Commit Graph
27 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicolas (vin) 7354da6923 [IMP] account: Accounts m2o behavior
There are inconsistencies in the m2o accounts create & edit behavior.
New off-balance account type was not correctly filtered

This change correct those two issues

Task ID: #2288757

closes odoo/odoo#54626

Related: odoo/enterprise#11920
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
2020-08-13 08:56:53 +00:00
Xavier Morel 01354a3314 [FIX] account, purchase: almost certainly incorrect domains
This started from noticing that purchase somewhat oddly *removes* a
filter (internal_type='other') from a domain which is fairly
rare. Looking at the file histories didn't yield anything of
interest ("v9 accounting") but finally looking at the model revealed
an additional multi-company filter missing from both views.

After consulting with @qdp-odoo, @sle-odoo and @lap-odoo, no good
reason was found for the discrepancies:

* internal_type filter should probably always be there, unclear why it
  would get removed from purchase
* whoever added the multicompany filter *probably* missed that it
  would never be used because there was not one but two views
  overriding it (differently)
* sibling "income" field, as well as the corresponding fields on the
  product category, should match (though they were less incoherent).

closes odoo/odoo#44602

Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
2020-02-04 14:44:59 +00:00
Sylvain LE GAL 1e1e511cea [FIX] call _get_product_accounts() everywhere
closes odoo/odoo#41632

Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-23 14:29:45 +00:00
jem-odoo 14ec06e04a [IMP] account: multi company domain on product account fields
As we have to set account on product and product category to know in which
account generate some accounting entries in some business flow (e.i.: expense),
we need to keep some consistence with those accounts.
Since those fields are company dependent, meaning their value depends on the
current company, we want to ease the selection for the end user by only displaying
the relation available in the current company. To do so, specific domain are needed.
This guidelines should be applyied on each property fields.

Task-1999686
2019-09-05 07:48:32 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 886eca0131 [IMP] *: remove usage of oldname attribute
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.

Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
 - left on fields during multiple versions.
 - used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
   complete, but, as is, it was useless.
 - kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
   versions later the first rename).
 - used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
   `archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
   in the database should be switched.
2019-08-05 09:36:41 +00:00
Adrian Torres 4b38cc6590 [REM] *: calls to @api.multi
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.

Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
2019-07-17 14:13:12 +02:00
Laurent Smet bc131c0cfb [MERGE] manual forward port of accounting-pocalypse (beaa30a3d1)
This commit merges the following models
 * account.invoice and account.move
 * account.invoice.line and account.move.line
 * account.voucher and account.move
 * account.voucher.line and account.move.line

It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.

==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.

The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.

==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist

Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.

Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.

There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.

==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping

field (account.invoice) 		field (account.move)
-----------------------			--------------------
name 					invoice_payment_ref
number 					name
reference 				ref
comment 				narration
user_id 				invoice_user_id
amount_					total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual 				amount_residual
state 					state + invoice_payment_state 		/!\ selection changed
date_invoice 				invoice_date
date_due 				invoice_date_due
sent 					invoice_sent
origin 					invoice_origin
payment_term_id 			invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id 			invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id 				invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id 				invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email 				invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name 			invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon 				invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id 			invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next 			invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix 		invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix

'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()

* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping

field (account.invoice.line) 		field (account.move.line)
----------------------------		-------------------------
invoice_id 				move_id
uom_id 					product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids 			tax_ids
account_analytic_id 			analytic_account_id

'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'

* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping

field (account.invoice.tax) 		field (account.move.line)
---------------------------		-------------------------
invoice_id 				move_id
account_analytic_id 			analytic_account_id
amount 					price_unit
base 					tax_base_amount

'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'

* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line

==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'

Was task 1917430
2019-07-01 13:45:57 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 71a50a2214 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-12.3 up to 409679866b 2019-06-06 11:54:35 +02:00
Yannick Tivisse f5dfe4727c [IMP] api.py: Rename company_id/company_ids into company/companies
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.

Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.

Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
2019-05-29 08:09:15 +00:00
Olivier Colson 57feafd4d9 [FIX] account, hr_expense, point_of_sale: 'affect subsequent taxes' base" taxes
Consider the following use case:
- Two taxes:
-A: price included, affect base of subsequent taxes, 10%
-B: 15%, regular
- Create an invoice with a line applying A, then B, for 110€. Post it
- The following move lines are generated:
- base: 100€
- tax A: 10€
- tax B: 16.5€

Before this fix, line "tax A" only had the tax tags of tax A. It should also receive the base tags from tax B, in order to affect its grid total correctly in the tax report.

