Commit Graph
2189 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jorge Pinna PuissantandSamuel Degueldre f43a0814ae [IMP]*: configuration of ESLint for specific files
This commit will add the needed ESLint configurations on the JS files.
These configurations are added if the JS file uses a different
environment (serviceworker, node, etc) or if it uses a specific global
(google, ace, etc).

Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
2021-05-04 13:32:49 +00:00
Philémon van HeldenandNicolas Lempereur 1d3c886b95 [FIX] web: no error on single active_ids state load
In eg. 13.0 when refreshing sales analysis action of a product, we would
get an error because we have a single active_ids which is not expected
by the code.

With this commit, we use .toString() on the jQuery BBQ parsed active_ids
as it was done before 32b8cec5 refactoring (january 2018).

The added test with the fix fails with an error:

  TypeError: state.active_ids.split is not a function
  at Class.loadState (/web/static/src/js/chrome/action_manager_act_window.js)

opw-2471982

closes odoo/odoo#70285

X-original-commit: bf9a985f4b62cc6f1eef4f9fcca2a8dfbd453004
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: pvh-odoo <SwagSamaSempai@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lempereur <nle@odoo.com>
2021-05-03 18:01:10 +00:00
Simon Genin (ges) ecfe85db84 [REF] web: static/src/(img|fonts) => static/(img|fonts) 2021-04-29 07:34:40 +00:00
Aaron Bohy b592d119e5 [FIX] web: make test pass on chrome 90
The changed test uses the drag&drop helper, and an operation does
not work as expected with the given params on chrome 90. The runbot
currently uses chrome 80, so it is not an issue, but if your chrome
is up-to-date, and you try to run the test suite, this test would
fail.

closes odoo/odoo#70032

X-original-commit: 43994da9980e4133274984f720bb58f3546ea0f9
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-04-28 14:35:07 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) a3b3ca9568 [FIX] web: fix bouncing edit button prevention
The PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/68799 tried to prevent the
form's edit button to bounce when quick editing.
The fix was wrong and some field continued to bounce the button.

This commit prevents the edit button to bounce when clicking on
any field by checking if we are quick editing.

closes odoo/odoo#69826

X-original-commit: 8393b3c51b38bd285acb91279cb08a28c241c9ca
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-04-26 09:35:30 +00:00
Xavier Morel 95128e6472 [FIX] web: test broken in Firefox
This is arguably a 20 years old Firefox bug (at the very least an
under-specified area of the spec where Firefox's behaviour is
technically allowed under spec but not super useful or convenient):
`window.getSelection()` simply doesn't work when invoked on a form
field: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85686.

Getting the selection data more explicitly by looking up the focused
form element, then checking *its* selection, seems to work fine and be
cross-browser.

Also focus() the input while at it: according to MDN

> Calling element.select() will not necessarily focus the input, so it
> is often used with HTMLOrForeignElement.focus.

And jQuery doesn't really document whether `select()` will implicitly
`focus()`, so better safe than sorry.

closes odoo/odoo#69579

Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
2021-04-21 06:22:48 +00:00
Xavier Morel f6790b9895 [IMP] web: drop event during click() dispatching if disabled
Causes the failure of [0] on FF as it expects that clicking a disabled
button does nothing, which is what happens for Chrome, but the event
is dispatched for Firefox.

Asking the internet it looks like Firefox is in the right here:
click() ultimately calls dispatchEvent (directly), dispatchEvent
should go through even on disabled event. This was specifically fixed
in Firefox[1], and there is an issue opened against Chrome[2] (cf
also: spec discussion[3]).

There's an other issue which mentions inconsistencies between the
actual browser and WPT[4], but for us Chrome always 100% does the
"wrong" thing.

Anyway add a disabled flag in click, though I don't know that it's the
right fix, and it may need to be added to other events as well?

