In this commit, all the questions type have been redesigned to look more fancy.
(impacted question types : radio and checkboxes, text boxes (textarea and text
inputs, date and datetime inputs and matrix)
For radio and checkboxes, both design have been aligned to work the same way
(except checkboxes can still have more than one selected option).
Selection by key have been applied on those two question types if the number of
option is under 26 (to use all the alphabeat character for selection). This
selection by key is only available on page per question layout.
Tests have been adapted accordingly to the redesign (typically for choice and
matrix inputs)
* Progress Bar
This commit adds a progress bar to the survey to inform the user
where he is in the survey filling process.
There are two progress modes:
- Number : will display the number of the current page on the total number
of pages (or questions if layout mode is question_per_page)
- Percentage : will display the percentage of page or question already done
So this leads to, on last page:
- in Number mode :
the progress bar div is 100% filled 3 / 3 pages [===]
- in percentage mode :
the progress bar is aligned to percentage 66% completed [== ]
* Print Widget
A widget is added for survey print mode in order to resize all textarea to fit
their content, instead of showing a scroll bar. This can be usefull if user
wants to print the results. He will get the entire content of the 'textarea
answers' instead of only the two first lines.
* Misc
This commit also :
- adds background image to survey.
- redo quizz correction and add some data to illustrate non scored
questions rendering in print template
- review breadcrumb style
Note : readonly data option on survey form widget is not set anywhere yet but
the usage is done in prevention of the future work on presenter view for survey
session mode.
Task ID: '2150291'
PR #43237
PURPOSE
To have a better UX, the transition between questions in a survey should not
be done by loading another page, but by loading next questions in AJAX.
This will allow to fade out / fade in the next question and improve the user
experience, as well as prepare the work for the complete survey redesign.
SPECIFICATIONS
General
=======
This commit refactors the way the questions are loaded.
To go to next question(s), instead of redirecting to a new page containing
the next question(s), the submit process is loading the next question(s)
using ajax. The template of the question is prepared at server side and is
given in html string to the client that display the next question in a smooth
transition (fade in / fade out).
This commit includes also the start and the end screen of the survey inside
the survey form in order to perform smooth transition between start screen
and first question(s) and between last question(s) and end screen.
Only one master template (survey form) is now used to display every part of
the survey : start + questions + end screens.
The answer_done error is now handled by the _prepare_survey_data itself.
If the user wants to display an already_done survey, the returned template
is the end screen.
This commit handles page transition for the survey results. When submitting
survey, the survey result widget is initialized and attached to the survey
result section.
A new route has been added : /survey/begin/.
If the user arrives on start screen, the state is 'New'. Once the user clicks
on Start button, an rpc call is made to survey/begin that will call the
survey_prepare_data to render the first question page and set the state to
in_progress and the start_datetime of the answer.
Validation
==========
Add the validation of all types of questions directly in the frontend.
This allows to reduce the latency before the survey is validated and was
necessary to go along with our new fade out / fade in mechanism.
The client does not need to wait the validation answer from the server to
display validation error messages.
The current questions are only faded out if the frontend validation has passed.
The server still makes this validation before submitting answers and loading
next question(s) to avoid direct rpc calls that would mess up the answers.
Error messages are now displayed with a slide down transition, for a wonderful
wow effect !
Timer
=====
As the survey form works with ajax to display start screen, question(s) and
end page, the timer has to be started only after the start screen.
This commit display and start the timer only after start survey button is
clicked.
Breadcrumb
==========
As the survey form now works in ajax to display in same page start screen,
question(s) and end page screen, the breadcrumb has to be controlled not only
on page loading but also manually between transition from a screen to another.
To ease the breadcrumb management, breadcrumb is now a widget that will reload
a js template, mainly depending of the current page id.
The js form initialize or update this widget giving this new page id.
On breadcrumb item click, the widget triggers a onclick caught by the form
that calls the submit with the given target.
This commit handles page transition for the breadcrumb. When going forward or
backward (next or previous page), the breadcrumb activates, deactivates and
links elements are reinitialized depending of the target page.
LINKS
Task ID: 2152223
PR #41453
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
This commit prepares the complete redesign of survey.
Simple choice question type will only use the radio button display mode.
So the dropdown display mode is deleted.
