Problem
-------
Sales people can have restriction on partner they can see
Private addresses, multi company, ....
When they convert a lead to opportunity, it's currently possible
that the wizard will find and link a partner that the current user
cannot see.
Solution
--------
Field that are now computed store field, that were previously
normal field with onchange, should not be computed as sudo
to respect the record rule
closesodoo/odoo#59957
X-original-commit: 182fa38d7f28a92e7171c4ee3a42c8f73217b765
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
To investigate a bit. Sometimes a few extra queries are generated.
Task ID-2359847
closesodoo/odoo#59869
X-original-commit: 36bb56a5e9704c76e84960ec84588524b52406f8
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Handle salesmen allows to assign responsible to leads using a round robin like
algorithm. Currently a write on each lead is done to update its team and
responsible, even if number of leads is far greater than number of available
users to assign.
Current implementation can be simplified by doing one write per sales person
to assign on its batch of leads, or a single write if no salesmen has to be
assigned.
Performance counter on a mass convert wizard on 50 leads show that we gain
about 9% of queries (125 on 1471) with this simple optimization.
Task ID-2351604
PR #59084closesodoo/odoo#59324
X-original-commit: 973a2998666813ca4fbe90f1b486c1b18091c4e7
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit is to
* move tests about mass management of leads (mass assignment + mass convert
wizards) in its own file to ease writing of tests;
* add some performance tests :
* performance for assignment;
* performance for convert wizard in mass mode;
Task ID-2351604
PR #59084
X-original-commit: 950dd491bc4b680e0bcfab83815313e909a3c282
The method _compute_probability has a dynamic depends, that depends on the
crm.pls_fields config parameter. When installing the DB, the depends is
evaluated. If the config parameter is modified afterwards, the depends is not
re-evaluated as the registry is not rebuilt.
The result is that when modifying the config parameter, if an optional
pls_field's value is modified on a record, the compute won't be triggered, as
that pls_field is not in the compute's depends.
This commit force to re-setup the registry after a modification (or the
creation) of the crm.pls_fields config parameter, in order to force the
depends of the _compute_probability method to be updated.
Task ID: 2341829
closesodoo/odoo#58165
X-original-commit: e95afbedc18d198454c7f66b523c4cafb19a4066
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: David Beguin <dbeguin@users.noreply.github.com>
Setting a lead to won or lost should not impact others leads' probability
until they are modified.
Tests have been added to ensure that.
Task ID: 2254543
closesodoo/odoo#57681
X-original-commit: 7edc12e366659d226d56197e09bd65d17c80bd2f
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: David Beguin <dbeguin@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
Avoid automatic partner finding and update on lead to erase too much data.
RATIONALE
On crm.lead, the address fields, email_from and phone, are computed field
since saas-13.3 based on the partner_id. Previously they were synchronized
with an onchange on partner_id which was never triggered during automatic
flows on the lead.
Now computed field are triggered each time the partner_id is written.
Problems
- If someone uses the mass conversion with the action "Use existing partner
or create", the partner is found for each lead with the method
_find_matching_partner. This method can find any partner with a name that
contains the lead name, the lead contact_name or partner name. It can find
wrong partner. Previously, only the partner was changed and the contact
information remained on the lead. Now, all the information are erased with
the wrong partner information.
- If at creation all the address information are set and the partner_id
as well, the address field from the partner won't be synchronized.
The lead will end up with the address information we forced.
During the conversion to opportunity, the partner_id defined on the
lead, will be written again. It will trigger the synchronization
of the address field on the lead. Those info can be incomplete or wrong
You will end up with a data loss.
SPECIFICATIONS
Tell _find_matching_partner to match partner only based on exact email address
in the case of mass convert. Avoid fuzzy matching based on name likeliness.
During opportunity conversion, don't write the partner_id if the partner is
already the one set on the lead.
LINKS
Task ID-2316828
PR #55825
X-original-commit eed0a31e1e2c428c94dae4703c9575534a49ec1d
X-original-PR #55194closesodoo/odoo#55838
X-original-commit: e82b5a92f44709592b25fa66d9555d64abef1ec9
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Distinguish synchronization of partner values on lead: address fields (all
or none), classic fields (propagate if set) and special cases (names-alike).
