When a lot of components are trying to do the same `search_read`, they
are spamming calls to the server when they could be batched instead.
Instead of using `search_read`, we can also call `precision_get` which
is `orm_cache`d
To reproduce:
* Main settings: activate/check "Analytic Accounting"
* Menuitem: Accounting > Accounting > Journal Items
You should see a lot of calls of `search_read` to `decimal.precision`
closesodoo/odoo#103928
X-original-commit: 332a673b6b289761ae3c42d1bfa8effca475abf1
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Since odoo/odoo#95729
nodes with a `groups=` are completely removed from the views when
the user is not part of the group, instead of being made invisible.
In that PR, views have been adapted to add back fields, with invisible="1",
when they were required, for instance when they were used in a domain
of another field which was still there despite the user is not part
of the given group.
As `tree` views having `multi_edit="1"` where not considered
as editable views, the domain of fields in these views were not
validated:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1460
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1321-L1322
while they are well required for the web client,
in `multi_edit="1"` this is possible to edit relational/many2one field,
and therefore it will do `name_search` calls using the domain of the
field, and therefore the fields used in these domains must always
be present in the views. Without it, a crash in the web client occurs
when attempting to edit the relational/many2one field.
This revision targets to consider the `multi_edit="1"` tree views
as editable, to make the field domains validated as they should be.
Hence, views are adapted to add back fields with `invisible="1"`
when they are required in domains of other fields.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103790
The analytic distribution widget in the Analytic Distribution Model form displayed its selection field on a new line, making it too large and odd. This PR fixes the styling and simplifies the widget.
closesodoo/odoo#103282
X-original-commit: 73b11378b18a709537dff5b60373b40009a04a14
Signed-off-by: Ayob Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
The `analytic_distribution` field is a Json.
It was stored temporarily as a char.
Search is not available yet, so we do queries by hand when we need to search on keys.
Also added a constraint on account_analytic_distribution_model,
so we don't have models with accounts specific to a company when the model has no company or another company.
It would cause an issue when looking at the models from another company.
X-original-commit: 7064c95aa04e5138bb12ae97acfee04ebb67cc0e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103097
Analytic distributions that contain mandatory plans should be blocked from posting.
However, automatic flows (for example subscription invoices) should not be blocked.
For this reason, the context is used to determine whether the distribution should be validated.
closesodoo/odoo#102720
X-original-commit: 7b11af76598c0782ac2097d3cbeb718962be2537
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Add choices for the business domain on applicability rules, so rules are more precise
Also put 'general' as domain from the view when it's what should have been.
Make analytic field visible since owl migration (for sale and purchase)
closesodoo/odoo#102461
X-original-commit: c5867d5009a7fb448fff1be487b9e9c3e7945d4b
Related: odoo/enterprise#32421
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Wala Gauthier (gawa) <gawa@odoo.com>
`activeActions` is a set of boolean values determining what actions
(i.e. 'create', 'delete', etc.) can be performed on the current view or
subview (x2many).
Before this commit, the x2many fields used a different naming convention
than the one set on the views (e.g. 'canCreate' instead of 'create').
This caused mismatches when subviews would try to rely on the parent
view `activeActions` to define their own. This also introduced a bad
design where the "type" of `activeActions` would be determined by that
same mismatch.
Another issue was that the list renderer did not always check for the
existence of activeFields in its props, despite defining them as
optional.
This commit unifies the names of the active actions accross views and
x2many fields, while adding a "type" property to it s.t. its owner
can determine what context it finds itself in.
closesodoo/odoo#102115
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
On the smart button where you can see the accounts of the plan,
we want to be able to see all accounts of subplans too.
We also change the order of the analytic accounts, by plan's complete name then name.
closesodoo/odoo#102717
X-original-commit: a1f886e7babd6283e01eed686e043aabe72d7dd9
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
The status indicator for optional plans switches between grey and green and creates a perception that action is required, when in fact, all values are valid.
