The attributes field.depends and field.depends_context are problematic
for sharing fields across registries, because they depend on the model's
registry class, which may vary from one registry to another. In order
to make computed fields shareable, we have to move those values away
from fields.
For the same reason, field.recursive should not be inferred, because its
value may depend on the registry, although it is generally not the case.
Moreover, the flag recursive=True is set on a field when field triggers
are determined (on the registry). A compute method may be called before
the flag is set (if no update has been done yet), and that can lead to
incorrect computations.
This happened in test TestUsers2.test_reified_groups in module 'base'.
The user groups view was apparently determined without the flag being
set, and the view depends on the recursive field 'trans_implied_ids',
which was not correctly computed.
We thus force developers to be explicit about recursive computed fields.
The code now logs a warning when the flag is not set up properly.
The code from v13 used to look for partners in JS before making the RPC, which
was much faster, and also gave better results by returning partners that were
already known and therefore more likely to be selected.
The same logic is reintroduced here, and further improved to take into account
all known partners and sort them according to the likeliness they will be
selected based on various criteria.
task-2413776
closesodoo/odoo#68045
X-original-commit: 930e090ced8134c3819a5a87b9052467ba23e8e4
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to better differentiate channel members technical
model from partner members in code :
* ``channel_partner_ids``: contacts member of a channel, filtering notably
on active and checking ACLs on res.partner business model. This one
should be used whenever we deal with members of a channel at business
level;
* ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids``: memberships of a channel and technical
model. This one should be used for internal processes and members
management;
Also containing
* clean naming or API of methods managing channel members. This should
not change anything functionally as only code renaming / cleaning is
performed;
* improve performances of channel member auto subscription by aggregating
all members to add and creating them at once;
* check the use of ``mail.channel.partner`` and ``res.partner`` records
through ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids`` and ``channel_partner_ids``
Channel fields;
Functionally nothing should change with this commit. It only cleans code
in order to prepare future modifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
The "Departure Reasons" where hardcoded and couldn't reflect all the
valid departure reasons (like "End Of Fixed-Term Contract").
This commit introduces a new model `hr.departure.reason`.
closesodoo/odoo#66905
Taskid: 2447056
Related: odoo/enterprise#16709
Related: odoo/upgrade#2211
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The work location of an employee was previously a fields.Char. That was
changed to a Many2one field to a the new model called work.location.
That had some consequences in other modules that had to be slightly
adjusted. The modules impacted were hr, hr_appraisal, hr_payroll.
Task id: 2335646
closesodoo/odoo#63192
Related: odoo/enterprise#15235
Related: odoo/upgrade#2020
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Prior to this commit:
* All employees were treated the same way regarding the contractual point of vue.
From this commit on:
* Three employee types will be created:
- Employee, which is supposed to be under contract
- Student & Contractor which are both not supposed to have an employee contract (but are still use the employee as working for the company)
* Employee view and Contract History will take this consideration into account.
closesodoo/odoo#64931
Taskid: 2446000
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The field is defined on the private address (address_home_id) of the
employee.
It would be more convenient to allow the configuration directly on the
employee view and to allow the employee to change it by himself.
closesodoo/odoo#64949
Taskid: 2410407
Related: odoo/enterprise#15918
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Reason: In Employees app, it is confusing for the first time users to see
both 'Employees' and 'Employee Directory' folder. Also, first user
is not assigned to any departments.
Solution: If the user can see the folder 'Employees', don't show
the folder 'Employee Directory'. Assign the first user to the
'Administration' department.
Task - 2377506
closesodoo/odoo#63038
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Problem
-------
A user with no read access on private employee (hr.employee) model
will get a bad query error if he search on employee_id on res.users
The new domain evaluation system generate query like this
SELECT "hr_employee"."user_id" FROM "hr_employee_public"
because the _search of hr.employee was not returning the search result
from the right table
Solution
--------
Return a search result from the right table
closesodoo/odoo#63036
X-original-commit: e542c4121af098372c250a081635a44829e50406
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
The goal of this commit if double:
- Prevent employees to change the m2o address_home_id, that could lead
to future inconsistencies on future HR processes
- Allow the employee to modify it own private address, even if the
access is restricted to administrators for private addresses
closesodoo/odoo#62891
Taskid: 2412387
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was possible to activate the Advanced Presence
Control feature without any advanced feature enabled.