SPECIFICATIONS
Follow up of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f8179007f9aa662be7318edeb18426ea1c906c15
Context: many fields are now synchronized from the partner_id: address fields
as well as other contact fields. A first commit 9c9f477f04e8f4ee9b18092fe894890c2ab31b58 kept the value
from the lead if the value from the partner was empty. This lead to mixed
address fields.
A second commit fixed that behavior f8179007f9aa662be7318edeb18426ea1c906c15 by taking the value from
the partner only when it was set.
Problem: This erases too much information.
```
>>> lead.partner_name
'testtest'
>>> partner_id.name
'testtest@mailinator.com'
>>> partner_id.parent_id
res.partner()
>>> partner_id.is_company
False
>>> lead.write({'partner_id': partner_id.id})
>>> lead.partner_name
False
```
We indeed need a consistent address but for the other fields we want to keep
the maximum of data.
SOLUTION
For the address fields, take all the values from the partner if one of the
address fields is defined, otherwise keep the information defined on the lead.
For all the other fields keep the lead information if the partner information
is empty.
LINKS
Task ID-2316828
PR #55825
X-original-commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/55194/commits/f53fba6663a34e8e6b13354dde3dc225f5814de3
X-original-PR #55194
X-original-commit: b136df8530279a54c9be96beeea9bdda01643000
Followup of 9c9f477f04e8f4ee9b18092fe894890c2ab31b58 and f8179007f9aa662be7318edeb18426ea1c906c15
In some cases (notably event_crm addon in 13.4) a country record is propagated
instead of a country ID; converting as write values ensure we always deal with
IDs in all cases.
Also add some tests to cover more test cases. Notably phone and email behavior
in 13.3 compared to other fields. For example phone is kept is partner's phone
is void. It may leads to inconsistencies (partner US, Belgian phone number).
We think it is better to keep values and let salesmen change them than
voiding values customer gave.
PR #55390
Task ID-2311981
closesodoo/odoo#55412
X-original-commit: a26735f516e48acb77e234862e17e29be71d7d1d
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Consider a lead with valid email and/or phone. Some process assign a partner
to it, like mass convert. This partner has no email and/or phone. We should
not void lead values for email and/or phone, as this is information loss.
This is a followup of 89ca89ca92 . Test cases are added to try to
avoid future regressions.
Task ID 2311981
PR #54619
X-original-commit: 0b69d98cf4cbd2c99d7c3fb510e324f49652eea5
FIXUP of 9c9f477f04e8f4ee9b18092fe894890c2ab31b58
[FIX] crm_lead: do not erase computed field based on partner
Don't erase the field on the lead if you emptied the field partner_id
but erase them if you select a partner_id that have empty value
for the corresponding field
otherwise you end up with mixed address field.
Make an exception for the phone and the email_from
Keep the value from the lead if the partner_id has no value
for those field
X-original-commit: ed3979f84e65ebfa9534f12196a8fa41cade8370
Issue:
When you write partner_id = False on a lead
it erase all the values computed based on the res.partner
this lead to data loss during the conversion to opportunies
by the lead assignation process
Solution:
Revert to v13.0 behavior, don't erase the value
of the address, phone, email when the partner is set to
False
+ Fix typo in method name
X-original-commit: 21db6cf93fea7d07ec4a8655fc6030a177abc36f
RATIONALE
Activities are a way to organize our daily pipe. Notably in a sales pipeline
salesmen may have multiple leads with activities to perform in the next few
days. We would like to be able to have a list view displaying a list of leads
with "my" deadline, and to order leads based on this field.
PURPOSE
As activities are linked to records through a one2many and as my activities
are only a subset of those activities, it is impossible to store a field
on lead model. Indeed it would depend on the current user which makes storing
it impossible.
However ordering on a column in list view asks for a stored field. As it is
not possible, this commit proposes to hijack the web client and search of lead
model in order to allow it.
SPECIFICATIONS
Introduce a activity_date_deadline_my field, computed and searchable that
behaves like activity_date_deadline. It is filtered on current user activities
instead of being global to the record activities. "My" deadline is the earliest
deadline of my activities, even in the past.
Ordering through web client calls search_read with an order parameter set.
Search_read then calls search. In this commit we therefore override search
to intercept a search without count with an order on activity_date_deadline_my.