[0] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c89cdcf11c66e80c33cd77edceaee7eb59a704b3/addons/web/static/tests/fields/relational_fields/field_many2one_tests.js#L2044
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329509
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1115661
[3] https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5805#issuecomment-672960163
[4] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1116161
2021-04-20 14:11:30 +00:00
Xavier Morel fe8204a48d [FIX] web: overspecified test
Testing what's literally just a native feature seems odd, but in this
case it's also way over-specified: Firefox's error message for the
conversion of a symbol to a number is

    can't convert symbol to number
2021-04-20 14:10:31 +00:00
Sunil Shrimali 7c2fb9bb16 [IMP] web: set visible overflow on modal for inline domain editor
When we have (inline) domain widget within a modal, user can not see
all the fields because overflow is hidden on the modals by default.
This is not ideal behavior.

With this commit, when the inline domain editor is opened with field
widget within a modal, we allow field selector to overflow by
manually setting visible overflow on the parent modal. The changes
are inspired by 'DomainSelectorDialog'.

Task ID-2480625
COM odoo/odoo#68586
2021-04-21 07:49:12 +00:00
Aaron Bohy c0c6be8dd1 [FIX] web: properly unpatch session after each test
Before this commit, `getTZOffset` and `user_has_group` weren't
correctly reset to their initial values after tests. As a
consequence tests executed afterwards might behave unexpectedly.

closes odoo/odoo#69497

X-original-commit: b7b83db88c61d7db87045d87b09d7348f3a8a9eb
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-04-19 15:48:31 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) 3036fc05b8 [FIX] web: fix widget wrapper and weekdays widget
Before this commit, `WidgetWrapper` tried to redirect the call to
`updateState` on its wrapped component but it can happen that the
wrapper is not mounted yet and thus calling a function on its wrapped
component will crash.

This commit changes the implementation of `WidgetWrapper.updateState`
to redirect the call to `this.update` which will update the props of
the wrapped component and not directly its state.

task 2504521

closes odoo/odoo#69421

X-original-commit: 67f09b9a9df248fec26f53758e76070ab3171435
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-04-16 16:04:00 +00:00
Jérémy Hennecart ac13964244 [IMP] calendar: improve the way calendar event are displayed
With this commit we try to improve the way the events are displayed
to the user. Now, an event is displayed for each attendee of the event
that are selected in the filter. These events are displayed correctly
based on the status of the attendee in the event.
The colors displayed for the events now represent the attendees and not the
organizer.

If an attendee edit an event, it is edited for all others attendees.
Also, when an attendee that is not the organizer try to delete the event,
then the event is now declined in place of being deleted. If the organizer
delete the event, it is deleted for all attendees.

In case of an event where all attendees have declined it but the organizer,
the organizer see now a danger icon before the name of the event and it's
outlined and not filled with color, no matter of the actual status of the
organizer in the event.

task-2196775
COM PR: odoo/odoo#55190
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#12196
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#1532
2021-04-15 16:07:12 +00:00
Simon Genin (ges)andjeh-odoo 0774459f5d [IMP] web: prepare calendar view to ease modifications
The calendar renderer used a template for events.
Now moved as a configurable template to ease futur calendar changes.

This commit adds also a custom event to the calendar renderer so that custom
implementations have a way to re-render the event items within the calendar
after making internal changes to the event records.

We introduce also a new option for a field "filter_field" which allows to specify
the field of the model in which we will save the status of a filter.

This is preliminary changes in order to make the calendar view able to modify
the attendance status of a meeting and refresh the events to visually display
if the user is attending or not.

Task ID 2196775
COM PR: odoo/odoo#55190
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#12196
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#1532

Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jeh-odoo <jeh@odoo.com>
2021-04-15 14:05:10 +00:00
Aaron Bohy facd78d5f3 [FIX] web: onchange: send correct nested x2manys values
Commit [1] recently fixed an issue with nested x2many fields and
onchanges: in some cases, all field values weren't sent to the
server as they should.

However, there is a small issue with this fix. We didn't correctly
apply the default value to option `changesOnly`: when not given,
it was considered false, whereas in this particular function it
should have been true.

It caused an issue in the following scenario:

Have a form view with an x2many field (say A) displayed as a list.
In the list, there is another x2many field (say B), and (whatever
its type) a field C with an onchange. When the user changes C, the
onchange is performed, and we send to the server the value of all
fields. In particular, in the row, we send the value for the
many2one field pointing to the main record (the inverse field of
the x2many relation). The value for that field is basically the
whole record, containing itself field A. For field A, the value is
a list of commands, and for the updated record, it is a command 1.
Before this commit, in the values sent for this command, field B
was the empty array, even if it wasn't empty.

