Change the default rouning digits of all UoMs to be two, also change the
decimal.precision of UoM to be two. Adapt all the tests.
Also to avoid hardcoded digits in `should_consume_qty` widget.
PR #56000
X-original-commit: 460ec0402a2352a5b179d81935f7230f6bc97cb7
This commit sets up the logic and adds the button for "Put in Pack"
action that already exists in stock.picking. Reuse/extension of logic
from stock.picking reused where possible, including extension of pack
wizard to handle products with different destination.
Note that logic to handle "Delivery Packaging" wizard when "Delivery
Methods" is active was purposely not extended to work correctly in batch
pickings due to complexity of adding in a new module just to handle
conflicting carrier_ids across pickings in the same batch. It is
expected that this use case will not occur except in case of user error.
Additionally, stock.picking implementation of 'put_in_pack' method has
been renamed to 'action_put_in_pack' to have consistent naming (and
support enterprise level code).
Part of "1. Improve Batch Pickings" specification of overall barcode
improvements task.
Task: 1884520
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#12086Closes: odoo/odoo#55096
This commit makes it so products can be replenished without any other
module. This is achieved by adding a "pull" rule to the default receipt
route generated when a warehouse is created. "Pull" rule is added to 1-,
2-, and 3-step receipt routes. Previous to this commit, an additional
module (e.g. purchase, mrp, etc.) was needed for a pull rule to trigger
with the existing receipt route rules. Replenishments can be triggered
via "Replenish" button in product form, recording rules (auto trigger),
and replenishment (manual trigger).
Additionally, this commit makes it so when other modules (mrp, purchase)
that handle replenishment are installed, this additional "pull" rule is
removed from the default receipt route to prevent undesired behavior
(e.g. MTO manufacturing components magically being received from no
where). Unfortunately this means 2 undesirable situations:
1. If a user adds adds/changes rules to the receipt route and then installs
mrp or purchase then their additions/changes will be removed.
2. If a user removes either (when only 1 installed) or both of these
modules then stock module will again not be able to replenish as the
pull rule will not be re-added to the receipt route.
It is expected that these 2 cases do not need to be handled in most
cases or can be handled by advanced users.
Stock tests have also been updated to accomodate this new pull rule.
Specification 4 of overall inventory onboarding improvement task.
Task: 2220129
Related Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#10719
Check backorder is divided in 3 blocks:
1) quantities on move lines linked to a move
2) quantities on move lines without moves nor products but with a
package
3) quantities on move lines without moves but with a product
1) added quantities in the move's uom, 2) added quantitis in the product
uom, 3) doesn't seem to be used (and shouldn't be). Clarify all of that.
task-2239964
closesodoo/odoo#49790
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
followup of rev [0]
If these wizards are called on multiple pickings, display the list of
the pickings that could be impacted and allow to select which one should
be impacted.
We also adapt the sanity checks at the start of `button_validte` in
order to specify the concerned pickings if needed. We do not enable the
multi behavior for batch at the moment, so it's only enabled for the
validate multi in the list view.
[0] 6ab4b0d496
task-2069646
closesodoo/odoo#41497
X-original-commit: ff276c6484b138982f185ec9c832f2dbf25baaef
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
`action_done`on pickings should be a private method,
and called only trough the picking validation process.
task-1938108
closesodoo/odoo#39174
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
rev[0] added the possibility to put in pack without setting any done
quantity on move lines but when the reserved move lines are hidden
(thanks to rev[1]) it got confused on which move lines to work on.
[0] e03c1a836f
[1] ffd5d5a097closesodoo/odoo#36832
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Ensure proper domains are applied and enforced on relation fields thanks
to the `check_company` attributes.
product.template
- make responsible a property field in order to ensure proper next activities when a product
is used between multiple companies
stock.putaway.rule
- added a company_id field
stock.move.line
- company_id is not related anymore since a move line can exist without a move until its validation
stock.package_level
- added a company_id field
stock.picking.type
- company_id is now required
stock.production.lot
- added a company_id field, adapted the constraint accordingly
stock.quant
- check the consistency only in inventory mode
stock.quant.package
- company_id is now empty if the package is empty
stock.picking
- company_id is now related to the one of its picking type
Added some tests.
Moved stock_traceability in the `report` directory.