For this reason, the status indicator only applies to mandatory plans (green: ok, orange: editing, red: invalid)
The grey status is removed entirely.
closesodoo/odoo#102503
X-original-commit: e2cd7f93d49cbdd60d6f84b465b042fae9389bb1
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayob Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
There are a few issues solved in this commit
1. Fetch plans is called too many times (Journal items List view). This is not necessary as plans are only required if editing
2. Plans are not fetched again if the product/account changes. This is because the record referenced by props and nextProps is the same, hence a change is not detected.
3. In list views - analytic account data is retrieved for each instance of the widget. To reduce the calls, a batched read is used instead
Improve test
closesodoo/odoo#101803
X-original-commit: 01d7579cfc8bf441f03d4467ef34a2d3bae015a4
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
This commit does multiple things:
- The readonly mode of form view is removed but not for the fields.
it means that the fields in the view are always in edit mode except
if we force them to be readonly.
- The control panel is revamped to take less vertical space and shows now
the record editing (dirtiness)/validity status after editing the record.
- The record is saved only when leaving the view or by clicking the save
button when hovering the record status in the control panel.
- The record can still be discarded by clicking the discard button when
hovering the status text in control panel.
task id: 2822553
X-original-commit: 77824ad44b6945a9811120380747f87ef6362ae2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101118
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Improve both tree and form views for the account.analytic.distribution.model
closesodoo/odoo#101001
X-original-commit: bb2820ad585ceed0f0562de3cd5f9ef8f1fac7d1
Signed-off-by: Ayob Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Only for terms containing Credit Note and expenses
closesodoo/odoo#97840
X-original-commit: 1754b094a66476a0bdb29fe60dc5583c03336c3f
Related: odoo/enterprise#30262
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Most of the extensions of `_name_get` are very similar and only want to
search for the given string in multiple fields.
A lot of extensions also don't take into account the negative operators.
Some implementations were also really outdated and needlessly
complicated.
closesodoo/odoo#86588
Related: odoo/enterprise#25608
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
`account.analytic.line` has been set as translatable in saas-15.1. In hindsight,
we can say it was clearly a bad idea as it introduced complexity and confusion.
This is why we are reverting it.
closesodoo/odoo#86203
X-original-commit: 0e0d9e76c6735a688707d51b54f8e978c168a1d9
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
The possible index names have been renamed "btree", "btree_not_null"
(instead of "not null") and "trigram" (instead of "gin").
Task 2742526
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83274
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
2022-01-19 16:52:23 +00:00
Laurent Stukkens (LTU)andXavier BOL (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>, Nicolas Seinlet <nse@odoo.com>
This commit adds an index on the user_id field of account.analytic.account
task-2700429
closesodoo/odoo#81907
X-original-commit: 9b7ad00143145030ca67d8a7bfbe44b700cd1573
Related: odoo/enterprise#23100
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier BOL (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>, Nicolas Seinlet <nse@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit to improve ux for timesheet app.
So, In this commit done following changes:
- make name field of account.analytic.line model translatable
by user.
- changes in report of timesheet:
- make generic table templete for timesheet.
- changes label for employee_id field column 'responsible'
into 'employee' and unit_amount field column
'time spent (hours)' into 'hours spent' and
'time spent (days)' into 'days spent'.
- move name(description) field column right of the task
column.
- add timesheet entry report for project.
- change internal project name when user has access to
multiple companies.
TaskId-2604773
closesodoo/odoo#75141
Related: odoo/enterprise#20242
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit change search view that display in
act_window view that open by cost/revenue stat button in
analytic account form view.It displays the search view that
come from timesheet, it should be display search view of
analytic items.
So, In this commit add analytic items search view in
action of cost/revenue stat button.
Task Id: 2622912
closesodoo/odoo#76999
X-original-commit: 8a6145ca809168080a1a2162f2d6da98b6e5c7e2
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
We clean various graph archs taking into consideration that:
- the default type of a graph is "bar".
- a bar chart is by default stacked.