This issue was reproducible in account.move, on an existing record
having already a line in invoice_line_ids (this is field A). In
that line, tax_ids (this is field B) must have a tax which is
included in the price. When changing the quantity of the product,
the subtotal wasn't correctly computed.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a8b43d02066b2299ac2f4b88056c37725e9ce6cd
opw~2489755

closes odoo/odoo#69227

X-original-commit: 3f54ca3e29d1537f66c6a3b56494dc065d9230e9
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-04-14 09:01:34 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) b73545ff2a [FIX] web: no bounce button form field/label click
Since commit [1], a delay was added to "debounce" the quick edit to
check if the user did a click or a select.
Because of this delay, the edit button now bounces when clicking on
a field or label.

In this commit, we check if the user clicks on a "quick editable"
field or a label to prevent bouncing.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/2939ea4dd4736e659cc3e4df2226a3b08ac8ec48

closes odoo/odoo#68835

X-original-commit: 755a02135049f22e1e8db356169b5224f00c1f92
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-04-06 13:50:07 +00:00
Alexandre Kühn 1874d6e827 [IMP] mail: Attachment viewer header UX on mobile
Task-ID 2200168

closes odoo/odoo#66614

Related: odoo/enterprise#16579
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
2021-03-31 16:53:24 +00:00
Mohammed ShekhaandMathieu Duckerts-Antoine 3ed1890c7a [IMP] web: use search groupbys in pivot
Before this commit: all groupable fields were offered to selection when
a user would click on a suitable pivot header. While guaranteeing maximal
flexibility, this was easily overwhelming to any new commer.

After this commit: when at least one groupby is defined in the search
arch, the selection is done in the search arch groupbys (plus eventually
some custom groupbys) via a menu similar to the "Group By" menu in the
control panel. The advanced users have still access to more options in a
"Add custom group" menu again as in the control panel. When no groupby
is defined in the search arch, the selection is done among the groupable
fields as before.
This has led to a small modification of control_panel_model_extension.js:
it has become necessary to distinguish the groupBy filters coming from
the arch from those created by the user via the "Add custom group" menu.

Task ID: 2376505

closes odoo/odoo#61572

Related: odoo/enterprise#17341
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
2021-03-31 13:56:38 +00:00
Aaron Bohy c89cdcf11c [FIX] web: tests: patch form multiClickTime once for all
A lot of tests in different QUnit modules need this delay to be
patched to 0. Some of them (e.g. the 'ActionManager > Misc' module)
didn't patch it correctly. It worked before because a patch was
done in a previous test, and wasn't unpatch. The previous commit
ensures the patch is removed, so now we have at least 2 tests of
the above mentionned module that fail. This commit ensures that
the delay is patched in every tests, and allows to specify a
custom delay if necessary.
2021-03-31 09:30:07 +00:00
Aaron Bohy a3937cfde5 [FIX] web: tests: properly unpatch after test
For testing purpose, the multi-click timeout delay of the quick
edit is patched. However, in this specific test, it is patched
twice (once to set it to 0 in beforeEach, and once to set it to 50
in the test itself). A single call to unpatch removes the second
patch (50) but keeps the first one, for the remaining of the test
suite. This could lead to weird situations where the whole suite
passes, but a single test executed on its own fails.

Issue spotted in the assets revamp PR, as it alters the test order.
2021-03-31 09:30:07 +00:00
Mohammed Shekha 8b6063ac16 [IMP] web, *: discard unchanged record in editable list
* sale_product_matrix

Before this commit, if we created a new row in an editable list view,
do not "touched" it and clicked out of the list then the record tried
to be saved and threw error notifications.
Now, that flow will discard the record to make it consistent with the
form view which discards the record when we leave the form.

task-2431691

closes odoo/odoo#68382

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-30 10:44:25 +00:00
Simon Genin (ges) 51e660c47e [IMP] web: align date range widget behavior with date picker's.
The range date lib would open the selector on focus.
This is a behavior we don't want in lists, but want to keep in quickedit
forms.

