Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider a vendor V with a supplier currency €
- Let's consider the current company's user C in $
- Let's consider two vendor bills journals J1 in € and J2 in $ from C
- Create a vendor bill for V
Bug:
The default currency was $ instead of € and the default journal was J2 instead
of J1. This fix keeps the same behavior as implemented in 82794c8662
opw:2226115
closesodoo/odoo#48857
X-original-commit: 801182f6222521c2961560b3b67743a143a22eff
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Adds a customized table to top of list and kanban views of requests for
quotation (RFQs). This table includes the following values:
- RFQs to Send (PO.state = 'draft')
- RFQs Waiting (PO.state = 'sent' and PO.date_order >= now)
- RFQs Late (PO.state = 'sent' and PO.date_order < now)
- Avg Order Value (specifically only for POs)
- Avg Days to Purchase (PO.date_approved - PO.date_created and PO.state
in ('purchase', 'done'))
- Purchased Last 7 Days (specifically only for POs)
- RFQs Sent Last 7 Days (hacky calculation looking at chatter for state
change 'RFQ' => 'RFQ Sent')
This change corresponds to "Requests for Quotations KPI's" subsection of Purchase
KPIs task.
Task: #2198420
Adds "Expected Date" and "Effective Date" fields to purchase orders to
match what exists in sales orders. "Effective Date" mirrors sales logic
(= first completed stock move). "Expected Date" has simplier logic due
to simplier nature of receiving stock vs shipping (= earliest "Scheduled
Date" of all PO lines). Form view has been updated to include these new fields.
Additionally code was changed to not have PO 'order_line.date_planned' be
overwritten by the 'purchase_order.date_planned' value. Previous behavior
was both confusing and made it so info was lost. Also logic for related
stock move picking line expected date values has been updated to now consider
'purchase_order.date_planned' value if set. Related changes include:
- not overwriting when PO is edited+saved (this only occurred in write()
logic, not create() which caused inconsistent behavior anyways.),
- updating related tests,
- removing PO line date_planned editing restriction when PO date_planned
is set
- updating of relevant stock moves/picking expected date due to
PO.line.propogate_date = True ('purchase_order.date_planned' if
exists, otherwise 'order_line.date_planned')
This change also includes some small related improvements:
- Removal of outdated code comment.
- Addition of Help strings to better explain fields.
- Prevent copy of 'date_planned' value into new POs (now mirrors sales
logic).
This change corresponds to "Receipt Date on PO's" subsection of Purchase
KPIs task.
Task #2198420
Several improvements in order to improve user interface are done here.
[IMP] purchase: Prevent create PO&RFQ in calendar
It was possible to create PO's and RFQ's from the calendar view.
The Product Owner wanted to prevent the users from doing so.
[IMP] purchase: Add tooltip to Receipt Date
[FIX] purchase: Align report & stat button data on product form
The use of Last 365 days time_range in the purchase analysis was automatically
excluding today's purchases wich was confusing users as the stat button info
was taking those into account.
Different behaviours were implemented for product template and product product
in the filters that were used which makes no sense.
Use of context_today() instead of datetime.now() in order to take the user's
timezone into account.
[IMP] purchase: Use relevant dates for RFQ's and PO's in calendar view
The date used in order to display RFQs and POs in the calendar was date_planned
which is not mandatory and so not always filled. It has been decided to use the
order_date for the RFQ's and date_approve for PO's.
[IMP] purchase_requisition: Making Agreement selection type more explicit
[IMP] purchase: Show UOM menu only if installed
[IMP] purchase: Add product variant in settings
[IMP] purchase: Remove Favorites predefined filters
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase PO action helper
[IMP] purchase: Allow open/edit Agreement Type
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase RFQ action helper
[IMP] purchase: Remove PO's and RFQ's name from fields in calendar
The Product Owner originally wanted to have a link on the PO name field
that was shown in the calendat popover. As the Edit button already allows
to edit the PO's or RFQ's from the popover it was decided to simply remove
the field (as it was already displayed at the top of the popover)
[IMP] purchase: Open the right view when click on Reporting top menu
Task ID #2196688Closes#47810
Related: odoo/enterprise#9294
Related: odoo/upgrade#961
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
========
Purpose
========
Currently, purchase missing some billing functions that we have in sale
invoicing:
- Create credit note when necessary
- Create vendor bill in batch in list view
========
Spec
========
- In case of retures, when create a bill for a purchase order, we check
the total amount we want to bill to decide whether it's a vendor bill or
a credit note.
