Make an expense report containing 2 expenses
one of them has tax exigible on payment
Validate the whole thing and make a payment
Before this commit, the journal entries were wrong
this was because:
- there were 2 move lines in the payable account
Each of them wanting to reconcile with the payment, and each of them trying
to create an cash basis entry
- the amounts were incorrect too, as the matched percentage was computed
on move lines that were not in a payable/receivable, but in taxes accounts
OPW 1912247
closesodoo/odoo#29878
opw-1917605
Before this commit, when accounting is set to global rounding, the base
amount per tax is not correctly calculated.
Now, the Base amount per tax is calculated adding the rounded lines.
To test this issue, you need to set to global rounding and create a
customer invoice with the following lines :
line 1 = Qty:40; unit price:2.27; tax:15%; discount: 10%
line 2 = Qty:21; unit price:2.77; tax:15%; discount: 10%
line 3 = Qty:21; unit price:2.77; tax:15%; discount: 10%
When the invoce is printed, you would notice that the amount is 186.43
and it should be 186.42.
closesodoo/odoo#30021
When creating a new line on a customer invoice, we could get the price
unit in the company currency instead of the invoice currency.
This is because the uom_id onchange would ignore currency when setting
the price.
Changing an invoice line's price unit on uom_id change was introduced
in february 2018 in saas-11.3 with 3a38080ff.
Change to how currency is applied when setting an invoice line's price
unit was introduced in june 2018 in 9.0 with 367fadc8.
So there was a missing part in saas-11.3 to adapt 367fadc8 for 3a38080ff
change that is added with this commit.
Without the fix, the added test failed with:
AssertionError: 10.0 != 20
opw-1920504
closes#29776
Suppose calling get_fiscal_year(date, day=29, month=2) with date(year=2017, month=2, day=28)
The computation steps are:
date_from = date(year=2017, month=2, day=28) - 1 year = date(year=2016, month=2, day=28)
date_from = date_from + 1 day = date(year=2016, month=2, day=29)
It's incorrect because the value of date_from must be date(year=2016, month=3, day=1)
closesodoo/odoo#29416
Create an invoice for a day, and register a payment right away
BUT choose a date in the future for that payment
Imagine a French Check. You write it, and tell your partner to cash it in
10 days later
You would enter that transaction as a temporary payment
in your own books
OPW 1893646
Before this commit, the line of the partner did not appear in the aged
report after if the report was for the date just after the invoice date
After this commit, it does
closesodoo/odoo#28728
As the journal is mostly set in the Odoo world the _default_journal
method is not needed during create, but in case you only have
partner_id, account_id and type in vals you will have retrieved a wrong
journal in case you have an incoming invoice.
closesodoo/odoo#28635
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a credit note for an amount of 100$
- Validate it and register a payment
- Let's pay an amount of 90$ and mark this credit note as fully paid
Bug:
An error message was raised saying: Wrong credit or debit value in accounting entry !
The field residual_company_signed must be positive for out_invoice and in_refund and
negative for in_invoice and out_refund. In this way, the correct writeoff amount
can be computed in function _create_payment_entry.
PS: In function _compute_payment_amount, the field residual_signed and residual_company_signed
are already signed, that's why it was wrong to multiply a second time on it with MAP_INVOICE_TYPE_PAYMENT_SIGN
opw:1893570
closesodoo/odoo#28148
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a credit note for an amount of 100$
- Validate it and register a payment
- Let's pay an amount of 90$ and mark this credit note as fully paid
Bug:
An error message was raised saying: Wrong credit or debit value in accounting entry !
DO NOT FORWARD-PORT
opw:1893570
closesodoo/odoo#28433
Let's consider an aged partner balance with a period of 30 days as of
2019-02-08. The specific dates used in the report are:
``` python
bisou = datetime.strptime('2019-02-08', "%Y-%m-%d").date()
for x in [0, 1, 30, 31, 60, 61, 90, 91, 120, 121]:
print(x, bisou + relativedelta(days=-x))
0 2019-02-08
1 2019-02-07
30 2019-01-09
31 2019-01-08
60 2018-12-10
61 2018-12-09
90 2018-11-10
91 2018-11-09
120 2018-10-11
121 2018-10-10
```
However, the current periods generated are incorrect:
```
{'name': '0-30', 'stop': '2019-02-08', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '30-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-09'}
{'name': '60-90', 'stop': '2018-12-08', 'start': '2018-11-08'}
{'name': '90-120', 'stop': '2018-11-07', 'start': '2018-10-08'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-07', 'start': False}
```
There is a clear inconsistency between the name of the period and the
date used. Moreover, the name is misleading: 0-30 includes the -0 date,
while 30-60 doesn't include the -30 date.
After the fix, the name and the periods are consistent. We also change
the first period to 1-30 since including 0 would mean to include amounts
which are not due yet.
