The xpath was wrongly replacing the 'owner_user_id' field before the
kanban templates definition (which isn't displayed in the view).
closesodoo/odoo#53459
X-original-commit: b63043e36702046000aedf3f1f934122d51ef441
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The purpose of task is to update the 'user/employee avatar' to the new
widget in all the kanban view across all modules.
The below new widget are introduced for avatar:
- many2one_avatar_user (for user_id fields)
- many2one_avatar_employee (for employee_id fields)
which displays the avatar (i.e. picture) of a user/employee in front
of his name and clicking on the avatar will open a chatbox to message
that specific user/employee.
So in this commit, For each kanban view with a user or employee avatar,
replaced it by the field with the new 'many2one_avatar' widget.
TaskID: 2244928
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/10420
closes odoo/odoo#50789
Closes: #50789
Related: odoo/enterprise#10420
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
* converts dynamic domain from onchange_department_or_employee_id to a
static domain on the field
* remove the department_id field (and all uses of it), it looks to
never be set and not really be settable: the field is hidden in the
form, doesn't have a default value, does not have anything to
compute it, ...
* remove the onchange itself as it has very little value: it
auto-selects an equipment if there exists a single equipment
assigned to the selected employee or to no employee
Even if we removed the "equipment not assigned to any user"
bit (under the assumption that people would mostly request
maintenance for their own equipment, and that this would usefully
trigger more often) it's unlikely for dedicated users of
hr_maintenance to assign only one equipment per employee. So the
onchange would rarely do any useful work, and what work it saves is
trivial: if there's only one equipment the employee could ask about
for maintenance it's really trivial to do that.
Task 2115472
closesodoo/odoo#40963
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Modify tree view for MRP Production
Modify form view and tree view for Unbuild orders
Add group by for Bill of Materials
By default show line shart when opening MRP Production report
Modify view for Work Orders
Modify view for Work Centers
Modify view for Routings
Modify view for Maintenance Request
Modify view for Bill of Materials
task-2042304
closes - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/35482
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
When a user is assigned as responsible of request, we want him to get a
mail saying that he's a assigned to this request, a standard behaviour
exists in Odoo to perform such a thing, which consist of having a field
named 'user_id' which is tracked, so to avoid overriding the method, we
renamed the field 'technician_user_id' in 'user_id'.
Wre also set teh mail subtype 'request create' with default false, to
have the same behaviour as the on in project, meaning that it is true
only if you have the parent subtype set to true.
TASK-ID: 58645
Today, Odoo is really tricky to use without seeing the screen, it must be improved to be usable.
This PR forbid to use labels without a "for" attribute, add some title, rule and aria attributes in HTML. With that, Odoo will be fully usable with a screen reader.
* [IMP] Labels must have a for attribute. Improve accessibility.
* [IMP] Better error message when trying to read a missing cached value
* [FIX] Add some aria-label and title attributes for screen readers.
* [FIX] Template name is not included in the error message in case of SyntaxError in QWeb
* [FIX] Improve the Tour failed at step error message to be more explicit.
* [IMP] Add aria-labels
* [FIX] Add missing aria-label on failing test
* [IMP] aria-hidden means hidden. Fix all bad aria-hidden and hide aria-hidden for all.
* [IMP] Color names on kanban views and many2many tags
* [IMP] Add some checks on views for accessibility.
* [IMP] Add `alt` attribute on `img` tags.
* [IMP] Add aria-label and title on non-described icons
* [IMP] Add button role to widgets with btn class
* [IMP] Translate aria and formatted attributes.
* [IMP] Remove wrong aria-labelledby
* [IMP] Add menu role on dropdowns
* [IMP] Buttons must be focusable
* [IMP] Add aria attributes on progress bars
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of basic widgets
* [IMP] Change main layout to more semantic tags
* [IMP] Add menuitem role when missing
* [IMP] Remove wrong role='presentation'
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of tab panels
* [IMP] Add aria-invalid on invalid fields
* [IMP] Add aria-sort on ordered columns
* [IMP] Add role on alerts
* [IMP] Use dialog role, header, main and footer tags for modals
* [IMP] Add labels on o_status
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of kanban view with feeds and articles
* [IMP] Add alerts in case of new messages
* [IMP] Add widget, navigation or img role to aria-labelled items
Purpose
=======
The attribute name isn't required on the <filter> tag. If not set, it can't be selected with a xpath and it can't be overwritten.
A lot of PR are coming from the community just to add a name on a filter because:
- It can't be selected with a xpath.
- It can't be used with `default_search_foo` on an action context.
Specification
=============
Make the atttribute name required
The fields `owner_user_id` used `maintenance` search view to filter on
assigned equipment is overwritten in `hr_maintenance` to be computed
based on employee or department manager linked user.
However employee may not have linked user, considering equipment
unassigned.
Use directly the presence of employee or department to
determine if an equipment is assigned or not.
In maintenance.equipment form view, the field owner_user_id has been replaced
by equipment_assign_to, employee_id and department_id. But in the kanban view,
this field was still displayed even though the image was replaced by the image
of the employee. So now, the kanban view follows the same behavior as the form view.
opw:724378
- rename models from hr.equipment.something to maintenance.something
- add concept of maintenance team and dashboard
- remove generic alias for maintenance
maintenance is not dependant on hr anymore. A new module hr_maintenance is
added that adds hr-related fields (employee owner, ...). This way maintenance
is a stand alone application.
Victor Feyens