In that case we do the search in two steps.
First step: fill with deadline-based results
* Perform a read_group on my activities to get a mapping lead_id / deadline
Remember date_deadline is required, we always have a value for it. Only
the earliest deadline per lead is kept.
* Search leads linked to those activities that also match the asked domain
and order from the original search request.
* Results of that search will be at the top of returned results. Use limit
None because we have to search all leads linked to activities as ordering
on deadline is done in post processing.
* Reorder them according to deadline asc or desc depending on original
search ordering. Finally take only a subset of those leads to fill with
results matching asked offset / limit.
Second step: fill with other results. If first step does not gives results
enough to match offset and limit parameters we fill with a search on other
leads. We keep the asked domain and ordering while filtering out already
scanned leads to keep a coherent results.
All other search and search_read are left untouched by this commit to avoid
side effects. Search_count is not affected by this commit.
As web client order availability is simply based on field being stored we
have to allow hijacking its value. A new option 'allow_order' is added that
display the order icon in list view column headers. It allows calling
search_read with an order based on the column but nothing more. Using it
on a not-stored field will give a warning log and ORM ignores it by default.
LIMITATIONS
At least following limitations apply
* search on "my activities" gives a list of ids that is used for searching
and ordering. It means that having too much activities on a given user can
result in poor performances.
-> we consider that activities assigned to a given user should be kept
under control. Leads with activities for a given user should be a small
subset of leads without activities.
* ordering on activity_date_deadline_my always put those records on the top
(deadline asc or desc) whatever the actual ordering of order items given
to search. This is done to avoid complex implementation where deadline
would be used to order records within groups ordered by another field.
-> for example: order = 'priority DESC, activity_date_deadline_my ASC'
actually behaves like 'activity_date_deadline_my ASC, priority DESC'.
WARNING
This implementation is a hack. It has been done by professionals. Do not try
to do it at home.
More seriously this is hackish and should be avoided. IN our case we consider
that the use of activities in sales pipeline is mainly driven by "my activities
deadline", which is not necessarily the case with longer processes like tasks.
Moreover user tests tend to show that this feature could be interesting. It
will improve quality of Odoo CRM and its adoption by improving its daily
use. A framework solution has to be found. Until this is done we keep this
hack and hope it is not duplicated in other applications.
LINKS
Task ID 2276011
Prepares Task ID 2243124 (My activities in CRM)
PR #52232
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Get rid of email / phone behavior on lead that is hard to understand: if
and contact is set fields are readonly, if not they are editable.
SPECIFICATIONS
We want to be able to edit them if a partner is set. If we write on the
email/phone of the lead, it should write on the partner (and vice-versa).
Even a Falsy value is propagated to the customer. Reason is that if you update
a contact information, it should be available for all other records. Setting
a void value probably means you want to stop contacting this contact. This is
now also propagated.
SIDE NOTE: MOBILE FIELD
Mobile field is a bit different. Main phone contact field is phone, and is
placed in the main contact section of the lead view. Mobile is under a more
technical / detailled tab and is not completely synchronized with the partner.
Like zip, city or country, changing partner updates lead information but
changing lead values does not propagate those to the customer. Those fields
can be used for deal-specific information if needed.
Statistics: 5k crm.lead use mobile for 80k active records which means it is
a "lesser field".
LINKS
Task ID 2207636
PR odoo/odoo#48395
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1025
PURPOSE
Prepare enhancements of sales team membership.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to prepare modifications in sales team management
notably by cleaning sales team tests. We also move some data preparation in
sales team. It allows to rely on some common data while doing sales team
then crm tests.
LINKS
Task ID 2086889 (sales team enhancements)
Task ID 2234698 (preparation lint)
Community PR odoo/odoo#49520
PURPOSE
Try to move from onchange / default_get to stored editable computed fields.
Behavior should be the same (computed or set by user), with support of
create / write / onchange field update without additional code.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update classic fields updated in some cases by onchange and/or default methods
by fields with store=True, readonly=False. It means their value comes either
from manual user input, either from trigger based computation.
Remove onchange and default_get when possible, leading to an unique computation
method and clearing fields definition.
Also clean some fields definition inconsistencies, notably required fields
that should instead be correctly computed or default that have no real meaning.
