Before the fix we were requiring for product.supplierinfo.requisition_id
which is a non existing field of the model 'product.supplierinfo'. I
just change it then to purchase_requisition_id which is the required
field.
This triggered an error when you add a product selled by the defined
vendor for an aggreement type defined as 'Blanket order'.
opw-1914712
closesodoo/odoo#29342
Usecase to reproduce:
- Enable 'Managers must approve orders'
- Set agreement type as 'exclusive'
- Connect as purchase user
- Create a requisition and an RFQ linked to it
- Confirm the RFQ
It raises a usererror that ask to close other PO linked
to requisition.
It happens because the purchase requisition code do not take
care of double validation on PO. It will try to close the requisition
once button_confirm is called. However it will only write 'to approve'
on PO state and thus trigger the requistion error will be raise since
all linked PO are not 'done' or 'cancel'.
In order to fix it, the action_done on requisition should be call
on button_approve instead of button_confirm. (button_approve is
automatically called when double validation is not enable).
Task: #1884410Closes#28068closesodoo/odoo#29049
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a product : stockable + purchase : propose a call for tenders + reordering rule (qty min 0, max 0, multiple 1)
- Create a SO for that product.
- Run the scheduler once : a requistion is generated (Purchases > Purchase > Purchase Agreements), which is normal behavior
- Run the scheduler a second time
Bug:
A new requistion was generated for the same product, by the same reordering rule
opw:1892950
closesodoo/odoo#28611
payment_term.id, creates a tuple wich works if payment_term.id is set
in case payment_term.id is False this creates the tuple (False,) which
is then converted by the Odoo ORM to a account.payment.term(False, )
record set, which in term may cause weird behaviour as this value does
not eval to false in cases like `if self.payment_term_id:`
Closesodoo/odoo#28397
When creating a "purchase.requisition" record, the default Operation Type was
always the one defined in the company 1 even if the user was not in the company 1.
opw:1890190
closesodoo/odoo#27830
When creating a "purchase.requisition" record, the default Operation Type was
always the one defined in the company 1 even if the user was not in the company 1.
opw:1890190
closesodoo/odoo#27520
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Purpose of this commit is to give description more "business oriented"
because those descriptions appears in Odoo Studio which is supposed to be used by end users, not only by developers.
Related Task ID : 37311
Purpose: improve understanding of partner and product models as well as their
daily use. This is done by improving tooltips and labels of some fields
according to business logic.
This commit is related to task ID 1880696 and closes PR #27133 .
Thanks to @xmo-odoo for its in-depth review.
…eduler"
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider P a product with routes "buy" and "mto" and with
purchase_requistion = 'Propose a call for tenders'
- Let's consider a BOM B with P as component
- Create a MO for B
- Run the scheduler two times
Bug:
Two purchase agreements have been created for the the same MO.
opw:1882280
Purchase agreements create request for quotation with prefilled field.
The issue is:
date_planned (on RfQ) is filled from schedule_date (on PA). The first
one is a datetime object. The second one is a date object.
This commit makes a right conversion between datetime and date at the
RfQ creation. This issue was introduced by the datetime refactoring
(#24717)
Task id: 1878136
Purchase orders created from purchase agreement behave differently depending on
the agreement type.
On one hand, if the agreement is a blanket order, the vendor must be set automatically on the
purchase order and be the same as the BO. Changing the vendor is forbidden.
On the other hand, if the agreement is a call for tender, multiple purchase order can be
created with different vendors. It that case, the vendor field must be editable in RfQ states.
This commit is related to task ID 1866975.
From this commit onwards, Date fields will return datetime.date objects and Datetime fields will return datetime.datetime objects, this implies a number of things that are clearly explained both in the ORM API for master.
This commit also introduces a number of helper functions for dates and datetimes that are exposed in tools.date_utils and fields.Date[time], explained in the documentation as well.
Task-ID: 47189
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a product P with routes MTO and BUY
- Set a vendor V on this product
- Create a BOM B with P
- Create a MO M with B
- A RFQ is created with M as origin
- Create a purchase requisition PR with vendor V
- Set PR as purchase agreement on the RFQ
Bug:
- The field origin with M was erased by the name of PR
- The field partner_ref was erased by the name of PR
The fix is inspired by: c914df5a36
opw:1860430
[IMP] purchase_requisition : add analytic_tag_ids field in purchase requistion
[IMP] sale: set analytic tags on invoice based on the analytic tags defined on SO
[IMP] account_analytic_default: add default analytic tags to invoice lines created from SO for down payment
(#23110)
As the sequence name depends on the requisition type. The name must be
set not when the requisition is in draft but confirmed. In the confirm
state, the type in readonly. The name is also reset when the requisition
is put in draft.
When the user decrease the quantity on the SO it will log the
activity on a the upsteam documents however the user can't easily
find the impacted documents linked to it. In order to achieve that
the _get_upstream_documents_and_responsibles method pass a stack
that remember all the documents browsed in order to return the final
document. This stack is then passed in the _render_method in log activity
in order to use it when rendering the note for the activity.
return the linked requisition line and the responsible for the requisition
instead of returning the origin moves. there should be nothing upper
the requisition itself so we don't need anymore to grind documents in order
to find the upstream one. More information about _get_upstream_documents_and_responsibles
in method _log_activity_get_documents in stock_picking.py
Swapnesh Shah