- In the list view, add a new action to create vendor bill/credit note
for all selected order.
========
Links
========
Task 2170715
PR #44210
Related: odoo/upgrade#919
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
The 'vendor bills' stat button on purchase order, once clicked, will
have a specific behavior depending on the invoice count :
0 : open a new invoice with pre filled fields (not saved yet)
1 : open the form view of the invoice
2+: open the list view of the invoices.
Before this commit, the invoice count was computed with an environment on
the current user. That means a record rule could make the invoice count
lower than the real count and so give an unwanted behavior. Ex: create a
new invoice even if there is already one created because the user cannot
see the other people's invoices.
After this commit, the action_view_invoice with make an explicit read()
in database to fill the cache with all the purchase order's invoices and
make sure the count is the real one.
Task : 2206969
closesodoo/odoo#48274
X-original-commit: e3101d92187946b2bd539e05956e4e83cd9c9097
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Clean and rename code about language management and template rendering in mail
template model.
SPECIFICATIONS
Clean method naming and try to make code easier to understand and call. Also
add and/or clean docstrings of rendering methods.
Notably
* ``_classify_per_lang``: for each lang-contextualized template, give the list
of record ids;
* ``_render_template``: now working only on a valid list of IDs instead of
allowing both int / list and having a return type depending on the input
type. It allows to simplify code and delegate some processing to callers;
Introduce new API method
* ``_render_lang``: for each record id return the lang matching it;
* ``_render_field``: render a field of mail.template, on given set of record
ids. Usage: template._render_field('body_html', records.ids). Language
computation is available for this method;
Remove the "multi mode" support of rendering that either returned a rendered
value, either a dict based on given ids. Now all methods always work in batch
and caller have to fetch the correct result if necessary.
LINKS
Task ID 1963529
Community PR odoo/odoo#32397
685f4eff50 added date_approved as
fields.Date.context_today
b5cea7e2b6 has changed the field
as a Datetime
Both together introduced a miss calculation of the date_approved
closesodoo/odoo#48055
X-original-commit: 6dff3024d19c9dd44c71992469540e3f09dd3247
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
1. Create a product A with 'Control Policy' set to 'On received
quantities'
2. Create a PO for 10 units
=> status is `no`
3. Validate the PO
=> status is `no`
4. Receive 5 units
=> status is `to invoice`
5. Invoice 5 units
=> status is `invoiced`
6. Receive the remaining quantity
=> status is `to invoice`
7. Invoice the remaining quantity
=> status is `invoiced`
There is an inconsistency between steps 3 and 5: there is pending
material to receive, but the status is different.
This is due to the fact the `order.invoice_ids` is checked, while it
shouldn't affect the computation of the status.
The status should be `no` in steps 3 and 5.
opw-2206447
closesodoo/odoo#47802
X-original-commit: 15330712d2ea3c16c57e01c236c783a6febd1376
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Issue
- Install Sale and/or Purchase
- Create new order
- Debugger > Set Defaults
- Set default value for payment terms
- Quit and re-create
Default value is not filled
Cause
The default value is set but it's overridden
by a onchange
Solution
Remove the override who puts the value to False
OPW-2197940
closesodoo/odoo#45776
X-original-commit: 4d03e6dd81fab2aa12e3205106fd59758c6c90f6
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
Issue
- Create new db with language en_CA
- Install Sales & Purchase
- Enable fr_CA
- Create a product & Save
- Edit the name & Save
- Create a quotation or RFQ
- Do not select partner
- Select your product
The description is still the old name
Cause
We try to browse a product with an empty
partner language
Solution
Use odoo.tools.misc.get_lang() in order
to fallback to a language is the partner's
one is empty
closes#44357
OPW-2196602
closesodoo/odoo#45620
X-original-commit: 4561b6bd4c2afab8ae29ced1a9085e6878a9921d
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
Create a purchase order, confirm it and create the vendor bill. The
source document will be not filled.