Task id: 2492914

closes odoo/odoo#68390

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-29 09:38:07 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur 0e004e1b7c [FIX] web: no quick edit on mouse text selection
Do not trigger quick edit when we are selection text with mouse:

- click and holding to select text
- multiple clicks selecting text

Since click on an editable field now change the edit mode, we could no
longer select the text.

With this change, quick edit is delayed by a given delay and if the edit
mode is not enabled if:

- there is a subsequent click within the delay
- there is a text selection when the click event is handled

closes #68023

X-original-commit: 2939ea4dd4736e659cc3e4df2226a3b08ac8ec48
2021-03-22 16:59:38 +00:00
yograj tandelandMohammed Shekha ef62df2bfd [IMP] web: consider FieldDependencies given on custom widget
With this commit we support adding FieldDependencies on custom widget, consider
FieldDependencies given on custom widget and add it to fieldInfo so that when
modal does calls to server to fetch data it consider those fields while reading

this will let us to design custom widget which may have some other fields in
dependency, say for example weekly recurrence widget which uses sun, mon etc.
fields, so with this we can fetch data of those dependent fields without adding
it to view.

task-2335399

closes odoo/odoo#60277

Related: odoo/upgrade#2021
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
2021-03-26 12:25:44 +00:00
YOGRAJ TANDELandMohammed Shekha 7da9c296eb [ADD] calendar,lunch,web: weekly recurrent widget
with this commit we adding weekly recurrent widget, currently proeject and
calendar shows boolean for each day vertically but with this widget we displays
week days and its boolean horizontally.

Here widget will display first day as per language's week_start field, also we
adds FieldDependencies on custom widget and consider those FieldDependencies
while processing view node in basic_view.js

We add support of registry to contain owl custom widgets and add support
of rendering owl custom widgets.

Also with this commit we removes fields like sun, mon, tue etc. from view and
instead use "web_weekly_recurrence" custom widget to display boolean for each
week day.

Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
2021-03-26 12:25:44 +00:00
Mohammed ShekhaandAaron Bohy 877ef5552b [IMP] web: add support of owl custom widget
add support of <widget> tag for owl, In order to prepare the future,
we want to convert everything in Owl, in future widgets generated by
<widget> tag will also be converted to owl.

with this commit we support widget to instantiate using ComponentWrapper.

task-2337692

Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-26 12:25:44 +00:00
Simon Genin (ges) 3d0b77a711 [FIX] web: remove memory leak in editable list used as one2many
The confirmUpdate method in list_editable_renderer would destroy all
rows' widgets and recreate them *except* the currently modified one
(this one gets updated).

The problem was that the widgets of the current row were recreated
anyway. It created a memory leak.

This memory leak isn't such a big deal, as anything is garbage
collected as soon as the view is left anyway (so it's a small leak
during the lifetime of the x2many list)

The fix consists in keeping the reference of the widgets on the
currently modified row, and when all rows' widgets are recreated, we
delete a replace by our reference for the current row.

closes odoo/odoo#68386

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-26 13:27:48 +00:00
Simon Genin (ges) a52d32822d [FIX] web: o2m list editable updates did not call on_attach_callback
In a list editable used as a one2many representation, inside the
confirmUpdate method, the on_attach_callback method on the field widgets
wasn't called.

It wasn't detected earlier because most of the legacy widgets didn't
implement this callback (all owl components do however).

It was problematic as the confirmUpdate function destroys and recreates
all the field widgets (with exception for the currently modified row).
Not calling the on_attach_callback would result in missing / unexpected
behavior such as _applyDecoration not being called.

The fix is simple: call the method if it exists on all the widgets after
they have been created.
2021-03-26 13:27:17 +00:00
Barad Mahendra 9a57330d06 [IMP] web: display the default label next to the icon in state_selection
Purpose of the commit is to display the default label next to the icon
for state_selection widget in list view.
also that widget support the hide_label option to hide the label in
state_selection widget of the list view.