This commit enforces the selection of *at least* one of those option
(email or IP).
closesodoo/odoo#60498
Taskid: 2361870
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The open_action_with_context was not using _for_xml_id, producing an
error when reading the action content.
In open_action, the action_name was taken from the context and needs
sanity checks. Ensure only actions from the account module can be
read and only if the user has access to the target model.
This is a limitation of the previous behaviour but, at the moment, all
known calls are made refering to an action from the account module.
Limit the scope of this method while the 14.0 is still early to avoid
having a door open to ready any action, and difficult to close later.
Remove old action fetching from the context in create_move that is no
longer used.
closesodoo/odoo#61602
X-original-commit: a39e94f7e4dc74e850650ac90bbc5f85af130bc8
Related: odoo/enterprise#14695
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Morel <xmo@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Some fields weren't editable, even when the option is enabled on
the settings.
closesodoo/odoo#57842
X-original-commit: 57d595e87642fa6f7bec62cbb88a39c35cc72589
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Remove the employee's image by default to avoid unnecessary image storage.
Add a placeholder in the kanban view.
closesodoo/odoo#55243
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Right now on few business objects (like leads, invoices, tasks, helpdesk
tickets etc) creation message contains
* subtype description;
* generic creation message;
This looks like multiple creation message on chatter after creation of the
record as you generally have "Task Created - Task created" (subtype description
then generic message).
This happens when we provide custom subtype on creation by by overriding
`_creation_subtype` method.
This commit fixes the issue by only using provided creation subtype and
removing default body. If creation subtype is not provided default creation
message is posted as before.
In this commit we also fix subtype for Lead/Opportunity creation and make
it generic ('Lead/Opportunity created') to avoid inconsistent behavior.
Finally some cleaning is made in method naming. Semi followup of 92e9e84b63
LINKS
Task ID-2288458
PR odoo/odoo#56631
PR odoo/enterprise#12707closesodoo/odoo#56688
X-original-commit: 2ebbeb4b5443c6405dd9a3b202a1eee9c5c67ebb
Related: odoo/enterprise#12728
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Since v13 some commits added code in mail thread file. This file is already
quite long and keeping it organized allow to understand its content.
SPECIFICATIONS
Some methods defined on mail.thread may actually be called on models
not inheriting from mail.thread . Instead of having model methods on mail
thread receiving a records parameter it seems better to have those available
directly on BaseModel.
Move static_message_track on BaseModel in models.py. This method is now called
_mail_track, to be coherent with othe rmail-related naming. It is used in
accounting to track values in line model that does not inherit from mail.
thread. Update accounting accordingly (followup of d862965).
Move _message_get_default_recipients_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_message_get_default_recipients() allow to be compatible with current behavior
and current override available in some addons (like CRM, event, ...).
Move _notify_get_reply_to_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_notify_get_reply_to() allows to be shorter and coherent.
Move _alias_check_contact_on_record in models.py. Renaming it
_alias_check_contact_() allows to be shorter and coherent. Its override in
hr is also moved on BaseModel.
LINKS
Task ID-2327096 (code cleaning)
PR #56631
X-original-commit: f5df1ed912455e5ed52a65df3149f30a9d424de0
Currently, Due to _compute_phones method when going to read
the work_phone and mobile_phone from salary configurator then
it will randomly failed on read access right for those two fields.
So in this commit, Defined the _compute_phones method properly and
remove the compute from mobile_phone as it's not computed anymore.
TaskID: 2283753
Closes: #56205
Make the method `_search` return a `Query` object, and make that object
generate a subquery when used on the right-hand side of a condition.
closesodoo/odoo#52403
Related: odoo/enterprise#10945
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Use _for_xml_id to replace all the self.env.ref().read()[0]
This has the advantage of having a single point of control and to add
the fields filtering and model verification.
