Do not use the model `_description` field which cannot be translated. Use
the `display_name` of the corresponding model instead.
Moreover, `<t t-esc="'%s' % model_description or 'document'"/>` gives
`'None'`, while `'document'` is expected.
This adds a query to some tests, which is expected since `display_name`
requires information stored in the DB, while `_description` is defined
at the Python level.
opw-1908420
The signature is shown by default when sending a mail and in particular
case it is not shown.
In c8d283a592 there was a small regression that in some instance the
signature that was shown before is not shown anymore. This is because
the default in those instance is to not show signature.
eg. a message sent in a chatter would not have signature in sent emails
With this commit, the previous behavior is reintroduced.
opw-1903001
opw-1896262
closes#29088
Suppose that a Task is added on a task via a studio customisation.
Then the _get_message_needaction method gets called on the onchange of the
toplevel task, which triggers another call to _get_message_needaction.
During that update, we get a self with a model.newID; its ids field is empty,
so the list of tasks res itself is empty.
As a result the method crashes on a malformed query.
This can in turn prevent the completion of some higher-level operation,
e.g. a state change on the task.
opw 1909043
closesodoo/odoo#29084
When a bounce is received, we look for matching partners in order to
increment the bounce counter. However by using [`ilike','email`] we carry
the risk of matching emails that contain the bounce email:
['email', 'ilike', 'john@hitmail.com´]
will also match 'random.john@hitmail.com' for example.
Using strict equality is safer, and the worst that can happen is that
we fail to count one bounce.
- When deleting attachments, the foreign key constraints on
`message_main_attachment_id` are triggered which could take
a lot of time to be computed.
closesodoo/odoo#28358
The _search was already excluding these attachments but not the read_group
Avoid the read_group from mail to search on all existing attachments
Fixesodoo/odoo#27673closesodoo/odoo#27698
Before this fix the creation of task assigned to admin was leading
to the creation of mails.
This is a generic fix to avoid to notifiy a user when he is add as a
follower when creating data from odoo data files.
closesodoo/odoo#27682
Fix to commit: a1d6064dcc
Which erroneously put a mass_mailing method in mail,
as mail.mail.statistics is defined in mass_mailing.
Since it does not depend on the records, it been extracted from the
loop.
opw 1890461
closesodoo/odoo#27431
After a refactoring for v11, the id of a newly created thread is not returned
anymore.
Therefore server actions weren't being executed on newly created records.
opw 1886383
closesodoo/odoo#27238
Reason: The Attachment count of mail_thread is used by the new
attachment button of the chatter, the compute field has been chosen
over a search_count JS RPC to keep a synchronous chatter and prevent
flickering.
This commit refactors those changes to follow the naming
conventions of mail_thread and to optimize the count method for
eventual reuse follwing TDE's advices.
- Changed the name of a mail_thread's related_attachment_count into
message_attachment_count.
- Changed the count method to a read_group.
PR: 26989
Task: 1860031
This is done by adding a new field on mail.thread objects and setting it when posting a message with attachments on a model inheriting from mail.thread.
Was part of PR #26740
Was part of task #1880089
- Added a new button to the chatter that displays the amount of
attachments on the current record and when clicked, all the attachments
attached to the current record
- added mail.FormView (includes), used by the chatter attachment
button to fetch the field value of attachment_count.
- added a computed field "attachment_count" to mail.thread that
contains the amount of attachment attached to the record.
- changed the followers div, it is now sharing a "right side"
area with the attachment button.
task: 1860031
The 'help' of window action is often fiddled with, adding thing before,
after or arround it.
For example in CRM leads, we add at the beginning "Click to add a new
opportunity" with an arrow towards the button, and after if there is a
mail alias: "All email incoming to * will automatically create new...".
But for crm.lead, hr.expense, sale.order this would not take into
account that the fiddled "help" can be edited, so if we edit 2 times
help in studio or backend action editing, we would get:
Click to add a new opportunity
Click to add a new opportunity
Click to add a new opportunity
[Original help content]
All email incoming to * will automatically create new...
All email incoming to * will automatically create new...