Related Ent PR: odoo/enterprise#16559

closes odoo/odoo#66589

Taskid: 2451287
Related: odoo/upgrade#2195
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
2021-03-22 08:42:04 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 2c69b323b1 [FIX] web: do not display falsy url field widgets
Before this fix, unset char fields with the url widget in form view
displayed "false", whereas they should simply be empty. This is a
side-effect of commit [1], which aims at reducing the shift between
readonly and edit modes in form views.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/288b24cbdf54ac0dbee7e012f074fac9a0c68238

closes odoo/odoo#68330

X-original-commit: de1f7ab77d37adbbc68e640ea9877721bfc869d2
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-25 11:03:54 +00:00
Mohammed Shekha 2f6dd3d172 [IMP] web: x2many list: update all modifiers after an onchange
Let's assume an x2many list with an onchange. When a sub-record is
modified, an onchange is performed, and it may update other records
in the relation (e.g. the debit/credit case in accounting). This
commit ensures that modifiers are correctly re-evaluated in that
situation, so that they are up-to-date with the new x2many values.

task-2373929

closes odoo/odoo#61911

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-25 10:33:47 +00:00
Krzysztof MagusiakandAaron Bohy b08afa3475 [FIX] web: can update one2many with custom field widget
One might design a custom field widget to display/interact with a
one2many field. Before this commit, if this field widget triggered
a field_changed event to update a related record, it crashed,
because the code assumed that there was a view associated with the
field.

Closes #68276
opw~2468238

closes odoo/odoo#68309

X-original-commit: 3826a2645b94e0f62c719814c4dbe4cc6502e1f2
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-24 14:38:11 +00:00
Laurent Stukkens (LTU) 68d6427a2a [FIX] web: correctly set current_company_id in BasicModel
This commit fix a bug introduced in #66551 where a mismatch has been done between
session.user_context.allowed_company_ids and session.user_companies.allowed_companies.

This commit also adds the following tests:

- a JS test in order to prevent future unwanted issues regarding multi company
  in BasicModel.
- a Python test in order to ensure that session_info['user_companies'] is not
  involuntarily changed.

closes odoo/odoo#68025

Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
2021-03-19 11:29:51 +00:00
Andrea Grazioso (agr-odoo) 01077a32a6 [FIX] web: fix float value representation in export
- Create a product with:
  Cost: 60.80
  Quantity On Hand: 999.0
- Go to Inventory / Reporting / Inventory Valuation
- Click on export all (little button next to "Inventory at date")

The field "Total value" have too many decimals: 60739.2000000004

This occur because of the multiplication: it yield the correct value
(60739.2), but every rounding attempt done, even in the ORM, will
mess up the representation

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/042298f8c949fba470eda6ad90f94c95ca291030/odoo/fields.py#L1333

opw-2438384

closes odoo/odoo#67558

X-original-commit: 67cf82962688360cfe25c6b2118a7dbd17a6ee95
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-03-15 08:43:53 +00:00
Nasreddin (bon)andLucas Perais 9a1de0ef05 [FIX] web: compute default locale of Date(Time)Picker at the right time
Issue
        - Install "Accounting"
        - Change user language to arabic
        - Go to Customer Invoices list view
        - Try to filter on field "Created On"

        Traceback is raised from the DatePicker Component

Cause
	The cause is two fold:
	There is an issue in moment that behaves abnormally when its internals
	are not able to extract the month in a locale, and, instead of returning an
	invalid moment, it returns a valid moment with the month set to January
	which just happens to be the first month of moment's default locale
	ref: https://github.com/moment/moment/issues/5600

	Secondly, the defaultProps "locale" of the DatePicker was set to moment.locale()
	at the file's initial loading, that is, before any user locale parameters were loaded
	The bootstrap datepicker was then set with the wrong locale, and the case fell under moment's issue

After this commit, the locale of the DatePicker is always the one of the user, and there is no traceback

opw-2460156

closes odoo/odoo#68059

X-original-commit: e2c46bb80e1e312dd34ac554d79813ef35282e62
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: bon-odoo <nboulif@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
2021-03-18 09:51:06 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 98ede6e553 [IMP] web: patch/unpatch: better error handling
Before this commit, calling unpatch on an object that hasn't been
patched before crashed (before reaching the code that handles the
case by throwing an Error). This scenario is now properly handled.

This commit also defines specific Error classes for the patch and
unpatch faulty cases, so that they can be elegantly catched (in
tests for example).

closes odoo/odoo#68057

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-03-18 10:25:31 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 6418a55fe4 [IMP] web: patch/unpatch: allow to re-apply a patch
In tests, we might want to disable a specific patch for a specific
test (e.g. to remove a monkey patch done when another addon is
installed, to test the behavior of the current addon).

