RATIONALE
Event will soon gain a major update called Event Online, allowing to better
support full-online events. In order to prepare its merge, preparatory merge
are done to lessen the final diff and have a smooth integration in a stable
version (13.3).
PURPOSE
Purpose of this merge is to clean visitor synchronization and tests. It
prepares further improvements to visitor model linked to Event Online.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add anchor methods to somehow merge visitors and update partner linked
to visitors and their sub records.
Main idea would be to be able to
* avoid unlinking visitors, notably because we have keys linked to them
allowing push notifications. As a given user may be linked to several
devices (different keys / different visitors) keeping them in database
improves push efficiency;
* allow to link sub-records to a main visitor, like tracked pages history,
even if multiple visitors are linked to the same identity;
In this stable we cannot remove current unlink of duplicate visitors due
to constraint of partner_id / visitor_id. However those methods allow to
tweak behavior by override. This will be done in future tasks.
LINKS
Task ID 2290016 (improve visitor synchronization and tests)
Prepares Task ID 2252655 (main Online Event task)
Prepares Task ID 2284043 (Visitor-based track wishlist)
PR #54036
X-original-commit: 8a8d2d4412d1b58545ee4f0240cca5114e541b6a
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Beguin <dbe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
If a visitor logs in (and has a visitor_id in his cookie), the partner will be
linked to the visitor. If, after 1 week, the visitor tries to connect again
with a different session (or another visitor_id in cookies), the authenticate
will crash because
* _cron_archive_visitors applies on visitor inactive since at least a week
* there can be only one visitor per partner (sql constraint)
* the visitor linked to the partner is not retrieved (because archived) and
we try to link the partner to a new visitor.
Further than that, if the visitor is archived and the linked partner wants to
login again with a new visitor_id, we should
* reactivate the previous visitor,
* copy history from newest to previous one,
* delete the newest one
Note that last two points were already done before this commit.
Task ID: 2120464
PR #40199Fixes#40077Fixes#40301closesodoo/odoo#41273
Original-signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
X-original-commit: 53a6bed3b5c1ae09be490254ed09f18acbb970c4
Signed-off-by: David Beguin <dbeguin@users.noreply.github.com>
When you try to create two users with the same login, the shown error message is
the Postgresql integrity error instead of a nice (translated) validation error.
This happens since bf88f3e which changed the way error messages are translated.
The reason is the manually created unique index `res_users_login_key_unique_website_index`.
The error handling and translation mechanisms don't know it exists.
The index was created for performance reasons in commit b5a12b4 where the
original python constraint was replaced with this custom SQL index.
In this commit, the python constraint is re-introduced to remove the index hack,
but the implementation now uses a single SQL query, which should be quite fast.
closesodoo/odoo#38737
X-original-commit: 817a811ec98b0c313b12e6464b5e98ca432cb3fc
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
The update of visit_count now uses website_track instead of
website_visitor_lastconnection for less complex query and better
precision.
The name of a visitor is now changed only if it has no partner linked
and the # is removed
The cookie was not reset when a new partner connects or if a partner
disconnects. Now a check is performed to ensure the cookie belongs to
the partner/public user.
Now website visitors that log in will be added to the previous
website visitor of the partner. This way we have a full history and only
one visitor per partner.
Now a partner is able to delete a recently viewed product from his
recently viewed product list.
task-2072877
This commit adds the website_visitor model that will be used
to track website visitor activity (page viewed, number of visits and
more general info about the visitor (country, lang, etc..)
This model will, in later commit, be used to send chat requests
and push notification from the operators (or backend users)
directly to the visitor.
- A website_visitor is created once the visitor is requesting
a website.page that is tracked.
- A website_visitor is considered as connected if his last tracked
website_page request is within the last 5 minutes.
- The number of visits for a website_visitor is incremented
if his last tracked website_page request was at least 8 hours ago.
- A website_visitor is only handled by the system. Users cannot
create, edit or delete a website_visitor.
- A unique website_visitor is created per website.
That means that the same real person can triggers multiple visitor
creation if visits multiple websites.
This is because, for livechat purpose on later commit, for example,
the chat request can be created on the correct livecaht channel
(linked to the correct website)
- The visitor is recognized via his cookie (visitor_id). So if the visitor
flush his cookies, a new visitor will be created the next time he will
request a tracked website_page.