All email incoming to * will automatically create new...
And see several "arrows" towards the button (in enterprise the
additional ones are on same color background).
With this commit we do what is done in "mail.thread" by default which is
not fiddling with the `help` if has been fiddled before (if it contains
"oe_view_nocontent_create" class).
note: this is the 11.0 version of #26912
opw-1877663
closes#26911
- When a tracked field is modified, a mail.message is created.
When create is called its tries to fill missing values with "default
values".
It first tries to find the default values in the context, which may
occurs.
For example, modifying a tracked field on a subtask will add a key
"default_parent_id" in the context, which is the parent_id of the project.task.
Create will try to use "default_parent_id" for the mail.message
parent_id field, which make the SQL Request invalid.
Following 50ab18176 an access token is added in the URL, but there may
not be an existing access token. If so this commit generate one.
opw-1877347
closes#26526
This commit fixes two issues:
- If a partner has multiple users and if any of these users is a
share user, then the access button on mail notifications is not displayed.
- If a project.task is either assigned or has its stage folded
the access button may not be displayed for certain users.
The users affected by this bug are the one who have their user's
partner is linked to multiple users with at least one flagged as a share user.
This commit is the counter-part of an enteprise commit introducing
the Documents app.
Here is a summary of what has been done:
- tweak unlink of ir_attachment to prevent unlink recursivity
(when attachments are attached to ir_attachments)
- improve ir_attachment kanban view
- add several arguments to binary_content controller:
- 'force_ext': to force the extension in the filename, base on
mimetype
- 'share_token' and 'share_id': to autorize download from a
share link
- add 'thumbnail' field on ir_attachment to optimize Kanban view
- add 'upper_limit' argument to image to allow to bypass the
500*500 size limit
- DocumentViewer now handles text files
More information available on task 1853490
Co-authored-by: Pierre Paridans <app@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: sri-odoo <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: ThanhDodeurOdoo <tso@odoo.com>
In order to avoid sending mail indefinitely to a wrong email address,
Take the mail statistics for the recipient of the last 3 month :
if more than 5 mails bounced (with interval of more than 1 week)
the email is blacklisted.
Purpose of this commit is to improve onboarding with a wow effect and a bot
to test the Discuss app. Otherwise new users have nobody to talk to. Retention
will be improved by both increasing interactions and onboarding of Discuss
features.
This commit adds a simple bot in discuss. It answers some questions, helps
users getting their hand on discuss and eases the onboarding.
In this version, the flow is quite simple, and only im_livechat adds some
logic in order to show canned response. The logic is contained in new
modules: mail_bot and im_livechat_mail_bot in order to keep everything
well separated. It also allows users to remove the mailbot if they do not
want to keep this functionality.
Odoobot will only answer if he is in the onboarding conversation (alone
with a user in a channel of type chat) or if a user pings odoobot.
Odoobot logic applies to both standard chatter / channel messages and
also transient messages (like help commands).
Specifications
* 2 minutes after first sign in, users will receive a direct chat from
Odoobot;
* make Odoobot an archived partner;
* scenario
* Odoobot: "Hello, I'm here to help you discover chat features. Try
answering me with an emoji :)";
* User: Send emoji
* Odoobot: "Great! :) Did you notice that you can also send attachments,
like a picture of your cute dog? Try it!"
* Odoobot: "Not a cute dog, but you get it :) To access special features,
start your sentence with "/" (I.E. /help)""
* User: /help
* Auto message then Odoobot: "Wow you're a natural! As a channel usually
contain a lot of users, you can grab the attention with a ping. Try to
ping me with @Odoobot!"
* User: @Odoobot lorem ipsum
* if Livechat installed
* add 2 demo canned response so it does not look weird (like "Hello, how
may I help you?" and "Have a nice day!")
* Odoobot: "Perfect! <br> Try to type ":" to use canned responses."