Fixing the related variable and changing also the missing reference to
the partner
opw-2197272
closesodoo/odoo#45534
X-original-commit: 8498dbe10db87f718b9287f69188c627e36f98a3
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
1) Go to purchasing, and in the search area type "8888"
2) Click on the little arrow next to "Search Product for: 8888"
3) Select "[FURN_8888] Office Lamp"
4) Choose Purchase Order PO00009 which has FURN_8888 on the second line:
5) Choose Action > Duplicate
The 1st line end up with the searched product, not the original product.
This happens because the search add the context key
'default_product_id'. By chance the product.product model has a
'product_id' field which may happen to be not filled.
This cause the model api to look for a default value in the context and the
first line of the order get overridden.
Removing the specific key from the env solve the issue
opw-2188429
closesodoo/odoo#44802
X-original-commit: ed6ac9c63b4e8a5815e2f46693ababbde4a82919
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
purpose of this commit is when we import po with po lines
system expects from user to import all those requried fields manually.
Using sale's hack 'prepare_add_missing_fields' fix this issue.
Now we can import po lines in purchase too.
Task- 2093205
closes- #41681
- Create a product A
MTO, Buy
Add a supplier S1 and set a specific reference
- Create a product B
MTO, Buy
Add a supplier S2 and set a specific reference
- Create a SO with A & B, confirm
- 2 RFQ are created
The first RFQ is created with the correct reference, but not the second
one.
This is because `display_name` depends on context keys: it is computed
once for both products with `partner_id` set as `S1`, while it should be
recomputed for product B with `partner_id` set as `S2`.
In order to avoid this, we use `with_prefetch()` to avoid reusing the
prefetched value.
opw-2176638
closesodoo/odoo#44564
X-original-commit: d96c1910be8f242455de9b443fc9db82155b4dd1
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Fixes#44133
Before this commit, the Bank account on the new Bill created from the PO was not set due to missing methods to set those fields.
This commits adds missing methods to set Bank account.
closesodoo/odoo#44252
X-original-commit: f66042c96795701c1a313f40fdd320d28e9803ee
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Move the method `_prepare_purchase_order_line` from 'stock.rule' to
'purchase.order.line'. The purpose is to reuse it in approvals_purchase.
task-2040710
closesodoo/odoo#41046
Related: odoo/enterprise#6702
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Do not update the date_planned of section/note purchase lines when
writing on the order date_planned. Otherwise the SQL constraint
ensuring display lines have no other data blocks the changes.
Fixes#40741closesodoo/odoo#40747
X-original-commit: f3ebab6eb52e3dc8be1f030aecfff348a22f7e09
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
NB: if the company_id isn't defined, with_company doesn't change the
environment.
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a RFQ
- Add a line with a product
- Add a line with a note and save
- Duplicate the RFQ
Bug:
A traceback was raised because the function _select_seller was called on a line
with no product.
opw:2085977
closesodoo/odoo#38921
X-original-commit: 4ffc517d6011c2443f78ba27a608d4ec3815e737
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
-Define "g" as the default UoM for a product.
-Make a purchase order with that product.
-Select the "kg" UoM in the order line and a price of 50.
-Check the Purchase tab of the product.
Before this commit:
the UoM of the price created is the default UoM for the product, "g".
This is because it's a related field.
However, the price wasn't converted to the default UoM, it's still 50.
After this commit:
the price is converted to the default UoM, it's 0.05 per "g".
closesodoo/odoo#38688
Opw: 2076722
X-original-commit: 341b568773b28b2bbce02f3532215e9664b318ec
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
**Steps to reproduce**
* Define "Purchase Order" sequence for using date ranges checking "Use subsequences per date_range".
* Change sequence prefix to "PO/%(year)s/".
* Create a purchase order with order date in 2020 (a different year than current one).
