Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider a consumable product P with a subcontracted BOM B
- Let's consider that B is subcontracted by a partner S and B has a storable component C
- C has the route Resupply Subcontractor on Order and has a partner SUP as supplier
- Create a purchase order PO with 1 P to S and confirm PO
- A delivery order DO1 is created with C to S
- Change the ordered quantity on PO and set 2 instead of 1
Bug:
DO1 was canceled and a new delivery order DO2 was created with only 1 C instead of 2
It happens due to merge move, when updating the PO line a new rule is
trigger and create the object in this order:
- Move Sub-Stock(finished) -> Subcontract Order -> Move Stock-Sub(comp)
Then the action_confirm is trigger and will run _merge_move
on object from left to right order. But when the move Sub-Stock is
merged, everything is write in the first move and the new move is
unlink. It result by canceling all the following object (so the new
subcontractor and the Move Stock-Sub). It was not an issue for the
subcontracting since the write of stock.move is overridden in order
to update the order quantity when the move quantity is updated.
However in this case the rule are not triggered in order to create
the moves that ressuply the subcontractor.
In order to avoid this mess, this PR prevent the merge in case of a
subcontracting move.
opw-2419222
closesodoo/odoo#69553
X-original-commit: c6447e724b9df3c25c5a5306fc902dfc5dcd6bb8
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: simongoffin <sig@odoo.com>
Some usage of `_bom_find` are performance bottleneck (one request by
product). By example, when the mrp is installed, search products
with fields compute by `_compute_quantities` (e.g. 'Negative forecasted
quantity'). it is due to the override of `_compute_quantities`
in mrp which will make (in the worst case) a `_bom_find` for each
product in the DB.
To avoid this situation the `_bom_find` method become batched
which can handle several products in once. The signature of the method
has changed and uniformize in all module.
Example performance Gain:
------------------------
In a DB with 7000 products (type 'product'), 500 locations, 1800 BoM,
9000 Stock moves, etc. Search in the tree view with filter "Negative
forecasted quantity":
Before: 10879 (nb SQL request) 12.67 +- 0.11 sec (Total RPC Time)
After: 159 (nb SQL request) 1.82 +- 0.03 sec (Total RPC Time)
task-2439019
Issue:
In case of MTO on the component tracked by serial of the subcontracted
MO, if the picking generated by the MTO is complete
before record component on the subcontracted picking, when we
record the component, move lines is duplicated, one for the
reservation (due to the MTO chained move) and a other only with the
quantity done. Then it is painful to register component.
Fixes:
Don't the call of `_set_qty_producing()` when we click on
'Record Component', the user should it self applied the `qty_producing`.
closesodoo/odoo#68151
X-original-commit: e61ae06572db8aa5d1c3ecea754d3be6719eb55b
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously, when we find out subcontracted productions of moves, we get
all production_id from the origin moves of the moves. When user use
multple steps manufacturing, moves may also have their move_orig_ids.
In this case, we will consider its production_id as subcontracted
production.
To fix, we filered the moves, consider only move that is_subcontract is
true.
closesodoo/odoo#67101
X-original-commit: 60d799059d60befc976fd0fe5e2c0afec5d3f83b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang <yhu-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Create a subcontracting BoM by partner A,
for a tracked product B (by serial or lots)
- Create a incoming transfer coming from A and mark as todo.
- Fill the move with move lines with lot + quantity.
- It is impossible to validate the transfer, "You need to supply lot..."
Also at the creation of the picking a warning popover indicate that
the previous operation (the hidden MO) is set after the transfer.
These issues comes from the refactor of mrp for v14 and the part of
subcontracting wasn't complete obviously.
Fixes done:
- Rewrite the code of the `_action_done` for subcontracting. It is for
the case of tracked finished product without any tracked component,
there wasn't any code to manage that. Now manage it by backorder MO
feature. Fix the main bug
- Set finished_date_planned before the transfer to avoid the alert
popover.