SPECIFIATIONS: CONSTRAINT USER_ID / TEAM_ID
In this commit we also remove all the better implementations of "not really a
constraint" constraint about user_id and team_id. Indeed as this is a computed
field normally we should not have to call the onchange manually, even through
a hackish call to a falsy constraint (see fdc8749, 222cca2, 4e8ebc7 ). You are
all inferior to SM team.
SPECIFIATIONS: DATE_OPEN
Assignment field, namely ``date_open``, has a random definition as it seems
linked to assignation, with several behaviors intended
* ce39ca8a97 : reset only when going from
no salesman to a salesman (aka, keep assignation when changing)
* 8e540558ee: reset when changing salesman
We choose to keep first implementation as it seems a bugfix broken again
by second commit. It will also replace the ``assign_date`` defined in
``website_crm_score`` module.
SIDE EFFECTS
Several side effects occur with this commit. Indeed behavior is not always
exactly the same, notably as code rewriting allowed to fix some issues,
incoherent behavior or was simply not able to achieve exactly the same
result. Notably
* at lead creation: default probability is the one coming from PLS and not
0.0 anymore, since field is already computed. Synchronization with PLS
still works the same way (change probability, you are out of syn);
* various user_id / team_id combinations notably in convert / merge wizards
may change, notably we do not reset team_id if user_id is reset. We
consider we could keep a team_id set without user_id;
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#781
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Florent Lejoly <fle@odoo.com>
SPECIFICATIONS
Improve heuristic used to find lead to convert duplicates
* check email_normalized instead of email_from, as it may contain formatted
emails. Normalized email are sanitized and normalized version of emails
and ease comparisons;
* use lead email if its customer has no email;
* if no email is available but a customer is set, use it anyway;
This notably reverts 2917b38f28 . Indeed no reason has been found why
this fix is necessary.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
SPECIFICATIONS 1: FORCE_ASSIGNATION
Move and rename force_assignation in convert wizard. Purpose is to move the
force_assignation field from mass convert wizard to its base convert wizard
used through _inherit. It allows to avoid relying on context propagation in
some methods. This field is also renamed as assignation as other meaning in
English.
SPECIFICATIONS 2: OPPORTUNITY_IDS
Improve search of duplicate by always ensuring duplicated are computed using
active_test. Also add the active_test on the field as otherwise computed
results are actually not visible to the user.
Generic opportunity_ids field is also renamed to better indicated it is used
to store duplicates and avoid thinking it holds data related to batch convert
or merge.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#781
PURPOSE
As CRM is going to be updated (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving code is a necessary first
step.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to rewrite code located and/or used in convert or
merge wizards. Indeed it holds unnecessary variables, dictionaries manipulation
that hides the real business flow, badly named variables, unclear methods, ...
Logic of those wizards seem quite simple but is hidden behind a wall of
bloated code.
Notably for wizards
* try to set explicit arguments in methods;
* less use of context values, replaced by arguments when possible;
* try to make better use of lead2opportunity wizard in its mass wizard that
inherit from it, notably by correctly calling super;
Notably for tools
* ``get_duplicated_leads`` was just a shortcut to ``_get_duplicated_leads_by
_emails``;
* ``_get_duplicated_leads_by_emails`` is renamed to ``_get_lead_duplicates``
because email is not the only way of finding duplicates;
* try to make better use of record sets instead of propagating ids, notably
for partner. For example input of ``_get_lead_duplicates`` or output of
``_find_matching_partner``;
* ``_create_lead_partner`` rename to ``_create_customer``, and its sub
method ``_create_lead_partner_data`` to ``_prepare_customer_values``;
* ``handle_partner_assignation`` was difficult as its use is not documented
and its docstring was not updated. Parameter have been renamed to be more
explicit about what it does. Method is renamed to ``handle_partner_
assignment`` as assignation has other meaning in English;
* ``allocate_salesman`` is renamed to ``handle_salesmen_assignment`` to match
the partner assignement and code is slightly cleaned;
No functional change should occur with this commit. Tests have been gradually
added to try to ensure behavior does not change.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
PURPOSE
As CRM is going to be updated (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) ensuring data integrity in tests is necessary to
avoid having hidden issues or tests difficult to debug.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565 (crm: from onchange to compute)
PURPOSE
As CRM is going to be updated (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving code is a necessary first
step.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tests. Amazing. Notably about matching partner / duplicate based on email
as there is some weird behavior.
closesodoo/odoo#45477
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Following changes needing ir.model.access on transient models too.