Removed useless /tests/tours/route.js.
task-1985992
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
This class referenced demo data but even if they weren't installed, the
tests were passing. Remove the definition and usages.
closesodoo/odoo#35343
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
pass all test cases without any demo data.
If a user has not installed any demo data, then also test cases must not be break.
task-2024202
closes : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/34258
Change the use of Inventory Adjustment, notable changes are:
- Removed filter field: When user creates a new inventory
adjustment, he can set one or multiple locations and/or products.
An inventory adjustment will worry only about defined
locations/products, but if neither product or location was set,
it'll manage all stock.
- Inventory Adjustment Lines have their own view instead of be
listed on the Inventory Adjustment form view.
Inventory adjustment lines have new color legend:
- Red: The quantity is outdated.
- Blue: There is difference between the on hand quantity and the
counted quantity.
New inventory lines created by the user are written in bold.
- User can't modify already existing inventory lines, except for the
counted quantity.
- When an inventory line is outdated, the user has the possibility
to select and update it, that'll recompute the on hand quantity.
- When an inventory adjustment is validated, it will take in account
only the difference between the theoretical quantity ('On Hand
Quantity') and the counted quantity to adjust the quants.
- When an inventory adjustment is canceled, it will keep its
inventory lines and won't regenerate them when re-started.
- When an Inventory Adjustment generates Account Moves, user can now
find them in a stat button in the Inventory Adjustment form view.
Also, made some changes in demo data to match new requirement.
Task #1935921
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Improve the procurement requests performance. Instead of processing
procurement request one by one, search rules that apply for each of
them and group them by rule's actions.
The main technical change is the record creation order.
E.g. 2 SO lines with pick ship delivery.
-Before this commit:
line1 -> LAUNCH_RULE -> PICK MOVE1 -> MOVE1 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE1
line2 -> LAUNCH RULE -> PICK MOVE2 -> MOVE2 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE2
-After this commit:
line1/2 -> LAUNCH RULE -> PICK MOVE1/2 -> MOVE1/2 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE1/2
Also there is one batch creation by company_id. It implies that values
are group by company_id. Since company_id are passed by previous
procurement or by the rule, it become a required value and it's added to
the procurement arguments (it was already always passed in the values,
no functional modification).
_run_buy is reworked. It receives a bathc of procurements, those
procurements could be merged in the same PO or the same PO lines.
However the PO/PO lines are created (if procurement couldn't be
merged in an existing one) at the end of the method. It implies
that 2 procurements creating a PO and merged inside, would now create
2 distinct PO (same for po lines). _run_buy in order to fix this issue:
- group procurements by PO search domain. If the PO doesn't exist,
create only one.
- Inside the same PO: merge quantities, move_dest_ids for procurements
with the same product and UoM.
Other _run_ methods are just adjusted in order to process batch.
For a pick pack ship scenario, without procurment_jit confirm a SO
containing 500 lines will take 40s instead of 15 minutes.
- The docstring for the method `create_backorder(self)` was updated to a more convenient one.
- The kwargs `backorder_moves` was remove since it was useless.
`_action_done` could unlink a quant. This happens when moving a product from a
location to another one and makes null the quantity of this product in one of
theses locations. In this case, we unlink the quant because it is now useless
and could be confusing on reports based on quants.
The unwanted side effect is that unlinking a record will invalidate the cache. In
some pathologic cases, like making an inventory adjustment of 600 products
and reseting their quantity back to 0, the time of the operation is around 15
minutes. With this patch that tries to work carefully with the cache invalidation,
the same operations takes around 15 secondes.
This commit do not unlink quant anymore, instead it use a 'garbage
collector' on quants without quantity. The garbage collector is trigger
on the scheduler and when the user open the inventory view.
The method 'action_done' on inventory adjustment became private and the
action launched from the view is now 'action_validate', so we adapt
those tests to use the new function.
TASK-30921
This commit remove force_assign method in every tests of point_of_sale, purchase, sale_mrp,
sale_stock, stock and stock_account . This method is not longer used since V11.
This commit is related to task ID 59417
Use case to reproduce:
- Go for a delivery order and use show detailed operations mode
- Have something reserved on a picking
- Manually delete the stock.move.line
-> The move state is not adapted to the new state of the stock move lines
It happens because the move state is not computed not
update on the move line unlink method.
