A copy call cn be made with a specified value to an inherits value, e.g.:
self.env['product.product'].browse(42).copy({'product_tmpl_id': 1})
In such scenario, it is assumed the translations are already correct on the
specified related record and should not be used in the copy translation.
i.e. the translations of the product.template 1 must not be duplicated during
the copy call above
Same logic for One2many fields which should not recursively copy the
translations for user provided values
Closes#27108
- When a tracked field is modified, a mail.message is created.
When create is called its tries to fill missing values with "default
values".
It first tries to find the default values in the context, which may
occurs.
For example, modifying a tracked field on a subtask will add a key
"default_parent_id" in the context, which is the parent_id of the project.task.
Create will try to use "default_parent_id" for the mail.message
parent_id field, which make the SQL Request invalid.
On a new DB with demo data, as Demo User:
- Create a partner
- Unlink the partner
An `AccessError` is raised.
The error is raised on `ir.property`, for the field
`property_product_pricelist`. An entry was indeed automatically created
at partner creation. However, a regular user is not allowed to delete an
`ir.property`.
The property can be safely deleted as SUPERUSER as long as the proper
unlink access rights have been tested beforehand.
opw-1870737
This reverts commit 2054b59285 which
already has been fixed multiple times [0].
However this change does not correctly handle successive onchange calls on
ony2many fields which alter existing rows.
i.e., in saas~11.4, an onchange has been added on move lines [1] in
order to create and/or update lines containing taxes amounts.
However, with diff-only onchange, a second call to onchange will discard
changes made by a first one as nothing change between the 2 calls.
Scenario: On an existing account.move, add a new credit line with a tax set.
The first onchange will update the tax line with new amount. Add a
second line (with debit amount balanced). The onchange will not change
the tax line, resulting as it value being reset to initial value. As a
result, the move is not balanced and cannot be saved.
[0] cd2ccc4110, 5e58ac16c3, 07023137cd
[1] d49ab568a2
Since 2054b59 if we created a record in a many2many relationship of an
onchange, we would also possibly erreneously return the NewId.
The logic of convert_to_onchange of _RelationalMulti doesn't send back
the ID field (if the ID is needed, it is part of the command, not the
update/create dictionary values of a command) and this commit does the
same for the code changed in 2054b59.
This commit also adds a test for this fix, and a test for the regression
corrected with cd2ccc4110 reported in #25969
fix for https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/2054b5928#commitcomment-29837226closes#25984
Without the call to `super`, with at least two level off expected
onchange return data (eg. `invoice_lines.name`) we have an error in
python2, python3 python implementation of OrderedDict and possibly other
python implementation.
So this worked most often (with python3 CPython C implementation of
OrderedDict) by chance.
closes#25960
With website_version, when publishing a version and copying the current version,
the copy_translation wrote a new translation for the copy of master in the published
view instead of the copied view.
Reason:
When writing in the view, odoo checked in the context the current version and
wrote in the view corresponding to the key and the verion seen in the website.
So when copying a view, it translated the copied view instead of the copy of
the view.
The write is made by the function copy_translation with the line:
"new_wo_lang[name] = old_wo_lang[name]"
opw:1856150
In 10.0, the resolution of the m2o field in a read group was
done with a `read` (which sudo the name_get). So, the access
rights were bypassed to get the display_name of the related
records.
In 11.0, a call to `name_get` but not as `sudo` causing access
error in some case. For instance;
- a user has read access on project
- he log some timesheets
- its access to project is removed, but not the timesheet ones
- trying to access its own timesheet via the grid view (which does
a read_group)
- the user gets the access error for project.
The read_group should reproduce the behavior of the `read` method,
so the `name_get` for m2o field during a read_group is now sudoed
to restore previous behavior.
opw-1855942
When ir.values was removed and the "action" ir.values were merged
directly into the actions themselves, "client_action_relate" was
discarded as unused (and possibly too similar to
client_action_multi?). *However*:
* it was actually used implicitly as "relate" was the default key2 of
the <act_window> XML tag
* and it had a crucial difference from client_action_multi:
client_action_multi is shown on both form and list views by default
and only on list if multi=True, whereas relate is shown on *either*
the form or list view (tree if multi else form)
This means without relate the actions which should be only visible on
the form view are now on both list and tree, which leads to
overpopulated `Action` menus and odd behaviours (e.g. actions relying
active_id on lists, which id do they get and why?)
=> reintroduce relate as "action_form_only" for the specific case of
multi=False and either no key2 or a key2 of client_action_relate. If
multi=True then binding_type=action.
Fixes#20124
Followup: Task 1843603 to remove #multi and redundancy
New records (with a NewId) are not necessary in the cache, but should
not be prefetched.
This check has been omitted during optimisation in b0c08a6846.
opw-1843566
opw-1843636
opw-1843683
opw-1843548
opw-1843629
opw-1843657
Closes#24595
Instead of searching for ids in the whole cache, search for the ones we will potentially prefetch.
Example: imagine you have 1K records in cache, and only 3 records in your prefetch set. Instead of retrieving the 1K records that have a value in cache, retrieve which of the 3 records that have no value in cache.
Restore behaviour of not adding the separating dot if the module field
of an ir.model.data record is empty. This is useful/important for
interop with external systems.
Assume a custom field F is defined on model 'res.partner'. The setup of F may
silently fail because of missing stuff. In that situation, setting up the
field inherited from F on model 'res.users' should also silently fail.
To reproduce the bug, install Invoicing, create a related custom field F on
'res.partner' with 'property_account_position_id.active', and install another
module. Setting up F after loading module 'base' will fail because the field
'property_account_position_id' does not exist yet. The error is not caught by
the inheritance of F on model 'res.users', and the installation crashes.
Martin Trigaux