Task ID: 2152223
PR #41453
The matrix data structure awaited by the server is the following :
{
question_id: {
'row_id_1': ['col_id1', ..., 'col_idn'],
'row_id_n': ['col_id1', ..., 'col_idn'],
'comment': 'This is a comment',
}
}
Before this commit, the comment was encapsulated into a dict, into an array,
with an incorrect key :
-> 'questionId_comment': [{'comment': 'This is a comment'}]
This was leading to 2 errors :
- A traceback when nothing is selected in the matrix options
- Comment is never saved.
After this commit, the comment is correctly given to and extracted by the
server. So the comment is saved and the traceback is avoided.
Task ID: 2152223
closesodoo/odoo#43086
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Allow some questions to be linked to customer data. We would like to have an
email field filled with user info / updating user info automatically in the survey.
SPECIFICATION
For now, we only want to be able to collect the user email address for a specific
question of the survey. For that purpose, add a ``save_as_email`` field on the
question model.
If this option is checked, the answer to that specific question will override the
"email" stored on the survey.user_input allowing live udpate of user input
based on given information. If multiple questions are marked as such, the
last (not empty) answer will prevail.
If user input already has an email (invitation-based surveys for example)
prefill the answer with the email so that people don't have to retype it.
GOING FURTHER (aka, incoming)
With live mode: maybe some additional fields will need to be saved
nickname
avatar
LINKS
Task 1919290
PR #41429
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
From
"Their was an error during the validation of the survey."
To
"There was an error during the validation of the survey."
Some side code linting is also performed because my linter is screaming on
me.
Task ID 1919290
PR #41429
Co-Authored-By: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to globally rewrite the way statistics are
pre computed and used in results page of surveys. Indeed current code is
very complex, having a lot of calls to the same methods while taking only
part of its results. It also have a mix of model and controller methods,
data is computed several times a bit differently, ...
In this commit we rewrite that part. Including
* a simpler code flow;
* a simpler data structure;
* use a better naming for methods instead of "prepare_results" called
randomly within the code and re-using part of its returned content;
* use record sets / records instead of giving sub-elements of a record
like question.title, label.value, ...
Data structure
* simply give a question_and_page_ids to the template that will iterate
on pages / questions;
* have a graph_data, table_data dictionaries available for graph and
table display with simple entries;
* graph_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for graph display
if question allows it;
* table_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for table / summary
display;
* hold record sets of done / failed answers and answer lines;
In this commit we also simplify and clean pagination in survey graph results
* remove page_range helper tool that can be inlined in the templates
directly, doing a simple range;
* fix and improve pagination code;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
In survey.user_input.line, clean code about constraints. Purpose is to make
it easier to read and understand.
Code creating user input lines is moved from survey.user_input.line model to
survey.user_input. Indeed it is now based on a user_input record, and create
answer line related to a question, based on values coming from controllers
(and therefore frontend). It makes more sense to delegate that code to the
user_input model itself that creates its lines. Code is also rewritten to
be cleaner and easier to read.
Code computing statistics on user input records is moved from survey model
to user_input model, where it belongs. Missing translation marks are added
because translations matter.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :
Type----Old type-----New type
text----free_text----text_box
char----textbox------char_box
Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts
QuestType--------Old type-----New type
text_box---------free_text----text_box
char_box---------text---------char_box
numerical_box----number-------numerical_box
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming
AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field
text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box
Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
``question_ids`` field name is quite difficult to understand as we wonder why
there is such a field on user input model. As its purpose is to store questions
user has to answer (randomly chosen or all chosen) let us rename it to
``predefined_question_ids``.
Moreover starting from now on if it is now given at create it is automatically
computed. Classic flows go through ``survey._create_answer()`` method that
prepares them accordingly. However tests or demo data do not necessarily go
through that method and it makes scoring fail (notably) if people forget
to define them.
