PURPOSE
Allow to manage attachments when updating a frontend review.
SPECIFICATIONS
As those widgets grow it is better to have them in separate files in order to
better understand code organization. Future commits will improve composer
behavior, notably in attachments management.
LINKS
Task 2066600 (manage attachments)
Task 2058595 (eLearning v13 testing)
As we now have a new debug mode 'tests' which load a new asset bundle
containing tour-test files, we moved those files to a new folder hierarchy.
That will clean the .js files trees.
Also, those files should be included in the new asset.
Basically, the .js tour files (not test) should be inside /static/src/js/tours
while .js tour test files (test=true) should be inside /static/tests/tours next
to QUnit tests, inside a tours folder.
+ test_new_api: don't run the test in debug assets
task-1934445
Comes with https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/4281Closes#33213
* portal, sale, website, website_blog, website_crm, website_event,
website_event_sale, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment,
website_sale, website_sale_wishlist
At last, that ugly JS module can be removed. Before this current PR, it
was still used to wait for "page ready", to initialize widgets on page
loading. Now, all can be done thanks to public root and public widgets.
web_editor.base was also still used in tours, which should not be
necessary anymore for the same reason, especially since the tour manager
waits for the public root naturally.
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29442
task-1932066
Add a new widget for binary fields. It open a dialog box and the user can sign manually,
or an signature can be draw automatically or he can upload a picture of his signature.
Move fonts, controller, scss,templates about signature from portal to web to avoid redundance
closesodoo/odoo#30222
Purpose
=======
The goal is to avoid duplicate code between portal and sign (enterprise), and
also to allow the user to use the signature mode 'auto' and 'load' in portal
(before this commit only 'draw' was available in portal).
The sales order signature (currently the only portal signature) has been changed
to use this new code.
This signature widget has been improved:
Improved style:
- better structure and use of BS classes
- removed most of custom CSS
- made it more responsive
Changed code to follow guidelines, added JSDoc.
Technically
===========
New widget NameAndSignature common to portal and sign (enterprise).
Reworked existing portal signature form to use new widget.
Related to enterprise PR https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/3266
task-1894903
closesodoo/odoo#29453
* auth_password_policy_signup, auth_signup, website, portal, survey,
web_unsplash, website
Following the new editor's merge at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29775
web_editor.base has been moved to website while it was still used by
frontend pages which do not depend on website (especially portal).
This commit moves web_editor.base to portal while waiting for
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29442. It also removes the unnecessary
dependencies to it in non-portal pages (in survey for example).
* portal, theme_bootswatch, web, web_editor, website
With less2sass and bs3tobs4 tasks, the assets structure was reviewed to
handle the specificities of both framework and to prepare for our next
odoo tasks. In particular, the assets_helpers and bootstrap overrides
were basically split into 4 parts: utils, primary variables, secondary
variables and bootstrap variables.
(see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/6e4db7d13a926845bf82f5b035afede42d6d5a89)
Using the !default system for the bootstrap variables parts seems now
a good improvement. This is part of what this commit does: adding the
default flag for all bootstrap variables overrides and inverting the
order of the files in the _assets_backend_helpers and
_assets_frontend_helpers templates. This allows to avoid code like this:
portal:
```
$body-bg: white;
```
website:
```
@if $var != null {
$body-bg: $var;
}
```
This code makes the body white with portal or equal to $var with website
if $var has a value. The same behavior in the new file order is achieved
with:
website:
```
$body-bg: $var !default;
```
portal:
```
$body-bg: white !default;
```
This order is now also followed for the _assets_secondary_variables
templates (there are only a few).
This commit also make better assets hierarchy by making website inherit
from portal assets (instead of web) and portal inherit from web_editor
assets (instead of web) (thus relying on strong dependencies instead of
installation order which is not always right for migrated databases).
closesodoo/odoo#29757
With BS4, the website's font size was set to 16px instead of 14px as
before. We finally decided to force the 14px back. This commit also
moves some bootstrap variables extensions to portal as it should have
been done and reformat the files to match the bootstrap _variables.scss
file.
This is necessary to make it among the first of the "assets frontend"
inherited views, and specifically make it appear *before* the one from
website. Without this, SCSS styles may be randomly broken if the
original installation order of `portal` and `website` was reversed
(e.g. for older databases).
with this commit, this generic widget allow to basic functionality for portal sidebar like: print btn (direclty print the document),
set due or delay label of the document (based on given date), used affix to locked to an area on the page for sidebar.
Purpose is to reuse it in account customer portal and online quotes notably.
some css code convert to the less file to have working portal sidebar skeleton, which is already used in website_quote
Task ID: 39876
Indeed this lib is used either in frontend and backend. Portal modules
uses it in frontend (sale to sign orders in customer portal). eSign
uses it in backend. Let us therefore put it in common assets.
This generic widget allow to confirm and sign documents on the customer
portal. Purpose is to reuse it in sale customer portal and online quotes
notably. It is made generic to call a route using parameters given to the
widget. It also supports access token to ease its use in various customer
portal pages where the customer is not always connected but is granted
access through an access token.
Two things happen in this commit
* move portal less from web to portal. This code has been wrongly
moved to web when moving the customer portal and should be in
portal module;
* merge customer portal generic less and customer portal chatter
specific less into the same file;
We should now have only one less file for customer portal less and
located in the right addon.