- Link user's res.partner to website.visitor.
If a website_visitor log in
(a visitor that has visitor_id in his cookie),
the website_visitor is linked to the res.partner.
The website visitor name is than adapted to match the name of
the first res.partner linked to the visitor.
A visitor can have multiple partners as the same session
can be used by multiple person (one PC for a team for example).
To keep a detailed history of the visitor page views,
we add a website.visitor.page model that makes the link
between visitor and website.page but that keeps the visit date.
So that we can see if a visitor went mulitple times
on the same page and when. It's usefull to see his last page views.
Task ID : 2028059
PR #34624
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Since b5a12b4aac the website_id was not set anymore.
Indeed, before this commit website_id was the field from the inherits, thus
when writing on website_id from res.user, we would write on the partner field.
But with b5a12b4aac the website_id was explicitely overrided on res.users as a
related to res.partner (its inherits) with readonly=True.
Thus, writting website_id on res.users was not working anymore.
closesodoo/odoo#33521
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
- Create 2 companies A & B
- For each company, create a website linked to a different URL and
activate 'Free sign up' and 'Specific User Account'.
- As a public user, go to website of company B
- Go to 'Sign in > Don't have an account?' and create an account
The user is created in company A (the company of the user template)
instead of company B (the company of the website).
We set the company of the user based on the company of the website.
opw-1962197
closesodoo/odoo#32823
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Constraints in SQL are faster than python equivalent.
Adding a coalesce in PostgreSQL constraint doesn't seems possible.
This combination of constraint and weird named unique index is the
fastest way to ensure a unique constraint with NULL values.
This index require the website_id to be present in the res_users
table. To do this, a stored readonly related field is used.
This was introduced by 4f6ec1cd2a
From now, when you install a theme, it load the data from xml to template
table theme [ir.ui.view|ir.attachment|website.page|website.menu].
Data are only copied from this template table into the real table when you
choose a theme on a website; Making them website_specific and with a link
to the original to allow futur update.
A special case is done to create theme.ir.ui.view when you are installing
a theme, even if you continue to use template tag to create quick view.
Co-authored-by: Derie Romain <rde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Kersten Jérémy <jke@odoo.com>
This implements support to administer multiple websites. Although the
core functionality already existed, managing multiple websites was
fairly technical.
In the interest of database updates and migration this attempts to
keep duplicated data to a minimum. To do this the usual generic
records are rendered unless some website-specific record exists that
replaces it. Copy-on-write (COW) is used to create these
website-specific records. Through this mechanism creating a
website-specific record is delayed until necessary. A COW mechanism
has been implemented on 4 models: ir.ui.view, website.page,
website.menu and ir.attachment. These COW mechanisms are activated
when editing data through the website (aka frontend). These frontend
edits (e.g. with web_editor) will be website-specific, possibly
creating a website-specific record when necessary. When editing data
in the backend nothing special will happen, even when editing a
generic record. Note that because of this mechanism also facilitates
the ability to create new, uncustomized websites because the generic
data is kept.
Support is provided for a website to have any theme. Themes are fairly
complex to handle. Standalone themes can depend on other standalone
themes (e.g. theme_beauty depends on theme_loftspace) and themes
usually modify some data of the themes they depend on. Because a theme
can be installed on multiple websites, using website_id m2o fields
does not work well. It would require duplicate data, making updates
and migration harder. Because of this, data for themes (ir.ui.view and
ir.attachment specifically) have a theme_id m2o. website has a
theme_ids m2m that identifies all theme modules currently installed on
it. Through these fields we figure out what to render. A theme is only
fully uninstalled when it's no longer active on any website. The
advantage of this approach is that upgrading or migrating theme data
is no different from the single-website case.
The website.published.mixin class was modified to handle multiple
websites. A wizard was added in the backend to easily manage this for
multiple website.
Although not used anywhere in this commit, a 'website_id' variable has
been added in the evaluation context of ir.rule. It allows to easily
make any model multi-website aware, all that's needed is a custom
website_id m2o field on a model and a custom record rule.
This commit:
1. Adds settings to install the new `web_unsplash` enterprise module.
See counterpart commit on enterprise for details.
2. Export `ImageWidget` and `update_control_panel` to be able to override them.
3. Add the unsplash access key rights to website designer. (see related OE
commit)
task-35060
Closes#25825, closes#25637
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field