This commit use the existing move function in order
to compute the state and add a test.
A part of test_stock_flow_74 is updated. Since procurement
refactoring make a move mto and confirm it will not work
since purchase or mrp are not install (Usererror). Also do an unreserve
on a draft move is not a real use case and should not pass
it in waiting since moves orig are never created.
The rationale for the need of a merge move mechanism is that, with the new default view,
having multiple stock move for the same products is confusing. The idea is that if a move
is confirmed in a picking already having a move with the same characteristics, we update
the existing move and unlink the new one. That’s why it’s done at the end of `_action_confirm`.
In some cases, merging moves is unwanted (backordered moves for examples). Therefore, we chose
to add a kwarg to `_action_confirm` in order do control the mechanism.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
The function that checks if we need a back oder or not compares
the initial demand and the quantity processed on the picking.
When unit of measure are activated the initial demand (product_qty)
uses the uom of the product. However the quantity processed on the move
(quantity_done) uses the uom of the move.
This commit uses product_uom_qty instead of product_qty. Product_uom_qty
represents the initial demand transformed with the uom of the move.
It also add a small test with a back order that ensure the quantities
are correct.
It also repairs the test stock flow where in some case immediate transfer
return the back order wizard instead of processing the move. In these cases
we catch the back order wizard and run it.
When validating a stock picking there were 2 different cases:
(1) If all qty are equal to 0 it will display a wizard asking
if the user want to set the quantity done to the reserved quantity
for all moves. If the user accept it will automatically perform the
moves after setting the quantity done.
(2) If the user set a quantity on a move, it will check if there is
a need for a back order. If yes it will display a wizard asking if
a back order is needed or not.
However the check if a back order was needed or not was never perform
in case 1. If the quantity reserved was lower than the initial demand
a back order was automatically created.
This commit add the step 2 in the procedure of step 1 (after setting the
quantity done).
The purpose of this is to help stock manager in their quants analysis.
An overview of quants can be accessed via inventory menu and for specific
lot/SN via the locate button.
This commit add quants in every location (only internal location previously)
The purpose is to introduce a double entry for quant (add quants to a destination
location will always remove quant from a source location).
Quants in customers/suppliers location are shared between all customers/suppliers.
In order to know the amount of product that come from a specific customer/supplier
the tracability report should be used.
Before this commit, `action_done` on stock.move.line was intended to
receive the recordset of the move lines of a single move where the move
lines having a null `qty_done` were already unlinked.
This part of code was in stock.picking's `button_validate` and not
copied in mrp, and weird things happened when mrp tried to run
`action_done` on a stock.move.line with a `qty_done` of 0.
We move this check directly in `action_done`, as well as the check on
the picking type that was done in stock.move's `action_done`.
We also adapts rev[0] that was not working anymore since the new stock,
and add some tests.
[0] e79eaecc46
When we validate a SO with an MTO product, then an RFQ and a delivery
picking are created. The status of the delivery picking is in state
'confirmed', but should be 'waiting' as the delivery waits for a
specific delivery input.
The problem is caused by the unreserve method, which is called in the
'procurement_jit' module. This method only checks that a move has
ancestors to determine if the move should be in waiting or in confirmed,
which is not the case for our delivery move because the RFQ has not been
validated yet so there is not ancestors yet.
To fix this issue, we check the 'procure_method' of the move, and if it
is in 'make_to_order' we put it in 'waiting' instead of 'confirmed'.
We also fixed the function recalculate_move_state that could cause the
same problem.
Original commit (in 10.0) be9dce625c
From original commit:
It is still possible to have negative and positive quants in the same
location because of returns: if you send something to the customer that
is not there and you return it, you will still be able to reserve the
returned goods to send to another client.
Before, if you would do an inventory adjustment, it would not take into
account these returned quants and their negative counterpart, which made
them difficult to get out of the system.
This fix takes them into account by creating two movements for one
inventory line: move the positive counterpart to the inventory location
before getting back from this location the same quantity.
This way, even if you have 0 as quantity on hand but you have those 2
quants, it will eliminate them. (if you are increasing the stock, part
of the process might have done it automatically already).
Also, a key of context has been added which authorizes the process described above in the case of both a tracked product and no lot_id on the stock inventory
OPW 743107
Closes#17167
yhu-odoo