* mass_mailing, payment, point_of_sale, portal, survey, web, web_tour,
website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_event,
website_event_questions, website_form, website_forum, website_gengo,
website_hr_recruitment, website_links, website_mail,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_quote,
website_sale, website_sale_options, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit reviews the whole "JS side" of the web_editor and website
apps. This is a first step to be able to improve them with new and
better functionnalities; this commit is not supposed to change any
visual behavior.
The main goal was to achieve a structure similar to the backend one.
Now, the frontend side also has a root widget (like the WebClient)
and all other widgets are attached to it one way or another. This allows
the benefits of using the 'trigger_up' functionnality for example.
As RPC are now mainly done with the `this._rpc` functionnality (being
possible thanks to the parent hierarchy), the frontend will also be
possible to test thanks to QUnit in a future update (besides the "text"
editor side which still requires a refactoring to be able to do that).
---
Here are some of the changes:
(-) conventions and documentation
The code has been updated to follow JS conventions and a lot of code has
been commented (around +2000 lines of comment). This also means that
lots of functions have been renamed to use camelCase or simply to make
their name understandable.
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Javascript-coding-guidelines.
(-) deprecated: web_editor.base
The "web_editor.base" module has been split and does not force the
modules which require it to wait for DOM ready anymore. This was indeed
slowing loading times, but also prevented to use some modules in some
contexts (see the LESS editor use in web_studio which is the subject of
another task).
Now the "editor context" can be got thanks to the "web_editor.context"
JS module with its "get" function.
The "web_editor.base" module should probably not be used anymore (see
its code and recent updates).
(-) new: web.dom_ready
If a JS module should wait for the DOM to be ready to be executed, a
new JS module has been created: "web.dom_ready". This should always
be used in a module which only want to instantiate stuff. Do not
extend (or worst, include) classes after DOM ready.
(-) website.website
The "website.website" module has been split. "website.website" does not
return anything useful anymore, it just initialize some miscellaneous
stuff, without waiting for the DOM to be ready. You might want to check
"website.utils", "website.content.compatibility" or `WebsiteRoot`. Also
`website.form` has been deleted (use `this._rpc`), so has been
`website.error`. `website.prompt` will be removed in a future update to
be replaced by `Dialog.prompt`.
(-) widgets are great
Many classes which were not widgets are now widgets. This allows them to
use the 'events', the 'xmlDependencies' and the 'this._rpc' features for
example. Here are some of the main ones:
- Snippet options: these were classes with a `$el` for the menu element
and `$target` for the customized element. This is still the case
but following standard `Widget` structure (one exception: using
`this.$(...)` searches in the `$target` as before this update).
- Snippet animations: instead of class instances with a `$target`
element which can be `start` and `stop`, these are now standard
widgets which can be `start` and `destroy`. `this.$target` is
an alias to `this.$el` for ease of compatibility.
- Snippet editors: instead of class instances in charge of an editor
overlay, these are now widgets. Each "child" snippet editor is
properly attached as a "child", which allows editors to communicate
and to be properly destroyed.
(-) root widgets and website navbar
The frontend is different of the backend. In the backend, the page has
an empty <body/> element and all the components are instantiated from
parent to children (i.e. the `WebClient` is instantiated and is in
charge of instantiating the `ControlPanel`, etc). The frontend cannot
work like that on page loadings as they are way more frequent than in
the backend and we do not want them to flicker. A frontend page is
loaded as a <body/> element which already contains the website navbar
and its menus and the whole content page. JS code has to be "attached"
to these existing elements. This is possible thanks to the `RootWidget`
instances and the specialized `WebsiteRoot`, `IframeRoot` and
`WebsiteNavbar` (see code for details).
(-) lazy loading
No more (or at least a lot less) XML/JS has to be loaded on page
loading, thanks to the use of the `Widget.xmlDependencies` feature.
XML which have to be lazy loaded is loaded only on related Widget
instantiation if necessary, which allows to execute a lot of JS code
before the DOM is ready and to start many widgets on DOM ready (not
later). A visual benefit of this is clicking on the 'edit' button as
soon as it is possible: before this commit, this was sometimes not
doing anything as event handlers were not binded yet.
Still a possible exception: loading the session and locales. This may
be asynchronous stuff which is still required before widget
instantiations but this will be the subject of another task.
(-) deprecated code and code location
More than reviewing code and organizing it, many apparent dead code was
removed. More importantly, mislocated code was put in the right app.
This is the case for snippet animations which is a concept for website
apps but was defined in the web_editor app, or some translation concepts
which were part of website but should have been part of web_editor.
---
There are probably more things to say about this commit but I will let
the comments speak for those.
This commit moves the whole customer portal to the portal module.
It now completely uses portal and http_routing features and is not
dependent on website anymore.
An override of web controller is added in portal in order to redirect
portal users to /my instead of /web. That way once having the customer
portal installed all share users are correctly redirected to their
account.
All modules defining customer portal templates and controllers are
updated accordingly.
This module adds required base code for a fully integrated customer
portal. It contains the base controller class and base templates.
Business addons will add their specific templates and controllers
to extend the customer portal.
This module contains most code coming from odoo v10 website_portal.
Purpose of this module is to allow the display of a customer portal
without having a dependency towards website edition and customization
capabilities.
Some CSS files used in frontend assets are already moved to have a
working portal skeleton. A is_public method on users is also added
as it will be used in various portal code soon.
Thibault Delavallée