category.
With this patch challenges are correctly categorized, allowing to accurately
filter them based on their category.
Task ID : 1961053
PR #32594
Purpose of this commit is to help users knowing there is new content in a
course by adding a visual insight. It is done through a new content arrow
displayed in courses homepage.
Regarding the file "website_slides_templates_homepage.xml", the choice to
incorporate the t-call attribute into a 't' balise was necessary to display
the customize option (part front) associated with the model course_card.
Side dish usability improvements raised during development
* display completed courses as last instead of first in "my courses";
* do not show promote strategy field for training courses as it has no
use, only for documentation courses;
TASK ID 2025186
Closes PR #36703
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this task, when the user arrived on his profile,
some empty sections didn't had any call to actions
task-2080615
closesodoo/odoo#38029
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This commit adds a button in the certification card in the profile page.
this button opens the share modal and allows to share to social networks
the course linked to that certification.
Task ID : 1950396
PR #31776
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Martin Trigaux