Let us automatically generate them at user input create if not given.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced:
``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate
that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is
* ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
on a given row;
* ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
questions;
It adds two benefits
* it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
* it better indicates the use;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZ_SCORE ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, quiz_score field to scoring_percentage
``quiz_score`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZZ_PASSED ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success
``quizz_passed`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME TOKEN ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
on survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token
Survey user input model holds two token field. One is used to distinguish
a pool of attempts linked to a given invite: ``invite_token``. The other
one is used to control access to a specific user input. It means that
``invite_token`` indicates a set of user inputs and each of them is accessed
through its own ``token``. To be coherent with other naming in odoo this
latter field is renamed to ``access_token``.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME THANKS_YOU_MESSAGE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done
In this commit we rename thanks_you_message field. Indeed for certifications
or recruitment form, "thank you" is not really the unique content you
would get in a post-survey message. We therefore rename it to description_done
to better indicate its use.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME CERTIFICATE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification
All certification related fields on survey model begin with certification_ .
Only the boolean one telling if a survey is a certification or not is called
certificate. In order to ease grep and ordering it is renamed to certification.
SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME PASSING_SCORE ON SURVEY.SURVEY
on survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min
``passing_score`` field name is not really the best name we could find.
Renaming the field using a ``scoring_`` prefix allow to know this field
is linked to the scoring mechanism.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to
answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from
``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with
general odoo naming guidelines.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.
After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.
As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model
* ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
used to display suggested values to the user;
* ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
columns which seems easier to understand;
In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model
* ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS: QUESTION FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title.
Question model holds two fields for its title: ``title`` and ``question``.
Question is simply a related on title, making the two fields completely
redundant. It is mainly due to historical reasons, when updating models for
certifications and eLearning. In this commit we keep only title field and
remove the question related field as it adds unnecessary complexity to the
model.
SPECIFICATIONS: INPUT_TYPE FIELD ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT
On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect.
``input_type`` field exists on user input model to tell whether answer has
been created through invite or through manual click on a survey page. It
has been added a long time ago when surveys were either open to everyone,
either closed and on invite only.
Since eLearning and certification surveys access mode on surveys has evolved.
Notably being able to distinguish invite from manual survey user input is not
necessary anymore. Indeed what is important is the way people can reach the
survey, not how they created their user input.
Invitation creates token and this can be used if people effectively want to
find invitation-related user inputs.
Since 09ea5c7d49 manual entries still in draft are garbage collected.
Reason is still unclear as it is not obvious that tons of unnecessary entries
will be created. As this seems like unnecessary optimization this commit
removes that feature along with the input_type field.
SPECIFICATIONS: REPLACE URLS FIELDS BY METHODS ON SURVEY.{SURVEY, USER_INPUT}
On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods
In this commit we remove some remaining of URL fields that are better found
using methods. Both survey and user input holds a "start" url field that is
replaced by a method call ``get_start_url`` on both survey (generic) and
user input (token specific) models. We also introduced a ``get_print_url``
method doing the same for the printable version of survey / user input.
SPECIFICATIONS: REMOVE CATEGORY FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY
On survey.survey, remove unused category field.
Survey model holds a ``category`` field whose purpose is to be able to somehow
categorize surveys according to their use. However using this field is not
easy as it is hidden and is a simple selection field. Module should add their
own key. Its sole use is in ``hr_recruitment_survey`` which is a niche module.
Let us clean models and lessen model complexity.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
This commit adds possibility to select a layout for certification rendering.
User can choose among 6 predefined layouts carefully designed and that should
cover all use cases, therefore removing any need of allowing customization.
It also adds possibility to preview certification directly from survey.
closes odoo/odoo#32675
Task: 1967652
Pr: #32675
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Mourier <qmo@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Purpose is to perform some cleaning in survey models: naming, ordering,
dead code [0]. As new features are about to land in survey, notably live
interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning
is necessary [3].
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove dead code :
* old code bits not used anymore since several code cleanings have
already been performed;
* use tools when possible instead of manually checking stuff like
email validation;
* clean unused imports;
No functional changes should occur with this commit. It contains only
code move, not any change at all.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2144393 (surveys split / cleaning)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
[3] Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
PR #40623
PURPOSE
Purpose is to perform some cleaning in survey models: naming, ordering,
dead code [0]. As new features are about to land in survey, notably live
interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning
is necessary [3].
SPECIFICATIONS
Code move main points
* move fields to have them grouped by main use;
* move methods to have them grouped by main purpose;
* reorganize some line breaks to ease reading files;
Globally this code move is done according to our famous guidelines.