- Avoid to write activity in channel about the hidden MO in case of
cancelling.
- Fix `action_record_components` to manage multiple subcontracting
products with tracked component.
- Remove the `priority` field from the wizard MO (in case of tracked
product. Also the wizard is not really a wizard, just a weird hybrid
MO form)
PR: odoo/odoo#61606
task-2357115
closesodoo/odoo#62109
X-original-commit: 1a34e46eaca14aec981dd0f162e8014c7cb0abea
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a product P with route 'Resupply subcontractor on an order'
- Let's consider a BOM for P with type 'Subcontracting'
- Create a PO with subcontractor set on that product and process with Qty > 1,
- Validate a receipt with partial Qty and no backorder
Bug:
An error was raised because no production_id was set when trying to create a mrp.product.produce
When function _action_done is called with cancel_backorder = True, the function _action_cancel is called on the new_move
with no backorder and it called the function _action_cancel defined on model stock.move in module mrp_subcontracting
This function called _action_cancel on the mrp.production record MP
And finally this function called action_cancel on model stock.move on all finish_moves and raw_moves of MP
This line unlink MP of finish_moves and raw_moves
move.move_dest_ids.write({'move_orig_ids': [(3, move.id, 0)]})
That's why production_id was not set
PS: In this way, we don't cancel a MO when it is still used by other moves.
opw:2322278
closesodoo/odoo#57346
X-original-commit: e4d22d390c8aa8edf757e36704a9e04b2b89f115
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
After the odoo/odoo#52949 , the registering of tracked component,
in case of subcontracting, was broken. Fix and try to mimic
the same flow than before. The produce wizard has been replaced
by a clean MO form to register component and use backorder mechanisme
of MO to manage tracked finished product + tracked component.
task-2278147
closesodoo/odoo#54994
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Removed abstract workorder
Removed the integration of expiry wizard in tablet view since it should
be moved in enterprise in the tablet view implementation (not possible
to set consumed lot on workorders on community anymore)
Refactor _set_quantity_done to use ORM command in order to not return a
dict with vals to_create/to_write
task-2241471
Now, by default, a Bill of Material have a flexible
consumption instead of strict consumption. Also
add new consumption choice: a flexible consumption
but with a warning when the bom isn't respected.
Also, now, the strict (a new warning option) consumption
is checked only when we try to mark as done the MO.
task-2241471
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
**Steps to reproduce:**
* Create a subcontractor.
* Create a BoM of type Subcontracting and assign the subcontractor.
* Create a children contact for the subcontractor.
* Creat a purchase order (or a receipt picking) with the children contact of the subcontractor.
* Confirm the document.
**Current behavior:**
Subcontractor documents are not created.
**Expected result:**
They should be created.
**Cause:**
The BoM search is not including possible parents of the partners.
**Solution:**
With the use of `parent_of` operator in the search, we cover both cases of the children
and the parent as initiators of the subcontracting.
closesodoo/odoo#46670
X-original-commit: 86726aba26f4ba8d7dadb29ed2415baf49fe54c0
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
- Activate the multi-step reception
- Create a Subcontracting BOM for product P and supplier S.
- Create a PO for S with P
- Validate the PO
- Validate the input transfer
- Validate the internal transfer
A error is raised because a mandatory field is not set.
The root cause comes from the INT move being flagged as a subcontract
move, while it shouldn't be. Indeed, only the input move should be
flagged as subcontract.
We force the `is_subcontract` value to `False` when a move is copied in
the context of a stock rule.
opw-2193009
opw-2202727
closesodoo/odoo#46115
X-original-commit: 8795e0f3d4301710a089d263395633759eae76b7
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a subcontracted product tracked without tracked components
- Create a receipt for this product
- Click on show detail
-> Lot_id are display even if the picking type uses create lot.
The assign serial feature is not working either.
