The goal of this commit is to restore the behaviour of the legacy
attach_document widget.
How to reproduce :
- clicking on the attach_document button and selecting a file
In legacy:
We have a full reload of the view (Render and reload the record).
Before this commit:
Render the view without reloading the record.
After this commit:
We reload the model which causes a rendering of the view and a reload of
the record.
Why do we have to reload the record ?
If the action linked to the attach_document button modifies the record,
we want this modification to be applied in the view and not only on the
server side. To do this, we need to reload the record data to ensure
that all the changes are displayed in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#103891
X-original-commit: 82d4f0cd2f0265393cf66cd7be1a0a714584400c
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Georis François (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in a list view in multi_edit mode and editable="0",
it was possible to edit a required field with an invalid value.
Why:
In the PR 101924, we decided to no longer pass readonly/required of fields
in non-editable views (if no editable="1").
Solution:
To know if a view is editable, you should not only look if it is
editable="1" but also if it is multi_edit="1".
So we want to pass the readonly/required fields if the view is
editable="1" or multi_edit="1".
How to reproduce:
- Go to a multi_edit="1" and editable="0" list view with at least one
required field on the server side
- Select the checkbox of the record you want to edit
- Edit that field with an invalid value (e.g. clearing a text field)
- Click outside the line being edited
Before this commit:
The record is saved with the invalid value
After this commit:
An alert dialog is displayed to warn us that the value is invalid.
The record returns to readonly mode with the old value.
closesodoo/odoo#103790
Related: odoo/enterprise#33066
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Since odoo/odoo#95729
nodes with a `groups=` are completely removed from the views when
the user is not part of the group, instead of being made invisible.
In that PR, views have been adapted to add back fields, with invisible="1",
when they were required, for instance when they were used in a domain
of another field which was still there despite the user is not part
of the given group.
As `tree` views having `multi_edit="1"` where not considered
as editable views, the domain of fields in these views were not
validated:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1460
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1321-L1322
while they are well required for the web client,
in `multi_edit="1"` this is possible to edit relational/many2one field,
and therefore it will do `name_search` calls using the domain of the
field, and therefore the fields used in these domains must always
be present in the views. Without it, a crash in the web client occurs
when attempting to edit the relational/many2one field.
This revision targets to consider the `multi_edit="1"` tree views
as editable, to make the field domains validated as they should be.
Hence, views are adapted to add back fields with `invisible="1"`
when they are required in domains of other fields.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103790
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to a list view with multiple items
- Click on an item
- Delete it
- Go back in history twice (Using the browser navigation) to return to the list view
-> We can't click on another record
opw-2854113
closesodoo/odoo#103808
X-original-commit: 92c90823139b413c8289d1c323ad694fc8220a61
Signed-off-by: Hubert Van De Walle <huvw@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Fix the hatching and striking effects for events
by moving some scss rules to the right place:
- o_event_hatched
- o_event_striked
Various fixes for the calendar popovers to display properly, such as:
- year scale popovers
- proper popover body padding and font-size
- style that depends on attendee status
- other scales popovers
- inverse the condition when the popover footer must shrink
closesodoo/odoo#103661
X-original-commit: 917d8e4123517c73d8bd6a4bd83becf1b0ee1090
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Before this commit, multi clicking quickly on the "Ok" or "Cancel"
buttons of a ConfirmationDialog would call the confirm/cancel
callbacks multiple times. For instance, in "Mass mailing", create
a new mailing and click "Send". In the confirm dialog, clicking
quickly multiple times on "Ok" would call the "Send" button action
multiple times.
This commit also ensures that we wait for the promise of the
confirm callback before closing the dialog. This highlighted an
issue in the ORMBatcher, as we didn't reject the promise when
the batched rpc failed. As a consequence, the confirmation dialog
never closed itself. This has been spotted by an existing test.