No functional changes should occur with this commit. It contains only
code move, not any change at all.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2144393 (surveys split / cleaning)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
[3] Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
PR #40623
Purpose of this commit is to ensure challenge linked to surveys linked to
slides have ``slides`` category, while challenge linked to surveys not
linked to slides (if changing survey_id for example) have ``certification``
category.
With this patch challenges are correctly categorized, allowing to accurately
filter them based on their category.
Task ID : 1961053
PR #32594
This commit simplifies the answer_tag and question name
by removing the survey_id (uses now only question id) for the most simple cases
Factorise the save and validate survey answers to avoid duplicate code
Review posted submit data :
- process all questions by question type (instead of using form data
(key,value) that needed key parsing and was un-typed)
- regroup answers by questions and adapt all validation and save flow
- remove post data in save and validate question methods
and uses directly the answer(s)
- remove useless input names
The tests have been adapted consequently
Task ID : 1930132
PR #32419
Purpose of this commit is
- to make the survey js controller a widget, to be more 'odoo-standard'.
- to lessen number of RPCs and clean old code for prefilling and validation of
surveys.
Clean Prefill :
Prefill can be done directly in the template as the template has already
all the needed values (in answer object).
Clean Validation :
Validation is done at server side and is independant from prefilling values.
Dates:
Dates are now formatted directly in the template, at rendering, using a
format_date fonction pointer called in the template.
Don't use widget in review mode:
Remove o_survey_form class from review template as only dates were processed in
the widget for review template.
Breadcrumb :
Remove button previous, prev=prev and go_back mechanism :
The previous page is handled by the breadcrump
Remove redirect url mechanism.
Breadcrumb now saves the answers when going to a previous page.
Move o_survey_form class to a higher div to englobe breadcrumb in the widget
and ease his handling.
Remove locale load as already done in session.js#load_modules
This commit modifies the route type of survey submit to work in json.
The js survey form controller calls now manually the route via rpc.
Task ID : 1930132
PR #32419
Since commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/dba478332681dd21a39c4a183c002b1cf6e046d2, a survey can have questions with no section
associated, which means 'page_ids' field will be empty.
This prevents to display some questions of a survey, as we are
still expecting a structure page/questions. To solve it, we first
append questions with no sections, then all other questions.
closesodoo/odoo#39113
X-original-commit: 149657cfd696e5065b55519927973fa785cc0e22
Signed-off-by: Alex Tuyls <alt-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
When accessing answers (survey.user_input) through the survey form view, we used a separate action
to hide the test entries.
This could be confusing when you actually wanted to see the test entries for that survey.
This commit changes that to use a default filter instead, leading to the same visual behavior.
Task #2058598closesodoo/odoo#36835
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When a user tests the Survey, he should not get a valid certification document when he succeeds.
To avoid that, we add a "specimen" watermark on the background when the user_input is a test_entry.
In addition, we also don't send the mail containing the certification for test entries.
Task#2058598
Still due to some recent ORM changes: finding a real ID, assigning values
even in create mode with default values.
Task 2058598 (survey internal testing)
PR #36756
Before:
The method _get_mark called Model.exists() just after calling
Model.browse
This process makes 2 calls to database to do almost the same thing
Now:
Removed the method _get_mark and directly call Model.browse
FP feedback
Task 2066646
This commit header is quite fun. If a question is not a question it should
not have a type. Maybe it should not be a question but, hey, you don't always
do what you want. That's life my dear Lucette.
In this commit we remove required attribute from python field definition of
question_type and make it required conditional based. Real questions have a
type, unreal questions have no type.
Alss update Questions menu entry to display only real questions, not unreal
questions.
Most of this commit message makes no sense, but remember who asked to push
this model.
Task 2053833
closesodoo/odoo#35835
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Hardik K Prajapati <hap@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Perform a back2basics review of survey to improve daily use, new user
onboarding and labelling.
SPECIFICATIONS
When finishing a certification survey, add an overall correctness circular
graph. Quarters are
* correct
* partially (if multiple corrects answers on the survey);
* incorrect
* unanswered
Questions without points are not displayed in this graph.
LINKS
Task 2039068
PR #36229
PURPOSE
Perform a back2basics review of survey to improve daily use, new user
onboarding and labelling.
SPECIFICATIONS
Order answer lines following question order.
Display section in answer lines form view to better understand question and
answer organization.
Add a correct flag on answer lines and display it in user input embedded
view in order to know which line are correct.
