This implements support to administer multiple websites. Although the
core functionality already existed, managing multiple websites was
fairly technical.
In the interest of database updates and migration this attempts to
keep duplicated data to a minimum. To do this the usual generic
records are rendered unless some website-specific record exists that
replaces it. Copy-on-write (COW) is used to create these
website-specific records. Through this mechanism creating a
website-specific record is delayed until necessary. A COW mechanism
has been implemented on 4 models: ir.ui.view, website.page,
website.menu and ir.attachment. These COW mechanisms are activated
when editing data through the website (aka frontend). These frontend
edits (e.g. with web_editor) will be website-specific, possibly
creating a website-specific record when necessary. When editing data
in the backend nothing special will happen, even when editing a
generic record. Note that because of this mechanism also facilitates
the ability to create new, uncustomized websites because the generic
data is kept.
Support is provided for a website to have any theme. Themes are fairly
complex to handle. Standalone themes can depend on other standalone
themes (e.g. theme_beauty depends on theme_loftspace) and themes
usually modify some data of the themes they depend on. Because a theme
can be installed on multiple websites, using website_id m2o fields
does not work well. It would require duplicate data, making updates
and migration harder. Because of this, data for themes (ir.ui.view and
ir.attachment specifically) have a theme_id m2o. website has a
theme_ids m2m that identifies all theme modules currently installed on
it. Through these fields we figure out what to render. A theme is only
fully uninstalled when it's no longer active on any website. The
advantage of this approach is that upgrading or migrating theme data
is no different from the single-website case.
The website.published.mixin class was modified to handle multiple
websites. A wizard was added in the backend to easily manage this for
multiple website.
Although not used anywhere in this commit, a 'website_id' variable has
been added in the evaluation context of ir.rule. It allows to easily
make any model multi-website aware, all that's needed is a custom
website_id m2o field on a model and a custom record rule.
Purpose of this merge is to improve onboarding of Discuss. This is done via
a wow effect and a bot to test the Discuss app; otherwise you have nobody to
talk to. Purpose is also to improve retention as "the best way to increase
retention is this: when the user invites someone, when this guy activates its
account, the user gets a push notification from the invited user that just
logged in; that way he will come back to Odoo and start discussing with its
colleagues.
Concerning your new best friend: it is not a dog but Odoobot.
See sub commits for more details. This merge is linked to task ID 1838588 and
closes PR #25075.
Purpose of this commit is to improve the onboarding and the first steps of
Odoo notably when using Discuss and inviting first people to join Odoo.
When a new user connects the user who invited him will be notified with
a desktop notification inviting him to have a chat in Discuss and talk
together.
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588 and PR #25075.
When duplicating a user, an email was sent to a user at the email of the
previous user (as the create is called before changing the email).
opw-1853359
The token field is a technical data that the other users are not able to use.
It may be confusing for users to see token on the user interface.
Still show it to administrator for debug reasons.
Rather than requiring the user have a name *or* a partner, the check
required the user have a name *and* a partner. The B2C form only has a
name and expects the partner to be created from/via the user, so this
would raise an exception which wouldn't even be bubbled to the user, so
trying to signup would just yield a 500 Server Error when trying to
create an account.
Currently if a user has already been invited you cannot invite him again
via the web_settings_dashboard as it automatically tries to create a new
user.
This commit changes that behaviour in case you have the mail app
installed odoo will now send an invitation email to the invited user as
long as this user has never connected.
1) Mail app not installed:
- if user is active > display error (this email is already in use)
- if user not active > activate the user
- if user doesn't exist > create new user
2) Mail app installed:
- if user is active && state confirmed > display popup (this email is
already in use)
- if user is active && never connected > resend invitation mail
- if user is inactive > activate the user
- if user doesn't exist > create new user and send invitation mail
This commit is related to task #54023Closes#23081
Purpose of this commit is to standardize portal user creation when
creating new portal users (when 'Free sign up (B2C)' option activated). It
copies the portal user template. The same behavior now applies when
converting a partner into portal user using the portal wizard.
This commit is related to task ID 31399 .
Purpose of this commit is to standardize portal user behavior and creation.
As all portal required features (user, group, support) have moved to
base let us move the template user used to create portal users to base.
'Portal User Template' is therefore moved from auth_signup to base module.
Various config parameters are updated due to the change in xml id.
This commit is related to task ID 31399 .
Since 5425316eff errors when signing up will only display two
messages:
* "Another user is already registered using this email address." or
* "Could not create a new account."
While Odoo creates a multitude of other comprehensible error messages
such as
* "Passwords do not match; please retype them."
* "Signup token '%s' is no longer valid"
This commit now separate UserError and AssertionError from SignupErrors.
Those are still hidden in a general message (see 5425316eff for reasons) while
the other ones are fully displayed.
This commit also improves translations of messages.
Change the label of active state label from Activated to Confirmed. Indeed
it indicates the user logged itself at least once. Active / Inactive is
controlled through the active field. An user that logged once is non labelled
as confirmed.
Yannick Tivisse