```
{'name': '1-30', 'stop': '2019-02-07', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '31-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-10'}
{'name': '61-90', 'stop': '2018-12-09', 'start': '2018-11-10'}
{'name': '91-120', 'stop': '2018-11-09', 'start': '2018-10-11'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-10', 'start': False}
```
opw-1886633
closesodoo/odoo#27294
Before that, with "post at bank reconciliation option" activated on bank journal, the following scenarii did not work as expected:
1. When creating an invoice, making two payments for it, and then matching only one of them with a bank statement
=> the invoice was marked as 'paid' while it should have staid 'in payment' until the second payment gets a bank statement.
2. When directly reconciling a bank statement with an invoice for its full amount
=> the invoice staid in "in payment" state, while it should have been "paid"
[IMP] account: add tests for the aforementioned cases
closesodoo/odoo#28428
1. Create a payment term with:
- 50% due now
- balance due in 14 days
2. Validate an invoice with this payment term and partner Agrolait
3. Create a payment from Agrolait with the 50% due
4. Add this outstanding credit to the invoice
It is reconciled with the balance due in 14 days instead of what is
due now. Because of this e.g. the Aged Receivable report will show the
customer being overdue with a payment.
This issue was first fixed in 9.0 at
adad192cc0. It was then reintroduced in
saas-11.4 at d3d2612061. This commit
adds a test to avoid regressions like this.
To fix the issue this sorts journal items by their Due Date if there
is one. Otherwise we use the date from the journal entry as before.
Note that before this commit journal items were not sorted at all by
the two 'sorted' statements. sorted returns a sorted recordset, it
doesn't modify the recordset it's called on.
opw-1906665
Bank statement lines need to be matched with entries; We have to automate this operation as much as possible.
At the same time, create an algorithm that fit everyone needs is quite impossible.
For that reason we will let users choose the rules they want with the improvement of reconciliation models.
Note that we did it only for bank statement reconliation, not for manual reconciliations.
Was task: 1877375
Was PR #26669
l10n modules are blacklisted on the runbot.
With this commit, a tagged test is added that installs all the l10n
modules. A chart of account is installed in a different company for each
one. This test is a first step to test all l10n. It's intended to be
launched by a runbot cron script.
Before that, the administrator could use accounting features by default. This is not what we want, the group only gets assigned by default when installing account_accountant, on enterprise.
Continuation and ending of 1f848bf.
Before this commit, the bank statement reconciliation still sometimes
crashed.
Each step of the tour waits 10 secs before timeout and in this case,
changing URL may take more time since this commit b0a29c9b because
we added 'debug=assets'. It was probably a mistake.
So, removing this from the URL would probably solve the error but
the second step would always be dependent on the first.
It's why we decided to load the tour with the correct URL defined
in Python.
Co-authored-by: Adrien Dieudonné <adr@odoo.com>
Suggestions made to reconcile bank statement lines are now more accurate (based on communication and amount)
There's no automatic mode anymore (button + <CTRL+ENTER> shortcut removed)
Partners are set automatically when selecting a line in the widget (that will help the creation of a res.partner.bank for him, for a better partner detection next time)
Was task: 1847703
Was PR #25438
In some countries, it might be preferable not to recon the payments journal entries at the time they are registered in the system, but to do so at the date of the bank statement line they will be reconciled with.
Thus, to manage this we've added an option on bank journals to have payments generating draft account.move when they are validated, and posting them only after bank reconciliation (+overwriting their date)
Was task 1870892
Was PR #26349
This is done by displaying this field on top of the vendor bills form view and using it as a default value when registering the payment. The use of a sequence on res.partner.bank also allows giving priorities to partner bank accounts directly from the tree view that is contained in res.partner form. In case payments are generated for multiple invoices at once, their account is set as the partner's most prioritary account.
[IMP] account: payment for multiple invoices: option to group + also group on account + hide memo
Add an option in the multiple invoices payment wizard to choose whether or not to group the generated payments. This is useful in case we want to keep one payment by invoice (even if they share the same partner, etc) so that each of them corresponds to a single communication.
The memo field of this wizard is now also hidden in some cases, when displaying it would allow entering wrong communication values (for example, when paying invoices from different partners ; it makes no sense that all the generated payments share the same memo).
[IMP] account: option to sanize invoice communications
From this commit onwards, Date fields will return datetime.date objects and Datetime fields will return datetime.datetime objects, this implies a number of things that are clearly explained both in the ORM API for master.
This commit also introduces a number of helper functions for dates and datetimes that are exposed in tools.date_utils and fields.Date[time], explained in the documentation as well.
Task-ID: 47189
On the accounting config, you can select an automatic way to compute the
reference on invoice and then, improve the reconciliation in a later task:
- free communication: set what you want as reference (default)
- based on partner: find the partner more easily
- based on number: retrieve the invoice directly
Was task: 1847703
Was part of PR #25921
Christophe Simonis