Add sudo for other operations on ir.actions.*
Added a new tour for the module hr_recruitment
Hr.job:
Form view:
- Using a notebook view for increased clarity
Kanban view:
- Added a toggle button to publish/unpublish a job offer.
- In the menu, added the « Create Interview Form » button to create an interview form.
Hr.applicant:
Generale:
- Use of the "Applicant: Acknowledgement" template by default when an application is moved to the "First Interview" stage.
Form view:
- Possibility to consult an interview after this one and not before
- The "CREATE EMPLOYEE" button no longer directly creates an employee. The employee will be created if the "SAVE" button is pressed.
Hr.employee:
Generale:
- Added of two new certifications.
And some other minor style and name changes.
closesodoo/odoo#55928
Related: odoo/enterprise#12420
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
On the dashboard of Time Off (calendar view), the banner displaying
the remaining leaves is not shown as _get_contextual_employee_id
of hr_leave_type.py is returning False due to the missing required
on the company_id of hr.employee.
A fix was made in 2bd5e9a but missing the part that the employee_id
is not required. Confirmed by YTI
close opw-2252479
closesodoo/odoo#53109
Related: odoo/upgrade#1596
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Make the employee presence icons more descriptive.
Allow to quickly filter the Presence Reports based on the user status.
closesodoo/odoo#54527
Taskid: 2246447
Related: odoo/upgrade#1488
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Improve slightly the layout of some forms related to employee and contracts.
Modified modules:
hr
hr_expense
hr_holidays
timesheet_grid
hr_contract_salary
hr_payroll_account
Task ID 2277298
closesodoo/odoo#52981
Related: odoo/enterprise#11156
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of the task is to improve the employee image and phone
behaviour while changing the user.
So in this commit, IF there is no pitcure on employee then apply the
image of user while adding the user to employee from cretae, write
and onchage. do not change the employee image if employee image is
already set while creating employee or changing the user on employee.
Also improve the phone behaviour when changing the company,
- Never change the mobile_phone when switching the company
on employee
- Always change the work_phone when switching the company, except
if empty on res.company.
closes odoo/odoo#50115
Taskid: 2240167
Closes: #50115
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Using a few regex like
\((_\(.*%s.*)(\) % )([\w\[\]][\w .\[\]\(\)'"]*)\)
($1, $3))
Old syntax is still compatible but starts the migration to the new
syntax that catches error.
Issue
- Open console in debugger of the browser.
- Install "Employees" app
- Go to "Employees" and edit or create any employee
- In 'Department' field, quick create one
Error is raised in console and the modal department form view is opened.
Cause
'name' field is required but empty since 'complete_name'
is the one set as _rec_name in 'Department' python model.
Solution
Cherry-pick of 7c0fed48a1
opw-2267356
closesodoo/odoo#52489
X-original-commit: 056618914e9f1f437f8855459c302fc0ac6663c5
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: bon-odoo <nboulif@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
=======
On the Employees App, we dont have a smart way to start a discuss
with a colleague or an employee.
Specification
=============
Style for each button :
- use fa-comments
- use primary color/action color (green)
On private/public employees form/kanban views, add a button to
start a chat with the user
closesodoo/odoo#51484
Taskid: 2252207
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
By using the user's related company to create a employee, we prevent
creating several employees for the same users on the basic flow.
But this is exactly the way we want people to use the system.
Example: Jojo is working in Belgium, has a belgian employee liked
to a belgian user in the system.
Now Jojo is about to work during 1 year in another company, based in
the USA. Jojo wants another employee, to manage the HR things
properly (payroll, ...), but he doesn't want to have 2 users, he
prefer to manage all its notifications in the same place.
We create another employee for Jojo, in the US company.
So instead of creating the employee in the user's company (Belgian),
as it would raise an error for the second employee, we should use the
contextual company instead, allowing to create the second employee
smoothly.
closesodoo/odoo#51435
X-original-commit: 0318f0acc5e98950c274c90a86a94d4588d2966d
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, Creating New Employee from User's form was taking default company from the current logged-in User instead of the User for which it Employee is being created.
With this commit, We take default company from User for which employee is created.
closesodoo/odoo#51014
X-original-commit: 9206cc4db2a8dc5a7fbc281c1574f09bfba76544
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
For a tag to be displayed on a kanban card, it needs to have a color set.