Also, tax_base_amount field used to be computed, but its computation was too simple, and most of the time wrong when doing advanced use of taxes like the one we defined above. It is now not computed anymore, and directly takes its value from the compute_all's result.

closes odoo/odoo#33420

Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
2019-05-16 08:55:12 +00:00
Olivier Colson 3936d655c4 [IMP] account, l10n_*: v13 taxes
- Add repartition lines on taxes

- Link account tags directly to account.move.line; remove the tag_ids field from account.tag

- Add a new report engine dedicated to tax reports, directly generating account tags. It is called as an alternate mode of generic tax report, with a dedicated "Use tax grids" toggle.

>> The biggest change lies in the way the new tax report computes its values.
Everything is now aggregated directly using the tags set on the account move lines. Thanks to that,
modifying the configuration of a tax today will not impact the report for the previous periods anymore.
This is a big improvement, as it means the report will keep on reflecting the values that were submitted
to the state before, whatever the configuration change.

- Add an audit char field to account.move.line telling with tax grids are impacted by the line, with the corresponding amount

- Modify the behavior of cash basis taxes: the cash basis account is now used as the transition account, while the regular account given in tax declaration is used to store the final entry (it was the opposite before)

- Modify every l10n_* module in order to keep them consistent with these changes

closes odoo/odoo#32833

Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
2019-05-10 11:52:58 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 8dd5a85267 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-12.3 up to 60e71302a3 2019-05-13 15:26:12 +02:00
Yannick Tivisse a5b6f31cf2 [IMP] base: Contextualize the multi company
Purpose
=======

Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.

It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.

Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.

/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.

Specifications
==============

1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.

2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.

3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.

4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.

5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.

6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.

7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids

8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.

9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.

10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.

11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624

12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.

13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.

14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.

15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.

16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.

17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.

TaskID: 1960971

closes odoo/odoo#32341

Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
2019-05-13 08:57:49 +00:00
Prakash Prajapati 4b5265b9b9 [IMP] contact, product, various: improve labels and tooltips of partner and product fields
Purpose: improve understanding of partner and product models as well as their
daily use. This is done by improving tooltips and labels of some fields
according to business logic.

This commit is related to task ID 1880696 and closes PR #27133 .

Thanks to @xmo-odoo for its in-depth review.
2018-09-21 10:57:58 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 12ddec3a76 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 152519cd65 2018-06-27 11:37:52 +02:00
William Henrotin 85f8e4761b [FIX] uom: useless constrain on purchase UoM
The purchase UoM doesn't interfere with account move line at all so we
can remove this check.

Task id: 1844684
2018-06-25 09:20:55 +02:00
Christophe Simonis a277b58507 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 259686ba78 2018-02-15 10:58:08 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 72508cc241 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-16 up to 7792755946 2018-02-14 18:26:57 +01:00
Goffin Simon 5ca0ef978f [FIX] account, point_of_sale, stock_account: POS Anglo-Saxon Accounting
Anglo-Saxon Accounting entries are not created when the POS session
was closed with button "Close and post entries

opw:802727
2018-02-13 15:52:54 +01:00
rde a86de52aac [FIX] account: Incorrect behavior for default taxes when multi company is enabled.
Was PR #18931
2017-11-08 20:39:13 +01:00
Fabien Pinckaers 506ecfd6ac [IMP] account: better tooltip on COGS account 2017-06-19 14:41:26 -07:00
Fabien Pinckaers 59c191a427 [IMP] account: better tooltip on COGS account 2017-06-19 14:30:37 -07:00
Fabien Pinckaers afa437bff4 [IMP] account: sometimes the expense account should be an inventory one; improved tooltip 2017-06-19 10:58:54 -07:00
Yannick Tivisse d6e1d41128 [MIG] account: Migrate remaining old API chuncks of code 2016-08-08 12:24:40 +02:00
Goffin Simon a96e60475b [FIX] account, account_asset, stock_account: get the right account for an asset
When creating an invoice line from a PO, if the product is linked to an Asset type
then the account used for this line must be the expense account.

When creating an invoice line from a SO, if the product is linked to an deferred revenue type
then the account used for this line must be the income account.
2016-05-31 14:54:07 +02:00
Fabien Pinckaers 1fe10b5417 [IMP] Supplier --> Vendor. American English 2015-07-09 16:10:09 -07:00
Mahendra barad 38dc782eaa [RESTRUCTURE]Account : Files Restructure according to new api guideliens 2015-06-23 14:00:43 +02:00