Fixing #74647 (from 16.0 to master)
closesodoo/odoo#103572
X-original-commit: 95f8266a5b84f5faa59a713019ab713392b3ef78
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Take a (py.extras) datetime representing the moment "2022-10-17 00:00:00"
in the timezone of Brussels. Trying to get the related utc moment through
to_utc gives wrongly "2022-10-16 23:00:00". This happens because the
months are not numbered in the same way in Date or datetime, so that in
October for example, the offset applied was that of November which is
-60 instead of -120 (summer/winter change). We fix that problem.
closesodoo/odoo#103579
X-original-commit: ee1a8d26f241f2f7bea6880afcc946119b0e6bd8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Take a PyDateTime representing the moment "2022-10-17 00:00:00" in
the timezone of Brussels. Trying to get the related utc moment through
to_utc gives wrongly "2022-10-16 23:00:00". This happens because the
months are not numbered in the same way in Date or PyDateTime, so that
in October for example, the offset applied was that of November which is
-60 instead of -120 (summer/winter change). We fix that problem.
closesodoo/odoo#103561
X-original-commit: a11e1fb5f702400fe51938362fe3f24570977ba9
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
**Before**
A traceback is raised when pressing shift-tab on the first column of
the first row in a focused list field as shown in the vid:
https://youtu.be/g97ZTp1QdBE
**After**
shift-tab on the first column of first row will now unselect the list field
and immediately focuses on the previous field.
**Additional change**
We now allow skipping focus on the dropdown toggler by introducing new
props.
closesodoo/odoo#103485
X-original-commit: 9ba9977e42d201035b5299bc13ba03211cddbc1f
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Caburnay (jcb) <jcb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Now that the module web_dashboard has been removed https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/31641,
some props of the reporting views graph and pivot have become unused.
We remove the code related to those props.
X-original-commit: 7d231d1d37707dab4b0ecdd4e2e7cc4535ba6196
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102761
When a x2many record is opened in a X2ManyFieldDialog, it can happen
that the form renderer displayed in the dialog also contains a x2many
that use a kanban or list renderer. In those cases, the View component
is not used. Consequently, the WithSearch component responsible for
making available a search model in the env is not used either so that
a crash occurs at the setup of the kanban renderer (and sometimes later
on for the list renderer). We fix that problem.
closesodoo/odoo#103349
X-original-commit: 2c284317b6dc3c0f0b4e9e376dcee755d81222da
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
This commit removes the code that wrapped legacy fields and widgets
(coming from the legacy registries) into owl components and added
them to the wowl registries. This temporary compatibility layer,
which was incomplete and only allowed us to merge the new views
without converting all fields/widgets in once without breaking
everything, is no longer necessary as we now have converted all of
them into owl components.
X-original-commit: 555959c87e25faa71396f61479e8bb41b66ac164
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102606
Before, even if the checkbox is deactivated, clicking on it
cause an `onChange`.
This caused unexpected behavior, the form view changed to a dirty
mode even if the checkbox was in read-only mode and nothing
was modified.
Now, the checkbox does not call `onChange` when deactivated.
closesodoo/odoo#103429
X-original-commit: 4802c2528cfa23c5981fa30fa69cfa23f28faf05
Signed-off-by: Luca Vitali <luvi@odoo.com>
Have some keys in the context passed to a view.
Have a many2x field in that view that uses those keys in its domain
with some flavor of:
```xml
<tree>
<field name="many2one" domain="[['someField', '=', context.get('some_key')]]" />
</tree>
```
Before this commit, the global context was not added to the evalContext used to evaluate the domain.
After this commit, it is.
closesodoo/odoo#103370
X-original-commit: 93c5e6cbc06bdb6ab2cfc959b68be8088837e1de
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Have more than one Odoo module installed. Go to the Settings.
Scroll the first page.
Change the app in the sidebar.
Before this commit, the scroll position was the same for all modules (or apps, same thing).
It is not wrong per se, but when changing app, there is no reason that the scroll position of the former
is somehow correct business-wise.
After this commit, the scroll position is stored and restored on a per-app basis.
closesodoo/odoo#103369
X-original-commit: 01b16c392b888ceaccc8b0c95da142dbb90517ef
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Have a simple char field somewhere in res.config.settings.
Before this commit, when arriving on the settings form view, the settings page
was scrolled. This was because the standard FromRenderer has and used its autofocus feature,
thus focusing the first text field present in the view.
After that, the Settings form view gave the focus back to its search view input.
After this commit, the FormRenderer's autofocus feature is deactivated.
X-original-commit: 2c67b1dbe15d2cb77ee0b50514a4b9d41a006114
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103369
Do an action in target new that will spawn a record in its form view.
The typical example is "Edit View: XXX" in the debug systray.
On the dialog, click on "Discard".
Before this commit, that button did not close the dialog.