Before this commit, it was possible to unpatch at the beginning of
the test, but we couldn't re-patch when the test was over.

Feature required by task~2392303
2021-03-18 09:59:53 +00:00
Julien Mougenot 9bf7d15da4 [FIX] web: allow filtering with decimals on price filter + unit test
Issue

	- Install "Sales"
	- Switch to "German" language
	- Go to Sales -> Products -> Products
	- Try to filter on "Public Price" is equal to "2,3"

	Not possible to add decimal point at the end (only in middle of number).

Cause

	In case the 'decimal point' in DB params is not a dot '.',
	the filter input will be considered as 'text' instead of
	'number'.

	In case of the 'number' type; HTML do already a pre and post
	processing, including managing decimal point (who, for example,
	is not included in ev.target.value if last char is a '.').
	Unfortunalty, the library is not well working with other
	language and not supported on every browser, therefore,
	must use own logic.

	In case of a 'text' type, the value will be send to 'parseFloat'
	,then `parseNumber` will replace decimal_point by dot (also one the
	issues since needed to display decimal_point according user language),
	and `Number` will remove the decimal_point in case of '123,' -> '123',
	and therefore we will not be able to write decimals ( apart of adding
	the decimal point after writing the whole number...)

Solution

	If user input is well parsed, store parsed value in condition.value and
	set condition.displayedValue to the input value (an so without updating
	input value). Else, replace input value with previous value (who should
	be the condition.DisplayedValue).

opw-2463441

closes odoo/odoo#67978

X-original-commit: e795ce5bff14b6b748c1f4a2651946aafdc299f4
Signed-off-by: bon-odoo <nboulif@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-03-16 16:02:07 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) d94a1afe69 [FIX] web: quick edit when add a line on m2m
Before this commit, clicking on the "add a line" button on a
many2many list field directly opened the dialog without
switching the form into edit mode.
This is incorrect, the form needs to switch into edit mode otherwise
the selected records are saved and cannot be discarded.

closes odoo/odoo#67919

X-original-commit: 3608e724c6099f0eff5f14cbd844e0d7507d0d1d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-16 09:23:51 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) c56324ea38 [FIX] web: display remove buttons in embedded list
Since the quick edit behaviour has added, embedded lists
can be edited and display the "add a line" buttons  in a
readonly form but not display the remove buttons
This commit fixes that inconsistency.

X-original-commit: 7cc17a345bc9cbe165d061300d91d1ac0e583fc1
2021-03-16 09:23:49 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 09c64c3db4 [FIX] web: do not forget to unpatch in tests
Without this commit, all tests executed after that one would use
the patched version of the FormViewDialog.

Issue spotted in the assets revamp branch, by moving form_tests.js
after calendar_tests.js

closes odoo/odoo#67887

X-original-commit: ff19ee8d8b39a719a09dd9f6060faa3afa474da3
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-03-15 16:10:59 +00:00
Aaron BohyandGéry Debongnie 1988db86aa [FIX] web: nested one2manys, onchange and no command
Let's assume the following situation. We have a form view with a
one2many field A displayed as a list. In the list, there is a
one2many field B. B can't be edited, its value is computed by
an onchange. By default, it contains a single record (i.e. the
first value returned by the onchange is [[5], [0, 0, {...}]]).
When another field (say C) changes, B's value is re-computed to
[[5]]. Moreover, there is an onchange on A.

In this form view, let's assume the following scenario. Create a
new record and add a line to A. In this new line, B already
contains a record. Change C. This triggers an onchange that
returns [[5]], and B is now empty. It triggers a second onchange,
on the main record (as field A changed).

Before this commit, in this second onchange, B's value wasn't sent
among the other values of the new line.

The spec says that for onchanges, we must send all data, not only
what has really changed. From that perspective, the above scenario
highlights an issue.

That issue had two root causes. First, commit [1] wrongly fixed
another issue, and as a consequence, when building what to send
for the onchange, we didn't generate the values for fields that
hadn't changed inside an x2many (for added subrecords at least).
This commit reverts the fix of [1], and fixes it differently by
only sending a command 1 (update) after a command 4 (link to)
when the record is dirty (i.e. when it has been modified). See
[1] for context and details.

