Trying to improve the resources used by the challenge update cron
operation.
Before this commit some count-based goals and all sum-based goals were
computed with one select count or sum per user.
After this commit each count or sum based goal is computed in a single select
for all users. The goal form now also allows to enable batch mode for
sum computations. Other changes include:
- adding an index on the challenge_id of goals after verifying the
positive impact of such an index on high volumes on a staging server
- introducing additional intermediary commits to allow massive crons to
catch up over several attempts.
task-internal
closesodoo/odoo#63265
X-original-commit: 0f9411d10753aa96103ce77702dbdc0516e9969a
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Clean organization of templates in odoo apps: mail.template records in data,
qweb templates (views) used directly in code, notably using post with view.
Purpose is to ease future improvements in posting based on templates.
SPECIFICATIONS
* move those templates in their own file to ease their discovering and
maintenance;
* put them into data (as those are not views even if it contains qweb)
* guidelines are now :
-> Qweb templates should be in data/mail_templates.xml;
-> mail.template records should be in data/mail_template_data.xml;
* put their declaration in no update when not done if template has no
technical code or complex dependency on underlying code;
* move found mail data (mail.message.subtype or mail.activity.type) records
in a mail_data file that should contain only "core" records linked to mail;
LINKS
Task ID-2375767
COM PR odoo/odoo#61814
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#14775
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#1936
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
* Code cleanup
* Avoid a safe evaluation of the field value when loading those records.
closesodoo/odoo#44883
Related: odoo/enterprise#8283
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to improve model of followers, notably management
code and its use in routes. Indeed it is quite an old model and code had
to be cleaned a bit to improve code readability and maintenance.
In this commit we
* remove unnecessary code examples in gamification about followers: using
that model as example of code for goals is probably not a good idea as it
is technical;
* rewrite routes called by JS are simplified to better match JS
implementation;
* introduce computed fields to fetch related partner or channel name,
email (partner only) and active status;
LINKS
Task 1933771
Task 2078313
closesodoo/odoo#39808
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Remy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jgi-odoo <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier-Do <xdo@odoo.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Notably
* remove cdata and fix html code when necessary;
* re-order fields declaration to have globally the same order in various
template definition;
* remove unnecessary reply-to, make user signature and auto delete fields
explicit when necessary;
* improve some name to ease template ordering and understanding in the
template list view;
Related to task 1972615
Linked to PR #32872
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose: use more email_formatted when possible, clean and simplify
email_from, email_to and partner_to computation.
Next step is to try to extract some common patterns in tools or methods in
order to simplify template creation and customization.
Related to task 1972615
Linked to PR #32872
A challenge with less than 3 participants was failing with a key error
The challenge line has only one 'goal' result per participant
As the template is set in a noupdate, even a module update does not fix the bug
Generate fake goals that will be displayed in the top 3, e.g.:
1 Bob $100 42%
2 Alice $50 21%
3 0 0%
closesodoo/odoo#28363
- Add a method for generating an image data URI, and expose it in QWeb context
- Fix reports, website templates or mail templates with data hardcoded
data URIs, to use the helper (Python cases), or the existing
kanban_image helper (for JS cases)
This will gracefully handle SVG support in addition to classical image
formats.
Closes#26635
Purpose of this commit is to enhance quality of templates proposed by Odoo
and make them use notification layout when send by emails. Those emails
are cleaner and more up to date compared to other emails.
Including
* calls to message_post now use the light notification layout. It is
given as parameter to the message_post process;
* some cleaning in templates;
This commit is related to task ID 51122 (and PR #24052).
* [FIX] Gamification: email template
- realized that the pictures of users were not public by default,
which means src with an url won't work if not connected to the database.
This is fixed by embedding the pictures directly in the mail.
* [FIX] Gamification: challenge template
- fixed layout problems with what works in the renderer.
* base_action_rule, gamification, mass_mailing
1) Create the independant DomainSelector widget
- Allow to build a prefix char domain
2) Replace old FieldCharDomain with a new FieldDomain which uses the
new DomainSelector widget
3) Create the independant ModelFieldSelector widget
- Allow to build a valid field chain for a specific model
(e.g 'partner_id.name' for a 'res.users')
- Used by DomainSelector widget
---
The DomainSelector widget uses a tree-like representation with
user-friendly buttons (ALL/ANY/+/-/...). Any domain can be built,
except those containing the "!" (not) operator or some operators
like "like", "child_of" (@see DomainSelector). However, if the
user enters these in the debug input, the widget can handle them.
Note: these widgets had to do unusual stuff the widget API does not
allow to handle efficiently right now but it will be adapted to the
new widget/field API in a further update.
Note2: the widgets also have possibility of other improvements like
supporting m2o input instantiation in DomainLeaf, etc.
---
This work is an adaptation of the original code made by @pga-odoo.
Therefore, the template could be seen from
the Discuss module, when clicking on "Send Mail",
but, when attempting to use it, it failed
(as it was not applied on the right model).
opw-670546
for channel-related stuff. mail.channel views as well as timeline views
and actions have been renamed. Now the names follow the guidelines and
will be used in the upcoming refactoring of mail and chat.
model has been renamed to mail.channel to prepare the slack modeling.
In future commits the mail.group model will be merged with the channel
model from im_chat. The first move is to rename mail.group into
mail.channel to have a model that will unite both features.
1. The merge of the "email_template" module into the "mail" module.
2. The send action of the mass mailing has been moved from the frontend to a cron, because it was too slow to send over 10,000 mails (the user's browser was blocked for 15 - 20 minutes). Mass mailings have now their own process in the kanban view.
3. Mails sent from the mail form are sent immediatly instead of from the mail queue (for instance, when you go to sales > customers > list view > select 2 -3 customers > More > Partner Mass Mailing).
4. Users have now the choice from which mailing list they want to unsubscribe when they click on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the mail.
5. Mass mailings inherit from their campaign UTMs and mass mailing campaigns are linked to an UTM campaign.
6. Many little improvements
Benoit Socias