Remove groups declaration on the action to move it to ir.model.access
when possible.
Rules are strict by default with no unlink access by default and high
priviledge asked. Adaptations may be needed later.
Write access is given as a wizard may need to be modified in case the
action triggers an error and the user has to correct a value
account*: use account.group_account_user for all transient by default
remove account.print.journal relic
stock*: use stock.group_stock_user by default
survey: survey user can send invitations
mail: allow any employee to execute wizards
additional verifications are made to ensure they are executed
only on the documents the user has access to you
give portal access to mail.compose.message as portal still does
some actions like posting messages on the forum
add ir.rule to avoid reading somebody else messages
increase the query count because of undeterminist count
crm: saleman for lead2opp, manager for massmailing
partner manager for actions linked to partners
avoid a write in test_lead_lost
sms: any employee can send sms
mrp: mrp user can execute wizards
give unlink access as making write during do_produce operation
base_import: employees can import files
delivery: stock user can deliver
event_sale: sale user can configure the wizards
event user inherit from sale rights
gamification: employee can give badge
google_service: resolve FIXME
hr: add specific rights
manager can set a plan according to group on button
anyone who can write on an employee can register a departure
hr_expense: set rights based on buttons
hr_holidays: an approver can make a summary report
hr_recruitment: recruiter can refuse a candidate
hr_timesheet: can use the wizard if can create a timesheet
l10n_eu_service: managers can create fiscal positions
mass_mailing: same group as on mass.mailing.list
membership: accountant can create invoice from membership
payment: accountant can create a link
as the source is an account.move
keep the payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard to system user
only as it is called during company configuration
point_of_sale: PoS manager only can use wizards
never create closing_balance_confirm_wizard records
product_expiry: stock user has rights on stock.picking
product_margin: access from accounting menus
repair: same rules as for above models
sale: set ir.rule for self wizard only
add rule from model introduced in payment to add salesman group
sale_crm: saleman can create a quotation from a lead
sale_coupon: any saleman can generate coupon
add self ir.rule
sale_product_configurator: salesman can select product variants
snailmail: employee can send letters
website: designers can write on website
website_crm_partner_assign: same rule as group on action
website_sale: sale ACL as for payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard
website_slides: anyone can send invitation
base: base.language.*: allow employee (cf lang_install)
change.password.user: can not read change password wizard of
other users
test.*: no access is needed
Courtesy of Damien Bouvy, William Andre and Antoine Prieëls for review
of acl
PURPOSE
As crm will soon evolve (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving tests is necessary to avoid
regressions.
SPECIFICATIONS
This wizard has no tests at all. Even if it not really complex it is better
to have some tests ensuring at least marking a lead as lost with a reason
correctly updates it.
LINKS
Task ID 2180521 (add tests for crm wizards)
Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR odoo/odoo#43473
PURPOSE
As crm will soon evolve (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving tests is necessary to avoid
regressions.
SPECIFICATIONS
Improve and clean tests about leads and opportunities merge.
Some strange behaviors spotted :
* user_id / team_id interaction is somehow unclear;
* probability is not taken into account in confidence level, which is very
very strange;
LINKS
Task ID 2180521 (add tests for crm wizards)
Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR odoo/odoo#43473
PURPOSE
As crm will soon evolve (onchange -> compute, code improvements, better
management of sales teams) cleaning and improving tests is necessary to avoid
regressions.
SPECIFICATIONS
After ff6b35f759 that added some first tests, this commit will add more tests
notably about convert wizards.
Notably
* add tests for crm.lead2opportunity.partner wizard, notably options about
action (do nothing, exist or create partner), as well as some corner cases
like stage update, lost leads, ...
* rewrite and improve tests about crm.lead2opportunity.partner.mass, aka the
mass converted wizard that implements some random behavior on top of the
crm.lead2opportunity.partner wizard;
Some strange behaviors spotted
* partner action works on lost leads, but not the convert;
* user_id / team_id / stage_id coherency is not enforced during convert
as it relies mainly on onchanges that are not called;
LINKS
Task ID 2180521 (add tests for crm wizards)
Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR odoo/odoo#43473
Try to understand a bit this code with comments. Some unnecessary code is
removed, and some parameters are added to try to understand the various flows,
but main purpose is to understand that mighty spaghetti, not destroy it.