Second, the code that generates the values to send to onchanges is
the same as the one that generates the values to save records
(write or create). However, when saving, we only send what has
really changed. The values are at some point processed to remove
empty command lists from the list of changes (as it means that
nothing changed). However, here we ignored the flag that stated
whether we want all field values or just what has changed. This
commit takes the flag into account before removing the field's
value.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/3e3a244e1afc4d74920a6302a14fa2590e8b6648

Issue reported in task~2352524
  Model: account.move
  One2Many (A): account.move.lines
  Nested computed One2Many (B): tax_detail_ids
  Field triggering the onchange (C): tax_ids

closes odoo/odoo#67739

X-original-commit: a3732031d38d7c7e93565cdd3cd4fdf838ae54ec
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
2021-03-12 09:42:21 +00:00
Aaron Bohy cd367a3967 [FIX] web: FieldMany2Many: link/unlink options
Commit [1] altered the way the FieldMany2Many behaves with respect
to 'create' and 'delete' options. Indeed, for many2many fields,
adding or removing records doesn't mean "creating" or "deleting"
records, as it is only about adding/removing records to/from a
relation. This is completely fine and correct.

Unfortunately, a feature has been lost in the process: it is no
longer possible to state that a many2many field should be editable
but should not allow to add (or remove) record to the relation.

This commit fixes the issue by adding two new options: 'link' and
'unlink' for that purpose.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/c98579d25af01c14df4baf57fb4652f3e7469096

opw~2466213

closes odoo/odoo#67495

X-original-commit: df44e65bbbba55a7ee2224ad5b4f13248a39423a
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-08 16:37:38 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 469dd4cad9 [FIX] web: correctly edit Many2ManyCheckboxes with 100+ values
The Many2ManyCheckboxes widget displays all values that could be
in the many2many relation, with a checkbox indicating whether each
value is in the relation or not. It is designed to be set on fields
where the comodel contains a few records (typically, we don't want
to see dozens of checkboxes in the form view). This widget shouldn't
be used on many2manys with a large comodel, as we have better tools
to handle them (like a tree view).

We deal with extreme cases (when the widget is, by mistake,  set on
a field where the comodel is huge) by using the name_search limit
of 100: at most 100 checkboxes are displayed.

Before this commit, this extreme situation wasn't correctly handled.
If there were in the relation records that weren't displayed
(because they weren't inside the 100 limit), then, editing the value
by (un)selecting a checkbox would automatically remove all non
displayed values from the relation.

This commit ensures that we keep in the relation all values that
aren't displayed.

Issue spotted when working on opw~2439041

closes odoo/odoo#67400

X-original-commit: 9e9d3aa78c42ad4ffca3b56a28382ed84078cde3
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-03-05 16:59:25 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 015ad5ff73 [FIX] web: can edit many2many_checkboxes with 40+ values
Before this commit, if the widget "many2many_checkboxes" was set on
a field with more than 40 values in the comodel (i.e. more than 40
checkboxes displayed), (un)selecting a checkbox that wasn't in the
first 40 checkboxes crashed. This was due to the default x2many
limit of 40: we only created a datapoint for the first 40 values,
whereas we could have up to 100 values to process (name_search
server-side limit). Note that this limit of 40 had no other impact
than limitating the number of records processed by the BasicModel,
the maximum number of checkboxes displayed being ruled by the
name_search server-side limit.

This commit ensures that all values returned by the server (at most
100 when this message is written) are processed and can be edited
as expected.

opw~2439041

X-original-commit: d037d12753179d890459b23319b0d769fce62771
2021-03-05 16:59:24 +00:00
Géry Debongnie 11d2e6dde5 [FIX] web: properly apply onchange in some cases
A previous commit (8dbd1efef899fb637acca3c318ae99cb23838b8f) fixed a
part of the basicmodel that used _.each to iterate on an object with
field names as keys, which does not work when a field is named "length".
To fix it, I simply used a native for ... in statement.  However, I
missed the fact that there was a second 'return' statement in the body
of the closure given to _.each, so the onchange method returned
prematurely.

