Commit:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/818c18e55d0718286ff5bf332186a10f4d7a58ef
Updated the resequence logic in a way that was almost falser than before.
The added test however did work by coincidence, as index values were equal to
the sequence field values.
To be sure that we synchronize with what happens on the server, we do a read
after the resequence.
Additionnally, we take into account the result of the server resequence return;
if it is false, it means no resequencing happened, so we should not do a read.
opw 1867049
closesodoo/odoo#27184
Remove part in service_mixins who hide this error. Queries must be able
to be canceled for better performance. Also in the case of longpolling,
if the request is not canceled, wait for a server message or the maximum
time (30 sec) to add or delete channels.
Let x_1, ..., x_a, x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} be a record
sequence ordered by its 'sequence' field.
Suppose the reordering occurs between elements x_{a+k} and x_{a+1}.
If the subsequence x_1, ..., x_a is ordered, then it does not change.
This is also true of the subsequence x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n}.
The resquence function makes exactly this assumption, and only sends the server
the subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} to update its 'sequence' field.
The update of x is done as follows: it is index + offset, where index is the
position of x in the subsequence, and offset is the 'sequence' of the first
element of the sequence (i.e. x_{a+1}.sequence).
It is easy to see that we need another hypothesis: that the sequence numbers are
unique. To show it, suppose that the sequence of x_1, ..., x_a is 0, then all
x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} have sequence 1, and lastly all x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ...,
x_{n} have sequence 2. Then after the call to the server resequence, the
subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} would have sequence numbers 1, 2,..., k.
Since the x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} subsequence have 'sequence' value 1, this would
obviously be incorrect.
We fix the reordering of the data in the js frontend to be consistent with
what is done by the server.
Note that this is only pertinent for sequences of reordering moves, since
otherwise the data comes directly from the server.
opw 1867049
In a test, we might want to check the domains given to RPCs with
assert.step/verifySteps. Before this rev., if there were an
'active' field on the model, ['active', '=', true] was
automatically added to the domain by the MockServer in place, thus
altering the expected domain in the test.
This change is usefull to convert the bus.bus into a sweet bus and cross tab bus service.
Actually, if we use the _rpc mixins in the bus, the long polling can't be abort, and
raise an exception.
The pyeval name is quite confusing, given that there is already an eval
and an evaluate function in py.js, and that the web.pyeval exports two
evaluate functions.
Since this file is more about odoo specific customization to py.js, it
is renamed in py_utils to better express its intended use.
Have a view with a field as:
<field name="stuck_in_the_middle" attrs="{'readonly': [('with_you', '=', False)]}"/>
Before this commit, the contents of attrs were parsed and merged into the modifiers
and the attrs attribute of the node was deleted
which might cause divergence between reality and tests
After this commit, the mock server does what the server does in this case
closes#25583
Before this commit _mockReadGroup method support only day and month aggregate
function and return invalid domain for date type field.
With this commit _mockReadGroup method support week and year aggregate function.
And return correct domain having start date and end date if date type field.
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
When a user creates a new column in a kanban view, leave the action and
comes back, the order is not preserved. With this commit, we force a
call to resequence to ensure that the order does not change.
With this commit, we add the possibility of using many2ones as measure.
The way a many2one is aggregated is by using the count distinct
operator.
Some care had to be done to gracefully support the situation when a
pivot view is grouped by a m2o field F, and the same field F is used as
a measure.
The read_group method was recently modified to allow more flexibility.
With this commit, we add the possibility of aggregating many2one fields.
These fields can be aggregating by counting the number of distinct IDs,
directly in postgres.
Also, note that we had to modify the mock server to implement the
corresponding functionality.
The read_group method (from the server) is implemented in the mock
server, to allow easy unit testing in javascript. However, the
behaviour was not exactly the same: a read_group call on a domain with
no records returns null for aggregates. But the mock implementation
returned a value of 0.
We fix this in this commit, to allow more precise testing of Odoo
javascript.
Before this commit, some breaking spaces were present in the js code.