After this commit, that "Discard" button closes the dialog.
closesodoo/odoo#103275
X-original-commit: 08751e0eef0cefe74e626ffa8ba26a5e8f18113f
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the basicRelationalModel could not handle the legacy
event "reload" trigger by the basicModel., resulting in crashes.
In particular, when the method "action_archived", via the method `record.archive()` returns an action
(in target new usually) to confirm or ask the user for some additional information, closing that modal
will trigger a model reload via the event.
After this commit, this whole flow is tested and works correctly.
closesodoo/odoo#102826
X-original-commit: 0abb90fb2aa7857990b5f5dae95e9e891125b5fa
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
# Before
A calendar arch without a main color attr that has
some dynamic filters would crash.
# After
No traceback occurs, the default color is used.
closesodoo/odoo#103350
X-original-commit: 54e690b9c789ea862ce3039dd6040e210fa80b39
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
Before this commit, click on the "Search More" option in a list many2one
and then selecting an option in the opened dialog would lead to a crash.
This used to happen because the record is updated with a value of the
form [integer, undefined] (that is with no defined label) and nothing was
done in the list model to fetch that label, making impossible to render
the many2one after the update.
Here we make sure that a label is available after the update.
closesodoo/odoo#103271
X-original-commit: 81abccf729ef5b56a8656961931b7489e4364a1f
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Have a kanban view grouped on a many2one and displaying that many2one
with a widget in the record cards. Drag a record from one column to
another: a crash occurs. This happens because the record update is done
with a value of the form [id, undefined] (that is with no defined label)
and nothing is done in the kanban model to fetch that label,
making impossible to render the many2one after the update. We fix that
problem by using the known group display name as label for the dropped
record.
X-original-commit: 2a6fe373d48385485933429fbc1e6e3eabd877b4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103271
This commit does 2 things for the draggable hook builder:
- the scrollable feature will apply on the nearest scrollable parent if
the current element cannot be scrolled (removes the need to pass a
parent ref which is not the target container);
- the dragged element is now strictly bound to the current viewport or
the container ref, whichever is the smallest.
closesodoo/odoo#103137
X-original-commit: 70bdf940cc1491fd0cdbae0240d930e8a1d5b25e
Signed-off-by: Simon Genin (ges@odoo) <ges@odoo.com>
Before this commit the attribute default_order was not taken into
consideration by the kanban view.
closesodoo/odoo#103127
X-original-commit: 0116b590a47c8c12354877498e576ad28e42c1f2
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
Before this commit, a list header with no label and associated with a
first orderBy field would be highlighted (i.e. would have the class
table-active). Since this is visually weird, we remove that class from
such a header.
closesodoo/odoo#103108
X-original-commit: 36fb5a0d170d9f5692485d0b2fc374951794cd69
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
This commit adds an implementation of the UserMenu item's type 'switch'
for the BurgerMenu (used in smaller screen).
Note: this commit also adds unit tests for the BurgerUserMenu ; the
asserts are largely inspired by the regular UserMenu tests.
closesodoo/odoo#103102
X-original-commit: 0653ec8672e5878e40c804ea569dfccbd6105edc
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
Due to a previous fix, attachments uploaded through media dialog would appear in the attachments of mail marketting.
That fix prevents attachments from 'dangling' and being garbage collected later.
That fix is now limited to the mail composer in this commit as attachments are only garbage collected for that model, for now.
related commit: c112361bf9e2f5e7b087c5e5b9a31879856b1da4
task 3003939
closesodoo/odoo#103038
X-original-commit: 69fdca133b06eb66443635bc52d380233580ef51
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Since o_form_view class was not placed on the right element, as the
form is displayed in a dialog, some styles were not applied in x2Many
dialogs using a form view. Now, the selector matches all cases and
dialogs will be stylized as expected, since the class is placed on the
dialog container instead of the first div.
Now, we are consistent both for dialogs and standard form views.
Tests have been adapted to work as expected.
closesodoo/odoo#102953
X-original-commit: af67305b43d51e1669df19d376d9bda7418ba863
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Vitali <luvi@odoo.com>
This commit adapts several components in order to correctly handle
color-scheme variations.
It also allows user_menu to handle switch entries
task-2710677
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102868
Before this commit, the user was not notified when he
closed the tab or the browser while modifying a record.
