Rev. 42e1efded5 aimed to disable the quick create feature when
grouped by date(time) fields, by only enabling it for char, boolean
and many2one fields. However, the selection case is quite important
and must be handled as well. This is what this rev. does.
Task 1878254
when grouped on field types for which it isn't supported.
Rev. 42e1efd disabled the quick create feature when the view is
grouped by date(time) fields. However, it hasn't been correctly
forwardported to 11.0 (with the new views). Indeed, the check was
done only once, at the initilization of the view. So if the user
selected another field to group by afterwards, the quick create
feature wasn't enabled/disabled accordingly.
Moreover, we didn't check if it was available when the user clicked
on CREATE in the control panel. So even if it wasn't (and thus if
there were no '+' icon in the columns), when the user clicked on
CREATE, the quick create widget was inserted in the first column.
This rev. fixes both issues.
Task 1878254
closesodoo/odoo#27867
The datetimepicker option was introduced to be able to customize the
datetime picker widget in date/datetime fields. However, due to the way
the _makeDatePicker function was coded, it did not work in datetime
fields.
Thank to Yajo for the initial fix
closesodoo/odoo#27541
The lower-level widget itself supports passing options to the underlying
datepicker library. However this is not exposed to higher-level view
declaration. With this patch, one can declare a field in a view such as:
```xml
<field name="datefield" options='{"daysOfWeekDisabled": [0, 6]}'/>
```
That option would land in the widget and disable those weekdays.
Documentation has been updated accordingly.
Closes#25044.
content_subtype was a parameter to message_post allowing to give plaintext
content instead of html content. It has been removed at 74d4b3902d. This
commit cleans some leftover bits referencing this now removed parameter.
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Christophe Simonis