Such spaces are misinterpreted and worked by luck.
This has become a problem with exported js bunldes (e.g. the
external_lib bundle in im_livechat).
This commit replaces breaking spaces by regular spaces.
This commit improves the JS code of the mail module,
which comes maily from the new coding guidelines
and the addition of "JS services".
JS services are important objects that do not fit
well in the component tree, such as chat_manager
or ajax.
The benefits of JS services are improved readability
of the code, reduced coupling, and more testable
modules. In particular, discuss was hard to
Summary of the changes:
- ClientAction has been renamed into Discuss
- Clear instantiation of chatManager
- New coding guidelines in most mail modules
- JS Services can interact with each other
- Chat Manager and Window Manager are services
- Window Manager renamed to Chat Window Manager
- bus.bus is now encapsulated in Bus Service (a service)
- The test infrastructure has been tweaked with JS Services
- Chat Mixin has been removed
A future improvement would be to translate some 'trigger' into 'trigger_up'.
This rev. improves the QuickCreate widget for grouped Kanban views.
It allows specifying in the Kanban arch a form view xmlid, e.g.:
<kanban quick_create_view="some_form_view_xmlid">
...
</kanban>
When this attribute is set, the referenced form view is loaded and
rendered inside the QuickCreate widget. A real FormView widget is
instantiated, meaning that all form view mechanisms are available
in the QuickCreate (modifiers, default_get, onchanges, widgets...).
Task #27475.
This rev. is the first part (out of 3) of the refactoring of the
ActionManager and ViewManager layer of the webclient.
The main changes are:
- there is no ViewManager anymore, its work is now handled by the
ActionManager itself, but isolated in a specific file ; this
eases a lot of things, as the breadcrumbs handling for example.
- the ActionManager code is converted to the new coding principles
and guidelines ; mainly, children widgets communicate with it by
triggering events up, and not by function calls anymore.
- the ActionManager layer is now testable, and a lot of tests have
already been written.
- the code in other addons has been adapted consequently.
What's coming next:
- introduce the 'AbstractAction' Widget, and make client actions
and view controllers inherit from it ; this widget will
implement a common API that could be used uniformly by the
ActionManager (e.g. restore(), canBeLeft(), renderButtons(),
getTitle()...).
- move the ControlPanel handling from the ActionManager to the
AbstractAction.
instead of createView. This allows to log info like RPCs or
uncaught Odoo events even if we are not in a view.
Also remove the logLevel param from MockServer as it wasn't really
used.
Before this rev., sorting groups in list views wasn't supported. It
hadn't been implemented in the new views.
This rev. activates the feature, so groups can now be sorted on
their aggregates again. It also implements a basic (first level
only) sorting in mockReadGroup, in the mock server.
opw 781288
Here is a situation where we had a problem:
- a form view with a one2many field, which has no inline views
- the (non inline) list view has a field A, and is not editable
- the (non inline) sub form view has fields A and B, with an onchange on
B which modifies A
In that case, the user could do this:
- go to edit mode
- click on 'add' a new one2many line
- change the value of B in the form view, this changes the value of A
- click on save to close the modal form view
- click on the new o2m record to reopen the modal form view
- rechange B
=> the onchange does not work
The explanation is that when we reopen the modal, we update the known fields
information, but we had to perform a fieldviewget to fetch the list
view, so we have a full knowledge of the fields. However, the code did
not update the fields info (because it uses _.default), which means that
the onchange information contained in the form view is lost.
Note: the test system had to be adapted to more closely simulate what
actually happens. In particular, the onchange flag is no longer added
by the mock server, since it should be done by the data manager, like
'real' code. This change broke the basic model tests, which had to be
modified accordingly, by setting manually the onchange flag.
A recent fix in web changed the field FieldImage to make sure it also
loads a __last_update field. This is fine, except that a test in
enterprise (web_clearbit_tests) was using a field image, and failed
because it could not find the __last_update field in the demo data.
With this commit, we make sure that the mock server is always aware of
the __last_update field.
Christophe Simonis