Now, the user will be asked to confirm the close if there
is at least one invalid field.
task id: 2994132
closesodoo/odoo#102990
X-original-commit: 3fcc36786453f3006974f5fd0fa395ad5d07d9a2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in a grouped list view with at least one
group_operator and optional fields, the aggregated values in the header
are shifted one column to the right.
Why is this?
Adding the +1 to the colspan in the group header for optional fields
is always added on the left side (group name).
Solution:
The +1 should be added on the left side (group name) if there is
no aggregated value otherwise on the right side (pager).
Before:
TH TH TH TH TH AGG AGG TH AGG AGG TH TH TH OP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
[ TH 6 ][TH][TH][TH][TH][TH][ TH 3 ]
[ group name ][ aggregate cells ][ pager]
After
TH TH TH TH TH AGG AGG TH AGG AGG TH TH TH OP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
[ TH 5 ][TH][TH][TH][TH][TH][ TH 4 ]
[ group name ][ aggregate cells ][ pager ]
closesodoo/odoo#102754
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Georis François (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
In legacy, an m2x autocomplete would not display extra lines
received from the server inside the dropdown menu.
This commit reintroduce that behavior as it was lost in the
wowl conversion.
closesodoo/odoo#102954
X-original-commit: 1b2686aeadfac97f060a07de86e5a0eb2051eee2
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Convert the remaining legacy views in OWL. Before this PR, the list and form views are still in legacy in Project Sharing feature. The goal of this PR is to convert those views to have all views in OWL in Project Sharing.
Details implementation
----------------------
- Convert the list view in OWL
- Convert the chatter portal in OWL to be able to convert the form view in OWL
- Convert the form view in OWL and integrate the chatter into it.
- Review the assets used in Project Sharing to reduce the size of the assets since all components and views existing in the backend are not used (only the list, kanban and form views are used)
- Review the rows attribute set on `textarea` HTML element in`TextField` to be able to altered it with a props.
- Change the `FileInput` component to be able to override it to be able to use it when the route is different than the one set by default.
- Fix the `useInputField` hook to be able to use the `TextField` component without any `record` set on its props (since this prop could be optional).
task-2947516
closesodoo/odoo#102932
Forward-port-of: odoo/odoo#102130
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the rows attribute given on the TextField component
was always 2, it is not possible to alter it without overriding the
component.
This commit adds a props to be able to update the rows with a prop
called `rowCount` and this prop can be set via `rows` attribute set on
the field.
task-2947516
X-original-commit: 110915c80c2a2578563283b1744e0e88d80ac4bb
Before this commit when list view is in multi edit mode and there is a field
with required and readonly modifiers, the field is underlined, which is not
intended as the field is in readonly mode.
task-3000817
closesodoo/odoo#102871
X-original-commit: fa6e2bb566f05e064ff8f4df40f1f01b048ade60
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
Rationales:
- having a textual display "Unsaved changes" implied to the user that they
had to save
- having buttons "hiding" behind a hover effect on a span of text was
very unintuitive
- since we don't want an hover anymore, having text buttons would draw a
lot of attentions => use icons + tootltip instead
closes odoo/odoo#102757
Forward-port-of: #102605
Related: odoo/enterprise#32570
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
`activeActions` is a set of boolean values determining what actions
(i.e. 'create', 'delete', etc.) can be performed on the current view or
subview (x2many).
Before this commit, the x2many fields used a different naming convention
than the one set on the views (e.g. 'canCreate' instead of 'create').
This caused mismatches when subviews would try to rely on the parent
view `activeActions` to define their own. This also introduced a bad
design where the "type" of `activeActions` would be determined by that
same mismatch.
Another issue was that the list renderer did not always check for the
existence of activeFields in its props, despite defining them as
optional.
This commit unifies the names of the active actions accross views and
x2many fields, while adding a "type" property to it s.t. its owner
can determine what context it finds itself in.
closesodoo/odoo#102115
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the day of the month was smaller than 10,
multiple days were highlighted as today on the datepicker.
Now, only the correct day is highlighted.
closesodoo/odoo#102296
X-original-commit: 0545178d5d09f659d5309069ebcae9d7162356a0
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
Only kanban, tree and form implements onchanges.