LINKS
Task 2039068
PR #36229
PURPOSE
Perform a back2basics review of survey to improve daily use, new user
onboarding and labelling.
SPECIFICATIONS
Reorder some code to better understand module organization.
LINKS
Task 2039068
PR #36229
PURPOSE
Perform a back2basics review of survey to improve daily use, new user
onboarding and labelling.
SPECIFICATIONS
Improve labels of fields and wording in actions. See commit content for proper
specifications.
LINKS
Task 2039068
PR #36229
In order to display some stats on survey's card (in the kanban view), the survey's card has been reorganized:
We remove all the button present in the bottom of the card, button concerned are:
• analyze answers
• test
• share
We recreate the button "share" in the dropdown menu of the card.
We add the next information:
- For each survey with scoring, the number of people who passed the test is displayed as well as the success rate.
- For each survey with scoring and certification, a certification icon is displayed and the string "passed" (corresponding to the number of people who passed the test) bec$
TASK-ID : 2045617
closesodoo/odoo#35479
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
PURPOSE
eLearning should have its own application in manager. Indeed this is becoming
a big application and having it embedded inside Website application is not
enough anymore. It should also hold updated and easy-to-use menus,
navigation, actions and views in backend.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add menu entry inside Courses
* Certifications: kanban view of surveys of type certificate
Add menu entry inside Reporting
* Certifications: list view on surveys of type certificate
Columns: Title, Survey Stage, Registered People, Certified People, Attempts
Success Rate (certified/attempts), Average Results
LINKS
Task 1978729
PR #35061
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jérémy Hennecart <jeh@odoo.com>
Adds two stats button on res.partner form view :
- The first one will show all the courses that the partner is following.
- The second one will show all the certifications the partner has passed.
When the partner is a company :
- All the courses followed by all the partners are shown without duplicate.
- All the certifications passed by all the partners are shown.
PR : #34908
Task ID : 2034097
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
To avoid having to wait the cron that distribute badges to elligible users,
we run the cron manually at the survey passed
if the survey is a certification and if the certification delivers a badge.
Task ID : 1935136
PR #31486
This commit allow gaining a badge at the end of a certification survey if succeeded.
The badge can be configured on the survey if the certification mode is activated.
The badge is linked directly to the survey and not the challenge,
because it makes more sense to configure directly the reward on the survey and
not the way to gain this reward. As the way is always the same.
Only one badge can be set on the certification survey.
Only the name, description, image and badge level can be configured.
The rest of badge configuration is automatically set to correspond to the use case.
When a badge is configured on a certification survey, the needed challange, goal
and challenge line are autogenerated.
The badge is available on the user's profile page if he gained it.
Once the badge is configured on the survey, he cannot be changed
(remove + create new one), only modified (badge attributes edition).
The only way to remove the badge is to uncheck 'certification_give_badge'.
When removing the badge from the certification survey, all the autogenerated
records (at badge creation) are deleted to avoid ghost records (as they have
no purpose outside of this context). If the badge is owned by someone, the badge
is only archived. If nobody owns the badge, the badge is deleted.
Survey users now have the right to create badges but not challenges or goals.
All the autogenerated records are handled in sudo, to allow the survey user
to configure a badge on their survey.
Note : To avoid having to rewrite the complete context in an xpath expression
only to display the certification badge on the user's profile page,
the default website_published value of the certification badge is defined
directly in the survey module even if survey does not depend of website.
This attribute will be ignored until website module is installed.
Task ID : 1935136
Closes PR #31486
Purpose
=======
This commit adds the attempt number on the answer (= survey.user_input)
form & tree views.
The attempt number is always relative to its "pool" of attempts and
depends on the "invite_token" if specified.
ex: Attempt n° 2 / 4 (where "4" is the attempts_limit of the related survey).
closesodoo/odoo#31771
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
As other modules than survey (namely hr_skills) now need a hook to add specific
behavior when a survey answer is marked as 'done', we removed the '_send_certification'
method and replaced it with a '_mark_done' method.
It will make it easier to override this method as it has a more generic meaning.
closesodoo/odoo#32880
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
- When tyring to test a survey as a "Survey User" you are redirected to the
homepage.
This is due to a faulty access rights check that only allows "Survey
Managers" to test them.
closesodoo/odoo#33132
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
David Beguin