* User tries canned
* Odoobot: "Good, you can customize your canned responses in the live chat
application. <br><br> + réponse suivante"
* Odoobot: "There's 3 different ways in Odoo to interact with your
colleagues: via this chat window, [img of chat window] via the Discuss
application [img of Discuss app + icon on it] or via the chatter [img of
the chatter]. Aaaaand that's it! Enjoy discovering Odoo! :)"
* random answers to ping/bad answer
* "Mmmmh I'm not sure what you mean.. Can you try again?"
* "I'm afraid I don't understand. Sorry!"
* when someone pings @OdooBot with no reason: Odoobot: Yaaaay that's me!
[party emoji]
* fun stuff to add for some answer
* User: i love you / love
* Odoobot: Aaaaaw that's really cute but, you know, bots don't work
that way. You're too human for me! Let's keep it professional <3
* User: Fuck
* Odoobot: That's not a really nice thing to say, you know? I'm a bot but I
have feelings, ok?! </3
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588 and PR #25075.
We do not want inactive partners to be added as followers. Indeed this may
lead to unwanted notifications send as inactive partners are not easily
found in the various widgets. It also creates unnecessary data and
computation.
This commit has a small impact on performances as we choose to do it in
message_ subscribe method. Private _message_method is left untouched as
parameters given to this method are left to caller control.
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588.
Purpose of this commit is to avoid browsing and prefetching data about
recipients when notifying a message to partners and channels. Mail message
_notify computes all necessary data in a single query. This commit allow
to re-use this data by propagating it through the call chain.
Addons inheriting from classification methods used when sending notification
emails are updated accordingly to the API and data update.
This commit is linked to task ID 47934 and PR #24033. No functional change
should occur with this commit.
In this commit we update _notify method of mail.message to fetch most data
related to notification process in a single query. Indeed posting a
message can be a costly process, especially when involving several partners,
channels, depending on their notification status, user groups, ... Most
of the required data can be fetched in a single hand-tuned query.
Purpose is to lessen query count. Side effect of this commit is that code
is less recordset based and therefore more low-level. It is also harder to
customize the behavior through inheritance as it implies rewriting a bit
more of code.
This query is located in a private method on follower model. It takes
parameters allowing to either fetch data related to followers of a given
subtype, either related to some partners and channels. First use case is
related to the process of posting a message with a subtype that triggers
notification of followers. Second use case is related to notifying some
specific partners or channels of a given message. It takes notably into
consideration internal subtypes and active field of partners, allowing to
correctly handle corner case for deactivated followers and portal / share
partners.
Notification process is divided into two steps. First one is to compute
recipient data. Second one is to apply the result of this computation and
call the various notification mechanisms accordingly. Doing so allows to
easily re-call notification process or compute some data differently
if necessary.
API of notification methods is updated to allow passing notably the values
used to create the newly-posted message. It allows in some simple case to
avoid browsing message and partners when no notification is necessary. It
saves some queries in simple case like posting messages with specific
subtypes not often followed or logging notes without mentioning people.
This commit allows to save a few queries on several performance tests as
indicated by updated performance counters. Future commits will gradually
propagate the use of this data to further lessen query count.
This commit is linked to task ID 47934 and PR #24033. No functional change
should occur with this commit.
- Email generated from mass mailing will have its own layout with internal css.
- strip_classes is removed from mail_message because mail client are now supporting
internal stylesheet. we need it for make mail responsive.
mail: manually removed classes from incoming mail body
Because we removed strip_classes from mail message body field because we want to
allow classes in outgoing mail to make it responsive but classes are not removed
from incoming mails so here we manually removed classes from incoming mail.
opw-1836556
Fields in the chatter can be organized with a business logic.
Here fields for CRM and Website E-commerce have a tracking sequence.
For other fields/module just add "track_sequence=x" on model
Only the add_sign from notif_values is usefull for a resend. We can consider
that a mail on resend can be delete in every case, and we can find the
model_description from model since a resend can only be performed on
message linked to a model.
The other notif_values are now parameter in order to ease the understanding
of what can transit through this flow.
Task: #1860054
PR: #25622
Recently a ref() has been converted into a direct xml id match. As this
does not return a recordset but an ID, the .id that follows is not
necessary anymore.
Nicolas Martinelli