The lot_id instead of lot_name is required in case of tracked
components since it will open the produce wizard and the user
will create lot there. However in the case of non-tracked components,
the wizard will not be used nor lot created. In this case the
classic behavior should be used with lot_name
closesodoo/odoo#43997
Task: 2180191
X-original-commit: 00fe4186935435f46a0db197c68e6df956fe80db
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Allow to easily find product and partners related to subcontracting
closesodoo/odoo#43046
Task: 2158126
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When subcontracting a product via a purchase order and not a simple
receipt. Then the cancelation of the receipt will not only cancel
the receipt of the finished product but not the delivery for the
components.
It happens because button_cancel on purchase order will call
_action_cancel the stock.move linked to purchase order line. It will
not call action_cancel on the stock.picking. However the part
responsible for the cancelation of components delivery is in the
stock.picking action_cancel method.
Move the stock.picking action_cancel logic in the stock.move
_action_cancel method since it's always call for both usecase.
Fixes#42551closesodoo/odoo#42653
X-original-commit: 841305f271411c3a67af271ac09da9ce0922f100
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
`action_done`on pickings should be a private method,
and called only trough the picking validation process.
task-1938108
closesodoo/odoo#39174
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When the action is called by a javascript function the view
is not correctly rendered because the tree type does not exist
in the registry but the correct type is list.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt with a quantity of 2
- Receive 1 and create a back order
- Receive 2 in the BO
It will only require the components for 2 units and not 3.
closesodoo/odoo#37305
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
_bom_subcontract_find return a BoM of typer subcontractor for
any partners if the subcontractor is not set. The real behavior is
to not create a subcontracting order if the partner is not set.
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Force to set subcontractors on subcontracting BoM since
it's always used in order to determine if a subcontracting
should be apply on a receipt or not. Also there is not magical
behavior has 'if there is no subcontractor on the BoM then it
means all partners...'
- nothing tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products not tracked and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
- finished products and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Validate a purchase_order with a user without group inventory user or manufacturing user.
AccessError on operation read for BoM. A purchase user should be able
to validate an order independently of the documents that will be
generate.
Allow to do a dropshipping with a subcontractor.
If the product uses the routes drophipping and have
a subcontracting BoM. Then a PO for the subcontractors
will genrate a need in the subcontracting location for
the required components.
A module is needed because the picking_type_id for dropshipping
do not have a warehouse_id. The warehouse_id is needed in order to
know from which warehouse the subcontracting components should be
deliver.
If the components have the route resupply subcontractor on order then the
delivery order triggered by the receipt do not have the origin nor the
subcontractor partner. This commit update the procurement group in
order to add those information and propagate it.
due to commit 108ee65af2a88d61526dc047043138bddc3f9b63#diff-99ad190cf09687f6efdebc1f7636062c
picking type for subcontracting order use field use_create_components_lots
instead of classic picking type.
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
Currently, the subcontract picking present multiple difficulties:
- The user has to introduce multiple time the lot produced.
In register components button and then create a new move line with
the show details operation button.
- Same problem with the correction system. The user has to modify the
lot in details operation and then go on the subcontract production and
unlock and edit it.
In order to facilitate those behavior. A move line will be automaticaly
created during the register components process. Also the subcontract
moves for components will be available in the detail operations tab.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt of 1 units of a subcontracted product
- Receive 2
- Validate the receipt
-> An extra move for subcontractor of 1 has been validated but a
new move of 2 still in waiting availability and can not be
validated.
It happens due to action_done that will validate existing subcontract
order (with the initial quantity). Then the move is validated and an
extra move is created and merged in the first one. This new merged
move of 2 is then confirmed and validated. That will recreate a
subcontract order of 2 that will not be validated since it was validated
in the picking action_done at the start.
This commit will modify:
- action_done on move in order to validate the subcontract order after
the move validation and the new subcontract order creation too.
- action_confirm in order to create the subcontract order with the
additional quantity and then merge it to the existing moves.