**Current behavior**
Got a purchase order with 2019 (current year) number.
**Expected behavior**
Got a purchase order with 2020 number.
closesodoo/odoo#38468
X-original-commit: ce423e6adb6659a1d5885bad158c59b882cb4565
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Install stock and purchase. Make a RFQ for just one product, coonfirm
and receive in one transfer. Click on the delivery (should be only 1).
The picking will display. Open studio, select view, activate list view.
Javascript traceback will popup. Moreover the view of the stock
module will be altered in a faulty way (can be recovered from "Window
Actions", looking for the stock.picking action with external id
"stock.action_picking_tree_all" and removing the last added tree from
"View Mode").
This is caused by studio not detecting all the active views, thus giving
the possibility to add an already active view, because when there is just
one picking all other views are filtered out.
Changing the way the form view is retrieved in case of a single picking
fix the issue.
opw-2076241
closesodoo/odoo#38093
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
To avoid slowing down search like "{relational_field}" contains "{value}"
we always need to return the lazy name_get() for each [_]name_search method
closesodoo/odoo#36735
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
For some reasons, when the `mail_compose_message` wizard tries to
read the name of its source document, the id and the model are
sometimes mismatched as a `purchase.requisition` or a `purchase.order`.
To avoid this we force the `active_model` and `active_id` in the context of `action_rfq_send` to be always referring to the current `puchase.order`.
closesodoo/odoo#37097
Taskid: BugsLogistics.
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Before this commit, user got a traceback when he clicks on Units
Purchased button from product view form.
The issue was we asked to the purchase report to be based on a field who
doesn't exist anymore.
The fix only replaces `unit_quantity` for `qty_ordered`.
closesodoo/odoo#36342
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
On top of leading to AccessError in multi-company (if the PO was created
by OdooBot), it might also assign a user without Accounting rights to a
vendor bill.
This reverts commit 392f6f2b2b.
opw-2056061
closesodoo/odoo#36173
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
- Create a PO, change the Purchase Representative (`user_id`)
- Create the corresponding vendor bill
The `user_id` of the PO is not transferred to the invoice.
There is no reason to not keep the value.
opw-2046963
closesodoo/odoo#35611
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
To correctly choose in which account a line should be posted,
we have to know if the partner is a customer or a supplier.
Specification
=============
Keep track of the number of account moves "in" and "out"
a partner has. These counts should be based on the posted
account moves. A customer that has been created from the
'Customer' menuitem will have a rank=1. When a customer
invoice will be created for him, the generated account moves
will be taken into account to compute its rank. The most
invoices we have for a partner, the higher his rank is.
Note: To avoid any concurrent update failures on the partner,
if one transaction has already locked a partner row, the count
update will be skipped that time.
This means the values may be approximative in the database!
The exact values will eventually be correctly computed at
the next successfull try.
Known limitation of this approach: The computation ignores
the set of currently selected companies. Actually, storing
context dependent values in the database is a bad practice,
and is avoided in that case by taking all the companies into
account.
Use the stored fields `customer_rank` and `supplier_rank`
to order partners when searching by name. This allows to show
best customers or best suppliers on top.
To choose if best customer or supplier are shown on top,
the context key `res_partner_search_mode` is used.
The context key can take two values: 'customer' or 'supplier'.
This decision partially reverts/revamps 8766f38 to only use
account moves instead of PO and SO
On actions showing partners, set a default filters to menus to
only display customers (customer_rank > 0) if the string is
"Customers", and only suppliers if the string is "Vendors" or
"Suppliers".
TaskID: 2049131
closesodoo/odoo#35942
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
When the many2xxx field relates to a model where company_id is required, set
this domain [('company_id','=',company_id.id)]
When the company_id field of the related model is not required, set this domain
['|',('company_id','=',company_id.id),('company_id','=',False)]
When setting the domain on a field which is in the treeview of a xxx2many field
evaluate against the company_id of the 'parent'.
Some constraints have been added on sereval models. Take a look at the complete
specification for more details.
TaskID: 2024446
Closes: #35266
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Goffin Simon