We won't be changing that behaviour, since it would mean having
two options > the color, and whether or not to show it in the kanban
The purpose of this task is to set a color on new tags to make the user
save a bit more time, set a color for him as he might not find the feature,
and make sure the tag will be on the kanban cards.
Specification
=============
For each of the following models, at creation, set a random integer between
1 and 11 in field 'color'
Models:
res.partner.category
crm.tag
project.tags
hr.applicant.category
helpdesk.tag
hr.employee.category
event.track.tag
mrp.eco.tag
repair.tags
closesodoo/odoo#49967
Taskid: 2234527
Related: odoo/enterprise#10112
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, It was not possible to copy An employee which is already linked to User due `user_uniq` constraints.
Now we add `copy=False` on `user_id` field, so Employee will be copied without linked User.
closesodoo/odoo#49915
X-original-commit: 2a63df03859166414be338c6655ee8c4052666b7
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules:
hr, hr_contract, hr_recruitment, hr_payroll, fleet, hr_skills, hr_appraisal, ....
Several onchanges have been converted to computed fields in the following modules :
Community :
- hr
- hr_contract
- hr_recruitment
- hr_work_entry
- hr_maintenance
- hr_expense
- hr_expense_check
- hr_holidays
- sale_expense
- account_analytic_default_hr_expense
Enterprise:
- hr_contract_salary
- hr_referral
- hr_payroll
- hr_payroll_expense
- test_l10n_be_hr_payroll_account
There are still 2 onchanges with complex behavior that couldn't be converted easily:
- an onchange that updates "tz" (timezone) that is defined as a related field
to "resource_id.tz". Apparently it is useless except to initialize the default
value of "tz".
- an onchange that updates "name" that is defined as a related field to
"resource_id.name".
the applicant.
closesodoo/odoo#45414
Taskid: 2169099
Related: odoo/enterprise#8572
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
"Edition" is a French-English false friend word. "Edition" in English
means "version" whereas "edition" in French means "editing". This commit
updates user facing strings/documents that incorrectly use "edition" instead
of "edit" or "editing". Attempts were made to clean up English around
"edition" usage so please excuse any errors from lack of context
knowledge. Code comments and names incorrectly using "edition" were NOT
updated.
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
If employee is not set, the default picture will be user-slash
instead of camera.
Task ID 2221250
closesodoo/odoo#48114
Related: odoo/enterprise#9398
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
When incoming emails bounce due to alias security bounce email is quite
generic. Purpose of this task is to ease its customization and update.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to improve the flexibility of alias, add a customizable html field
on the alias model. This html content will be send as bounce email core content
in case of bounced/unauthorized mail received for this alias,
Obviously it has no effect on 'everyone' security setting as no email will
bounce due to that issue.
If it is not set a default generic mail will be send depending on security
setting. It allows to keep void html fields when no specific bounce content
is required
In HR, an old template allowing some light customization for employee based
security option is removed as it is completely replaced by the new feature.
Also add references message-id of the mail received to the answer so that
threads are correctly set.
LINKS
Task ID 2126509
Issue
- Install Employees
- Create a new user
- Click on "Create employee"
Traceback
Cause
In 999ced42989f, we add the user_id key but we
already have in the action_create_employee method
The key is duplicated so this is why there is a
traceback
Solution
Remove the key in action_create_employee since
we have it in _sync_user
OPW-2205354
closesodoo/odoo#46375
X-original-commit: e0c29f1a4cd8d95654963b024fd0b0e1b0578776
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
When creating a new user on-the-fly on the employee detail page (HR Settings/Related User), if the employee is never linked with a user before, the new created user will not be linked with the employee automatically and we have to select the user again.
With this commit, the new created user will be linked with the employee automatically.
Fixes#44442closesodoo/odoo#46125
X-original-commit: 136c0dbea0ab00ff27daac69c27dc0824a16ff70
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of the task is, when creating a new employee, the default
gender should be empty.
closes odoo/odoo#42843
Taskid: 2165484Closes: #42843
Related: odoo/enterprise#7648
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>