- the field attributes type="row" and type="col" does not make sense for
a graph view (since its implementation was separated from the pivot
implementation a long time ago))
- the boolean attributes should now take 1 or 0 as value (but the other
values are accepted for retrocompatibility).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76065
This commit moves the Track cost setting from account to analytic in
order to use it in modules depending on analytic.
This setting is based on a group defined in analytic
(analytic.group_analytic_accounting), this group is not moved.
PR : #72736
See odoo/upgrade#2706
task-2545084
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
The attributes field.depends and field.depends_context are problematic
for sharing fields across registries, because they depend on the model's
registry class, which may vary from one registry to another. In order
to make computed fields shareable, we have to move those values away
from fields.
For the same reason, field.recursive should not be inferred, because its
value may depend on the registry, although it is generally not the case.
Moreover, the flag recursive=True is set on a field when field triggers
are determined (on the registry). A compute method may be called before
the flag is set (if no update has been done yet), and that can lead to
incorrect computations.
This happened in test TestUsers2.test_reified_groups in module 'base'.
The user groups view was apparently determined without the flag being
set, and the view depends on the recursive field 'trans_implied_ids',
which was not correctly computed.
We thus force developers to be explicit about recursive computed fields.
The code now logs a warning when the flag is not set up properly.
* account, analytic, calendar, coupon, crm, crm_iap_lead_website,
delivery, digest, event, event_crm, fleet, gamification, hr,
hr_expense, hr_skills, im_livechat, lunch, mail, maintenance,
mass_mailing, membership, mrp, point_of_sale, pos_mercury, product,
purchase, purchase_requisition, sale_management, sales_team, sms,
stock, stock_landed_costs, survey, website_crm_partner_assign,
website_event_exhibitor, website_event_track, website_forum,
website_slides, base
This commit removes oe_edit_only labels and adds placeholder
on fields in form views from a lot of apps to minimize the
shift when switching mode.
task 2330101
The balance/debit/credit compute fields need the user to be part of 'account.group_account_readonly' in order to be calculated. This will avoid having an access error when a user who is not in 'account.group_account_readonly' accesses a view of 'account.analytic.account'.
We need it for the task-2195019. This task adds the possibility to display a m2o('account.analytic.account') field that can access the tree view with the 'Search More...' button.
Task-2195019
closesodoo/odoo#56554
Related: odoo/upgrade#1810
Related: odoo/enterprise#12680
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
From now on, it is possible to use the analytic account's code field in the "doesn't contain" filter.
Until now, only the name of the analytic account was processed when using this filter.
When using the "Contains" filter, both the name and the code of the analytic account were taken into account,
which was inconsistent with how the "Doesn't contain" filter worked.
Ticket #2368695closesodoo/odoo#61830
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Mainly transifex issues but also some errors found through 'grep' checks.
Fix typos and obscure english strings in xml contents, fields strings/helps, some docstrings, ...
ensuring correct translations base (and fallback when translations isn't available).
closesodoo/odoo#57276
X-original-commit: 4214f05d454bca2b60fda3a288d529c098e84f77
Related: odoo/enterprise#13053
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
This provides a better API to search for records by name without the
formatting part (`display_name`).
This also simplifies all the overridings of `_name_search` that no
longer need to call `name_get()`. The call to `name_get()` is done in
method `name_search` in a generic way.
Widget attributes have been removed from all search view archs since
they are no longer supported.
closesodoo/odoo#54107
Related: odoo/enterprise#11665
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closesodoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
Do not crash if the commercial partner doesn't have a name.
opw-2158809
closesodoo/odoo#43533
X-original-commit: 90b55325894a248b0386d2f8c4b8568d278963f9
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
-install accounting
-go to settings > accounting > check the 'Analytic Tags' and the
'Analytic Accounting' options
-go to accounting > configuration > analytic tags and try to use the search
=> You should be unable to search tags by name (working in 12.0)
Previous behavior:
searching tags by name is not possible
Current behavior:
searching tags works as intended and allows to filter by tag name
opw-2152154
closesodoo/odoo#41807
X-original-commit: bcd4458d57d996aa0812da21e7d03155a4314bcd
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
william