Therefore, on calendar, graph, pivot, ..., putting `on_change="1"`
is useless and is a waste of resources and KB.
e.g. CRM lead pivot view
Before:
```xml
<pivot string="Pipeline Analysis" sample="1">
<field name="create_date" interval="month" type="row"/>
<field name="stage_id" type="col" on_change="1"/>
<field name="expected_revenue" type="measure"/>
<field name="color" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="automated_probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="message_bounce" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="probability" on_change="1" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
</pivot>
```
After:
```xml
<pivot string="Pipeline Analysis" sample="1">
<field name="create_date" interval="month" type="row"/>
<field name="stage_id" type="col"/>
<field name="expected_revenue" type="measure"/>
<field name="color" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="automated_probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="message_bounce" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
</pivot>
```
I would have like something smarter, like using the `editable` concept
for instance, but it's not that easy.
e.g. kanban is not considered as editable, while it does support
onchanges when grouping record by a field and drag and dropping
record from one column to another.
However, if we change the kanban view to make it editable,
the view validation will start validating the fields domain:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/45d4ac14f65c53dcde56592715d50169bde116ad/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1439-L1442
causing issues:
- If a field used in the domain is not in the view, it will need to be
added in the view,
- while it will not be used, as you cannot do a search in related fields
in kanban views anyway.
e.g.
```
odoo.tools.convert.ParseError: while parsing /data/build/odoo/addons/analytic/views/analytic_line_views.xml:120
Error while validating view near:
<kanban class="o_kanban_mobile" __validate__="1">
<field name="date"/>
<field name="name"/>
Field 'company_id' used in domain of field 'account_id' ([('company_id', 'in', [company_id, False])]) must be present in view but is missing.
```
In addition, the kanban doesn't need the readonly and required
attributes on the field nodes, as other editable views (tree and forms)
do.
In addition, the tree list is currently considered as "editable" only
when it has `editable="bottom" or `editable="top"`, while
a tree without this editable attribute can still trigger onchange,
for instance when using `widget="handle"` or `widget="boolean_toggle"`.
We should therefore making the tree list editable whatever the case,
leading to the same issues than listed for the kanban above,
or make an exception for field in non-editable tree views using a
widget..
So, as the smarter way seems difficult and risky, for a limited gain
I choose the easy way by separating the concept "editable" and
"onchange-able" and to not set `on_change="1"` on views not considered
as "onchange-able".
closesodoo/odoo#102788
X-original-commit: aeb65ee536b1611c1cb829c91906f327f8e331c7
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Have a form view in a dialog (action in target=new)
The create/write of that model throws an error.
Before this commit, the "Oh snap!" dialog was displayed, but makes little sense
in a dialog.
After this commit, the old UserError dialog is displayed.
closesodoo/odoo#102764
X-original-commit: d36f1708219f63fae5a86b6c1e81b328ca96b347
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in a list view, if you clicked the discard button
for an invalid row, it would not be discarded and the discard button
would disappear.
Why did this happen?
Invalid fields in the record were not deleted.
How to reproduce?
- Go to a list view with a required char field
- Edit the char field of a record with an empty string
- Click outside the record (it becomes invalid)
- Click on the discard button
Before this commit:
The record is not discarded (its values do not change and it remains
in edit mode) and the discard button disappears
After this commit:
The record is correctly discarded and the discard button disappears
closesodoo/odoo#102763
X-original-commit: 73ba2217ec56819ff979020a43d0c13f8ff0b697
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
In house implementation of automatic scoll when dragging an element to
the edges of its container.
closesodoo/odoo#102756
X-original-commit: 290a6213a6e36fc2e5d11216b59a6aaf79554196
Related: odoo/enterprise#32568
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Genin (ges@odoo) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
This commit fixes the number of cells created in the ListView's footer
when the optional field's button is present.
Steps to reproduce:
- Open Accounting > Customer Invoices
- Switch to ListView
=> the footer (containing totals) has one less cell
closesodoo/odoo#102222
Forward-port-of: odoo/odoo#101954
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
This commit fixes the pager's position in a grouped ListView when the
optional field's button is present.
Steps to reproduce:
- Open Account > Intrastat Code list
- Unfold "Commodity" group
=> The group's pager is misplaced
Forward-port-of: odoo/odoo#101954
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102222
Have an InnerGroup which has a first div visible all the time
and a second div conditionally invisible.
Before this commit, when the second div was invisible, the first was not
displayed.
After this commit, the two divs are displayed correctly.
X-original-commit: c69836e3c53e1efb61f66612c266a31aa9b54816
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102578
FrancoisGe