The fix is to simply use the continue statement in that case.

closes odoo/odoo#67267

X-original-commit: d9834e65ee57511f4850fa2d74287eb0b67087b9
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-03-04 15:17:33 +00:00
Odoo's Mergebot f11fcba83c [MERGE] web,hr_timesheet,partner_autocomplete: make multi company timesheet uom work
# Purpose

This PR's primary objective is to ensure that the timesheet uom is working in accordance with the company settings in a multi company environment.

Prior to this PR:

 - The timesheet preferences sent to the front end were always those of the default
   company of the user.
 - The timesheet related widgets initialisation process (adding the correct ones in
   the fieldRegistry) was performed before the front end treatment of cids and coockies
   which prevented applying the front end selected company settings.

After this PR:

 - A dictionnary is used in the session in order to structure the companies info.
 - The company timesheet preferences are sent to the front end through the company dict.
 - The uom info is sent to the front end through the session.
 - The timesheet uom is now managed from the frontend and is now in sync with the settings.
 - Timesheet widgets are initialised during the AbstractWebClient init and are in sync with
   the multicompany front end settings

task-2168337

--
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

closes odoo/odoo#66551

Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
2021-03-04 13:25:17 +01:00
Laurent Stukkens (LTU) 3e847fc8f4 [FIX] web,hr_timesheet,partner_autocomplete: make multi company timesheet uom work
This commit's primary objective is to ensure that the timesheet uom is working in accordance
with the company settings in a multi company environment.

Prior to this commit:

 - The timesheet preferences sent to the front end were always those of the default
   company of the user.
 - The timesheet related widgets initialisation process (adding the correct ones in
   the fieldRegistry) was performed before the front end treatment of cids and coockies
   which prevented applying the front end selected company settings.

After this commit:

 - A dictionnary is used in the session in order to structure the companies info.
 - The company timesheet preferences are sent to the front end through the company dict.
 - The uom info is sent to the front end through the session.
 - The timesheet uom is now managed from the frontend and is now in sync with the settings.
 - Timesheet widgets are initialised during the AbstractWebClient init and are in sync with
   the multicompany front end settings

task-2168337
Closes: #66551
2021-03-04 10:34:32 +01:00
Laurent Stukkens (LTU) c815ba7d40 [FIX] web: add missing semicolons and typo in multi company files
Before this commit:

 - Some semicolon where missing
 - There was a typo in the variable name

After this commit:

 - The above problems are solved

task-2168337
Closes: #66551
2021-03-04 09:05:47 +01:00
Géry Debongnie 0cf7b8fd6f [FIX] web: issue with field named "length"
The underscore (_) library has a bug in which the _.each method does not
work with object which contains a "length" property. This is because it
does look for that key and if it is a number, it will assume that it is
an array with that length value.  Nicely done...

If that length value is set to 0, then it will just do nothing, since it
thinks that it is dealing with an empty array.

Note that if the value is set to an object, _.each is smart enough to
notice that it cannot be an array, and will do the correct thing in this
case.

Usually, our _.each calls are safe, since we usually iterate on arrays,
or on object with safe keys, or on object with values that cannot be a
number.

But there was 2 unsafe calls in basic_model, which leads to strange
bugs: some code is skipped, and the form view is then confused.  The
motivation for this fix is the fact that onchanges are not applied at
all, if there is a length field set to 0.

To fix this, we can just avoid using _.each.  Note to every Odoo JS
developers reading this: new Odoo code should avoid using the _ and $
libraries, because we do not really need them, and we want to keep our
dependencies to the strict mininum.

OPW: #2465808
closes odoo/odoo#66126

closes odoo/odoo#67172

X-original-commit: 8dbd1efef899fb637acca3c318ae99cb23838b8f
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-03-03 15:36:34 +00:00
Damien Abeloos 67c7460be1 [IMP] web: add an initial_date context key for CalendarView
* This feature will be useful when the user needs to "reschedule" an event.
  It is more convenient to open the CalendarView around the original start date of the
  event instead of "Today"

* Add a test to ensure that the context key is correctly passed to the view as the initialDate

Task ID : 2410217
PR : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/63370
2021-03-03 12:25:06 +00:00