LINKS
Side effect of Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Side effect of Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR #43127
Enterprise PR odoo/enterpreise#7656
Related: odoo/enterprise#7656
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
As crm will soon evolve (onchange -> compute, code improvements, addition of
new features) cleaning and improving tests is necessary to help avoid issues.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we add tests for the lead 2 opportunity converters. Indeed
it is strange that such a critical wizard has so few tests. Notably the
use of single-lead / multi-lead mode is more tested, allowing to see that
code is somewhat oldish.
LINKS
Side effect of Task ID 2056759 (remove crm.partner.binding mixin)
Side effect of Task ID 2088565 (crm onchange -> compute)
Community PR #43127
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7656
Purpose of this commit is to clean a bit crm tests, notably lessening data
created in tests and removing / improving some low level tests. As we are
about to remove onchange / default and replace them by editable computed
fields it is easier to clean some tests and data beforehand.
This commit is a preliminary cleaning coming from task 2088565 about CRM
onchange to compute methods update.
LINKS
Task ID 2088565
Community PR #42344
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7403
Related: odoo/enterprise#7403
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Parsing email values: make message_parse effectively prepare all required
values for later processing
* update message_parse to add some more data directly in parsed dictionary
and avoid having to parse value again in later processing and computation.
* notably recipients computation is now done directly in parsing. It
includes email check and reconstruction using tools methods. That way
routing just has to handle those values and not compute part of them;
* from and cc are correctly managed with parsed and cleaned (sanitized)
versions in dictionary;
* remove all code decoding message header and replace them by fetching
the parsed value instead;
* filter parsed values before calling message_post to ensure right values
are given to it instead of having to manage them in message_post. Indeed
caller has to give the right input;
* make parsing sub-methods (extract payload, post process payload) have
a dictionary as input and output to always manage a dictionary of values
through the parsing methods and update their namespace;
Routing: remove deprecated code parts
* remove use of email_references regex. Indeed emails are routed using their
messageId and not the regex anymore since several versions [1];
* clean some unnecessary variables;
* simplify variable type input, like message_parse accepts only valid
email.message instances and to avoid several decode / encode. Tests are
updated accordingly;
Update docstrings of those methods.
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
[1] See df037e2959 and 0028c42136
,*:crm, website_blog
The mail.message needaction_partner_ids meaning changed over time,
and doesn't actually reflect the list of partner in needaction.
More than that the message_format needaction_partner_ids used by js
began to diverged from mail.message field since 19fb650863
To avoid any confusion, renaming it to notified_partner_ids will help
to avoid confusion between python and js meaning, and reflect the actual
content of this field : a list of partner that where notified once on
this message. This field is mainly usefull for testing.
Task-ID 402597
This commit prepares the next Predictive Lead Scoring (aka PLS) ones.
With the new PLS implementation, stage based probablility is not relevant anymore
as the probability will be computed based on multiple criteria
following the Naive Bayes probabilist theorem.
To determine if the stage is a won stage, a new 'won_stage' boolean field replaces
the old probability field that is now removed.
won_stage = True is equivalent to stage.probability = 100.
Task ID : 1925439
PR #33589
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the syntax to start a tour was extremely verbose.
With this new method, it is possible to start a tour by just giving the
essential parameter: the tour name.
The full set of features from browser_js are kept by using **kwargs.
closesodoo/odoo#32316
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
crm lead is created with a default company_id which is the current company of the user
When creating a lead from email, this logic doesn't hold, especially in v12.0
where the __system__ user is not someone real
In that case, we retrieve the company from the sales team
OPW 1918837
closesodoo/odoo#30146
It was possible to define a delay in days on activity type
to reschedule next activity. It is now possible to specify a unit
(days, weeks, months) and a starting point for the delay
(as before, from the moment when the new activity is scheduled,
but also after the deadline of the previous activity).
We realy need to have all javascript action triggering a done
and schedule next to call the python corresponding method on
activities. A part of the work have been there but some
cleaning could still be done in activity.js.
Task: #1870662
PR: #26272
Thibault Francois